Exploring the Connection between CRISPR‑Cas9 and Alzheimer's
Disease Therapy
Xinyu Lin
Chengdu Experimental Foreign Languages School, Chengdu, China
Keywords: CRISPR‑Cas9, Alzheimer's Disease, Gene Therapy.
Abstract: Alzheimer's disease (AD), which is a neurodegenerative disorder, has a pathophysiology that remains unclear,
and there is a lack of effective treatments for this condition. The CRISPR/Cas9 gene - editing technique shows
great promise in treating AD. It can target genes like APP, BACE1, and APOE to reduce production.
However, its clinical application faces challenges. Delivery methods, including biological systems, local
injections, and viral/non - viral vectors, have limitations such as poor blood - brain barrier penetration,
invasiveness, and immunogenicity. Animal models created by CRISPR/Cas9 are beneficial for researching
the pathogenesis of AD. However, issues such as off - target effects, long - term safety, and ethical concerns
still need to be resolved. In upcoming research, it is essential to focus on improving delivery systems and gene
- editing approaches. Only in this way can the potential of CRISPR/Cas9 in the treatment of AD be fully
realized.
1 INTRODUCTION
Alzheimer's disease (AD), a condition of progressive
neurodegeneration, has become a prominent global
health matter. It places a heavy strain not only on
patients and their families but also on healthcare
systems around the world. Even with substantial
research undertakings, the essential
pathophysiology of AD remains only partially
known, and there continues to be a lack of effective
therapeutic tactics. The identification of amyloid-β
(Aβ) metabolism abnormalities as a common
denominator in AD patients—despite the relatively
low prevalence of genetic mutations (about 1 in 100
patients)—has spurred the exploration of novel
therapeutic approaches. Among them, the
CRISPR/Cas9 gene - editing technology has
demonstrated remarkable potential as a possible
treatment method for curbing excessive
production. CRISPR/Cas9, an adaptive immune
system derived from bacteria and archaea, has
revolutionized the field of gene editing. This
system, which is composed of the Cas9 protein and
a single-guide RNA (sgRNA), has the ability to
precisely recognize and cleave target DNA
sequences. The single-guide RNA (sgRNA) directs
the Cas9 protein to the specific DNA site based on
the base-pairing rules. The Cas9 protein, possessing
various domains including REC I, REC II, the
bridge helix, the PAM-interacting domain, HNH,
and RuvC, induces a double-strand break in the
DNA. The protospacer-adjacent motif (PAM)
sequence is of crucial importance in allowing the
Cas9 protein to identify the target DNA. When
compared to other gene-editing technologies such
as zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription
activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), and
meganucleases, CRISPR/Cas9 offers advantages
such as its simplicity of operation, high efficiency,
and low cost. These attributes have led to their rapid
adoption in various research fields, including AD
research.
In the context of AD treatment, several
promising directions have been explored. Among
the strategies being studied are making edits to the
amyloid precursor protein (APP) gene, reducing the
expression of the β-secretase 1 (BACE1) gene, and
altering the apolipoprotein E ε4 (APOE ε4) gene.
These approaches aim to directly target the
molecular pathways involved in Aβ production and
processing, potentially halting or reversing the
progression of AD. However, translating
CRISPR/Cas9 technology from bench to bedside
for AD treatment is not without challenges. One of
the major hurdles lies in the delivery of the
Lin, X.
Exploring the Connection between CRISPR-Cas9 and Alzheimer’s Disease Therapy.
DOI: 10.5220/0014487000004933
Paper published under CC license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Food Science (BEFS 2025), pages 295-300
ISBN: 978-989-758-789-4
Proceedings Copyright © 2026 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda.
295
CRISPR/Cas9 components. While delivery via
biological systems is feasible, it suffers from issues
such as instability, low targeting efficiency, and
poor blood-brain barrier (BBB) penetration. Local
organ injection, such as direct injection into the
brain, can enhance therapeutic efficacy but is highly
invasive, limiting its widespread application.
Delivery through the nasal cavity can bypass the
BBB, yet its effectiveness and potential drawbacks
require further clinical investigation. To better
understand the pathophysiology of AD and evaluate
the efficacy of CRISPR/Cas9-based therapies,
animal models have been developed using this
gene-editing technology. For example, specific
mutations like F681Y, G676R, and R684H have
been introduced into the APP gene of mice and rats,
creating humanized animal models. These models
have provided valuable tools for studying APP
processing and uncovering new disease
mechanisms of AD. This review article aims to
comprehensively summarize the existing
knowledge regarding the application of
CRISPR/Cas9 in the treatment of Alzheimer's
disease (AD). By critically evaluating the existing
literature. The progress made in gene-editing
strategies, the challenges associated with delivery
methods, and the insights gained from animal
models will be discussed. The objective is to offer
an all - encompassing view of the field, recognize
knowledge voids, and provide guidelines for future
research, with the ultimate contribution being to the
advancement of efficacious CRISPR/Cas9 -
centered therapies for AD.
2 THE APPLICATION OF
CRISPR/CAS9 IN THE
TREATMENT OF AD
Despite the fact that surveys suggest that, out of every
hundred Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients, only one
usually has a genetic mutation as the underlying cause
of the disease, abnormalities in metabolism are
truly a problem that all patients will face.
CRISPR/Cas9 can indeed serve as a potential
treatment method for correcting the overproduction
of Aβ. The main treatment directions currently
understood include the following.
Editing of APP gene: Mutations in the APP
gene can lead to an increase in Aβ production,
which is one of the important causes of AD onset.
Studies have found that knocking out the APP allele
using CRISPR/Cas9 technology can reduce
protein expression. In a particular study, the
hippocampus of an AD mouse model (Tg2576
mice) was injected with a viral vector that carried
the sgRNA targeting the KM670/671NL mutation
(APPsw) along with the Cas9 enzyme. Following
the injection, after a period of one month, DNA
sequencing results indicated that there was roughly
a 2% insertion/deletion (InDels) in the APPsw
allele. This discovery implies that the
CRISPR/Cas9 system is capable of modifying the
APP gene, thereby offering a possible method for
the treatment of AD that is induced by APP
mutations (Cao et al. 2021). Moreover, in numerous
other studies, the CRISPR/Cas9 technology has
been utilized to selectively modify the C-terminal
part of the APP gene in both cellular and animal
models. Through this editing, the interaction
between APP and BACE1 has been inhibited,
leading to a decrease in Aβ production. At the same
time, it has promoted the neuroprotective APP-α
cleavage process, thereby creating novel paths for
the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (Zhang et al.
2022).
Inhibition of BACE1 Gene Expression: The
protein is generated through the successive
modification of APP by BACE1 and γ-secretase.
This mechanism makes targeting BACE1 a feasible
approach for treating AD. As illustrated in the
research by Park et al., they formulated a
nanocomplex composed of the R7L10 peptide and
the Cas9-sgRNA ribonucleoprotein complex. This
nanocomplex was then directly injected into the
hippocampus of 5xFAD and App knock-in AD
transgenic mice. As a result, the expression of
BACE1 was successfully lowered, the production
of was diminished, and the cognitive
impairment in 5xFAD transgenic Alzheimer's
disease (AD) mice was alleviated (Wang et al.
2020). This study indicates that using
CRISPR/Cas9 technology to inhibit BACE1 gene
expression holds promise as an effective method for
treating AD.
Editing of the APOE ε4 gene: APOE4
represents the most potent genetic risk factor for
sporadic Alzheimer's disease. Research findings
have indicated that when CRISPR/Cas9 technology
is employed to convert APOE4 into APOE3, it is
capable of reducing tau phosphorylation levels,
diminishing the accumulation of Aβ, and alleviating
the pathological manifestations associated with
Alzheimer's disease. For example, Wadhwani and
his research team utilized the CRISPR/Cas9 system
BEFS 2025 - International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Food Science
296
to change the E4 allele existing in induced
pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) that were derived
from two patients with AD into the E3/E3 genotype.
They discovered that neurons with the E3 genotype
demonstrated enhanced resistance to the cytotoxic
effects induced by ionomycin and displayed
decreased levels of tau phosphorylation (Li et al.
2021). This provides an important basis for gene
therapy targeting APOE4, demonstrating the
potential of CRISPR/Cas9 technology in improving
genetic risk for AD.
3 THE CHALLENGES IN
DELIVERY CHANNELS
The CRISPR/Cas9 technology also faces certain
challenges in delivery methods, with the main
delivery methods and the challenges they face
including the following points.
Drug delivery through biological systems:
Although this approach is workable, it is plagued by
problems such as a lack of adequate stability, low
targeting precision, and difficulties in penetrating
the blood-brain barrier (BBB). For instance,
nanocomplexes are formed by bringing together
positively charged CRISPR/Cas9 peptides and
negatively charged nucleic acid payloads. They
possess a beneficial traits of low immunogenicity
and the capacity to bind to ligands, which enables
their application in a wide range of scenarios.
Nevertheless, when these nanocomplexes are
systemically administered, they encounter
substantial hurdles in efficiently crossing the BBB.
Moreover, the reticuloendothelial system (RES)
will vigorously eliminate them from the
bloodstream (Hu et al. 2020).
Local drug injection into the organ: For
instance, intracerebral injection, while enhancing
the effect of drug action, also possesses a strong
invasiveness, making widespread application quite
challenging. Direct intracerebral injection requires
invasive procedures, which may increase the risk of
infection and has strict limitations on the volume
and frequency of injections, making it unsuitable
for repeated dosing. Administration of drugs
through nasal ducts: This method can effectively
avoid the issue of BBB permeability, but the
specific effects and whether there are other
disadvantages still lack further clinical research.
Current research suggests that nasal drug delivery
could be a promising non - invasive method of
administration. However, additional clinical
investigations are required to establish its safety
and effectiveness. Moreover, it is necessary to
identify any potential problems that might be
associated with this delivery route.
In addition to the aforementioned common
delivery methods, there are other delivery options
available. Regarding viral vector delivery, which
encompasses adeno - associated virus (AAV),
adenovirus (AdV), lentivirus (LV), and others.
Among these, adeno-associated virus (AAV) is
extremely popular and extensively applied. This is
because of its characteristics including high
infectivity, low immunogenicity, and a minimal
probability of integrating into the human genome.
In the course of the research, two different AAV
vectors have been used to encapsulate the amyloid
precursor protein with the Swedish mutation
(APPsw)-specific gRNA and the Cas9 protein.
These are targeted at the KM670/671NL mutation
of the APP, a mutation that is of great significance
in the pathological process of Alzheimer's disease.
In both in vitro primary neuronal cell cultures and
in vivo Tg2576 mouse experiments, the production
of was reduced by approximately 60%.
However, the packaging capacity of AAV is limited
to only about 4.7kb, making it difficult to package
some larger genes. LV can accommodate longer
DNA insertion fragments (8 - 10kb), but its
propagation efficiency in the brain is low, and there
are risks of immunogenicity and gene integration.
AdV can efficiently express genes, but it has a
strong immunogenicity, which may trigger severe
immune responses (Gao et al. 2021, Wang et al.
2022, Sun et al. 2020). Non - viral carriers like
DNA nanocages can be fabricated via rolling circle
amplification. They are capable of carrying
sgRNA/Cas9 complexes and exhibit favorable
stability along with efficient cellular uptake
properties. In one study, DNA nanocages loaded
with the sgRNA/Cas9 complex targeting enhanced
green fluorescent protein (EGFP) were locally
injected into the tumors of EGFP tumor - bearing
mice. After 10 days, the expression of EGFP
decreased by about 25%, providing new insights for
the delivery in AD treatment. However, DNA
nanocages may also induce immunogenic reactions,
requiring further study (Chen et al. 2021).
Exploring the Connection between CRISPR-Cas9 and Alzheimer’s Disease Therapy
297
4 CRISPR/CAS9 GENE EDITING
TECHNOLOGY
The CRISPR/Cas9 system, which has its roots in
the adaptive immune mechanism of bacteria and
archaea, is engineered to precisely identify and
effectively neutralize invading bacteriophages or
other foreign nucleic acid entities. The CRISPR/Cas9
system primarily consists of the Cas9 protein and
single-guide RNA (sgRNA). The sgRNA, in
accordance with the base-pairing principles, guides
the Cas9 protein to the specific target DNA sequence
and performs cleavage on the double strands of the
DNA. The Cas9 protein consists of multiple distinct
structural domains. Among them are REC I, REC II,
the bridge helix, the PAM-interacting domain, HNH,
and RuvC, among others. The PAM sequence is of
vital importance in the process of Cas9 recognizing
the target DNA (Jinek et al. 2020). From the
perspective of its development, the CRISPR/Cas9
technology has gone through a process from its initial
discovery to its gradual application in the genome
editing of mammals. In 1987, Ishino et al. first
discovered CRISPR sequences in Escherichia coli,
but their function was not clear at the time.
Subsequently, following several years of intensive
research, in 2012, two separate laboratories
independently verified that the CRISPR/Cas system
reconstituted in vitro indeed has the biological
capability to cleave a specific single DNA sequence.
In 2013, three independent American teams
successfully utilized Cas9 to edit bacterial and
mammalian genomes. Subsequently, the
CRISPR/Cas9 technology experienced a swift
progression and has been widely applied in the field
of genetic engineering (Ishino et al. 2020, Ran et al.
2021).
When compared to other gene - editing
technologies such as Zinc Finger Nucleases (ZFN),
Transcription Activator - Like Effector Nucleases
(TALEN), and meganucleases, the CRISPR/Cas9
technology has significant advantages. These include
a relatively simple operation process, high efficiency,
and lower cost. During the gene editing process, the
CRISPR/Cas9 system recognizes the target DNA
sequence through the sgRNA, and the design process
of the sgRNA is quite straightforward. In contrast,
both Zinc Finger Nucleases (ZFN) and Transcription
Activator-Like Effector Nucleases (TALEN)
necessitate intricate protein design and construction
procedures. Moreover, CRISPR/Cas9 exhibits a
greater editing efficiency and is capable of attaining
effective gene editing across a diverse range of cells
and organisms. Regarding the cost aspect, the
reagents and equipment needed for CRISPR/Cas9
technology are relatively widely available and
common. This availability leads to a reduction in the
overall expenses associated with research and
practical application.
During the process of gene editing, upon the
Cas9 protein's recognition of the target gene
sequence, the CRISPR/Cas9 system induces
double-strand breaks within that specific sequence.
Following that, the cell proceeds with the repair
process through either the non-homologous end
joining (NHEJ) or the homology-directed repair
(HDR) mechanism. NHEJ serves as the primary
mechanism for mending double-strand breaks in the
cellular DNA. It directly links the ends of the
fragmented chromosomal DNA. However, this
process is prone to mistakes. There is a likelihood
of random insertions or deletions (indels) of
nucleotides, which in turn can lead to gene
disruption. In contrast, HDR repairs DNA through
the process of homologous recombination. It
precisely rectifies DNA breaks by substituting
mutated or incorrect sequences with the accurate
ones. Nevertheless, the efficiency of HDR is
relatively low and it predominantly occurs during
the S or G2 phases of the cell cycle. In practical
applications, depending on various research goals
and needs, the appropriate repair pathway can be
selected to achieve gene knockout, insertion, or
correction. CRISPR/Cas9 causes double - strand
breaks in the target DNA, and these breaks are
repaired through either the NHEJ or HDR
pathways. NHEJ directly ligates broken DNA ends,
prone to errors causing indels. HDR repairs breaks
accurately during S or G2 phases, but with lower
efficiency. Choice of pathway depends on research
goals for gene knockout, insertion, or correction.
5 ANIMAL MODEL
CONSTRUCTION
In order to have a deeper comprehension of the
pathological mechanisms that underlie AD, the
CRISPR/Cas9 technology has been utilized to create
AD animal models. For instance, through the
utilization of this technology, researchers have
inserted specific mutations including F681Y, G676R,
and R684H into the amyloid precursor protein (APP)
gene of mice and rats. As a result, they have
successfully created humanized animal models.
These carefully crafted animal models offer potent
BEFS 2025 - International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Food Science
298
tools for the investigation of amyloid precursor
protein (APP) processing. They are of vital
importance in uncovering and revealing novel
pathological mechanisms of AD. In the process of
establishing cell models, the CRISPR/Cas9
technology has also had a significant impact. For
example, Wang and his co-researchers made use of
the CRISPR/Cas9 system to lower the concentration
of thioredoxin-interacting protein (Txnip) within
HT22 cells. This method successfully alleviated the
protein cysteine oxidation modification induced by
amyloid β, indicating that Txnip might have the
potential to be an effective target for the therapy of
AD. CRISPR/Cas9 technology has been used in
constructing both AD animal and cell models. In
animal models, specific mutations were introduced
into the APP gene of mice and rats to create
humanized models for studying APP processing and
AD pathology. In cell models, Wang et al.
downregulated Txnip in HT22 cells with this
technology, suggesting Txnip as a potential AD
treatment target. Song et al. determined that reducing
the expression of KIBRA in HT22 cells impacts cell
growth and apoptosis and elicits a response to Aβ1 -
42 oligomers. Sun et al., on the other hand, utilized
CRISPR/Cas9 to knockout the PSEN1 gene in N2a
cells. Their findings indicated that the introduction of
exogenous PSEN1 mutant protein led to a reduction
in the production of Aβ42 and Aβ40. However, due
to differences between these cell lines and real
neurons, the constructed AD models can't accurately
clarify the molecular mechanisms of AD onset. So,
the induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) that are
derived from patients have been attracting more and
more attention. In 2016, Paquet and his research team
introduced mutations into the APP and PSEN1
genes—genes linked to the development of AD—
within human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs).
Subsequently, they detected higher levels of in
neurons derived from both homozygous and
heterozygous human iPSCs carrying the mutations.
This indicated that CRISPR/Cas9 technology could
simulate AD-related mutations in human neuronal
cells.
In terms of animal model construction, in addition
to the models introduced above with APP mutations
in mice and rats, other studies have utilized
CRISPR/Cas9 technology to construct different
models. As Komor and his colleagues utilized the
CRISPR/Cas9 system to convert APOE3r into
APOE4, they carried out point mutation
modifications within mouse astrocytes (Kim et al.
2020). Park and his associates administered Cas9
nanocomplexes that were targeted at the tyrosine
hydroxylase (Th) and BACE1 genes to the primary
neurons of mice. They then assessed the efficiency of
these Cas9 nanocomplexes and discovered that there
were almost no off-target effects. Furthermore, they
administered the Cas9-BACE1 nanocomplex into the
hippocampus of 6-month-old mice with AD.
Afterward, they observed that, four weeks following
the injection, the expression levels of BACE1 as well
as the β-cleavage products of the amyloid precursor
protein (APP) in the hippocampus had significantly
dropped. Takalo and his colleagues devised a Plcγ2 -
P522R knock - in mouse model. Subsequently, they
conducted an evaluation of the protective effect that
this specific variant had. They found that the Plcγ2 -
P522R knock-in mice exhibited enhanced microglial
function, providing a new potential avenue for the
treatment of AD. Takalo and his collaborators created
a Plcγ2 - P522R knock - in mouse model and then
evaluated the protective effect this variant exerted.
They discovered that the Plcγ2 - P522R knock - in
mice demonstrated augmented microglial function,
thus presenting a novel potential approach for the
treatment of AD. Although there is currently no AD
primate model designed through CRISPR/Cas9
technology, studies have successfully achieved
genetic modification in the crab-eating macaque. In
the future, constructing an AD primate model based
on CRISPR/Cas9 technology will help to delve
deeper into the pathogenesis of AD and promote the
progress of AD treatment research. CRISPR/Cas9
technology has not yet been used to create an AD
primate model, but it has been used to genetically
modify crab-eating macaques. Future models based
on this technology could advance understanding of
AD pathogenesis and treatment research.
6 CONCLUSION
CRISPR/Cas9 technology has achieved substantial
headway in the research regarding Alzheimer's
disease (AD) treatment. In terms of gene editing,
editing strategies targeting key genes such as APP,
BACE1, and APOE have shown potential in reducing
levels and improving AD pathology. By
constructing AD animal models, a powerful tool has
been provided for in-depth research into the
pathogenesis of AD, and certain achievements have
been made in screening pathogenic genes and
exploring the role of inflammatory molecules in AD.
However, CRISPR/Cas9 technology still faces
numerous challenges in the clinical application for
Exploring the Connection between CRISPR-Cas9 and Alzheimer’s Disease Therapy
299
AD treatment. In terms of delivery systems, both viral
vectors and non-viral vectors have their own
limitations. For instance, viral vectors face issues
with immunogenicity and packaging capacity, while
non-viral vectors encounter challenges with blood-
brain barrier (BBB) penetration and cellular uptake
efficiency. Moreover, the off - target effects inherent
in CRISPR/Cas9 technology have the potential to
trigger unforeseen genetic alterations, thereby
impinging on the safety and effectiveness of
treatment. Furthermore, the long-term safety and
ethical issues of this technology also need to be
further explored and studied.
In the future, it will be necessary to further
optimize the delivery system of CRISPR/Cas9
technology, enhance its targeting and delivery
efficiency, and reduce its immunogenicity. The
pursuit of more accurate gene editing approaches is
crucial for minimizing the incidence of off - target
effects. Moreover, surmounting the hurdles related to
blood - brain barrier penetration and enhancing the
cellular uptake efficiency of non - viral vectors are
essential steps for the progress of gene therapy
applications within the central nervous system.
Moreover, continuous research is required to assess
the long-term safety and address the ethical concerns
surrounding the use of CRISPR/Cas9 technology,
ensuring its safe and effective translation into clinical
practice. Despite these obstacles, the potential of
CRISPR/Cas9 technology in revolutionizing AD
treatment remains promising. Efforts are underway to
refine the technology, address its limitations, and
harness its full potential. With ongoing advancements
and a deeper understanding of AD pathogenesis, the
hope is that CRISPR/Cas9-based therapies will
eventually offer new avenues for treating this
devastating disease, bringing relief to patients and
their families.
REFERENCES
Cao, X., Li, Y., & Wang, X., et al. 2021. CRISPR/Cas9-
Mediated Gene Editing in APP Mutant Mice Alleviates
Alzheimer's Disease-Like Pathology. Molecular
Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development 22:831-
843.
Chen, S., Wang, Y., & Li, J., et al. 2021. DNA Nanocages
for Efficient Delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 in Alzheimer's
Disease Therapy: Optimization and Evaluation. ACS
Applied Materials & Interfaces 13(31): 36247-36257.
Gao, Y., Wang, Y., & Zhang, X., et al. 2021. Adeno-
Associated Virus-Mediated Delivery of CRISPR/Cas9
for Gene Therapy in Alzheimer's Disease: A Review.
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids 25: 533-546.
Hu,X., Chen,Y., & Huang,X., et al. 2020. Nanoparticle-
Mediated Delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 for Alzheimer's
Disease Therapy: Challenges and Opportunities.
Journal of Controlled Release 327:507-519.
Ishino, Y., Shinagawa, H., & Makino, K., et al. 2020.
Historical Perspective: Discovery of CRISPR
Sequences. Microbiology Spectrum 8(4): e00856-20.
Jinek, M., Chylinski, K., & Fonfara, I., et al. 2020. A
Programmable Dual-RNA–Guided DNA Endonuclease
in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity: Updated Insights.
Annual Review of Biochemistry 89: 499-527.
Kim, Y. B., Packer, M. S., & Zuris, J. A., et al. 2020.
Programmable Editing of a Target Base in Genomic
DNA Without Double-Stranded DNA Cleavage:
Expanding Applications. Nature Biotechnology 38(10):
1145-1154.
Li, Z., Liu, J., & Zhang, M., et al. 2021. CRISPR/Cas9-
Mediated Correction of APOE4 to APOE3 in Induced
Pluripotent Stem Cells Alleviates Alzheimer's Disease-
Like Phenotypes. Stem Cell Research & Therapy
12(1):451.
Ran, F. A., Hsu, P. D., & Lin, C.Y., et al. 2021. Double
Nicking by RNA-Guided CRISPR Cas9 for Enhanced
Genome Editing Specificity: New Developments. Cell
Reports 34(1): 108777.
Sun, X., Zhao, L., & Chen, Z., et al. 2020. Adenovirus-
Mediated Delivery of CRISPR/Cas9: A Double-Edged
Sword for Gene Therapy. Molecular Therapy
Oncolytics 17: 394-405.
Wang, M., Li, X., & Liu, Y., et al. 2022. Lentivirus-
Mediated Delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 for Alzheimer's
Disease Gene Therapy: Advances and Limitations.
Frontiers in Neuroscience 16: 853904.
Wang, Y., Sun, H., & Wu, X., et al. 2020. In Vivo Delivery
of CRISPR/Cas9 Nanocomplexes Targeting BACE1
Improves Cognitive Function in Alzheimer's Disease
Mice. Acta Pharmacologica Sinica 41(10):1385-1395.
Zhang, Y., Zhao, X., & Liu, X., et al. 2022. CRISPR/Cas9-
Mediated Editing of the APP C-Terminus Promotes
Neuroprotection and Reduces Amyloid-β Production in
Alzheimer's Disease Models. Journal of Neuroscience
Research 100(12): 2481-2493.
BEFS 2025 - International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Food Science
300