Advances and Challenges in RSV Vaccine Development: Pathways
toward Global Protection
Haoxiang Wang
Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China
Keywords: RSV Vaccine, Prefusion F Protein, Immunogenicity.
Abstract: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the leading cause of acute lower respiratory tract infection in infants
and young children worldwide. Recent breakthroughs in molecular biology and vaccine technology have
shifted prevention efforts from antivirals to targeted immunization, including protein and nucleic acid
based platforms. Currently approved recombinant protein vaccinesAbrysvo (for pregnant women) and
Arexvy (for older adults)demonstrate strong safety and efficacy profiles. However, developing
vaccines for neonates remains challenging due to their immature immune systems and variable responses.
This review summarizes the evolution of RSV vaccine design, underlying immunological mechanisms,
and results from pivotal clinical trials. We highlight ongoing strategies to overcome neonatal
immunogenicity hurdles and outline future directions for creating safe, broad-spectrum RSV vaccines
suitable for all age groups.
1 INTRODUCTION
RSV is a single-negative-strand RNA virus that
causes respiratory infections and is mainly
transmitted through droplets. The infection rate is
higher in the elderly, infants and young children, and
people with weakened immunity. RSV can easily
cause infectious bronchiolitis in infants and young
children, and in severe cases, it can lead to death
(Esther Redondo et al., 2024). In older adults, RSV
infection can lead to heart failure, stroke, and even
acute kidney disease (Schmoele-Thoma et al., 2022).
Viruses enter the human body mainly through
glycoproteins on their membranes (especially G
proteins) to recognize receptors on the host cell
membrane (Schmoele-Thoma et al., 2022) and bind
to F proteins to promote the fusion of viruses and cell
membranes. Recently, it has been found that the
integrin on the cell surface (integrin αvβ1) may also
be an important medium for RSV to enter host cells
(Zheng et al., 2022). RSV infection triggers elevated
levels of cytokines such as IL-6 and IL-8, leading to
neutrophil and eosinophil infiltration, which can lead
to bronchiolitis. At the same time, the Th2 immune
response induced by RSV infection may lead to
asthma symptoms in infants and young children
(Makrinioti et al., 2022; Van Royen et al., 2022). At
present, the treatment of RSV infection mainly relies
on monoclonal antibody (such as palivizumab) to
target the viral F protein for prophylaxis, especially in
neonates (Hammitt et al., 2022), but this therapy has
limited effect on specific populations (such as
neonates and immunocompromised patients), and the
protection period is short (half-life about 20 days),
which cannot provide lifelong immunity (Drysdale et
al., 2023). In addition, there is a lack of effective
monoclonal antibody therapy for older adults,
especially in the setting of immune failure and the
presence of chronic inflammatory underlying
diseases such as COPD, chronic bronchitis, and
cardiovascular disease (Falsey et al., 2022). There
may also be some potential adverse effects, such as
mild allergic reactions to the vaccine in infants
(Terstappen et al., 2024). The immune escape
mechanism of RSV virus itself, such as the non-
structural protein NS2 inhibits the interferon pathway
by blocking STAT2 phosphorylation (Jo et al., 2021),
and the secretory G protein of RSV hinders the
recognition of neutralizing antibodies, which brings
difficulties to clinical treatment (Bukreyev et al.,
2008).
Vaccines against RSV are mainly divided into
inactivated vaccines, attenuated vaccines,
recombinant protein vaccines, and mRNA vaccines.
Live attenuated vaccines attenuate RSV strains
through genetic engineering (e.g., reduce the
expression of their antigens) to mimic the natural
infection process, thereby inducing mucosal
324
Wang, H.
Advances and Challenges in RSV Vaccine Development: Pathways toward Global Protection.
DOI: 10.5220/0014487800004933
Paper published under CC license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Food Science (BEFS 2025), pages 324-329
ISBN: 978-989-758-789-4
Proceedings Copyright © 2026 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda.
immunity; Viral vector vaccines use vectors such as
adenoviruses that are not pathogenic and self-
encoding to express antigens on RSV by presenting
RSV antigen genes, thereby inducing T cells to
produce immune responses. Recombinant vaccines
(also known as recombinant protein vaccines) are
vaccines based on pre-F, a pre-stabilized
conformation of the RSV fusion protein (F protein),
which can induce the production of neutralizing
antibodies. The mRNA vaccine is the delivery of the
mRNA encoding the RSV F protein through lipid
nanoparticles to induce collective expression of
antigens and elicit an immune response (Topalidou et
al., 2023). However, compared with live attenuated
vaccines, protein subunit vaccines usually require
adjuvants to enhance immunogenicity (e.g.,
Pfizer/GSK), and at the same time, the storage
requirements for mRNA vaccines are high, and long-
term storage data have yet to be accumulated. For
example, Moderna's vaccine not only did not protect
infants and young children in the III clinical trial, but
worsened respiratory symptoms (Mahase, 2024). In
addition, the effectiveness of different vaccines in
different age groups varies significantly, for example,
the elderly and children are more suitable for live
attenuated vaccines, less virulent vaccines such as
mRNA vaccines, and for high-risk infants (preterm
birth, heart and lung disease, etc.), monoclonal
antibodies are required for passive immunization
strategies to directly provide specific antibodies. In
2019, global RSV-associated hospitalizations
occurred mainly in low- and middle-income
countries, while vaccine coverage remained
concentrated in high-income areas. This highlights
the disparate challenges faced by RSV vaccination
globally (Li et al., 2022). Despite this, the research
and development of RSV vaccines and monoclonal
antibodies is still very promising. This review
discusses the current status of RSV vaccine
development, analyze the main challenges, and look
forward to future vaccine technologies, so as to
provide new ideas for the prevention and control of
RSV.
2 RSV INACTIVATED
VACCINES
2.1 FI-RSV Vaccines
The formalin‑inactivated RSV (FI‑RSV) vaccine
employs a traditional inactivation approach, wherein
formalin treatment renders the virus noninfectious
while preserving its fusion (F) protein to elicit
immune responses and serve as the principal target of
neutralizing antibodies. Although the FI-RSV
vaccine has shown some immunogenicity in animal
experiments, it has not only failed to respond to the
expected immune response in clinical trials, but has
instead led to serious side effects, mainly manifested
as enhanced respiratory disease (ERD), which mainly
occurs in the middle and lower respiratory tract,
accompanied by clinical symptoms such as fever,
bronchial and lung inflammation, and even leads to
death in children. The failure mechanism of this
method is mainly due to the recognition of the
neutralizing antibody epitope of RSV only on the pre-
F conformation and not on the post-F (Magro et al.,
2012; Ngwuta et al., 2015), and the post-F
conformation may induce non-neutralizing antibodies
and Th2 immunotype responses.
2.2 RI-RSV Vaccine
The γ‑irradiated RSV (RI‑RSV) vaccine inactivates
the virus via gamma irradiation, employing a
development strategy analogous to that of the
formalin‑inactivated FI‑RSV vaccine. In animal
trials, RI-RSV vaccines have induced similar levels
of neutralizing antibodies to FI-RSV vaccines. RI-
RSV vaccine has shown certain advantages in
enhancing immunogenicity and focusing on vaccine
heterogeneity protection, but it also produces side
effects, such as weight loss and lung inflammation,
which may be related to RI-RSV vaccine-induced
conversion from pre-F to post-F (Chen et al., 2023).
Therefore, the design of inactivated vaccines should
focus more on antigen design specificity and take into
ac-count population differences. As structural
insights into the RSV F protein deepenparticularly
evidence demonstrating that the pre‑F conformation
presents superior neutralizing epitopesvaccine
development has increasingly focused on optimizing
the balance between immunogenic potency and
targeted immunoreactivity.
3 LIVE ATTENUATED RSV
VACCINE
Live attenuated vaccines mainly weaken the
virulence of the virus through gene editing or physical
and chemical methods, simulating the natural
infection process, so that its replication in the host is
limited and does not cause host disease, while
retaining its immunogenicity. The immune
Advances and Challenges in RSV Vaccine Development: Pathways toward Global Protection
325
mechanism is mainly through mucosal immunity to
produce secretory IgA and local T cell responses. For
example, CodaVax-RSVTM reduces viral virulence
through codon optimization, while activating secreted
IgA antibodies in the mucosa to form a local immune
barrier and block early viral colonization. Deletion of
NS1/NS2 virulence-related genes can reduce
pathogenicity by reducing the ability of the virus to
inhibit the production of interferon by the host,
effectively detect immunogenicity during clinical
treatment, and elicit a massive memory-immune
response to RSV (Karron et al., 2024). Similarly,
partial deletion of the G protein domain has been
shown in animal models to reduce viral toxicity while
preserving immunogenicity (Roe et al., 2022). The
targeted design of the F antigen is to generate
disulfide bonds through the DS-Cav1 mutation,
which stabilizes the pre-F conformation that can
produce highly effective neutralizing antibodies.
CodaVx-RSVTM vaccine demonstrated a favorable
safety profile in healthy adults during Phase I clinical
trials, eliciting both mucosal IgA and systemic
neutralizing antibodies; however, its safety and
immunogenicity in neonates remain to be established.
4 RECOMBINANT RSV
VACCINES
The RSV recombinant vaccine is a non‑replicating
formulations that express target antigens and require
adjuvants to elicit robust immune responses. The
sources of immune response elicited by using the
virus's own information are mainly divided into
recombinant protein vaccines, recombinant vector
vaccines and DNA vaccines (Giese, 2015). In the
development of RSV proteins, G membrane proteins
are prone to mutations, so the breakthrough is mainly
aimed at the relatively conserved F protein on the
RSV membrane, which is responsible for helping the
virus enter and fuse cells, and its conformational pre-
F has more neutralizing antibody epitopes (such as
site Ø, site V) than another conformational post-F, but
because its pre-F is naturally unstable and easily
spontaneously transformed into post-F, stabilizing the
pre-F protein conformation is the core challenge of
vaccine development(McLellan et al., 2013). Genetic
engineering plays an important role here, as GSK's
Arexvy (pre-F) vaccine has demonstrated its
effectiveness in clinical trials up to 80% in older
adults by stabilizing pre-F by stabilizing the pre-F
mutation with a DS-CAV1 mutation and increasing
the disulfide bond to improve protection. The
adenovirus vector AdC68 was used to express three
different gene mutations (DS-CAV1, SC-TM, DS2),
and then the neutralizing antibody titer and
immunogenicity size were determined, and the results
showed that DS2 showed better immunogenicity
(Yang et al., 2024). Pregnant women receiving the
pre-F vaccine during pregnancy are effective in
preventing neonatal RSV-related respiratory illness,
but in people aged 60 years, the immune efficacy
(vaccine efficacy) of the two doses before and after
vaccination within one year at the RSVAPREF3 time
of vaccination is about the same (Ison et al., 2024). In
2024, Clover Biosciences Inc. developed an
unadjuvanted bivalent RSV Pre-F-trimer vaccine,
SCB-1019, induced two neutralizing antibodies
(RSV-A and RSV-B) in animal trials, with antibody
titers comparable to Arexvy within one month,
yielding approximately 1.5-fold more specific
antibodies than SCB-10191, and local adverse events
(16.7% ) significantly lower than Arexty (76.7%).
5 mRNA RSV VACCINES
mRNA vaccines do not require cell culture or risk
integration into the host genome, with lower risk and
higher antigenicity because they do not integrate
nucleic acids into the host genome. LVRNA007 is a
lipid nanoparticle mRNA vaccine encoding a
DS‑Cav1–stabilized prefusion (pre‑F) RSV F protein.
In animal experiments, LVRNA007 showed a long-
lasting cellular and humoral immune response,
effectively fighting RSV while avoiding vaccine-
enhanced disease (VED) (Li et al., 2025). The
production of mRNA-1345 is introduced to optimize
structural biology, exposing pre-F neutralizing
antibody epitope, using pseudouridine instead of
natural uridine to reduce the immunogenicity of
mRNA and prolong its half-life in the human body
(Bansal, 2023). Packaging mRNA into nanoparticles
prevents enzyme degradation and improves delivery
efficiency. Finally, modification and purification are
made, and the lipid components in the nanoparticles
act as adjuvant ingredients to enhance the immune
response. At the same time, in clinical trials, the
vaccine has a protective effect of up to 80% on RSV-
A and RSV-B subtypes, and its neutralizing antibody
titers are significantly higher than those of traditional
protein vaccines. No vaccine-enhanced diseases are
seen. The possible side effects are local injection
reactions and temporary fatigue (Wilson et al., 2023).
A team from Xiamen University designed a new type
of truncated pre-F protein to make a vaccine as an
immunogen. By removing inefficient neutralizing
BEFS 2025 - International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Food Science
326
antibody epitopes and enhancing high-efficiency
neutralizing antibody epitopes, the vaccine antibody
response generated by the delivery of lipid
nanoparticles can effectively target the two subtypes
of RSV A and B. Moreover, no vaccine-enhanced
disease (VED) was found (Lin et al., 2025).
6 CHALLENGES FOR RSV
VACCINES
6.1 Immune Evasion
RSV infection is characterized by dysregulation of
type I interferon (IFN) signaling. Nonstructural
proteins on the RSV membrane (such as NS1 and
NS2 proteins) will hinder the host's natural immune
response. For example, the key molecule MAVS
(mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein) on the
outer mitochondrial membrane is a key molecular
platform of the antiviral RLR pathway. The specific
recognition effect of RSV's NS1 protein on the
protein TUFM on the mitochondria will initiate the
mitochondrial autophagy mechanism, thereby
affecting the host's immune signaling (Cheng et al.,
2023). At the same time, N protein can isolate the
antiviral protein, the immune-stimulating protein, in
the inclusion body, and then negatively regulate the
innate immune-related proteins (Cheng et al., 2023).
In addition, the Post-F conformation of RSV exposed
inefficient binding antibody epitopes (siteI and site
III), inducing nonprotective antibodies and at risk of
inflammation, which is more common in clinical
trials of advanced vaccines (inactivated and partially
attenuated vaccines). When the human body is
infected with RSV normally, due to the instability of
pre-F, it will turn into a relatively stable post-F
conformation, thereby escaping the pre-F-specific
antibodies produced by the host, resulting in immune
failure (Venkatesan, 2023). To overcome this
challenge, the key to vaccine design is how to
stabilize the pre-F conformation and prevent it from
transitioning to post-F. According to the recombinant
protein vaccines prepared by RSV viruses for proteins
(F and G proteins) that are closely involved in the host
response, although they can activate immune
responses as antigenic components, they require
adjuvants to enhance their immunogenicity in most
cases. New research direction - RSV nano-lipid
particle mRNA vaccine, which uses viral mRNA to
generate antigen proteins in host cells and activate
immune responses while lipid nanoparticles help
stabilize antigens and enhance immunogenicity.
6.2 Vaccine Efficacy and Adverse
Events across Age Groups
Infants and young children benefit most from
recombinant protein vaccines due to their lower
reactogenicity. For example, in the Abrysvo clinical
trial, after pregnant women received the maternal
vaccine, the antibodies were passed to the infant
through the placenta, and the vaccine protective
efficacy reached 81.8%. Although no serious adverse
events were reported, potential effects of maternally
derived antibodies on infant immune development
warrant monitoring. Palivizumab, an RSV
monoclonal antibody, prevents RSV infection by
inducing passive immunity, but is ineffective for RSV
treatment. In clinical experiments, severe respiratory-
related infections were observed in the RSV mRNA-
1345 vaccine produced by Moderna. This may be
related to the infancy of the immune system of infants
and young children, which leads to the inability to
make timely immune responses. Elderly and high-risk
populations (such as those with low immunity)
performed well in the second-generation vaccine,
Pfizer's Abrysvo RSV-preF bivalent recombinant
protein vaccination trial (Alfano et al., 2024; Havers
et al., 2023; Surie et al., 2024). The two vaccines
Abrysvo and Arexvy can have similar side effects on
the body after vaccination, including fatigue, muscle
headaches, headaches, and pain at the vaccination
site. But these effects are temporary and transitional
(Andreoni et al., 2024). RSV infection prevention is
mainly aimed at newborns, especially babies within
one year of birth. The current strategy is composed of
multiple steps: first, the maternal antibodies that
deliver anti-RSV are delivered to the baby; then,
within 3 months of the baby, monoclonal antibodies
are injected to produce passive immunity, and then
natural infection is simulated by vaccinating vector
vaccines or attenuated vaccines to test whether an
effective immune response is generated (Zheng et al.,
2022). High-risk groups also have corresponding
vaccine response strategies (E. Redondo et al., 2024).
7 CONCLUSION
After the failure of clinical trials of the first-
generation RSV vaccine, the development of RSV
vaccines has focused more on the role of vaccines in
the human body, especially for special groups such as
newborns, the elderly, and those with
immunodeficiency.
Advances and Challenges in RSV Vaccine Development: Pathways toward Global Protection
327
With the maturity of modern biotechnology, the
direction of vaccine research and development has
gradually shifted to artificially manipulating viral
antigens, such as enhancing the immunogenicity of
vaccines through lipid nanoparticles as adjuvants
while ensuring their safety. These innovations have
successfully transitioned to recombinant vaccines,
and have prompted mRNA vaccines and monoclonal
antibody vaccines to show great potential in
immunogenicity and safety. However, RSV vaccines
still face some challenges, including the limited
vaccine supply, price issues, public inadequate
awareness of the RSV virus, and differences in the
effects and side effects of different vaccines on
different age groups. The effectiveness of vaccines,
especially in neonatal and immunity-lowering
populations, still needs further verification, and long-
term tracking of the immune response and side effects
of vaccinated people is the key to vaccine research.
With the in-depth understanding of the RSV immune
escape mechanism and the continuous innovation of
vaccine technology, RSV vaccines are expected to be
widely used worldwide in the future, thereby
effectively controlling the spread and harm of RSV
infection.
REFERENCES
Alfano, F., Bigoni, T., Caggiano, F. P. & Papi, A. 2024.
Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection in Older
Adults: An Update. Drugs Aging 41, 487-505.
Andreoni, M. et al. 2024. RSV vaccination as the optimal
prevention strategy for older adults. Infez Med 32,
478-488.
Bansal, A. 2023. From rejection to the Nobel Prize: Karikó
and Weissman's pioneering work on mRNA vaccines,
and the need for diversity and inclusion in
translational immunology. Front Immunol 14,
1306025.
Bukreyev, A. et al. 2008. The Secreted Form of Respiratory
Syncytial Virus G Glycoprotein Helps the Virus
Evade Antibody-Mediated Restriction of Replication
by Acting as an Antigen Decoy and through Effects
on Fc Receptor-Bearing Leukocytes. Journal of
Virology 82, 12191-12204.
Chen, F. et al. 2023. Gamma Irradiation-Inactivated
Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccine Provides
Protection but Exacerbates Pulmonary Inflammation
by Switching from Prefusion to Postfusion F Protein.
Microbiol Spectr 11, e0135823.
Cheng, J. et al. 2023. The nonstructural protein 1 of
respiratory syncytial virus hijacks host mitophagy as
a novel mitophagy receptor to evade the type I IFN
response in HEp-2 cells. mBio 14, e0148023.
Drysdale, S. B. et al. 2023. Nirsevimab for Prevention of
Hospitalizations Due to RSV in Infants. New England
Journal of Medicine 389, 2425-2435.
Falsey, A. R., Cameron, A., Branche, A. R. & Walsh, E. E.
2022. Perturbations in Respiratory Syncytial Virus
Activity During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic. J Infect
Dis 227, 83-86.
Giese, M. 2015. Types of Recombinant Vaccines.
Introduction to Molecular Vaccinology, 199-232.
Hammitt, L. L. et al. 2022. Nirsevimab for Prevention of
RSV in Healthy Late-Preterm and Term Infants. New
England Journal of Medicine 386, 837-846.
Havers, F. P. et al. 2023. Characteristics and Outcomes
Among Adults Aged ≥60 Years Hospitalized with
Laboratory-Confirmed Respiratory Syncytial Virus -
RSV-NET, 12 States, July 2022-June 2023. MMWR
Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 72, 1075-1082.
Ison, M. G. et al. 2024. Efficacy and Safety of Respiratory
Syncytial Virus (RSV) Prefusion F Protein Vaccine
(RSVPreF3 OA) in Older Adults Over 2 RSV
Seasons. Clin Infect Dis 78, 1732-1744.
Jo, W. K. et al. 2021. Reverse genetics systems for
contemporary isolates of respiratory syncytial virus
enable rapid evaluation of antibody escape mutants.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 118.
Karron, R. A. et al. 2024. Evaluation of the Live-Attenuated
Intranasal Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV)
Vaccine RSV/6120/ΔNS2/1030s in RSV-
Seronegative Young Children. J Infect Dis 229, 346-
354.
Li, J. et al. 2025. An mRNA-Based Respiratory Syncytial
Virus Vaccine Elicits Strong Neutralizing Antibody
Responses and Protects Rodents Without Vaccine-
Associated Enhanced Respiratory Disease. Vaccines
(Basel) 13.
Li, Y. et al. 2022. Global, regional, and national disease
burden estimates of acute lower respiratory infections
due to respiratory syncytial virus in children younger
than 5 years in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet
399, 2047-2064.
Lin, M. et al. 2025. A truncated pre-F protein mRNA
vaccine elicits an enhanced immune response and
protection against respiratory syncytial virus. Nature
Communications 16, 1386 (2025).
Magro, M. et al. 2012. Neutralizing antibodies against the
preactive form of respiratory syncytial virus fusion
protein offer unique possibilities for clinical
intervention. Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences 109, 3089-3094.
Mahase, E. 2024. FDA pauses all infant RSV vaccine
trials after rise in severe illnesses. BMJ 387, q2852.
Makrinioti, H. et al. 2022. The role of respiratory syncytial
virus- and rhinovirus-induced bronchiolitis in
recurrent wheeze and asthma-A systematic review
and meta-analysis. Pediatric Allergy and
Immunology 33.
McLellan, J. S., Ray, W. C. & Peeples, M. E. 2013.
Structure and function of respiratory syncytial virus
surface glycoproteins. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol
372, 83-104.
BEFS 2025 - International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Food Science
328
Ngwuta, J. O. et al. 2015. Prefusion F-specific antibodies
determine the magnitude of RSV neutralizing activity
in human sera. Sci Transl Med 7, 309ra162.
Redondo, E. et al. 2024. Respiratory Syncytial Virus
Vaccination Recommendations for Adults Aged 60
Years and Older: The NeumoExperts Prevention
Group Position Paper. Arch Bronconeumol 60, 161-
170.
Redondo, E. et al. 2024. Respiratory Syncytial Virus
Vaccination Recommendations for Adults Aged 60
Years and Older: The NeumoExperts Prevention
Group Position Paper. Archivos de
Bronconeumología 60, 161-170.
Roe, M. K. et al. 2022. An RSV Live-Attenuated Vaccine
Candidate Lacking G Protein Mucin Domains Is
Attenuated, Immunogenic, and Effective in
Preventing RSV in BALB/c Mice. J Infect Dis 227,
50-60.
Schmoele-Thoma, B. et al. 2022. Vaccine Efficacy in
Adults in a Respiratory Syncytial Virus Challenge
Study. N Engl J Med 386, 2377-2386.
Surie, D. et al. 2024. Severity of Respiratory Syncytial
Virus vs COVID-19 and Influenza Among
Hospitalized US Adults. JAMA Network Open 7,
e244954-e244954.
Terstappen, J. et al. 2024. The respiratory syncytial virus
vaccine and monoclonal antibody landscape: the road
to global access. The Lancet Infectious Diseases 24,
e747-e761.
Topalidou, X., Kalergis, A. M. & Papazisis, G. 2023.
Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccines: A Review of
the Candidates and the Approved Vaccines.
Pathogens 12.
Van Royen, T., Rossey, I., Sedeyn, K., Schepens, B. &
Saelens, X. 2022. How RSV Proteins Join Forces to
Overcome the Host Innate Immune Response.
Viruses 14.
Venkatesan, P. 2023. First RSV vaccine approvals. The
Lancet Microbe 4, e577.
Wilson, E. et al. 2023. Efficacy and Safety of an mRNA-
Based RSV PreF Vaccine in Older Adults. New
England Journal of Medicine 389, 2233-2244.
Yang, Y. et al. 2024. DS2 designer pre-fusion F vaccine
induces strong and protective antibody response
against RSV infection. npj Vaccines 9, 258.
Zheng, K. et al. 2022. Biased agonists of the chemokine
receptor CXCR3 differentially signal through
Gα(i):β-arrestin complexes. Sci Signal 15, eabg5203.
Zheng, Z. 2022. Challenges in Maximizing Impacts of
Preventive Strategies against Respiratory Syncytial
Virus (RSV) Disease in Young Children. Yale J Biol
Med 95, 293-300.
Advances and Challenges in RSV Vaccine Development: Pathways toward Global Protection
329