Achilles Tendinopathy Treatment with a Focus on Extracorporeal
Shock Wave Therapy
Nanxi Pan
OT (Occupational Therapy), Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Keywords: Achilles Tendinopathy, Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT), Non-invasive Treatment.
Abstract: Achilles tendinopathy has been an extremely common problem especially among active people and athletes.
A multitude of previous and latest treatments have been studied and applied in clinical treatments, including
the ESWT (Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy). While there is still a lack of systematic summary or review
of the efficacy of ESWT. Therefore, this research will use a systematic review approach to review the existing
effective non-surgical treatments for Achilles tendinopathy, with a focus on shock wave therapy. And the
analysis and summary, in conclusion, suggest that ESWT has an excellent therapeutic effect on Achilles
tendon diseases. At the same time, it can be widely used in medical practice as a non-invasive treatment alone
or in combination with other therapies.
1 INTRODUCTION
Achilles tendinopathy is one of the most common
lower limb motor function diseases in contemporary
times. According to the available data, there are
relatively limited studies on the incidence and
epidemiology of Achilles tendinopathy in
authoritative journals. However, existing studies
have shown that it is a common condition. The
Achilles tendon is a core structural component of the
disease. This tendon is extremely strong and it is
essential for walking, running, and jumping, as it
helps push the foot off the ground. Despite its
strength, it is prone to being in a damaged state,
particularly in athletes and active individuals.
Types of Achilles tendinopathy encompass
Achilles Tendinitis, Achilles Tendon Tear/Rupture,
Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy and so on. It
causes great discomfort to patients and seriously
affects their lower limb functions such as walking and
even standing. Despite of the manifold associative
factors of the problem, it is commonly agreed the
causes and mechanisms of Achilles tendinopathy
remain not clear enough. However, what is currently
known is that Achilles Tendinopathy usually
develops from overuse, with healthcare professionals
frequently identifying repetitive tendon overloading
as a primary precipitating factor (Traweger et
al.,2025). This can occur with excessive jumping and
landing type activities. It can also occur as a
consequence of trauma such as a direct blow to the
tendon. Shoes that do not fit properly may also cause
irritation of the tendon due to the repetitive rubbing
forces on the tendon. Tendon vascularity, lifestyle,
age, gender, body weight and height are firmly
believed associated as well. For example, it is
suggested that the peak incidence of ankle injuries
occurs between 15 and 19 years old, with a rate of 7.2
per 1,000 person-years (Delahunt et al.,2019). In
addition, there are a variety of options for diagnosing
and evaluating Achilles tendon disorders.
Professional palpation and testing are considered to
be extremely effective in the diagnosis and
assessment of Achilles tendinopathy. Modern
imaging examinations are also crucially required to
confirm the diagnosis and precisely locate the site of
injury. In terms of the non-invasive treatments, as
with general treatments for Achilles tendinopathy,
plenty of common treatment options can also
demonstrate efficacy in Achilles tendinopathy. Ice,
adequate rest, lifting the injured foot above heart are
widely considered beneficial, along with specific
stretching and strengthening exercises and
nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. While with the
rapid advancement of modern technology, multitudes
of new treatment methods have emerged including
ESWT that will be focused on in this article.
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy is a widely used
medical therapy. It was first used for lithotripsy of
kidney stones in 1980. Later, due to its characteristics
of no side effects, simple operation, short treatment
Pan, N.
Achilles Tendinopathy Treatment with a Focus on Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy.
DOI: 10.5220/0014494800004933
Paper published under CC license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Food Science (BEFS 2025), pages 435-438
ISBN: 978-989-758-789-4
Proceedings Copyright © 2026 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda.
435
course, and ability to cure, the medical community in
various countries began to conduct research and
application in various aspects. At present, there are
literatures discussing and promoting its application in
orthopedics, rehabilitation, cardiology, urology, etc.
According to the generation and treatment principles
of shock waves, extracorporeal shock waves can be
divided into focused and diffuse types. Focused
Shock Wave is the main type of shock wave currently
used in the medical community, which is essentially
equivalent to ESWT. Radial Shock Wave was widely
used in the massage shock wave type of rehabilitation
in the past, usually as part of the pain relief course,
but it has gradually been replaced by focused shock
wave. ESWT is used in physical therapy to relieve
pain, promote cell metabolism, blood vessel
reconstruction, and restore normal muscle tension
after various diseases. ESWT is considered as an
extremely efficient non-invasive treatment option for
managing Achilles tendinopathy, manifesting
substantial effectiveness in relieving pain and
improving functional outcomes(Fan et al.,2020).The
increasing amount of evidence from clinical studies
and trials corroborates ESWT’s efficacy,
demestrating that it can rival or even surpass other
conservative treatments, including physical
rehibilitation therapy and corticosteroid injections in
certain curcumstances (Perwez et al.,2024).However,
at present, there is still a lack of systematic summary
or review of it. In addition, evaluation and
comparison of the treatment (ESWT) effect of
Achilles tendinopathy with other therapies are not
very comprehensive and well-rounded. Thus, it is of
great value to study and summarize the current
application and research progress of non-surgical
treatments especially the shockwave therapy
mentioned above.
This study adopts a systematic review approach to
evaluate the therapeutic effects of shockwave therapy
on Achilles tendinopathy. The literature selection
process was guided by the aim of including the most
recent and high-quality studies; therefore, only
publications from 2020 onward were considered,
except for very few special cases. A key inclusion
criterion was the presence of strong empirical
evidence, particularly studies reporting persuasive
experimental or clinical results. This served as the
primary benchmark for assessing the quality and
credibility of each study.
To ensure comprehensive coverage, literature was
retrieved primarily through Google Scholar, allowing
access to a broader range of publications beyond
conventional databases and high-impact journals.
The search strategy included combinations of
keywords such as "shockwave therapy," "Achilles
tendinopathy," "treatment outcomes," and "clinical
trial."
The included studies were categorized and
analyzed based on the specific therapeutic outcomes
they reported. This outcome-based classification
enabled a more nuanced synthesis of the effectiveness
of shockwave therapy across different dimensions of
patient recovery, such as pain reduction, functional
improvement, and recurrence rates.
2 THERAPEUTIC OUTCOMES
2.1 Pain Alleviation
Pain is often the primary reason why patients seek
medical treatment. It also causes great physical and
mental damage to patients. Especially psychological
damage, it may even hinder the patient's recovery.
Therefore, any treatment to relieve pain is extremely
important, including shock wave therapy. Shockwave
therapy has a complex mechanism for pain regulation
of pain. Shockwaves are able to modulate the release
of painmediating substances such as prostaglandins
and cytokines, and affect neural mechanisms
involved in pain modulation. Additionally, ESWT
may activate endogenous pain control systems,
including the release of endorphins and activation of
descending inhibitory pathways. In a general
controlled trial, 28 participants were assigned into an
experimental (n=9) and control group (n=9). And the
result demonstrates that the ESWT could improve the
pain in patients with CAI (Chronic Ankle Instability)
(Lee et al.2022). In addition, in another
systematically completed randomized controlled trial
by six weeks following the completion of therapy,
there was a notable reduction in Achilles tendon pain
associated with physical activity (Stania et al.,2022).
According to loads of multiple randomized controlled
clinical trials, extracorporeal shock wave therapy
(ESWT) has demonstrated significant efficacy in
alleviating pain and discomfort associated with
various Achilles tendon disorders. Thus, ESWT holds
considerable potential for clinical application in pain
management.
2.2 Restoration of Achilles Tendon
Function
The function of the Achilles tendon is extremely
important in daily life and lower limb movement. Its
core function is plantar flexion of the foot, which is
BEFS 2025 - International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Food Science
436
derived from maintaining balance, stabilizing the
body, absorbing and releasing energy, achieving
force transmission and tiptoeing. In daily life, it is
specifically reflected in running, jumping, walking
and all other activities that require the body to move
forward or upward.
One of the best standards for measuring Achilles
tendon and ankle function is the VISA-A. The VISA-
A(Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment–Achilles)
is a validated questionnaire designed to assess the
severity of Achilles tendinopathy. It consists of 8
items covering pain, function in daily living, and
sporting activity. Scores range from 0 to 100, with
higher scores indicating better function and fewer
symptoms. A score of ≥90 is commonly used to
indicate readiness to return to sport (Silbernagel and
Crossley,2015).
In a retrospective cohort study, after treatment
with radial shockwave therapy (n = 58) or combined
radial and focused shockwave therapy (n = 29) for
patients with Achilles tendinopathy refractory to
exercise therapy, it was demonstrated overall
functional improvement for both groups. Besides, it
is suggested that combined radial and focused
shockwave therapy may provide more predictable
functional gains for treatment of Achilles
tendinopathy compared to radial shockwave therapy
(Robinson et al.,2022).
2.3 Anti-inflammatory Effect
Inflammation is often present to varying degrees in
Achilles tendinopathy, commonly referred to as
Achilles tendonitis. Many symptoms, including
discomfort, swelling, warmth, and pain, are
attributable to inflammatory processes. Therefore, for
any therapeutic intervention to be effective in treating
Achilles tendon disorders, anti-inflammatory effects
are essential. However, there are very few clinical
studies and literatures, especially after 2020, to study
the anti-inflammatory effects of the shock wave
therapy of Achilles tendon disease. However, many
articles have discussed the anti-inflammatory effect
of shock wave therapy and explained its mechanism.
Therefore, at the same time, the materials cited in this
chapter are relatively special and are not entirely
literature after 2020 and clinical practice. As
highlighted in this concise review, a potential
molecular mechanism underlying the anti-
inflammatory effects of extracorporeal shock waves
(ESWs) appears to involve the maintenance of local
nitric oxide (NO) concentrations within physiological
ranges during the early phase of the inflammatory
response. This effect may be mediated through the
facilitation of both enzymatic and non-enzymatic
pathways of NO molecule production (Mariotto et
al.,2009). ESWT, therefore, has great potential to be
applied in an increasing number of inflammatory
diseases in the future.
No matter how effective a treatment may be, the
emergence of adverse side effects warrants serious
attention from both researchers and healthcare
professionals. Over the past five years, few clinical
studies and corresponding publications have
specifically focused on the adverse effects of
shockwave therapy. Nonetheless, a considerable
number of clinical reports have included discussions
on treatment-related side effects. Most of these
studies reported no observable adverse reactions
attributable to shockwave therapy throughout the
research period. However, some accounts have noted
the occurrence of typical side effects associated with
extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT), which
were generally limited to localized skin erythema,
mild bruising, swelling, pain, numbness, or tingling
sensations within or around the treatment area during
or within 24 hours post-treatment (Crevenna et
al.,2021). Other types of adverse reactions were
rarely documented. The most effective approach to
mostly avoiding side effects remains the strict
adherence to contraindication guidelines.
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy should be
contraindicated or used with caution under the
following conditions: pregnancy (particularly when
the treatment area is near the abdomen or pelvic
region); the presence of bleeding disorders or
ongoing use of anticoagulant medications; localized
infections or malignancies at the treatment site; and
patients with implanted cardiac pacemakers
(depending on the type of device).Overall, shock
wave therapy is a treatment with relatively few side
effects and can be regarded as a safe method.
3 LIMITATIONS
The analysis and synthesis presented in this study are
reasonably systematic. However, aside from the
illustrative references explicitly discussed, the
number of underlying studies identified and reviewed
is fewer than ten. This limited scope of literature
somewhat undermines the robustness of clinical
evidence supporting each specific shockwave therapy
system. Additionally, the study does not provide a
comprehensive exploration of the underlying
mechanisms through which various types of
shockwave therapy exert their therapeutic effects;
Achilles Tendinopathy Treatment with a Focus on Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy
437
instead, these mechanisms are only briefly
mentioned.
Furthermore, a comparative evaluation between
shockwave therapy and conventional treatment
modalities is warranted. Such comparisons are
crucial to better elucidate the unique advantages—
and potential limitations—of shockwave therapy
within clinical practice. Overall, a more extensive and
in-depth synthesis of the available evidence will be
necessary in future studies to strengthen the
conclusions and broaden the applicability of the
findings.
4 CONCLUSIONS
Achilles tendinopathy remains a prevalent condition,
particularly among athletes and physically active
individuals, with multiple factors contributing to its
occurrence. Traditional management strategies,
including rest, physical therapy have shown efficacy,
but emerging evidence suggests that extracorporeal
shock wave therapy (ESWT) offers significant
therapeutic benefits, particularly in improving pain,
Achilles tendon function recovery anti-inflammatory
effectand physical stability. Its mechanisms—such
as promoting local blood flow, stimulating cellular
activity, and accelerating tissue regeneration—make
it a compelling therapeutic option. Despite ESWT
showcases a promising non-invasive treatment
option, more and further research is needed to
optimize its protocols and long-term effectiveness.
Besides, it is worth noting that while ESWT is
generally well-tolerated, some studies have reported
mild and transient side effects, such as localized pain,
skin reddening, or soft tissue swelling following
treatment. These effects are typically self-limiting
and do not compromise the overall safety profile of
the therapy. Nevertheless, clinicians should remain
cautious, particularly when determining treatment
intensity and frequency.
Overall, ESWT can be considered a safe and
effective option for the management of Achilles
tendinopathy. Further standardized clinical trials and
long-term outcome studies are recommended to
better define its optimal application and to validate its
role in evidence-based treatment protocols.
REFERENCES
Traweger, A., Scott, A., Kjaer, M., et al. 2025. Nat Rev Dis
Primers 11: 20
Delahunt, E., Remus, A. 2019. J Athl Train 54(6): 611–616.
Fan, Y., Feng, Z., Cao, J., Fu, W. 2020. Orthopaedic
Journal of Sports Medicine 8(2).
Perwez, A., Tiwari, S., Madhual, D., Prasad, M., Sachan,
K. 2024. IJMSCRR 7(4): 831–838.
Lee, S. B., Kwon, J. W., Yun, S. H. 2022. J Kor Phys Ther
34(3): 91–97.
Stania, M., Juras, G., Marszałek, W., Król, P. 2023. Clinical
Biomechanics 101: 105830.
Robinson, D. M., Tan, C. O., Tenforde, A. S. 2022. The
Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery 61: 99–103.
Silbernagel, K.G., Crossley, K.M. 2015. Journal of
Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy 45: 876-886.
Mariotto, S., de Prati, A. C., Cavalieri, E., Amelio, E.,
Marlinghaus, E., Suzuki, H. 2009. Curr Med Chem
16(19): 2366–2372.
Crevenna, R., Mickel, M., Schuhfried, O., et al. 2021. Curr
Phys Med Rehabil Rep 9: 1–10.
BEFS 2025 - International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Food Science
438