loading
Papers Papers/2022 Papers Papers/2022

Research.Publish.Connect.

Paper

Authors: Amir Rafiee 1 ; 2 ; Hugh Breakey 3 ; Yong Wu 2 ; 4 and Abdul Sattar 1 ; 4

Affiliations: 1 School of Information and Communication Technology, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia ; 2 Griffith Business School, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia ; 3 Griffith University’s Institute for Ethics, Governance and Law, Brisbane, Australia ; 4 Institute for Integrated and Intelligent Systems, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia

Keyword(s): Autonomous Vehicle, AI Policy, AI Ethics, Automated Driving System, AI Regulation, Safety Assurance System, Self-Driving Cars, Ethical Dilemmas.

Abstract: As Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) rapidly progress and become widely deployed, governments worldwide grapple with addressing the ethical challenges associated with AVs in dilemma situations that result in loss of human life. They are tackling these issues through the formulation of policies and guidelines, the establish-ment of dedicated research centres exploring the ethical implications of AVs, and seeking public opinions on how self-driving cars should handle such moral dilemmas. In this paper, we will evaluate the Australian government’s strategies for addressing the ethical issues related to AV accidents. We will critique the Decision Regulation Impact Statement (DRIS) released by the National Transport Commission (NTC) in 2018, which assessed the safety assurance options for Automated Driving Systems (ADSs). We will critically examine the NTC’s decision to exclude ethical considerations for AVs from the DRIS and the Automated Driving System Entity’s (ADSE) Statement of Compliance. W e will contend that safety and ethics are intrinsically linked. Furthermore, we argue that relying solely on the safety criteria may prove inadequate when addressing ethical dilemmas. Consequently, we advocate for the inclusion of AV ethical considerations, especially in complex ethical dilemmas, in future dialogues, even if a clear consensus on ethical decision-making by ADSs remains elusive. In conclusion, we will propose recommendations for the Australian government to enhance the development, deployment, and acceptance of AV technology. (More)

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Sign In Guest: Register as new SciTePress user now for free.

Sign In SciTePress user: please login.

PDF ImageMy Papers

You are not signed in, therefore limits apply to your IP address 18.119.159.150

In the current month:
Recent papers: 100 available of 100 total
2+ years older papers: 200 available of 200 total

Paper citation in several formats:
Rafiee, A.; Breakey, H.; Wu, Y. and Sattar, A. (2024). Government's Response to Ethical Dilemmas in Autonomous Vehicle Accidents: An Australian Policy Evaluation. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence - Volume 3: ICAART; ISBN 978-989-758-680-4; ISSN 2184-433X, SciTePress, pages 1152-1161. DOI: 10.5220/0012451200003636

@conference{icaart24,
author={Amir Rafiee. and Hugh Breakey. and Yong Wu. and Abdul Sattar.},
title={Government's Response to Ethical Dilemmas in Autonomous Vehicle Accidents: An Australian Policy Evaluation},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence - Volume 3: ICAART},
year={2024},
pages={1152-1161},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0012451200003636},
isbn={978-989-758-680-4},
issn={2184-433X},
}

TY - CONF

JO - Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence - Volume 3: ICAART
TI - Government's Response to Ethical Dilemmas in Autonomous Vehicle Accidents: An Australian Policy Evaluation
SN - 978-989-758-680-4
IS - 2184-433X
AU - Rafiee, A.
AU - Breakey, H.
AU - Wu, Y.
AU - Sattar, A.
PY - 2024
SP - 1152
EP - 1161
DO - 10.5220/0012451200003636
PB - SciTePress