Research Progress on the Role and Potential of N6‑Methyladenosine
in Gastric Cancer Treatment
Ye He
Taiyuan Number 48 Middle School, Taiyuan, China
Keywords: N6‑methyladenosine (m6A), Gastric Cancer, Therapeutic Target.
Abstract: N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is the most prevalent RNA modification, playing a crucial role in RNA
metabolism, including stability, splicing, translation, and degradation. Dysregulation of m6A is involved in
gastric cancer (GC), affecting tumorigenesis, epithelial-mesenchymal transition(EMT), and chemotherapy
resistance. In GC, m6A modification promotes oncogene translation and alters non-coding RNA (ncRNA)
interactions, contributing to tumor proliferation, invasion, and therapy resistance. Overexpression of
METTL3 and YTHDF1 enhances m6A methylation which leads to MYC upregulation and EMT progression,
while FTO depletion stabilizes E-cadherin, suppressing tumor metastasis. Moreover, ncRNAs are
transcriptional modulators significantly affected by m6A modifications, influencing tumor growth and drug
resistance. Additionally, m6A regulates various forms of programmed cell death, including pyroptosis,
ferroptosis, autophagy, and cuproptosis, which indicates potential therapeutic target. Emerging strategies,
such as CRISPR-Cas9 and epigenetic modulation, offer new approaches for targeting m6A-related pathways.
Combining m6A-targeted therapies with conventional treatments may enhance GC outcomes, improving
patient quality of life and survival.
1 INTRODUCTION
N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is the most well-known
post-transcriptional RNA modification in mRNA
and non-coding RNAs. It plays an important role in
regulating RNA metabolism, including splicing,
stability, translation, and degradation. m6A is
dynamically formed by methyltransferases
(writers), removed by demethylases (erasers), and
recognized by binding proteins (readers). This
modification influences gene expression and has
been implicated in various physiological processes,
including embryonic development, immune
regulation, and tumor progression. In cancer, m6A
dysregulation changes oncogene and tumor
suppressor gene expression, affecting proliferation,
apoptosis, metastasis, and therapy resistance. As a
result, m6A is considered as a potential therapeutic
target in multiple cancers, including gastric cancer.
Gastric cancer (GC), also known as stomach cancer,
is a malignant tumor that originates from the lining
of the stomach. It is one of the most common
cancers around the world. Gastric cancer is
classified into different subtypes based on
histology, molecular characteristics, and location
within the stomach. The most common type is
adenocarcinoma, which accounts for more than
90% of cases. The primary risk factors for gastric
cancer include: Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori)
infection, a major cause of chronic inflammation
and lesions; unhealthy diet, such as high salt intake,
smoked foods, and low vegetable consumption;
lifestyle factors like smoking and alcohol abuse;
chronic gastritis and gastric ulcers, which may lead
to intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia. Genetic
factors also distribute to gastric tumorigenesis. It is
often diagnosed at an advanced stage due to vague
early symptoms, such as indigestion, mild
abdominal pain, or loss of appetite. This late
detection contributes to high mortality rates.
Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer
worldwide and the fourth leading cause of cancer-
related death. According to global cancer statistics,
it accounts for approximately one million new cases
and 770,000 deaths annually. The prognosis varies
based on the stage at diagnosis. Early-stage gastric
cancer has a five-year survival rate of over 90%
when treated with surgery; locally advanced gastric
cancer (spread to nearby lymph nodes) has a five-
year survival rate of 30–50%. Metastatic gastric
He, Y.
Research Progress on the Role and Potential of N6-Methyladenosine in Gastric Cancer Treatment.
DOI: 10.5220/0014486300004933
Paper published under CC license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Food Science (BEFS 2025), pages 267-272
ISBN: 978-989-758-789-4
Proceedings Copyright © 2026 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda.
267
cancer (stage IV) has a five-year survival rate below
5–10%, since treatment options are limited.
Treatment for gastric cancer depends on the stage,
location, and molecular characteristics of the tumor.
For advanced and metastatic cases, systemic
therapy is required. First line treatment include
chemotherapy, basically platinum-based
chemotherapy combined with fluoropyrimidines.
Targeted Therapy are specially for HER2-positive
gastric cancer, and during this kind of therapy,
trastuzumab (Herceptin) is added to chemotherapy.
PD-1 inhibitors like pembrolizumab or nivolumab
are considered with chemotherapy for certain
patients with high PD-L1 expression. Second-Line
Chemotherapy is usually for those patients who had
worsened after first-line therapy, and taxane-based
(paclitaxel or docetaxel) or irinotecan-based drugs
are used. Ramucirumab (VEGFR-2 inhibitor),
either alone or with paclitaxel, improves survival in
second-line settings. Despite treatment advances,
chemotherapy resistance is still a major challenge,
highlighting the need for novel molecular-targeted
therapies, including those new findings on m6A
regulation.
2 THE MODIFICATIONS
INVOLVING M6A
m6A modification is dynamically regulated by three
groups of proteins: writers, erasers, and readers. The
initiation of m6A is mediated by the
methyltransferase complex, primarily composed of
METTL3 (methyltransferase-like 3) and METTL14,
along with accessory proteins such as WTAP (Wilms
tumor 1-associated protein), KIAA1429 (VIRMA),
RBM15, and ZC3H13. This complex catalyzes the
transfer of a methyl group to adenosine residues in
RNA, typically occurring within the RRACH
consensus motif (R = A/G, and H = A/C/U). Thanks
to the action of demethylases such as FTO (fat mass
and obesity-associated protein) and ALKBH5 (alkB
homolog 5), the activitiy of m6A could be altered
(Jiang et al. 2021, Hu et al. 2022). These enzymes
remove m6A marks, allowing for regulation of RNA
degradation and function. The biological effects of
m6A are mediated by reader proteins, which
recognize and bind to m6A-modified RNAs. The
YTH domain-containing family (YTHDF1,
YTHDF2, YTHDF3, and YTHDC1) determines the
fate of m6A-marked transcripts. Other readers, such
as IGF2BP1-3 (insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-
binding proteins) modulate RNA stability, translation
efficiency, and localization (Jiang et al. 2021, An &
Duan 2022).
The m6A modification impacts many aspects of
RNA metabolism: By recruiting the YTHDF2
protein, which promotes transcript decay through
interactions with the RNA decay machiner, m6A
promotes RNA degradation. m6A enhances
translation efficiency by recruiting initiation factors
such as eIF3 or promoting ribosome engagement
via YTHDF1.m6A could affect RNA splicing by
modulating interactions between splicing factors
and pre-mRNA, thereby affecting the selection of
exons (Jiang et al. 2021, An & Duan 2022). m6A
modification is also responsible to nuclear export of
transcripts, ensuring their proper localization inside
the cell. Regulating specific gene expressions, m6A
could mediate various kinds of physiological
functions, such as neuron differentiation, embryo
development and cancer formation. Dysregulation
of m6A modification has been associated with
various diseases, particularly cancer. Abnormal
m6A levels is associated to oncogenesis by altering
mRNA stability and expression of tumor suppressor
genes or oncogenes. Additionally, m6A
modifications influence other diseases such as
immune responses and metabolic disorders. As a
newly found promising therapeutic target, M6A has
significant clinical potential. Now researchers are
focused in exploring small-molecule inhibitors and
epigenetic editing techniques to modulate m6A-
related pathways.
3 THE DYSREGULATION OF
M6A FUNCTION IN GASTRIC
CARCINOGENESIS
METTL3,a crucial transmethylase, is widely known
because it is associated to tumor cell proliferation and
migration. Previous researches have found that
METTL3 is overly expressed in cancer cells. By
enhancing m6A methylation, MYC translation could
increase, leading to cancer cell proliferation.
Increased METTL3 levels indicate higher N-
cadherin/ Vimentin levels and lower E-cadherin
levels. The loss of E-cadherin shows the progression
of EMT, which is considered as a molecular marker
in cancer studies (Zeng et al. 2020, Wang et al. 2020).
Enhanced expression of HOXA10 caused by
excessive m6A methylation can also promote tumor
cell migration. Absence of FTO expression results in
the increase of E-cadherin and the decrease of
BEFS 2025 - International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Food Science
268
vimentin. This indicates that FTO is related to
stabilization and expression in EMT related genes. In
the specific case of gastric cancer, higher EMT
expression levels could lead the transformation from
epilethial cells to mesenchymal cells (Wu et al. 2024).
By modulating the stability of mRNA, WTAP could
increase anaerobic glycolysis, which is a crucial
energy supply to cancer cells, since usually there are
less oxygen and higher temperature inside the tumor.
Over-expression of YTHDF1 is often found in gastric
cancer tissue In cases of resistance toward
chemotherapy drugs (Wu et al. 2024).
The demethylase, ALKBH5, specifically targets
the m6A modification on the mRNA of PKMYT1,
a protein kinase involved in cell cycle regulation.
The researchers demonstrated that its expression
was significantly lowered in gastric cancer tissues,
and low ALKBH5 levels correlated with poor
prognosis and increased cancer metastasis. This
means that ALKBH5 could be a potential
suppressor of gastric cancer metastasis. Through a
series of experiments, the study found that
ALKBH5 directly interacts with the m6A
modification site on the PKMYT1 mRNA.
ALKBH5’s demethylase activity could remove the
m6A modification from PKMYT1, thereby
stabilizing its mRNA and reducing its translation.
When overexpressed, PKMYT1 promotes cell
cycle. It has been linked to the increased motility
and invasion of cancer cells. The inhibition of
PKMYT1 expression by ALKBH5 limits the
metastasis of gastric cancer cells (Hu et al. 2022).
The researchers further corroborated this finding by
demonstrating that overexpressing ALKBH5 in
gastric cancer cells reduced cell invasion and
migration, while silencing ALKBH5 enhanced the
cells' invasive behavior. Additionally, they
observed that restoring PKMYT1 expression in
ALKBH5-overexpressing cells could partially
reverse the inhibition of cell invasion, so PKMYT1
is very probable to be a key mediator of ALKBH5.
These findings show the importance of the
interaction between ALKBH5 and PKMYT1 in
regulating the invasiveness of gastric cancer cells.
4 THE RELATIONSHIP
BETWEEN NCRNA AND M6A
There are mainly 3 types of noncoding RNA that
interact with m6A, including lncRNA, miRNA and
circRNA.
Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNA) are usually
described as RNA fragments longer than 200 bases
and they don’t have the ability to produce proteins,
but recent studies show that some of them do
encode microproteins that is essential in
physiological activities (Jin & Fan 2024).
Dysregulation of m6A could change the amount and
types of lncRNA, which may affect cell
proliferation, apoptosis and metastasis, eventually
leading to gastric cancer. Chemotherapy, the first
line medication for gastric cancer, faces a major
problem of drug resistance. Researchers found that
lncRNA-CBSLR could help tumor cells evade from
ferroptosis, protecting tumor cells in gastric cancer.
This results in chemoresistance. Another lncRNA,
ARHGAP5-AS1 is highly expressed in cancer cells,
and knocking down it could reverse this kind of
drug resistance. Also, high expression rate of
LNC942 is a signal of chemoresistant tumor cells in
gastric cancer. LNC942 can stabilize Myc mRNA,
and the upregulation of Myc would cause unlimited
proliferation of gastric cancer cells (Yang et al.
2021, Jin & Fan 2024).
MicroRNAs (miRNA) are small singular strands
of RNA. They consist of about 22 nucleotides.
Normally, miRNA acts as a transcription modulator
by binding base pairs with mRNA to interfere its
translation and promote degradation. Adenosine in
miRNAs could be modified as m6A, and research
shows that m6a plays an important role in
processing primary miRNA. The methylation of
specific sites within the pri-miRNA can promote or
inhibit the recognition of the transcript by Drosha,
an RNA enzyme which cuts unnecessary fragments
of primary miRNA. This regulation can determine
the levels of mature miRNAs suitable for post
transcriptional regulation. Some studies have
shown that METTL3, which adds m6A
modifications to RNA strands, can enhance or
suppress the maturation of certain pri-miRNAs,
thus modulating the expression of downstream
target genes that are involved in tumorigenesis.
Other numerous studies have shown miRNAs can
suppress the expression of m6A regulators,
resulting in alterations in m6A levels (Feng et al.
2023, Jayasree et al. 2024). In the cytoplasm,
mature miRNAs associate with RISC complexes to
silence the expression of target mRNAs. m6A
modifications on miRNAs can also influence their
interaction with RISC and the stability of the
miRNA-RISC complex. m6A-modified miRNAs
may change binding affinities for their target
mRNAs, affecting the efficiency of gene silencing.
Research Progress on the Role and Potential of N6-Methyladenosine in Gastric Cancer Treatment
269
This mechanism has been linked to the regulation
of key genes involved in cancer progression. For
example, m6A modifications on the miRNA miR-
21, an oncogenic miRNA overexpressed in many
cancers, modulates its activity and influences the
expression of tumor suppressor genes such as
PTEN. This interaction between m6A and miRNA
regulation contributes to the complex regulation of
cancer cell behavior.
Circular RNAs (circRNA) are generated via
mRNA splicing and most of them are found in
cytoplasm. circRNA could act like a sponge to
absorb miRNA by competing binding sites with
mRNA, promoting specific gene expression. It
could also affect gene expression at the
transcriptional level, regulate variable splicing, and
participate in epigenetic regulations (Lin et al.
2022, Qin et al. 2021). While the functional role of
circRNAs in cancer has been widely studied, the
regulation of circRNAs by m6A modifications is a
relatively new area of research. m6A modification
affects the circularization of pre-mRNAs and can
impact the stability and translation of the resulting
circRNAs. In some cancers, m6A-modified
circRNAs may promote oncogenesis by stabilizing
certain transcripts, while in others, they may
function as tumor suppressors. These observations
suggest that the interaction between m6A and
circRNAs is highly variable and could be a critical
factor of cancer cell behavior. circRNAs are
associated with chemoresistance. circRNA could
regulate the expression of ABC transporters, which
pumps chemotherapy drugs out of cancer cells, and
it may be modified by m6A to enhance their
stability and promote drug resistance. Similarly,
circRNAs in the regulation of apoptosis and
autophagy can also be modulated by m6A to gain
resistance to chemotherapy induced cell death (Qin
et al. 2021).
5 THE POTENTIAL OF M6A AS A
THERAPEUTIC TARGET IN
GASTRIC CANCER
Pyroptosis is a special form of cell death driven by
gasdermin-mediated pore formation. When
inflammatory signals show pathogens or danger,
caspase-1 will be activated to lyse gasdermin, and the
product on the N terminal could perforate the cell
membrane, causing the cell to lyse. It has been shown
to be influenced by m6A modification. Dysregulation
of m6A regulators can alter pyroptotic signals in
tumor cells. Increased m6A methylation of specific
long noncoding RNAs may downregulate
inflammasome components, inhibiting pyroptosis
and favoring cancer cell survival. Therapeutic
interventions that upregulate m6A levels could
promote pyroptosis, and part of normal function of
cancer cells could be restored (Yang et al. 2023).
Autophagy is a cellular recycling process that is
associated with two aspects of cancer -- survival
under stress or cell death. In gastric cancer, m6A
modifications have been linked to the regulation of
autophagy-related genes (ATGs). Overexpression of
m6A writers such as METTL3 has been associated
with enhanced autophagy that supports tumor cell
survival and increases the possibility of
chemotherapy resistance. Conversely, inhibition of
specific m6A modifiers can disrupt overly active
autophagy, making cancer cells more sensitive to
conventional therapies (Wang et al. 2020, Yang et al.
2023). When the ROS reach lethal levels and the iron
ion is imbalanced in the cell, ferroptosis will start.
This is because glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4),
which is important for reducing peroxidized
membrane lipid, is inhibited and iron accelerates
peroxidation of lipid. m6A modification affects the
stability and translation of mRNAs encoding key
ferroptosis regulators, such as lncRNA-CBSLR,
SLC7A11 and GPX4. Modulating these targets, m6A
regulators can tip the balance between survival and
ferroptosis. Targeting the m6A machinery to induce
ferroptosis could be a novel approach to combat
chemoresistance in gastric cancer (Yang et al. 2021,
Yang et al. 2023).
More recent researches found the cell death,
cuproptosis, is induced by overload copper ions that
blocks TCA enzymes, causing loss of Fe-S clusters,
mitochondrial metabolism failure and proteotoxic
stress. m6A modifications can influence the
expression of cuproptosis related genes such as
FDX1, which are critical for copper induced toxicity.
Since gastric tumors often exhibit irregular copper
metabolism, targeting m6A pathways to promote
cuproptosis may provide a new strategy to kill tumor
cells which are resistant to other forms of cell death
(Yang et al. 2023).
Gene therapy could also help in treating gastric
cancer involving m6A. Advancements in CRISPR-
Cas9 gene editing have made precise manipulation of
m6A regulators easier and more precise. By
selectively knocking out or modulating m6A writers,
erasers or readers, researchers can analyse the roles of
these proteins in gastric tumor development. CRISPR
BEFS 2025 - International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Food Science
270
screens have identified key m6A regulators whose
loss decreases tumor cell survival, finding new and
hopeful therapeutic targets (Kordyś et al. 2022, Tong
et al. 2021). Such approaches not only facilitate
functional studies but also provide a framework for
the development of gene therapies aimed at balancing
m6A levels. In epigenetics, m6A represents a
reversible mark that bridges genetic information and
post-transcriptional regulation. Specific m6A
patterns can lead to sustained oncogenic signaling and
contribute to the epigenetic plasticity of cancer cells
(Cusenza et al. 2023, Yue et al. 2023). Therapeutic
strategies that target m6A modifications can reverse
epigenetic deviations and restore normal gene
expression profiles. The integration of m6A targeted
drugs with epigenetic therapies could make gastric
cancer treatments more efficient.
6 CONCLUSION
Evidence shows the significance of m6A
modification in gastric cancer, influencing multiple
aspects of tumorigenesis, progression, and
therapeutic resistance. By modulating RNA stability,
translation, and interaction with non-coding RNAs
(lncRNA,miRNA and circRNA), m6A dynamically
shapes the cellular landscape of gastric tumors.
Dysregulation of m6A regulators can significantly
affect oncogene expression and tumor-suppressive
pathways, making it a promising target for novel
cancer therapies. Modulation of m6A levels could
enhance the effectiveness of existing treatments,
particularly by sensitizing cancer cells to
chemotherapy, regulating apoptosis, and inducing
various forms of programmed cell death, including
pyroptosis, ferroptosis, and cuproptosis. This could
be realized by the integration of m6A-targeted
therapies with CRISPR-based gene editing and
epigenetic modulators. In conclusion, targeting m6A
modification represents a novel and promising
strategy for gastric cancer therapy. Continued
research about the molecular mechanisms of m6A
and the development of specific inhibitors or
activators will be crucial in releasing its full
therapeutic potential. By integrating m6A-targeted
approaches with existing treatment modalities, the
future of gastric cancer management may gain
significant advancements, leading to improved
patient outcomes and higher survival rates.
REFERENCES
An,Y. & Duan, H. 2022. The role of m6A RNA methylation
in cancer metabolism. Molecular Cancer 21(1):14.
Cusenza,V.Y., Tameni, A., & Neri, A., et al. 2023.The
lncRNA epigenetics: The significance of m6A and m5C
lncRNA modifications in cancer. Frontiers in Oncology
13:1063636.
Feng, H., Yuan, X., & Wu, S., et al. 2023. Effects of writers,
erasers and readers within miRNA-related m6A
modification in cancers. Cell Proliferation
56(1):e13340.
Hu,Y., Gong, C., & Li, Z., et al. 2022. Demethylase
ALKBH5 suppresses invasion of gastric cancer via
PKMYT1 m6A modification. Molecular Cancer
21(1):34.
Jayasree, P.J., Dutta, S., & Karemore, P., et al.
2024.Crosstalk Between m6A RNA Methylation and
miRNA Biogenesis in Cancer: An Unholy Nexus.
Molecular Biotechnology 66(11):3042-3058.
Jiang, X., Liu, B., & Nie, Z., et al. 2021. The role of m6A
modification in the biological functions and diseases.
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy 6(1):74.
Jin,Y. & Fan, Z. 2024. New insights into the interaction
between m6A modification and lncRNA in cancer drug
resistance. Cell Proliferation 57(4):e13578.
Kordyś, M., Sen, R., & Warkocki, Z. 2022. Applications of
the versatile CRISPR-Cas13 RNA targeting system.
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: RNA 13(3):e1694.
Lin, H., Wang,Y., & Wang, P., et al. 2022. Mutual
regulation between N6-methyladenosine (m6A)
modification and circular RNAs in cancer: impacts on
therapeutic resistance. Molecular Cancer 21(1):148.
Qin, S., Mao, Y., & Chen, X., et al. 2021.The functional
roles, cross-talk and clinical implications of m6A
modification and circRNA in hepatocellular carcinoma.
International Journal of Biological Sciences
17(12):3059-3079.
Tong, J., Wang, X., & Liu, Y., et al. 2021. Pooled CRISPR
screening identifies m6A as a positive regulator of
macrophage activation. Science Advances
7(18):eabd4742.
Wang, Q., Chen, C., & Ding, Q., et al. 2020. METTL3-
mediated m6A modification of HDGF mRNA
promotes gastric cancer progression and has prognostic
significance. Gut 69(7):1193-1205.
Wu, S., Li, C., & Zhou, H., et al. 2024. The regulatory
mechanism of m6A modification in gastric cancer.
Discover Oncology 15(1):283.
Yang, H., Hu, Y., & Weng, M., et al. 2021. Hypoxia
inducible lncRNA-CBSLR modulates ferroptosis
through m6A-YTHDF2-dependent modulation of CBS
in gastric cancer. Journal of Advanced Research 37:91-
106.
Yang, P., Yang, W., & Wei, Z., et al. 2023. Novel targets
for gastric cancer: The tumor microenvironment
(TME), N6-methyladenosine (m6A), pyroptosis,
autophagy, ferroptosis and cuproptosis. Biomedicine &
Pharmacotherapy 163:114883.
Research Progress on the Role and Potential of N6-Methyladenosine in Gastric Cancer Treatment
271
Yue, S.W., Liu, H.L., & Su, H.F., et al. 2023. m6A-
regulated tumor glycolysis: new advances in
epigenetics and metabolism. Molecular Cancer
22(1):137.
Zeng, C., Huang, W., & Li, Y., et al. 2020. Roles of
METTL3 in cancer: mechanisms and therapeutic
targeting. Journal of Hematology & Oncology
13(1):117.
BEFS 2025 - International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Food Science
272