ONTOTERMINOLOGY - A New Paradigm for Terminology

Christophe Roche, Marie Calberg-Challot, Luc Damas, Philippe Rouard



Today, collaboration and the exchange of information are increasing steadily and players need to agree on the meaning of words. The first task is therefore to define the domain’s terminology. However, terminology building remains a demanding and time-consuming task, even in specialised domains where standards already exist. While reaching a consensus on the definition of terms written in natural language remains difficult, we have observed that in specialised technical domains, experts agree on the domain conceptualisation when it is defined in a formal language. Based on this observation, we have introduced a new paradigm for terminology called ontoterminology. The main idea is to separate the linguistic dimension from the conceptual dimension of terminology and establish relationships between them. The linguistic component consists of terms (both normalised and non-normalised specialised words) linked by linguistic relationships such as hyponymy and synonymy. The term definition, written in natural-language, is considered a linguistic explanation. The conceptual component is a formal ontology whose concepts are linked by conceptual relationships like the is-a (kind of) and part-of relations. The concept definition, written in a formal language, is viewed as logical specification. An ontoterminology enables us to link these two non-isomorphic networks in a global and coherent system.


  1. Alexeeva, L.M. 2006. Interaction between Terminology and Philosophy. Theoretical Foundations of Terminology Comparison between Eastern Europe and WesternCountries. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag
  2. Budin, G. 2001. “A critical evaluation of the state-of-theart of Terminology Theory”. ITTF Journal,12. Vienna: TermNet
  3. Buitelaar, P., Cimiano P., Magnini B. (2005), Ontology Learning from Text: Methods, Evaluation and Applications (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, Vol. 123). P. Buitelaar (Editor) Ios Press Publication (July 1, 2005)
  4. Cabré T. Theories in terminology. In Terminology 9:2 (2003), pp 163-199.
  5. Daille B., Kageura K., Nakagawa H. and Chien L.F. (2004), Recent Trends in Computational Terminology, Special issue of Terminology 10:1 (Benjamins publishing company).
  6. Gomez-Perez, A., Corcho. O., Fernandez-Lopez, M. (2004), Ontological Engineering : with examples from the areas of Knowledge Management, e-Commerce and the Semantic Web. Asuncion Gomez-Perez, Oscar Corcho, Mariano Fernandez-Lopez, Springer 2004
  7. Gruber, T. (1993), A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specifications. Knowledge Systems Laboratory September 1992 - Technical Report KSL 92-71 Revised April 1993. Appeared in Knowledge Acquisition, 5(2):199-220, 199
  8. ISO 1087-1:2000. Terminology work-Vocabulary-Part1: Theory and application. International Organization for Standardization.
  9. ISO 704:2000. Terminology work - Principles and methods. International Organization for Standardization.
  10. Madsen, Bodil Nistrup & Hanne Erdman Thomsen. 2008. “Terminological Principles Used for Ontologies.” Managing ontologies and lexical resources. TKE 2008. Copenhagen:ISV
  11. Roche C. (2001). The “specific-difference” principle: a methodology for building consensual and coherent ontologies. IC-AI 2001, Las Vegas USA, June 25-28 2001
  12. Roche, C. (2003), Ontology: a Survey. 8th Symposium on Automated Systems Based on Human Skill and Knowledge IFAC, September 22-24 2003, Göteborg, Sweden
  13. Roche, C. (2007), “Saying is not modelling”, NLPCS 2007 (Natural Language Processing and Cognitive Science); pp 47 - 56. ICEIS 2007, Funchal, Portugal, June 2007.
  14. Sager, J. (1990), “A Practical Course in Terminology Processing”, John Benjamins Publishing Company
  15. Staab, S., Studer, R.: Handbook on Ontologies. Steffen Staab (Editor), Rudi Studer (Editor), Springer 2004
  16. Temmerman R. (2000), Towards New Ways of Terminological Description. The Sociocognitive approach. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  17. Tricot C., Roche C. (2005), "Visual Information Exploration: A Return on Experience in Knowledge Base Management," in ICAI'05 - The 2005 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, 2005.
  18. Ushold, M., Gruninger, M. (1996), Ontologies: Principles, Methods and Applications. Knowledge Engineering Review, Vol. 11, n° 2, June 1996. Also available from AIAI as AIAI-TR-191
  19. Wright, S.E., Budin, G. (1997), “Handbook of Terminology Management”, volume 1 and 2, John Benjamins Publishing Company

Paper Citation

in Harvard Style

Roche C., Calberg-Challot M., Damas L. and Rouard P. (2009). ONTOTERMINOLOGY - A New Paradigm for Terminology . In Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Ontology Development - Volume 1: KEOD, (IC3K 2009) ISBN 978-989-674-012-2, pages 321-326. DOI: 10.5220/0002330803210326

in Bibtex Style

author={Christophe Roche and Marie Calberg-Challot and Luc Damas and Philippe Rouard},
title={ONTOTERMINOLOGY - A New Paradigm for Terminology},
booktitle={Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Ontology Development - Volume 1: KEOD, (IC3K 2009)},

in EndNote Style

JO - Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Ontology Development - Volume 1: KEOD, (IC3K 2009)
TI - ONTOTERMINOLOGY - A New Paradigm for Terminology
SN - 978-989-674-012-2
AU - Roche C.
AU - Calberg-Challot M.
AU - Damas L.
AU - Rouard P.
PY - 2009
SP - 321
EP - 326
DO - 10.5220/0002330803210326