during their survival. This method allows for the 3D
visualization and quantification of metabolic (glucose
metabolism) and neurotransmitter activity. It also
provides insights into the pathological mechanisms of
AD. PET scans enable clinicians to visually analyze
results through color coding and, crucially, gather
quantitative data on brain regions. This data supports
objective evaluation of diagnostic precision and
treatment outcomes. PET can identify early metabolic
and pathological brain changes before noticeable
clinical symptoms appear. With specific tracers, such
as the glucose analog of brain glucose metabolism, 2-
[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxygenase, PET is able to detect
subtle metabolic and pathological changes in the
brain before they become clinically apparent.
Oxygen-d-glucose (18F-FDG) can be used to
monitor cerebral glucose metabolism (Nordberg,et
al., 2012). This tracer has been widely used in
radiopharmaceutical imaging studies and clinics of
AD, which can clearly show the metabolic or
pathological changes in different regions of the brain
and help doctors accurately determine the site and
extent of lesions. In AD diagnosis, it can clarify the
functional abnormality of brain areas closely related
to cognitive function, such as hippocampus, internal
olfactory cortex, etc., which can provide an important
basis for localized diagnosis of the disease and
evaluation of the disease, and help to differentiate it
from other diseases that may lead to cognitive
disorders. PET test not only shows the anatomical
structure of the brain, but also more importantly
reflects the functional state of the brain, such as the
metabolic activity of the neurons, neurotransmitter
changes and so on, neurotransmitter changes, etc.
However, the PET test itself is expensive, and with
the cost of the tracer, the overall cost of the test is
usually high. PET equipment is expensive, with high
maintenance costs and high requirements for
installation environment and technicians, resulting in
its limited popularity in medical institutions. At the
same time, the analysis and interpretation of PET
images require specialized nuclear medicine doctors
or specially trained personnel who are not only
familiar with the normal anatomy and physiological
functions of the brain, but also understand the
characteristics of PET performance in various disease
states.
Therefore, in Alzheimer's disease detection, EEG
has outstanding advantages over mainstream
methods. Firstly, it is non-invasive. CSF requires
lumbar puncture, which is risky, while EEG only
places electrodes on the scalp. Secondly, it has a
higher detection accuracy and can capture early
abnormalities in neuronal electrical activity.
Furthermore, in terms of economy and popularity,
CSF and PET testing equipment and process costs are
high, while EEG equipment is cheap, with low
learning costs, and can be operated by primary
healthcare professionals after short-term training,
which is more conducive to popularization, and more
patients can benefit from early diagnosis, which has a
great potential for the detection of AD.
3.2 State of the Art and Development
of Sleep Stage Classification System
Technology
Classifying sleep stages is essential for studying
sleep, diagnosing sleep disorders, and assessing
treatments. It enhances our understanding of sleep
mechanisms and offers a foundation for managing
sleep-related conditions. At present, the sleep stage
classification system technology presents diverse
characteristics in methods and applications, and also
faces many challenges, and the future development
direction is becoming clearer.
Sleep specialists usually perform manual sleep
stage scoring through the analysis of
neurophysiological signals gathered in sleep
laboratories. This process is often challenging,
monotonous, and time-intensive. Scoring is usually
based on polysomnographic (PSG) data recorded
during overnight hospital stays. In traditional
practice, overnight PSG recordings consist of EEG,
electrooculogram (EOG), electromyogram (EMG),
and electrocardiogram (ECG) data. These recordings
are manually assessed by sleep specialists based on
the 1968 guidelines established by Rechtschaffen and
Kales (R&K) (Konkoly, et al., 2012). PSG recordings
are divided into 20- or 30-second intervals and
classified into wakefulness (W), REM sleep, and
NREM sleep. Due to their multi-channel signals and
expert-based visual analysis, PSG remains the gold
standard for assessing sleep in laboratory studies.
Polysomnography offers comprehensive insights into
sleep architecture, duration, and quality. However, it
is costly, labor-intensive, and unsuitable for field
applications, as it requires a sleep technician to install
equipment and place multiple electrodes on the face
and scalp (Arevalo, et al., 2012).
Consequently, the process of sleep stage scoring
incurs high costs, is prone to human mistakes, and is
frequently tiresome and demands a significant
amount of time. Analyzing overnight sleep recordings
usually requires 2 to 4 hours, and in some studies,
there has been a 90% expert agreement on sleep stage