amount of money involved in 2024 increased
significantly. Preventing financial fraud requires a
multi-pronged approach to technology, regulations,
and public awareness.
3.2 Problems Posed by Financial
Network Fraud
First of all, in the digital era, network financial fraud
means technologization, covert, and mainly
technology-driven. Fraudsters set up a scheme with
the help of AI face-swapping and other technologies,
such as a dating platform that cheated 470 million in
2024 by relying on an AI virtual tutor (Zhang, 2024).
New types of fraud penetrate emerging fields such as
the meta-universe and iterate quickly (Xu, 2023).
Secondly, there are structural contradictions in the
current regulatory system. Legal norms are lagging,
and the Cybersecurity Law lacks detailed provisions
on new cybercrime(Zhang, 2024); cross-border
collaboration mechanisms are missing, and it is
difficult to collect evidence from outside the country;
and financial institutions' technological prevention
and control are lagging, which increases the risk of
loss (Yang, 2024).
Finally, network financial fraud affects individual
victims, but also deepens the financial market trust
crisis, 23% of Internet users due to fraud reduce
online financial activities, a bank loss of more than
500 million. At the same time, the cost of social
governance climbed, and the hidden social cost of
telecom fraud in 2023 reached 2.8 trillion, the
problem is widespread and serious (Chen, 2023).
In summary, in the face of increasingly complex
online financial fraud, effective prevention and
governance mechanisms need to be constructed from
technology, law, public education, international
cooperation and other levels.
4 ANALYSIS OF THE CAUSES OF
THE PROBLEM OF
FINANCIAL NETWORK
FRAUD
4.1 Technology-Driven Escalation of
Crime
In the digital age, the rapid development of
technology has changed the means of online financial
fraud. Fraudsters use AI face-swapping and deep
forgery technology to build “full simulation” fraud
scenarios, increasing the difficulty of identification.
For example, in 2024, in the case of a dating platform,
the fraud gang cheated 470 million yuan through the
AI virtual investment mentor, and the difficulty of
identification increased by 300%. 2023, the account
theft cases caused by AI disguise surged by 147%
year-on-year, which is a serious threat to financial
security (Zhang, 2024).
The darknet ecology and vulnerability economy
provide a hotbed for cybercrime, and the average
price of financial vulnerabilities on darknet trading
platforms reaches $150,000, leading to frequent
cyberattacks (Xu, 2023). Technical outsourcing
promotes the specialized division of labor of criminal
groups, forming the “development - theft - money
laundering” industry chain. Virtual currency money
laundering technology is becoming increasingly
complex, cross-border fraud funds after multi-layer
currency mixing operation, the recovery rate is less
than 5%. Criminals use privacy coins and cross-chain
technology to hide traces, making it difficult for law
enforcement authorities to track and combat.
Technological advances have made online
financial fraud more efficient and covert, challenging
financial security and social stability, and urgently
requiring a tripartite synergy of technological
upgrades, legal improvements and public education to
reduce the incidence of crime.
4.2 The Governance Dilemma of
Internet Fraud
In the digital age, telecommunications network fraud
is rampant, posing a serious threat to the rights and
interests of citizens and social stability, and because
of the popularization of the Internet and smart
devices, fraudulent means are varied, and governance
is urgent.
China has built a legal framework with the Anti-
Telecommunications Network Fraud Law, adopting
full-chain governance, real-name system and multi-
sectoral synergy, with heavy sentences of up to life
imprisonment and sentencing based on the amount of
money, and the joint formation of relevant laws to
deter. However, there are problems such as vague
norms in legal governance, poor cross-sectoral
cooperation, insufficient corporate support, loopholes
in the protection of personal information, and non-
transparent anti-fraud technology.
Cross-border crime is difficult to combat, and
international cooperation is urgently needed. Public