N6‑Methyladenosine Modification and Circadian Regulation: Their
Impact on Diabetes and Underlying Mechanisms
Qinhan Liu
Aquinas International Academy, Ontario, CA, U.S.A.
Keywords: N6‑Methyladenosine, Circadian Rhythm, Insulin Resistance.
Abstract: m6A RNA methylation and circadian rhythms both affect how the body manages blood sugar, influencing
diabetes development. Recent studies show that clock genes such as BMAL1 and CLOCK interact closely
with m6A regulators, affecting insulin signaling in cells. When natural rhythms are disrupted—like staying
up late, shift work, or irregular eating—this balance breaks down, worsening insulin resistance. Therapies
targeting this connection, including timed nutritional strategies or treatments affecting m6A enzymes, may
help improve blood glucose control. More research is needed to clearly understand how these mechanisms
work together, potentially leading to better personalized diabetes treatments.
1 INTRODUCTION
Metabolic disorders, particularly type 2 diabetes
mellitus (T2D), have become a significant global
health burden due to the complex interplay of genetic,
environmental, and epigenetic factors. Among these
modifications, the most notable one is N6-
methyladenosine (m6A) RNA modification, which
has been found to be an important epigenetic
regulator determining the genes' expression in the
post-transcriptional process. However, it is essential
to highlight the circadian rhythms and their function
in metabolic regulation, which is related to the
glucose homeostasis, insulin secretion, and lipid
metabolism. The recent evidence demonstrates that a
complex interaction exists between circadian
regulation and m6A modification and that there is a
possibility of implications involving metabolic
disorders, although the exact mechanisms are
currently unresolved. Research findings indicate that
m6A modification is associated with the involvement
of insulin sensitivity and glucose metabolism, which
occurs through the stabilization of mRNA and
translation of important metabolic genes (Li et al.
2023). In addition to that, circadian rhythms interfere
with the insulin release and hepatic glucose
production, whereas the disruptions of this rhythm
caused by shift work, sleep disturbances, or irregular
feeding schedules have been found to increase
chances of insulin resistance and metabolic
syndrome. This investigation deals with the role of
m6A methylation as an intermediary between
circadian disruption and metabolic dysregulation,
which is a new and developing area.
Additionally, the role of m6A modification is
well-known in the diabetic complications,
especially in diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN).
According to the previous findings, the decrease of
m6A modification of Schwann cells as a result of
high glucose concentration leads to a drop in the
expression level of neuroprotective genes and the
dysfunction of autophagic process, which
eventually contributes to aggravation of nerve
damage in the case of diabetes. These findings
imply that m6A modification has an important role
in diabetes-associated complications, but not
merely in glucose metabolism. This paper aims to
review the connection between m6A RNA
modifications and their effect on transcriptional
activities governed by circadian regulation in
metabolic disorders, mainly involving insulin
resistance, diabetes, and obesity. These are going to
be useful as tools for identifying more advanced
therapeutic alternatives to address epigenetic
effects and circadian processes to improve
metabolic wellness outcomes.
Liu, Q.
N6-Methyladenosine Modification and Circadian Regulation: Their Impact on Diabetes and Underlying Mechanisms.
DOI: 10.5220/0014486400004933
Paper published under CC license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Food Science (BEFS 2025), pages 273-280
ISBN: 978-989-758-789-4
Proceedings Copyright © 2026 by SCITEPRESS – Science and Technology Publications, Lda.
273
2 M6A MODIFICATION AND
CIRCADIAN RHYTHM:
EXPLORING THE
MECHANISTIC
CONNECTIONS
2.1 Chronical Stability and Translation
of m6A in Gene Activity
The main function of circadian clock is accomplished
by the transcriptional and translational feedback loop
(TTFL), which is formed through the recognition of
transcription of PER and CRY genes by BMAL1 and
CLOCK proteins. With PER and CRY proteins
snowballing, the next steps will inhibit
BMAL1/CLOCK activity, which subsequently will
be degraded to bring the cycle to an end. The process
of gene expression requires proper regulation which
is often achieved by inserting m6A methylation
(Chen et al. 2023). A number of circumstances come
together in the process of m6A modification, which
takes place while the mRNA is being transcribed and
which has an impact on all three areas of mRNA,
namely stability, translation efficiency, and
degradation. Methylated sites on BMAL1, CLOCK,
PER, and CRY transcripts also exist and are
maintained in state dependent inverse relation to
specific m6A regulatory proteins (De Jesus et al.
2019). It has been documented that m6A modification
of both BMAL1 and CLOCK transcripts increases the
stability of those two mRNAs, thereby enabling these
mRNAs to be expressed properly. At the opposite end
of the spectrum, transcripts for PER2 and CRY1 go
through degradation, which is dependent on m6A and
ensures that BMAL1/CLOCK is not repressed to the
extent of preventing the transition from activation to
repression (Gibo & Kurosawa 2020). The
downregulation with METTL3 (the primary m6A
methyltransferase) has been shown to disrupt the
circadian clock, implying that the period of mper2
mRNA stability has been extended. The consequence
of this event is the postponement of the suppression
of BMAL1 /CLOCK (Robinson et al. 2019).
YTHDF2, an important m6A reader, was also
removed, leading to its accumulation, which is not
caused by m6A, and which also leads to the
prolongation of the circadian cycle (Yu et al. 2025).
These findings indicate that the precision of circadian
feedback loops in timing depends on m6A.
2.2 The Chronotherapy of m6A
Modifiers and Removers
There is not only the effect of circadian clocks on
m6A, but there is also the feedback regulating m6A
modifying molecules from circadian oscillators,
which are reciprocated by the above-mentioned
modulating variable, providing a way to synchronize
patterns in gene expressions (Yang et al. 2018).
BMAL1 and CLOCK are both in charge of the
activation of METTL3 transcription, which interacts
with the mRNA lock, bringing about METTL3
oscillatory output, leading to rhythmic disposition of
m6A marks on circadian transcripts (Gibo &
Kurosawa 2020). The clock is thus capable of
bringing together the m6A marks to the expected
extent and in due time by telling the clock what's
where to be disposed of as m6A. PDHDNs
involvement in the physiology of metabolic disorder
and sleep disorder was probably because of the
misalignment of m6A modifications and circadian
gene expression (De Jesus et al. 2019). Besides, m6A
erasers that are present in the family of FTO and
ALKBH5 also show circadian variations and their
expression patterns are variably opposite to those of
METTL3 to keep the cycle of methylation and
demethylation unbroken (Robinson et al. 2019). Via
example, the gene ALKBH5 is known to be
upregulated during the early active phase, which
counteracts the accumulation of extra m6A and
provides sufficient time for the stabilization of the
transcripts which are important for circadian function
(Chen et al. 2023). These data provide further support
to the view that circadian rhythms may directly
control both m6A deposition and erasure of some
transcript components and intermittuate the gene
expressions in a time-dependent manner.
Abnormalities in METTL3, FTO, or YTHDF proteins
can result in changes in circadian rhythms of the cells,
which represent the importance of m6A-circadian
interactions (Yu et al. 2025).
2.3 The Circadian Corse Effect on
m6A Periodicity and Amplitude
Circadian processes oscillate with a change or rising
of cycles (cycle length) and amplitude (oscillation
strength), and adjust m6A methylation in both
(Robinson et al. 2019). Scientific observation has
shown that circadian period is elongated when the
level of m6A decreases due to longer persistence of
the PER2 and CRY1 because their decrease is not
proportionalities with that of the m6A (Gibo &
BEFS 2025 - International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Food Science
274
Kurosawa 2020). Literally, mathematical modeling
studies have demonstrated that m6A-deficient cells
display lengthened cycles due to prolonged mRNA
stability (De Jesus et al. 2019). Furthermore, m6A
controls the advertisement of casein kinase
(CK1δ), which is a critical kinase required to
phosphorylate and degrade PER proteins. Impairing
CK1δ activity leads to alteration of the periodicity
and the binding of the mRNA specified by m6A;
hence, it is possible to conclude that m6A plays a role
in the proper ticking of circadian clock (Yang et al.
2018). Beside the increase in the cycle length, m6A
increases the amplitude of circadian oscillations by
making sure that the core clock transcripts are
stabilized (Chen et al. 2023). The removal of m6A
methlylation observably shortens the circadian state
of gene expression and causes substandard
oscillations that subsequently modify the circadian
control for the ease of use (Yu et al. 2025). This point
entails the conclusion that m6A activity contrasts
from both increase of the circadian period and the
amplitude which in turn allows steady oscillation on
all the cellular processes (Robinson et al. 2019).
2.4 The Environment Influence on
Interaction of m6A with Circadian
Time
Circadian rhythms are formed by external factors in
the environment, such as light exposure and feeding,
as well as occasional m6A modifications, both of
which are involved in regulating it (Gibo & Kurosawa
2020). Light being a significant environmental sync
factor for circadian rhythm has been implicated in
affecting the level of m6A in clock-associated
transcripts (Yang et al. 2018). Previous studies
indicated that m6A modifications were activated on
both BMAL1 and PER2 transcripts in response to
light signals and their degradation was timeshifted
according to external day-night cycles (De Jesus et al.
2019). Shift workers and people who are exposed to
artificial light during the night all have altered
patterns of m6A methylation, which may eventually
bring about circadian misalignment (Yu et al. 2025).
2.5 Feeding Habit and m6A
Modification
Meal time is also an important regulator of circadian
gene expression, which maintains the rhythm of m6A
activity (Chen et al. 2023). The fasting-feeding
regime has been associated with the alteration of
hepatic m6A patternings among all metabolic genes
in particular REV-ERBα (NR1D1), IGF1R, and AKT
(Robinson et al. 2019). Out-of-time feeding behavior
is ecologic, which enhances the m6A-mediated
circadian entrainment pull together (Gibo &
Kurosawa 2020). These discoveries suggest that m6A
works as a modulator of the exposure of
environmental information into the circadian system
as the surrounding conditions change (Yang et al.
2018).
2.6 The Possible Venue for m6A
Therapy in Circadian Disorders
Because the close connection between m6A
methylation and the circadian process is well known,
the targeting of the m6A axis provides a tool to
develop novel therapeutic approaches for the
circadian disorders. Pharmacological modulation of
m6A writers (METTL3), erasers (FTO, ALKBH5),
and readers (YTHDF proteins) could help restore
disrupted rhythms, particularly in shift workers,
metabolic syndrome patients, and individuals with
sleep disorders (Chen et al. 2023). METTL3
modulation has shown promise in regulating BMAL1
and CLOCK expression, reinforcing circadian
oscillations (De Jesus et al. 2019). Conversely, FTO
and ALKBH5 inhibitors have demonstrated effects in
stabilizing circadian metabolic pathways, potentially
benefiting conditions like type 2 diabetes (Yang et al.
2018). Additionally, nutritional interventions such as
dihydroartemisinin (DHA) supplementation and
chrono-nutrition strategies may help fine-tune m6A-
dependent circadian regulation (Gibo & Kurosawa
2020). Although m6A-targeting therapies remain in
early stages, the potential for correcting circadian
misalignment and mitigating metabolic disorders
warrants further investigation. Future studies should
focus on selective modulators of m6A regulators and
their clinical applications in circadian-related
diseases (Robinson et al. 2019).
3 M6A MODIFICATION AND
CIRCADIAN RHYTHM: THEIR
ROLES IN DIABETES
3.1 Circadian Rhythm and Glucose
Homeostasis in Diabetes
The circadian clock is essential in regulating glucose
and lipid metabolism through its influence on insulin
secretion, glucose uptake, and hepatic
N6-Methyladenosine Modification and Circadian Regulation: Their Impact on Diabetes and Underlying Mechanisms
275
gluconeogenesis. Disruption of this temporal
coordination contributes significantly to the
development of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
BMAL1, a core clock transcription factor, plays a
central role in maintaining rhythmic metabolic gene
expression. Mahajan et al. demonstrated that BMAL1
overexpression in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN)
of diabetic mice restored behavioral rhythmicity,
improved glucose tolerance, and reduced hepatic
glucose production, underscoring the link between
circadian regulation and metabolic homeostasis.
Further evidence suggests that dietary modulation of
circadian gene expression can also influence glucose
regulation. Wang et al. showed that theabrownin, a
tea-derived polyphenol, improved glucose and lipid
profiles in diabetic mice by altering gut microbiota-
derived metabolites and upregulating circadian genes
such as BMAL1 and CLOCK in liver and adipose
tissues (Lu et al. 2025). These changes contributed to
enhanced insulin sensitivity and metabolic balance.
Moreover, environmental cues such as light exposure
modulate sympathetic nervous system activity, which
in turn influences hepatic glucose metabolism. Chen
et al. found that circadian gene expression in
metabolic tissues is partly driven by light-regulated
neuroendocrine signaling, reinforcing the concept
that both intrinsic circadian components and external
factors jointly regulate glucose homeostasis (Le Bras
2025).
3.2 m6A Epitranscriptomic Regulation
in Pancreatic β-cell Function
m6A methylation has emerged as a critical post-
transcriptional regulatory mechanism in maintaining
pancreatic β-cell homeostasis. These cells are central
to insulin production, and their dysfunction is a
hallmark of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The
epitranscriptomic regulation mediated by m6A
modulates β-cell maturation, insulin synthesis, and
glucose-stimulated insulin secretion through dynamic
control of mRNA stability and translation efficiency.
METTL3, the major methyltransferase responsible
for m6A deposition, plays a key role in β-cell
development and function. Benak et al. demonstrated
that β-cell-specific deletion of METTL3 impairs
insulin gene transcription, reduces insulin granule
formation, and diminishes glucose-stimulated insulin
secretion, ultimately leading to glucose intolerance in
mice (De Jesus et al. 2019). Additionally, m6A reader
proteins such as YTHDF1 and YTHDF2 influence the
translation and decay of transcripts critical to β-cell
identity and function (Bornaque et al. 2022). On the
other hand, FTO and ALKBH5, the major m6A
demethylases, are also involved in regulating
metabolic genes in β-cells. Elevated FTO expression
has been associated with increased insulin resistance
and hyperglycemia. Zhang et al. reported that FTO
modulates the expression of AKT and FOXO1
pathways, linking m6A dynamics directly to insulin
sensitivity and downstream glucose regulation. These
findings suggest that targeting m6A regulators in β-
cells could be a promising therapeutic strategy for
improving insulin secretion and glycemic control in
diabetes.
3.3 The Disruption of m6A and
Circadian Crosstalk under Diabetic
Conditions
Under diabetic circumstances, the connection
between m6A RNA methylation and circadian
processes, which are normally functional, is gradually
perturbed and is harmful to metabolic homeostasis.
All these mechanisms undergo rhythmic changes,
which interfere with the expression of gene rhythm
that keeps the metabolic balance constant; otherwise,
the disorder may worsen. Last, the enzyme levels
associated with m6A have been found to be
modulated in the diabetic state. For example, in the
course of the hyperglycemic situation, diminished
activity of METTL3 and raised activity of FTO have
been witnessed, leading to disturbances in terms of
mRNA methylation of genes related to metabolism
and circadian rhythm. It exerts its effects by
prolonging the half-life of mRNA and changing the
translation dynamics, which in turn results in a
delayed or changed metabolism cycle. Moreover,
circadian rhythm disturbances that accompany
specific lifestyle habits, such as rotating work
schedules or irregular sleep patterns, have been
shown to alter the expression of circadian-controlled
genes (CCGs). CLOCK and BMAL1, which have
been disturbed in diabetic tissues, are associated with
the development of insulin resistance and chronic
systemic inflammation. Newly accumulating data
show that m6A can also act as a regulatory switch of
the circadian gene expression. To be more precise,
abnormal methylation of m6A involving the PER and
CRY mRNA biosynthesis are responsible for the
disturbance of circadian feedback loops, which in
turn amplify metabolic dysregulation (Hong et al.
2025). Furthermore, gut microbiota byproducts,
which are altered in diabetes, are reported to
contribute to m6A modification and alter clock genes,
implying a possible circadian epigenetic-metabolic
BEFS 2025 - International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Food Science
276
cross talk (Pelczyńska et al. 2025). These discoveries
bring to light the fact that the reciprocally controlling
cycle between m6A and circadian rhythm is
susceptible to disturbance under diabetic conditions,
which in turn might be a modifiable axis and striking
foundation for treating diabetes.
3.4 Therapeutic Strategies Targeting
the m6A-circadian Axis in Diabetes
Management
Treating diabetes by harnessing the m6A-RNA
methylation-chronobiology relationship comes as
an alternative now that the evidence is mounting
that both control glucose metabolism. A decrease in
the activity of METTL3, FTO, as well as the
circadian regulators such as BMAL1 and CLOCK
in diabetic conditions implies that restoring their
balance would provide a potential impetus to
improving metabolic outcomes. Targeting
therapeutic to fewer disturbances of m6A enzymes
is becoming an attractive option. FTO inhibitors
have displayed encouraging signs in terms of
insulin sensitivity and eventually lowering
hyperglycemia in preclinical trials (Zhu et al. 2025).
These medicines have the potential to correct m6A
monomethylation levels, most notably when they
bind to mRNA controlling insulin signaling and
circadian rhythms. Moreover, chrono-nutrition, a
concept which involves maintaining food intake
also in harmony with the biological clock, has been
promulgated as a starting point without invasive
treatment that could help improve metabolic
control. Dietary interventions timed according to
circadian cycles have shown benefits in improving
glucose tolerance and reducing insulin resistance
(Reinke & Asher 2016). Similarly, light therapy has
been studied as an external cue to reset circadian
rhythms and indirectly influence metabolic
pathways (Panda 2016). Emerging studies also
point toward the gut microbiota–m6A–circadian
axis. Modulation of microbial metabolites such as
short-chain fatty acids may influence both m6A
methylation and circadian gene expression, offering
a multi-layered therapeutic approach (Romaní-
Pérez et al. 2021). Taken together, integrating
pharmacological, nutritional, and behavioral
interventions targeting the m6A–circadian interface
may offer more precise and effective strategies for
preventing and managing diabetes.
4 THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN
M6A, CIRCADIAN RHYTHM,
AND INSULIN RESISTANCE
4.1 Molecular Mechanisms of Insulin
Resistance in the Context of
Circadian Disruption
Circadian rhythm is tightly coupled with metabolic
homeostasis, and its disruption has been increasingly
associated with the development of insulin resistance.
Core clock components such as BMAL1 and CLOCK
orchestrate temporal gene expression that regulates
key metabolic pathways, including glucose transport,
insulin signaling, and lipid metabolism (Kimura et al.
2025). Under physiological conditions, this rhythmic
regulation ensures insulin sensitivity in peripheral
tissues at specific times of the day. Disruption of
circadian genes affects insulin signaling cascades.
Notably, Kimura et al. reported that the circadian
metabolite D-alanine plays a regulatory role in
maintaining glucose metabolism via its interaction
with BMAL1 and CLOCK. Dysregulation of this
loop, whether by genetic perturbations or
environmental desynchronization, disrupts insulin
receptor expression and Akt phosphorylation,
contributing to decreased glucose uptake in hepatic
and muscle tissues (Kimura et al. 2025). In addition,
the role of sleep-related circadian misalignment in
impairing glucose tolerance has been emphasized.
Hong et al. showed that insufficient sleep affects
AMPK signaling and reduces GLUT4 translocation,
thus exacerbating insulin resistance (Hong et al.
2025). This was supported by evidence that sleep
deprivation alters appetite hormones and promotes
inflammatory cytokine release, further impairing
insulin action (Hong et al. 2025). Furthermore,
Pelczynska et al. highlighted the chronotype-specific
differences in insulin sensitivity, noting that
individuals with evening chronotype exhibit impaired
glucose regulation, elevated HbA1c levels, and
altered adipokine secretion (Pelczyńska et al. 2025).
These observations underscore the multifactorial
mechanisms through which circadian disturbance
contributes to insulin resistance. Taken together,
these findings suggest that insulin resistance is not
solely a result of metabolic overload but also a
consequence of disrupted circadian timing, mediated
by alterations in clock gene expression, metabolite
oscillations, and hormonal imbalance.
N6-Methyladenosine Modification and Circadian Regulation: Their Impact on Diabetes and Underlying Mechanisms
277
4.2 m6A Modification in Key Insulin
Signaling Pathways
m6A RNA methylation is a dynamic regulatory
mechanism essential for proper insulin signaling. Its
dysregulation significantly impacts glucose
metabolism, influencing the progression of insulin
resistance. Recent evidence highlights how specific
m6A enzymes modulate the insulin signaling cascade
and metabolic gene expression, emphasizing their
potential therapeutic relevance in diabetes. FTO, a
major RNA demethylase, influences metabolic
homeostasis by regulating m6A modifications on
critical transcripts involved in insulin signaling
pathways. Zhang et al. demonstrated that
pharmacological inhibition of FTO improves insulin
sensitivity, glucose tolerance, and energy
expenditure, primarily through increasing m6A
methylation of key metabolic mRNAs involved in
hepatic gluconeogenesis and lipid metabolism
pathways (Huang et al. 2023). Further supporting
these findings, betaine supplementation modulates
hepatic m6A patterns, specifically increasing the
m6A methylation of metabolic genes, consequently
reducing insulin resistance and hepatic lipid
accumulation. This occurs primarily through the
METTL3-mediated methylation of Trub2, a critical
regulator in metabolic control (Reinke & Asher
2016). Additionally, circadian misalignment disrupts
m6A modifications in insulin-responsive tissues.
Misalignment, induced by lifestyle factors such as
shift work or abnormal feeding times, significantly
alters rhythmic m6A patterns in clock-controlled
metabolic genes. This further exacerbates insulin
resistance by disrupting normal circadian-driven
metabolic homeostasis (Wu et al. 2025). Therefore,
targeting m6A methylation pathways represents a
promising therapeutic strategy to improve insulin
signaling in metabolic diseases, particularly when
circadian rhythms are concurrently disrupted (Wu et
al. 2025).
4.3 The Crosstalk between m6A and
Circadian Clock in Regulating
Insulin Sensitivity
Recent studies have revealed a functional
interdependence between m6A RNA methylation and
the circadian clock in the regulation of insulin
sensitivity. Core clock genes such as BMAL1 and
CLOCK not only maintain rhythmic metabolic
homeostasis but are also regulated by m6A
modifications at the post-transcriptional level.
Conversely, circadian oscillations can influence the
expression and activity of m6A regulatory enzymes,
suggesting a bidirectional interaction. For instance,
rhythmic expression of METTL3 and FTO, the m6A
writer and eraser enzymes, has been observed in
insulin-responsive tissues, with peak activity aligning
to metabolic gene expression cycles. Disruption of
circadian regulators alters the timing of m6A
deposition, leading to aberrant stabilization or
degradation of insulin signaling-related mRNAs,
including IRS1 and FOXO1 (Reinke & Asher 2016).
Moreover, m6A marks on transcripts such as PER and
CRY genes modulate their mRNA turnover and
translation efficiency, directly influencing circadian
feedback loops and thereby indirectly affecting
insulin sensitivity (Yang et al. 2018). Theabrownin
has also been shown to enhance insulin sensitivity by
restoring rhythmic expression of both m6A regulators
and core clock genes in diabetic models (Lu et al.
2025). In parallel, gut microbiota-derived short-chain
fatty acids (SCFAs) may act as upstream modulators
of both m6A methylation and circadian gene
expression. Romaní et al. proposed a gut–m6A–
circadian axis that synchronizes metabolic rhythms,
contributing to improved insulin responsiveness
(Romaní-Pérez et al. 2021). These findings highlight
a mechanistic bridge between m6A and circadian
timing in maintaining insulin action, offering new
targets for metabolic disease interventions.
4.4 Clinical Evidences and Implications
in Metabolic Disease Management
Emerging clinical and translational studies suggest
that the interplay between m6A modification and
circadian regulation has tangible implications in the
management of metabolic diseases such as type 2
diabetes. Evidence from human cohorts indicates that
circadian misalignment—resulting from shift work,
social jet lag, or irregular sleep patterns—is
associated with reduced insulin sensitivity and
elevated HbA1c levels, particularly in individuals
with evening chronotypes (Pelczyńska et al. 2025).
These clinical observations support mechanistic data
from experimental models linking disrupted circadian
gene expression to altered insulin signaling pathways.
Moreover, variations in m6A-related gene expression
have been observed in metabolic tissues of patients
with obesity and diabetes. Clinical studies have found
upregulation of FTO and decreased METTL3 activity
in diabetic individuals, correlating with impaired
glucose tolerance and elevated hepatic
gluconeogenesis (Huang et al. 2023). Such findings
BEFS 2025 - International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Food Science
278
reinforce the role of epitranscriptomic regulation in
the metabolic phenotype of insulin resistance.
Intervention studies also highlight the therapeutic
potential of targeting this axis. Chrono-nutritional
approaches that epidemiologically exactly match
food intake with circadian rhythms have shown
improvement in glycemic control and lipid profile in
clinical trials. Conversely, pharmacological blocking
of the FTO has showed promising effect in preclinical
trials, which could directly correlate the translational
potential for epigenetic changes of m6A methylation.
These findings emphasize the clinical relevance of
integrating circadian rhythm alignment and m6A-
directed therapies together as a crowded and
comprehensive strategy in preventing and treating
metabolic disorders.
4.5 Integrative Therapeutic
Approaches and Future
Perspectives
The concert of circadian modulation with m6A
epitranscriptomic control creates a new framework
for treatment of metabolic disorders. Since both
networks significantly intersect the control of insulin
signaling cascades and metabolism-associated genes,
targeting the m6A-circadian axis together holds
optimism for greater insulin sensitivity and better
glycemic control than the therapies based on the m6A
or circadian modulation alone. Recently proposed
strategies of dual intervention might consist of
chronotherapy combined with FTO inhibitors or
applying FTO inhibitors in an environment with light
and mealtime (Reinke & Asher 2016, Huang et al.
2023). Such methods aim at restoring the normal
levels of clock and epitranscriptomic genes' activity
while concurrently overcoming the underlying
metabolic disease. The progress in the creation of
circadian–m6A concentration-based predictors can
result in personalized physical activities protocols
intended for those with high chronotype risks.
However, a few problems remain unresolved, in
particular, m6A–clock discrepancies for particular
tissues, the effect of potential off-targets caused by
epigenetic drugs, and the lack of long-term safety
data. The development of bioinformatics, including
multi-omics profiling, will provide greater favor to
specifying therapeutic targets and finding the best
moment for treatment for maximum performance.
Thus, m6A-circadian connection should particularly
be regarded as a core interdisciplinary target in
metabolic diseases research that crosses the
boundaries of molecular regulation and system-wide
rhythm towards precision treatment.
5 CONCLUSION
The interplay between m6A modification and
circadian rhythm significantly impacts diabetes
progression by modulating insulin sensitivity and
metabolic balance. Circadian disruptions, such as
those induced by altered BMAL1 and CLOCK
activity, impair insulin signaling pathways, including
Akt phosphorylation and GLUT4-mediated glucose
uptake, exacerbating insulin resistance.
Simultaneously, dysregulated m6A RNA
methylation—particularly through altered activity of
METTL3 and FTO—further disrupts the expression
and stability of insulin-related transcripts like IRS-1,
contributing to metabolic dysfunction.
Therapeutically, aligning dietary patterns with
circadian rhythms, employing FTO inhibition
strategies, and manipulating gut microbiota
metabolites have demonstrated effectiveness in
restoring insulin responsiveness and glucose
metabolism. Future research must address
individualized therapeutic responses and long-term
safety of combined circadian and m6A-targeted
interventions, ultimately enhancing personalized
treatment strategies for diabetes management.
REFERENCES
Bornaque, F., Delannoy, C.P., & Courty, E., et al. 2022.
Glucose Regulates m6A Methylation of RNA in
Pancreatic Islets. Cells 11(2):291.
Chen, L., Xia, S., & Wang, F., et al. 2023. m6A
methylation-induced NR1D1 ablation disrupts the HSC
circadian clock and promotes hepatic fibrosis.
Pharmacological Research 189:106704.
De Jesus, D.F., Zhang, Z., Kahraman, S., et al. 2019. m(6)A
mRNA Methylation Regulates Human beta-Cell
Biology in Physiological States and in Type 2 Diabetes.
Nature Metabolism 1(8):765-774.
Gibo, S.&Kurosawa, G. 2020. Theoretical study on the
regulation of circadian rhythms by RNA methylation.
Journal of Theoretical Biology 490:110140.
Hong, S., Lee, D.B., & Yoon, D.W., et al. 2025. The Effect
of Sleep Disruption on Cardiometabolic Health. Life
15(1):60.
Huang, C., Chen, W., & Wang, X. 2023. Studies on the fat
mass and obesity-associated (FTO) gene and its impact
on obesity-associated diseases. Genes & Diseases
10(6):2351–2365.
N6-Methyladenosine Modification and Circadian Regulation: Their Impact on Diabetes and Underlying Mechanisms
279
Kimura, T., Sakai, S., & Isaka, Y. 2025.d-Alanine, a
Circadian Metabolite that Regulates Glucose
Metabolism and Viral Infection. ChemBioChem: A
European Journal of Chemical Biology e202500018.
Le Bras, A. 2025. Light regulation of glucose metabolism.
Lab Animal54(2):41–41.
Li,Y.L., Li, L., & Liu, Y.H., et al. 2023. Identification of
Metabolism-Related Proteins as Biomarkers of Insulin
Resistance and Potential Mechanisms of m6A
Modification. Nutrients15(8):1839.
Lu, Z., Zhen, Q., & Liang, Q., et al. 2025. Roles of Gut
Microbiota Metabolites and Circadian Genes in the
Improvement of Glucose and Lipid Metabolism in
KKAy Mice by Theabrownin. Journal of Agricultural
and Food Chemistry 73(9):5260–5273.
Panda, S. 2016. Circadian physiology of metabolism.
Science 354(6315):1008–1015.
Pelczyńska, M., Moszak, M., & Wojciechowska, J., et al.
2025. The Role of the Chronotype in Developing an
Excessive Body Weight and Its Complications—A
Narrative Review. Nutrients 17(1):80.
Reinke, H. & Asher, G. 2016. Circadian Clock Control of
Liver Metabolic Functions. Gastroenterology
150(3):574–580.
Robinson, M., Shah, P., & Cui, Y., et al. 2019. The Role of
Dynamic m6 A RNA Methylation in Photobiology.
Photochem & Photobiology 95(1):95–104.
Romaní-Pérez, M., Bullich-Vilarrubias, C., & López-
Almela, I., et al. 2021. The Microbiota and the Gut-
Brain Axis in Controlling Food Intake and Energy
Homeostasis. International Journal of Molecular
Sciences 22(11):5830.
Wu, Y., Yu, J., & Song, H., et al. 2025. Profiling of RNA
N6-Methyladenosine methylation reveals the critical
role of m6A in betaine alleviating hepatic steatosis.
Scientific Reports 15(1):7298.
Yang, Y., Hsu, P.J., & Chen, Y.S., et al. 2018. Dynamic
transcriptomic m6A decoration: writers, erasers,
readers and functions in RNA metabolism. Cell
Research 28(6):616–24.
Yu, S., Jiang, C., & Yang, Y., et al. 2025. Purine-rich
element binding protein alpha: a DNA/RNA binding
protein with multiple roles in cancers. Molecular
Medicine 31(1):20.
Zhu, S., Jiang, L., & Liu, X., et al. 2025. m6A demethylase
Fto inhibited macrophage activation and glycolysis in
diabetic nephropathy via m6A/Npas2/Hif1α axis.
FASEB Journal 39(2):e70332.
BEFS 2025 - International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Food Science
280