The Role of Lipid Metabolism in Cancer Progression: Molecular
Mechanisms and Therapeutic Strategies
Yuchen Han
College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University Avenue, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, Scotland
Keywords: Lipid Metabolism, Cancer Progression, Therapeutic Targets.
Abstract: Cancer cells undergo significant metabolic reprogramming to support their rapid proliferation, survival, and
resistance to therapy. One key metabolic shift observed in tumors is the alteration in lipid metabolism,
particularly in fatty acid oxidation (FAO), fatty acid synthesis (FAS), lipid uptake, and lipid storage. Unlike
normal cells, cancer cells rely on FAO to sustain energy production under metabolic stress while also
upregulating lipid synthesis and up-take to fuel tumor growth and metastasis. This study explores how
targeting FAO, FAS, and li-pid uptake can provide new therapeutic opportunities. The article will discuss
FAO inhibitors (Etomoxir, ST1326, Perhexiline), FASN inhibitors (TVB-2640, C75, Orlistat), and lipid
uptake blockers (CD36 and FABP inhibitors) as emerging anti-cancer strategies. Additionally, it will analyze
how metabolic plasticity allows tumors to bypass these treatments, emphasizing the need for combination
therapies and personalized approaches. By addressing these aspects, the article aims to provide insights of
lipid metabolism in cancer progression, the latest therapeutic advances, and the challenges of translating these
strategies into clinical applications.
1 INTRODUCTION
Cancer is a major challenge for global health, and
there are 20 million new cases, and 9.7 million deaths
reported in 2022(Bray et al.,2021). With the high
resistance to conventional therapies such as
chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy, the
lethality of cancer will continuously rise. Therefore,
finding new targets for cancer treatment or reducing
chemo-radiotherapy sensitivity is essential. Lipid
metabolism is significant for maintaining cellular
homeostasis, energy providing, structural
components, and signaling molecules necessary for
cell survival and function. In normal cells, lipid
metabolism is tightly regulated to balance lipid
uptake, synthesis, storage and oxidation, ensuring
energy sufficiency and membrane integrity (Baenke
et al., 2013). However, cancer cells reprogram their
metabolism, including changes in lipid metabolism,
to meet the demands of rapid proliferation, increased
survival and metastasis. These changes allow cancer
cells to acquire and utilize lipids more efficiently than
normal cells, conferring advantages in growth, energy
production, and adaptation to stressful conditions
(Beloribi et al., 2016).
Cancer cells depend on glycolysis to generate
energy instead of oxidative phosphorylation, even in
the rich-oxygen condition, and this is called the
Warburg effect, which is one of the main features
distinguishing the normal cells and cancer cells.
Cancer cells also enhance de novo lipid biosynthesis
and lipid uptake to sustain their rapid proliferation
(Snaebjornsson et al., 2020). Cancer cells upregulate
key enzymes involved in lipid synthesis, such as fatty
acid synthetase (FASN) and acetyl-CoA carboxylase
(ACC), to ensure a continuous supply of fatty acids
for membrane biogenesis (Carracedo et al., 2013).
Additionally, increased expression of lipid
transporters, such as cluster of differentiation 36
(CD36), allows cancer cells to enhance fatty acid
uptake from the extracellular environment, further
supporting their metabolic flexibility (Pascual et al.,
2017).
Fatty acid oxidation (FAO) is the main energy
pathway for fatty acid synthesis (FAS) in cancer cells
(Carracedo et al., 2013). Lipid oxidation provides
energy for the metastasis and migration processes.
The metastatic cells generate ATP and evade immune
detection depending on the lipid metabolism. FAO is
closely linked to epithelial-mesenchymal transition
(EMT). FAO-induced reactive oxygen species (ROS)
Han, Y.
The Role of Lipid Metabolism in Cancer Progression: Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Strategies.
DOI: 10.5220/0014431600004933
Paper published under CC license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Food Science (BEFS 2025), pages 117-123
ISBN: 978-989-758-789-4
Proceedings Copyright © 2026 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda.
117
upregulate key EMT markers such as vimentin and
snail, promoting cancer cell invasion and lymph node
metastasis. (Li, et al., 2021).
Additionally, FAO can cause the loss of cellular
attachment, which promotes cancer cell detachment
from the primary tumor and facilitates metastatic
dissemination. (Carracedo, et al., 2013). FAO has
multiple functions and plays a significant role in
various metabolic pathways in cancer, so it is a
crucial target of tumor progression and a promising
therapeutic target for improving radiotherapy and
chemotherapy outcomes.
Lipid metabolism also crosses with other
metabolic pathways, such as glutamine metabolism
and glycolysis. (Baenke et al., 2013). Glutamine
metabolism supports energy production and
biosynthesis to sustain the rapid growth of cancer
cells (Currie et al., 2013). Glutamine is converted to
alpha-ketoglutarate (α-KG), which enters the TCA
cycle and provides a carbon source and energy to
cancer cells (Schulze&Harris, 2012). Glutamine is
converted to lactate in cancer cells to produce
NADPH, which is essential for FAS.
2 METABOLIC PLASTICITY
AND THE INTERACTION OF
LIPID METABOLISM WITH
GLYCOLYSIS AND
GLUTAMINE METABOLISM
THE TEMPLATE FILE
Metabolic plasticity is a hallmark of cancer cells,
allowing them to adapt to environmental stresses such
as hypoxia and nutrient deprivation to ensure
continued proliferation and survival (Schulze and
Harris, 2012). Cancer cells reprogramme metabolic
pathways to optimize the use of glucose, glutamine
and lipids to form an interconnected metabolic
network.
Glutamine metabolism is critical in maintaining
lipid biosynthesis, supporting the tricarboxylic acid
(TCA) cycle and reductive carboxylation pathways
(Son et al., 2013). DeBerardinis et al. (2007)
demonstrated, using 13C NMR spectroscopy, that
glioblastoma cells exhibit a high rate of
glutaminolysis, where glutamine-derived α-KG
enters the TCA cycle, replenishes citrate, and fuels
fatty acid biosynthesis. Their study found that even
though these cancer cells primarily rely on glycolysis
(Warburg effect), approximately 60% of fatty acyl
carbon was glucose derived. At the same time, the rest
was supplied by glutamine metabolism (Son et al.,
2013).
Similarly, Son et al. (2013) provided evidence that
KRAS-mutant pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
(PDAC) cells use a non-canonical glutamine
metabolism pathway to fuel biosynthetic and redox
processes. Unlike normal cells, which primarily
convert glutamine to α-KG via glutamate
dehydrogenase (GLUD1), PDAC cells rely on
aspartate transaminase (GOT1) to convert glutamine-
derived aspartate into oxaloacetate (OAA), which is
then metabolized into malate and, subsequently,
pyruvate. This pathway increases NADPH
production, which supports FAS and redox
homeostasis. The knockdown of GOT1 in PDAC
cells resulted in a 50% reduction in the
NADPH/NADP+ ratio, demonstrating its essential
role in supporting lipid biosynthesis under oxidative
stress conditions.
Glutamine-derived α-KG is a key metabolite for
sustaining lipid biosynthesis in cancer cells.
DeBerardinis et al. observed that blocking glutamine
metabolism led to a 40% reduction in FAS in
glioblastoma cells, indicating that glutamine
metabolism is required to maintain the lipogenic flux.
Additionally, NADPH, which is generated from the
pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) and malic enzyme
1 (ME1), provides reducing power for FAS. Son et al.
(2013) further demonstrated that ME1 inhibition in
PDAC cells reduces NADPH levels by 35% and
impairs lipid synthesis, leading to increased oxidative
stress and reduced tumor growth.
Cancer cells reprogram lipid metabolism to
sustain survival in response to metabolic stressors
such as hypoxia or nutrient deprivation (Schulze &
Harris, 2012). Hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α)
is crucial in promoting lipid droplet accumulation,
enhancing fatty acid uptake, and shifting metabolism
away from oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS)
towards glycolysis. Furthermore, Son et al. (2013)
demonstrated that in PDAC cells, glutamine-derived
malate generates NADPH through malic enzyme
activity to counteract oxidative stress. When ME1 or
GOT1 was knocked down, the PDAC cells exhibited
a significant accumulation of ROS, demonstrating the
importance of glutamine-derived NADPH in
maintaining redox balance.
The interplay between lipid metabolism,
glycolysis, and glutamine metabolism is critical for
cancer cells to adapt to metabolic stress and sustain
proliferation (Schulze & Harris, 2012). α-KG and
NADPH play essential roles in FAS and redox
BEFS 2025 - International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Food Science
118
balance, supporting tumor survival under hypoxic and
nutrient-deprived conditions (Son et al., 2013). The
reprogramming of glutamine metabolism to sustain
lipid biosynthesis further underscores the importance
of targeting these metabolic pathways as a potential
therapeutic strategy in cancer.
3 LIPID UPTAKE IN CANCER
Cancer cells have the capacity to perform metabolic
reprogramming, which is different from how healthy
cells do it. They can quickly modify their metabolic
pathways to get the energy needed for their growth
and development. The mechanism of the key pathway
of fatty acid survival in cancer cells is the increased
uptake of exogenous fatty acids. For example, cancer
cells are known for using mitochondrial β-oxidation
to produce ATP by taking up fatty acids, which are
shown to be more effective than glycolysis and are
especially essential in low-nutrient or hypoxic
conditions (Butler et al., 2021). Also, nitrous oxide is
thought to help the cancer cell survive and become
more resistant to chemotherapy and radiation therapy.
However, the production of NADPH during the lipid
oxidation pathway will help cells resist oxidative
stress and further reduce the risk of oxidative damage,
resulting in apoptosis. Lipid does not only act as an
energy source. It is also a necessary component of the
tumor cell membrane. The excessive influx of fatty
acids into cancer cells drives the synthesis of
phospholipids and sphingolipids, resulting in the
development of highly flexible membranes that will
enable the cells to proliferate, migrate and also
metastasize effectively (Furman et al., 2019).
Exogenous fatty acids in the tumor
microenvironment (TME) give oxygen radicals,
promoting cell proliferation and facilitating immune
evasion; thus, cancer cells have a metabolic
advantage. High intake of dietary fat and a lipid
microenvironment rich in content allow cancer cells
to elevate the process of oxidative phosphorylation
(OXPHOS) and the formation of lipid storage, which
consequently leads to higher energy production and a
diminished reliance on glucose metabolism (Butler et
al., 20-21). The two sets of metabolisms are easily
distinguishable. The same techniques can be used to
direct drugs to cancer cells or perfect the sensitivity
of chemotherapy and radiotherapy.
Lipid transfer by cancer cells is mostly done
through specific fatty acid transporters like cluster of
differentiation 36 (CD36) and fatty acid binding
proteins (FABPs), acting as mediators for the entry
and movement of lipids inside cells. CD36 is a cell-
bound scavenger receptor that emerges as a factor in
lipid metabolism and has been shown to have a huge
impact on the metastatic potential of various cancers,
such as breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and melanoma
(Pascual et al., 2017). In lung adenocarcinoma
(LUAD), the high-fat diet (HFD) conditions are
driving the tumor growth as well as the metastatic
potential. The signal transduction pathway,
predominantly driven by CD36, has been shown to
play a prominent role in producing HFD- fueled
CD36-Src signaling axis. Data from experiments
suggest that PA as a stimulus for cells can lead to the
movement of CD36 to the cell membrane and
activation of the Src kinase pathway, which activates
the Akt/ERK pathway that eventually leads to
migration and invasion. The use of the fatty acid
analog blocker sulfo-N-succinimidyl oleate (SSO)
restricted LUAD metastasis in vivo and demonstrated
its efficacy as a therapeutic target (Liu, et al., 2023).
Not only that, but CD36-mediated fatty acid uptake is
a key factor in AML that is not changeable, and AML
cells depend on it for the survival of the cancer stem
cells. Newly found small-molecule inhibitor SMS121
reduces the uptake of fatty acids by AML cells,
thereby stifling their survival, especially in the cells
over-expressing CD36. When AML cells were
exposed to adipocytes, lipid transfer was observed,
which
facilitated leukemia particle growth. When the
function of CD36 is blocked with SMS121, the
metabolic adaptation is interrupted; thereby, SMS121
becomes a potential anti-leukemia drug, as shown in
the above case (Ábacka, et al., 2024).
A-FABP is another fatty acid transporter. A-
FABP is largely present in tumor-associated
macrophages (TAMs), which are the primary
producers of a pro-tumorigenic environment. It will
promote the disease via IL-6/STAT3. This will
increase the growth, and metastasis is seen as the
outcome (Hao, et al.,2018). By means of a certain
study, it was found that TAMs with blocked A-FABP
show a decrease in mammary tumor growth and
metastasis, which in turn indicates A-FABP as a
master regulator in these processes'
microenvironment (Hao, et al.,2018). Small-molecule
inhibitors of A-FABP already have proven anticancer
effects in preclinical models with them, reducing the
tumor burden and suppressing the tumor-promoting
functions of TAMs. These molecules, originally
invented for treating metabolic diseases, are now
being examined for their possible use in cancer
therapy (Hao, et al.,2018). Also, high levels of A-
FABP in obesity predict an elevated risk of breast
The Role of Lipid Metabolism in Cancer Progression: Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Strategies
119
cancer. Thus, it is evident that metabolic dysfunction
is a contributing factor to cancer progression (Hao, et
al.,2018). Targeting A-FABP can be a potential
strategy for novel cancer therapies that are especially
effective in addressing obesity-related cancers, given
its strong links with the tumor-promoting pathways
and the success of its inhibition in the preclinical
models.
There has been an increase in evidence to support
the idea that tumor growth is accelerated by the fat-
rich high-fat diet (HFD) because it provides more
fatty acids to cancer cells. Pascual et al. (2017)
revealed that CD36-expressing metastatic cells can
take in more fatty acids under a high-fat diet than
normal conditions. That is the reason why they can
persistently move from one part of the body to
another. This might be a new way to treat cancer with
dietary lipids by blocking the lipid uptake pathways
which might have to be explored further on this.
4 LIPID SYNTHESIS OF LIPID
METABOLISM
The de novo synthesis of lipids specific for cancer
cells allows them to multiply and grow at far higher
rates than normal cells, which rely on dietary lipids.
Adhering to an extracellular lipid supply or a de novo
lipid synthesis pathway is key to cancer cell viability.
Cancer cells use de novo lipid synthesis as the
exclusive pathway to the biosynthesis of fatty acids
when there is no help from an outside supply. FASN
is the main enzyme in the de novo synthesis of lipids.
It is responsible for converting acetate to palmitate
and synthesizing fatty acids from acetyl-CoA and
malonyl-CoA. However, because most tissues have
high-fat diets, FASN is rarely expressed in normal
tissues. Across different types of cancer, including
prostate cancer, it is highly expressed and is
responsible for tumorigenesis, metabolic adaptation,
and resistance to apoptosis. It is the main cause of the
carcinogenic effects of the protein FASN, as it is
involved in the production of crucial fatty acids for
the synthesis of membranes, energy production, and
signaling involving lipids. FASN seems to be a
potential target in cancer treatment due to its
exceptional part in the metabolism of the cancerous
cells and the result of the FASN blocking is the
apoptosis of the tumor cells, and the result of this
influences the proliferation (Baron et al.,2004).
FASN has emerged as a promising therapeutic
target because it plays a key role in cancer
metabolism. Its presence inhibits the occurrence of
apoptosis in tumor cells and it changes their
proliferation, hands down. (Baron et al., 2004). Some
potential targets can be tumor metabolism and
control, such as FASN that can have its inhibitors,
e.g., TVB-2640, BI 99179, C75, cerulenin, and
orlistat (Kley et al., 2011) (Kelly et al., 2023). TVB-
2640 is a first-in-class selective, reversible FASN
inhibitor that has proven effective in many cancers by
decreasing biosynthesis of lipid and overall tumor cell
survival. Phase II trial found that TVB-2640, with the
participation of bevacizumab, can significantly
prolonged progression-free survival in kids with
malignant tumors in comparison with standard
treatment (Kelly, W. et al., 2023). BI 99179 is a
potent and selective non-covalent FASN inhibitor
that has been researched in central nervous system
tumors and has preclinically shown potent anticancer
activity (Kley, et al., 2011). Cancer cells' dependence
on de novo lipid synthesis is what makes targeting
FASN such an attractive therapeutic strategy to
disrupt tumor metabolism.
ACC is the other vital enzyme in the fatty acid
metabolism that plays a major role in the neo-FAS
process of tumor cells. ACC is usually upregulated in
cancer cells to boost membrane lipid need for cell
proliferation that is fast and rapid. Data showed that
ACC is the protein that is behind the higher cancer
cell survival by an increase in the number of cell
membrane lipids, that is why they grow faster. Also,
the upregulation of these enzymes is an essential part
of the oncogenic signaling pathways (e.g.,
PI3K/AKT/mTOR and SREBP1) that promote
lipogenesis synthetics. Research has also proved that
ACC1 gene deletion or pharmacological inhibition of
ACC1 induces comprssion of cancer cell proliferation
and tumor growth. This finding was further supported
by in vivo lung cancer model, where the ACC
inhibitor ND-646 was able to reduce the size of the
tumor through blocking neoadipogenesis while
enhancing apoptosis (Svensson, R. U. et al., 2016).
By the same token, knockdown of ACC1 on acute
myeloid leukemia (AML) cells was corresponding to
higher levels of ROS and NADPH depletion, which
means the cells were under metabolic stress and easy
to eliminate. Recently designed medication, sorbitol
A, was found out to act as a macrocyclic ACC
inhibitor through the interference of lipogenesis and
the modification of the lipid bilayer composition, thus
making the cancer cell fleeted in an oxidative
environment.
BEFS 2025 - International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Food Science
120
5 ROLE OF FAO IN CANCER
FAO is an important contributor to the diversion of
energy toward tumor cells. It is a process through
which cells receive ATP synthesis and survival under
dead humidity; it also maintains their redox
equilibrium. Additionally, FAO has been suggested
to be a critical process in EMT which is a necessary
action for cancer cells to become more malignant and
capable of moving cells. Therefore, FAO could
promote tumor metastasis and tumor invasiveness in
a cancer cell population by effecting the EMT
process. Fatty acids, in turn, were shown to be
associated with the immunosuppressive milieu of
tumors. It was discovered that lipid droplet-dependent
fatty acid metabolism in TAMs preserved the
immune-suppressive phenotype of those cells. This
suggests that FAO is responsible for the immune
escape of tumours by altering the function of
macrophages. This suggests that FAO may promote
the tumor's immune escape by modulating the TAMs'
function.
FAO is suggested to be one therapeutic target in
cancer by virtue of the notable metabolic differences
between tumor and normal cells. It is thought that the
increased FAO competence of cancer cells may be
one of the factors behind their decreased sensitiveness
to these treatments. Thus the FAO can be used as an
effective personification, which considerably can be
used for detecting cancer and for cancer therapy.
Selective inhibitors of FAO have been plumbed in
preclinical directions with satisfactory outcomes.
Etomoxir is the lead of CPT1A inhibitors whose
capability to block the oxidation of fatty acids was
proven to entailing the effect of suppressing tumor
cell proliferation while enhancing chemosensitivity
to colorectal cancer (CRC) in animal models
(Mozolewska, et al., 2020). ST1326 (Teglicar) is
another CPT1 inhibitor, which has a lower toxicity
rate when compared with that of the etomoxir
treatment. This is why it might be appealing as an
alternative for clinical conditions. Perhexiline, a dual
CPT1/CPT2 inhibitor, has also been the mediator of
the anticancer skill to CRC cells by fostering its
sensitivity through oxaliplatin-based therapy
(Mozolewska, et al., 2020).
FAO is the pathway regulator for cancer cell
survival and TME formation. FAO also supports
immunosuppressive cells such as regulatory T cells
(Tregs) and myeloid-derived suppressor cells
(MDSCs), which allow cancer cells to escape
immune control. (Li, M. et al. 2021). The opposite,
i.e., the blocking of FAO, has been also shown to
rejuvenate tumour immunity and an assistance to the
effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors like
anti-PD-1 therapy (Li, et al.,2021). The other side, it
is an appealing metabolic hole to intervene in the
offensive process, to create life for the tumor, and to
enable them to emigrate and metastasize easily. The
corpus of experimental evidence formulating several
studies undergone the proposition that FAO
inhibition is a potentially effective treatment for
cancer. Among CPT1 inhibitors, such as Etomoxir,
ST1326, and Perhexiline either individually or in
combination with immunotherapy and chemotherapy
showed notable the anticancer potential and thus can
be the subject of further clinical investigations
required for the validation of persuasive efficiency as
a basis of the cancer treatment (Mozolewska, et al.,
2020).
6 CONCLUSION
This study investigates the crucial role of lipid
metabolism in cancer progression, in particular its
influence on tumour growth, resistance to therapy and
immune evasion. By exploring FAO, lipid synthesis
and lipid uptake, this review provides insights into
how metabolic intervention can be used to disrupt
tumor survival mechanisms and highlights the
clinical potential of CPT1 inhibitors, FASN
inhibitors, and CD36 targeting therapies,
demonstrating their promise in both preclinical and
clinical settings. It also suggests that combining
metabolic inhibitors with chemotherapy or
immunotherapy may help overcome drug resistance
and improve outcomes.
Essential clinical demonstrations have brought
alongside that CPT1 inhibitors, such as Etomoxir,
ST1326, and Perhexiline, have so far exhibited
enormous potentials in anti-cancer implications either
as a standalone or as part of combined therapies but
have not been well absorbed due to their high toxicity
and metabolic adaptation. In addition, the solution
needs to go deeper into ways of developing more
selective and targeted medications against next-
generation CPT1 inhibitors and combining FAO with
chemotherapy and immunotherapy to overcome the
resistance mechanism. It is also pointed out that
cancer stem cells (CSCs), which are under the
influence of FAO, are the cells in the carcinogenic
process that can lead to relapse and resistance. The
strength of FAO inhibition might be a new approach
to wipe out CSCs and avert tumor recurrence. Cancer
cells exhibit enhanced de novo lipid synthesis,
The Role of Lipid Metabolism in Cancer Progression: Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Strategies
121
making FASN (FASN) and ACC promising
therapeutic targets’ inhibitors (e.g., TVB-2640, C75
and orlistat, among others) have shown preclinical
efficacy, but their clinical translation remains
challenging due to metabolic compensation. The
future of lipid synthesis inhibition should focus on
combination therapies, where lipid synthesis-
targeting drugs are combined with glycolysis
inhibitors to prevent metabolic escape or impair
oncogenic signaling pathways by disrupting lipid raft
integrity.
These findings provide a valuable reference for
future studies, particularly in the refinement of lipid-
targeting drugs to increase specificity and reduce
toxicity, and in the development of combination
strategies to counteract metabolic compensation. To
address these limitations and advance cancer
therapies targeting lipid metabolism, future research
should focus on safer, more selective inhibitors of
lipid metabolism to minimise toxicity, improve
efficacy, and combine metabolic inhibitors with
immune checkpoint inhibitors or chemotherapy to
improve treatment response.
REFERENCES
Åbacka, H., Masoni, S., Poli, G., Huang, P., Gusso, F.,
Granchi, C., Minutolo, F., Tuccinardi, T., Hagström-
Andersson, A. K., & Lindkvist-Petersson, K. 2024.
SMS121, a new inhibitor of CD36, impairs fatty acid
uptake and viability of acute myeloid leukemia.
Scientific Reports, 14(1), 9104-9104.
Baenke, F., Peck, B., Miess, H., & Schulze, A. 2013.
Hooked on fat: The role of lipid synthesis in cancer
metabolism and tumor development. Disease Models &
Mechanisms, 6(6), 1353–1363.
Baron, A., Migita, T., Tang, D., & Loda, M. 2004. Fatty
acid synthase: A metabolic oncogene in prostate
cancer? Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, 91(1), 47-53.
Beloribi-Djefaflia, S., Vasseur, S., & Guillaumond, F.
2016. Lipid metabolic reprogramming in cancer cells.
Oncogenesis, 5(1), e189.
Bray, F., Laversanne, M., Weiderpass, E., &
Soerjomataram, I. 2021. The ever-increasing
importance of cancer as a leading cause of premature
death worldwide. Cancer, 127(16), 3029–3030.
Butler, L. M., Perone, Y., Dehairs, J., Lupien, L. E., de Laat,
V., Talebi, A., Loda, M., Kinlaw, W. B., & Swinnen, J.
V. 2020. Lipids and cancer: Emerging roles in
pathogenesis, diagnosis and therapeutic intervention.
Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 159, 245-293.
Carracedo, A., Cantley, L. C., & Pandolfi, P. P. 2013.
Cancer metabolism: Fatty acid oxidation in the
limelight. Nature Reviews Cancer, 13(4), 227–232.
Currie, E., Schulze, A., Zechner, R., Walther, T. C., &
Farese, R. V., Jr. 2013. Cellular fatty acid metabolism
and cancer. Cell Metabolism, 18(2), 153–161.
DeBerardinis, R. J., Mancuso, A., Daikhin, E., Nissim, I.,
Yudkoff, M., Wehrli, S., & Thompson, C. B. 2007.
Beyond aerobic glycolysis: Transformed cells can
engage in glutamine metabolism that exceeds the
requirement for protein and nucleotide synthesis.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences -
PNAS, 104(49), 19345-19350.
Furman, D., Campisi, J., Verdin, E., Carrera-Bastos, P.,
Targ, S., Franceschi, C., Ferrucci, L., Gilroy, D. W.,
Fasano, A., Miller, G. W., Miller, A. H., Mantovani, A.,
Weyand, C. M., Barzilai, N., Goronzy, J. J., Rando, T.
A., Effros, R. B., Lucia, A., Kleinstreuer, N., & Slavich,
G. M. 2019. Chronic inflammation in the etiology of
disease across the life span. Nature Medicine, 25(12),
1822-1832.
Hao, J., Zhang, Y., Yan, X., Yan, F., Sun, Y., Zeng, J.,
Waigel, S., Yin, Y., Fraig, M. M., Egilmez, N. K.,
Suttles, J., Kong, M., Liu, S., Cleary, M. P., Sauter, E.,
& Li, B. 2018. Circulating adipose fatty acid binding
protein is a new link underlying obesity-associated
Breast/Mammary tumor development. Cell
Metabolism, 28(5), 689-705.e5.
Hao, J., Yan, F., Zhang, Y., Triplett, A., Zhang, Y., Schultz,
D. A., Sun, Y., Zeng, J., Silverstein, K. A. T., Zheng,
Q., Bernlohr, D. A., Cleary, M. P., Egilmez, N. K.,
Sauter, E., Liu, S., Suttles, J., & Li, B. 2018. Expression
of Adipocyte/Macrophage fatty acid-binding protein in
tumor-associated macrophages promotes breast cancer
progression. Cancer Research (Chicago, Ill.), 78(9),
2343-2355.
Kelly, W., Diaz Duque, A. E., Michalek, J., Konkel, B.,
Caflisch, L., Chen, Y., Pathuri, S. C.,
Madhusudanannair-Kunnuparampil, V., Floyd, J., &
Brenner, A. 2023. Phase II investigation of TVB-2640
(denifanstat) with bevacizumab in patients with first
relapse high-grade astrocytoma. Clinical Cancer
Research, 29(13), 2419-2425.
Kley, J. T., Mack, J., Hamilton, B., Scheuerer, S., &
Redemann, N. 2011. Discovery of BI 99179, a potent
and selective inhibitor of type I fatty acid synthase with
central exposure. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry
Letters, 21(19), 5924-5927.
Li, M., Xian, H., Tang, Y., Liang, X., & Tang, Y. 2021.
Fatty acid oxidation: Driver of lymph node metastasis.
Cancer Cell International, 21(1), 1-339.
Liu, L., Wang, B., Zhang, R., Wu, Z., Huang, Y., Zhang,
X., Zhou, J., Yi, J., Shen, J., Li, M., & Dong, M. 2023.
The activated CD36-src axis promotes lung
adenocarcinoma cell proliferation and actin
remodeling-involved metastasis in high-fat
environment. Cell Death & Disease, 14(8), 548-548.
Mozolewska, P., Duzowska, K., Pakiet, A., Mika, A., &
Śledziński, T. 2020. Inhibitors of fatty acid synthesis
and oxidation as potential anticancer agents in
colorectal cancer treatment. Anticancer Research,
40(9), 4843-4856.
BEFS 2025 - International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Food Science
122
Pascual, G., Avgustinova, A., & Mejetta, S. 2017.
Targeting metastasis-initiating cells through the fatty
acid receptor CD36. Nature, 541(7635), 41–45.
Schulze, A., & Harris, A. L. 2012. How cancer metabolism
is tuned for proliferation and vulnerable to disruption.
Nature, 491(7422), 364+.
Snaebjornsson, M. T., Janaki-Raman, S., & Schulze, A.
2020. Greasing the wheels of the cancer machine: The
role of lipid metabolism in cancer. Cell Metabolism,
31(1), 62–76.
Son, J., et al. 2013. Glutamine supports pancreatic cancer
growth through a KRAS-regulated metabolic pathway.
Nature, 496(7443), 101-105.
Svensson, R. U., Parker, S. J., Eichner, L. J., et al. 2016.
Inhibition of acetyl-CoA carboxylase suppresses fatty
acid synthesis and tumor growth of non-small-cell lung
cancer in preclinical models. Nature Medicine, 22(10),
1108-1119.
The Role of Lipid Metabolism in Cancer Progression: Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Strategies
123