mental health service system combining traditional
Chinese culture and modern culture (Huang, Zheng,
2015). On this basis, Chen Xuefeng systematically
sorted out for the first time the policy evolution,
practical exploration and international experience of
the construction of China's public psychological
service system, and constructed a relatively complete
theoretical framework, proposing the development
path from psychological counseling to mental health
education and services (Chen, 2018). Chen
mentioned in his article that the core of the public
psychological service system is "to enhance the
mental health of people and foster harmonious and
stable development of society through mental health
services." Although the publication of his research
was later than that of Huang and Zheng's earlier
studies, given Chen's clear demarcation of relevant
definitions and the comprehensiveness and
systematicness of the analytical framework, his
research has become a major symbol of localized
research in China, providing inspiration for
subsequent research on Chinese characteristics.
Due to political and cultural factors, the
individualization process in China shows great
differences compared with that in Europe (Yan,
2021). Correspondingly, "mental health service
system" erected by Chinese government and those in
Europe or the United States have also taken
completely different routes: Different from the form
based on humanistic thought, which is relatively more
detailed and specialized and focuses on the cost of
medical services and patient participation in policies,
it presents a more macroscopic and "top-down"
feature (Goddard, Smith, 2011; Markham, 2020;
Zhang, 2023). That is, under the guidance of the
policies issued by the Party and the state, all sectors
of society carry out mental health services in
accordance with the policy texts and perform their
respective duties. However, due to the continuous
changes in the external environment, the incremental
and cost-saving characteristics of policy-making, the
logic of interpreting the mental health service system
within the Party and the state is inconsistent, the
relevant policies at the national level have undergone
multiple orientation changes (Zhao, 2012; Zhang,
2023). This leads to the fact that on the surface,
mental health policies are constantly introduced, so it
seems like the policy system tends to be improved and
the supporting measures are optimized. In reality,
however, there are still problems such as tension
between the old and new policies, imbalance among
various policy tools, and the main concentration of
policy objects in the health system and the education
system (Liu, 2023; Chen, et al, 2024).
3.2 Classified by Research Content
In terms of research content, scholars in China and
abroad have noticed the importance of online mental
health services at the first time and made a systematic
analysis of it (Li, 2007; Manhal-Baugus, 2001). After
the technical progress and the release of
"Administrative Measures for Internet-based Medical
Diagnosis (Trial)", Li Zhenlin and Guo Rui
mentioned the new situation and problems of online
mental health services in their research, but are
limited to the analysis of the method itself without
discussing existing policy impact of mental health
services online (Li, Guo, 2023). Schools where
teenagers and various ideological trends gather can be
said to be areas where the trend of individualization
is relatively obvious. Regarding mental health
services within the Chinese education system, Yang
Chengning, Fan Fumin and Feng Tielei respectively
made discussions on policy texts, consultation
models and the construction of the teaching staff, but
there is a problem of insufficient sample
persuasiveness (Yang, 2024; Pei, 2005; Feng, 2008).
Unlike individualization under the second modernity
in Europe, the individualization process in China is
led by the state, but the policy system has not yet been
fully established. This requires the foundation of a
social psychological service system to address the
problems that individuals encounter during the
process of embedding into the system. Since the
system's creation, Chen Xuefeng, Wang Junxiu, Lin
Ying and Jiang Junjie have all published pertinent
studies in an effort to pinpoint its precise location and
emphasize the fact that it is not just a mental health
service but also possesses social governance traits
(Chen, 2018; Lin, Jiang, 2019; Wang, 2020).
However, there is a lack of sufficient empirical
support, and the discussions on the cases (such as
Changning District, Shanghai)are relatively not
extensive. As the spokesperson of the government,
social work is directly connected to individuals and
forms an essential part of the social psychological
service system. Regarding the role of social work in
mental health services, Liu Jitong made a systematic
conception for the first time, constructed a practical
research agenda, and clarified the scope of the topics
(Liu, 2017). On this basis, Xie Yingying and Fan
Minglin pointed out the specific intervention paths
and analyzed the existing problems both theoretically
and practically (Xie, Fan, 2019). On this basis, Chen
R Z et al. not only conducted text analysis in the
research on how community mental health policies in
China have developed, but also took the 686 pilot
program as the core case, focusing on discussing the