integrate high-precision atmospheric detection
technology, a real-time pollutant monitoring network
and artificial intelligence algorithms. For the
intermittent problem of clean energy, it constructs a
power prediction model based on meteorological
prediction, together with the inter-regional power
dispatch mechanism, to ensure the stability of the
energy supply and the environmental friendliness of
the dual objectives. The system will eventually form
a closed-loop optimization model of ‘ pollution
emission-energy production-load demand’, which
will maximize the comprehensive benefits of meeting
the global power demand with minimal
environmental costs.
This study try to break through the dilemma of
limitation and lag in traditional environmental
governance, and explores a systemic climate solution
based on artificial intelligence. Through considering
the global energy system and the atmospheric
environment as an organic whole, the GAESCS
system is expected to provide a new technological
paradigm for addressing climate change and promote
the transformation of human society into an
environmentally intelligent and synergistic
sustainable development model.
2 TRADITIONAL POWER
GENERATION METHODS - AN
EXAMPLE OF THE IMPACT OF
COAL-BASED POWER
GENERATION
In the global electricity production pattern, coal
power generation occupies an extremely important
position, accounting for as much as 41% of power
generation.
Coal power generation has significant advantages
in terms of energy efficiency, but its impact on the
atmospheric environment should not be
underestimated. Between 2014 and 2017, China's
thermal power industry consumed between 41.66%
and 46.49% of the country's total coal, and the
consequent emissions of SO ₂ , NOx, and smog
accounted for between 14.72% and 36.93% of the
country's anthropogenic emissions, between 20.44%
and 37.69%, and between 7.26% and 13.55% of the
country's anthropogenic emissions, respectively.
37.69% and 7.26% to 13.55% respectively. Although
thermal power still occupies a dominant position in
China's energy structure, the air pollution problem
behind its high efficiency needs to be solved
(Cui,2021).Not only China, but also other countries.
India is the world's fifth-largest power-generating
country. It has a generating capacity of about 210
GW, and the scale of power generation will continue
to expand in the future. Currently, coal power
generation accounts for as much as 66% of India's
power generation, and coal power generation also
occupies a major part of the country's new power
generation capacity planning. According to relevant
information, during the 12th Five-Year Plan period
from 2012 to 2017, India planned to add 76 GW of
coal power generation capacity, while in the 13th
Five-Year Plan period from 2017 to 2022, it planned
to add 93 GW of coal power generation capacity. In
the 13th Five-Year Plan to be implemented between
2017 and 2022, an additional 93 GW of coal-fired
power generation capacity is planned. The various
types of emissions generated during the operation of
coal-fired power plants have serious and wide-
ranging impacts on human health, mainly in terms of
triggering higher mortality and morbidity rates.
The impacts of coal-fired power plants on human
health are severe and widespread. Back in December
2011, India had 111 coal-fired power plants in
operation, with a total capacity of 121 GW. These
coal-fired power plants consume a huge amount of
coal - about 503 million ton - every year. This process
generates a large number of pollutants, including
about 580 ton per annum of particulate matter with a
diameter of less than 2.5 μm, 2,100 ton per annum
of sulfur dioxide (SO2), 2,000 ton per annum of
nitrogen oxides (NOx), 1,100 ton per annum of
carbon monoxide (CO), 100 ton per annum of volatile
organic compounds (VOCs) and 665 million ton of
carbon dioxide (CO2 ) per annum. emissions. The
emission of these pollutants places a heavy burden on
public health. It is estimated that between 2011 and
2012, there were between 80,000 and 115,000
premature deaths and over 20 million cases of asthma
caused by exposure to total PM10 emissions from
coal-fired power plants. The economic cost to the
public and the government of such a serious health
hazard is in the range of Rs. 16,000 to 23,000 crore,
which translates to US$ 3.2 to 4.6 billion. The
greatest health impacts from emissions from coal-
fired power plants are concentrated in Delhi,
Haryana, Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh,
Chhattisgarh, the Gangetic plains of India, and most
of central and eastern India (Kone, 2017). This shows
that traditional thermal coal power generation is quite
serious in terms of atmospheric pollution, and as a
result, human life and health are seriously