The Impact of Parenting Styles on Adolescents' Anxiety and
Academic Achievement
Jincheng Liang
Hefei No.10 High School, Hefei, 230031, China
Keywords: Parenting Styles, Adolescent Anxiety, Academic Achievement.
Abstract: This paper reviews papers about the impact of parenting styles on adolescents' anxiety and academic
achievement, emphasizing the differential effects of cultural background and parental role. The study shows
that parenting styles have different effects on students' anxiety and academic performance. Cultural
differences play a crucial role in parenting styles and anxiety while permissive parenting is more favourable
to adolescents' adjustment to school life in Spain, compared to the conclusion that authoritarian parenting is
more positive in Asia. In addition, gender differences are also significant, with authoritative parenting styles
of fathers associated with low levels of anxiety in university students, while authoritarian parenting styles of
mothers were associated with high levels of anxiety. These findings emphasize the different roles that mothers
and fathers play in shaping the emotional well-being of their children. In terms of academic achievement, the
paper reveals that effective parental supervision and care is positively associated with academic success. It
also highlights the need for more nuanced research to explain the influence of both parents and to explore
how parenting styles affect gender differences in anxiety and academic achievement. The paper concludes
with practical recommendations, such as increasing parental involvement.
1 INTRODUCTION
In today's world, the influence of the family on
children is more widely discussed. Many studies have
shown that parents' educational expectations of their
children
with the educational environment provided and
the way it is done, have a significant impact on their
development (Fan & Williams, 2010).
At the same time, the anxiety status of young
people is also a topic of concern. In England, two-
fifths of young people score above the threshold for
emotional problems (Deighton et al., 2019). In
addition, the association between parenting and
children's academic performance has generated some
discussion and different perspectives.
The aim of this paper is to summarise the
literature discussing the association between the two
elements of family parenting on adolescents' anxiety
status and academic achievement (AA), and also to
further explore and give recommendations for future
research directions.
2 PARENTING STYLES (PSS),
ANXIETY STATES AND AA
2.1 Parenting Styles
PS is best conceptualised as a context that moderates
the influence of specific parenting practices on the
child (Darling & Steinberg, 2017). Baumrind's
influential model of PSs states that PSs can be divided
by two dimensions (parental warmth versus level of
control) which in turn can be classified into four types,
authoritative, authoritarian and permissive and
rejecting neglecting. Authoritative PSs are
characterised by high levels of control and warmth,
with parents listening to their children and respecting
their children's feelings, whilst giving appropriate
guidance and limits. Authoritarian PSs are
characterised by high control and low warmth; these
parents will tightly control their children's behaviour
but are less attentive to their children's emotional
needs or opinions. In addition, permissive PSs are
characterized by low control and high warmth; these
parents focus on their children's emotional needs but
rarely set clear rules or control their children's
behaviour. Rejecting-Neglecting PSs are reflected in
Liang, J.
The Impact of Parenting Styles on Adolescents’ Anxiety and Academic Achievement.
DOI: 10.5220/0014150600004942
Paper published under CC license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Applied Psychology and Marketing Management (APMM 2025), pages 673-676
ISBN: 978-989-758-791-7
Proceedings Copyright © 2026 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda.
673
low control and low warmth. This type of parent lacks
attention to both the child's emotional needs and
behaviour management (Baumrind, 1971).
2.2 Anxiety States
Anxiety is a subjective feeling of uneasiness,
discomfort, apprehension or fear accompanied by a
range of autonomic and somatic manifestations.
Anxiety is a normal, emotional, rational and
anticipatory response to real or potential danger (Shri,
2010). Increased anxiety leads to increased severity
of perceived pain and decreased pain tolerance
(Michaelides & Zis, 2019). At the same time, anxiety
can make people extremely fearful and anxious,
which can cause people to try to escape from
something they perceive as a threat, such as a social
situation or an unfamiliar place. Even if they don’t
pose a threat (Craske, 1999). Excessive anxiety in
students is detrimental to their health, and can cause
problems such as stomachaches or headaches, sleep
problems, and substance abuse (Miller, 2025).
2.3 AA
AA refers to a student's communication (speaking,
reading, writing), maths, science, social science and
thinking skills. These skills enable students to be
successful in school and in society (Lindholm-Leary,
2006). Typically, factors such as standardised
achievement tests, grade point averages, and other
factors can be used to measure AA in research.
3 IMPACT OF PSS ON ANXIETY
SITUATIONS
The initial point that requires clarification is that
some researchers have found that the relationship
between PS and anxiety varies across cultures. For
example, Asian samples reported more severe anxiety
symptoms on all anxiety subscales compared to
Europe/USA (Mousavi & Low, 2016). In addition, in
contrast to the finding that authoritarian parenting is
more positive in Asian, the findings in Spain are
completely different. For the study in Spain, the
researchers selected 437 high school students
encompassing different genders and levels of
education from seven public high schools in the
Valencia region of Spain. Also, this study used the
Warmth/Affection Scale and Parental Control Scale,
both integrated in the Parental Acceptance-
Rejection/Control Questionnaire to examine PSs and
used the Questionnaire of Academic Stress in
Secondary Education (QASSE) to measure academic
stress (Rohner, 1989; Rohner, 1990). Ultimately, it
was obtained that permissive parenting is more
favourable to the school adjustment of Spanish
adolescents and to the reduction of academic stress.
Again, this supports the significance of regional
differences.
In addition, anxiety situations do not produce the
same effects when parents of different genders
implement different PSs. In a study in 2007, 298
students from a university in the southeastern region
of the United States were selected from an age range
of 18 to 25 years old, from all grades, and from a
variety of ethnicities (80 males, 214 females, and 4
students who did not indicate their gender). The
researchers methodologically chose The Parental
Authority Questionnaire) (Buri, 1991). to measure
college students‘ PSs during childhood and The
Manifest Anxiety Scale (Taylor, 1953). to measure
students’ anxiety levels. They learnt from the data
that the father's authoritative PS was significantly
negatively correlated with college students' anxiety
levels (r = -0.23, p < 0.001), while the mother's
authoritarian PS was significantly positively
correlated with anxiety levels (r = 0.13, p < 0.02),
Whereas, mother's authoritative type, father's
authoritarian type, and both parents‘ permissive PSs
were not significantly associated with college
students’ anxiety levels (Silva et al., 2007).
Overall, some researchers have obtained
conclusions with clear generalisations: lower levels
of anxiety, or fewer anxiety symptoms or
internalising symptoms are associated with parental
affection, warmth and acceptance. Conversely, higher
levels or more of these symptoms are associated with
excessive parental control (Besteiro & Quintanilla,
2023). Moreover, MinJun Choong points out an
unexplored area where both authoritative and
permissive PSs are associated with children's social
anxiety, which requires further research (Choong,
2023).
4 IMPACT OF PSS ON
STUDENTS' AA
A number of researchers have pointed to the
differential impact of parenting on students' AA.
They analysed Wave I and Wave II data from the
National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult
Health (Add Health), completed in September 1994
to December 1995 and from April to August 1996,
APMM 2025 - International Conference on Applied Psychology and Marketing Management
674
respectively (Harris & Richard, 2018). After selection,
the final sample included 2,306 adolescents living in
heterosexual two-parent households that varied in
ethnicity, family income, and parental education. The
researchers also used latent profile analysis to
determine parental warmth patterns and measured
AA in terms of GPA. They found that different
parenting by fathers versus mothers can have
different effects on adolescent outcomes. At the same
time, excluding one parent and not considering the
joint influence of both parents can also produce
misconceptions about parenting in research (Chung et
al., 2019). In terms of overall impact, some
researchers have used the Alabama Parenting
Questionnaire-Short Form (Elgar et al., 2007). and
self-developed standardised tests by surveying 231
third- and fourth-grade students in the Romanian
region to measure, respectively PSs and academic
performance, ultimately leading to the conclusion that
poor parental supervision was negatively correlated
with student performance in language arts and
mathematics (Albulescu et al., 2023). Meanwhile,
Wilder's study also proved the point that the
relationship between parental involvement and AA is
positive (Wilder, 2023). It is also important to note
that Barton, A. L. and Kirtley, M. S. in their study
indicated that anxiety and stress mediated the
relationship between PSs and depression in female
students, whereas the existence of a mediating
relationship between male students' scores was not
found (Barton & Kirtley, 2011). This is a reminder
that researchers need to be aware of the influence of
adolescent gender in this issue.
5 DISCUSSION AND
SUGGESTION
When discussing the effect of PSs on anxiety, the
cultural difference factor is one of the key factors in
the discussion, for example, compared to some
European countries like Spain, in Asian countries like
Malaysia and China, children's anxiety reacts
differently in different PSs, which means that the
researchers need to take into account the cultural
backgrounds of different countries and regions, as
well as to give practical solutions. At the same time,
research also needs to focus on the different
influences of fathers and mothers in the same PS. For
example, fathers’ authoritative PS is significantly
negatively associated with college students’ anxiety
levels, while mothers' authoritarian PS is positively
associated with anxiety levels. This suggests that the
roles of fathers and mothers in the formation of
adolescent anxiety may differ and that there is a need
to make a distinction between parental roles in
education.
In addition, in terms of the effect of PSs on
students' AA, many papers suggest that adequate
parental supervision is sufficiently associated with
increased AA of children. Meanwhile, the effect of
PSs on AA varies across family roles. Moreover,
inappropriate PSs are more likely to induce anxiety
and lead to lower AA in the female group than in the
male group. This requires researchers to discuss more
about the gender differences in PSs on the AA of
students of different genders.
6 CONCLUSION
In family education, it is particularly important to
choose the right kind of parenting, as it can
significantly impact a child’s mental and academic
development. Reviewing some of the papers that have
examined the effects of family parenting on
adolescents' anxiety and academic performance, the
author find that cultural and gender differences have
an impact on this process. Furthermore, the influence
of fathers and mothers in the same PS can differ, with
fathers' authoritative parenting being associated with
lower anxiety levels in adolescents, while mothers'
authoritarian parenting is more likely to correlate with
higher anxiety. This indicates that the roles each
parent plays in the educational process are not
interchangeable and can have differential effects on a
child's anxiety. In addition, effective parental
supervision, coupled with warmth and affection, is
strongly linked to better academic performance.
Parents who engage in supportive, involved parenting
help reduce academic stress, foster motivation, and
encourage positive learning behaviors. Both parents
and society must remain sensitive to cultural, gender,
and individual differences when supporting
children’s education. Tailoring parenting approaches
to the child's unique needs can help alleviate anxiety
and promote academic success, which, in turn,
contributes to educational excellence and the healthy,
well-rounded development of the child.
REFERENCES
A. L. Barton, M. S. Kirtley. Gender Differences in the
Relationships Among PSs and College Student Mental
Health. J. Am. Coll. Health 60(1), 21–26 (2011)
The Impact of Parenting Styles on Adolescents’ Anxiety and Academic Achievement
675
A. Michaelides, P. Zis. Depression, anxiety and acute pain:
links and management challenges. Postgrad. Med.
131(7), 438–444 (2019)
C. Miller. How anxiety affects teenagers. Child Mind Inst.
(2022, October 11)
D. Baumrind. Current patterns of parental authority.
Psycnet.apa.org (1971)
E. M. Besteiro, A. J. Quintanilla. The relationship between
PSs or parenting practices, and anxiety in childhood and
adolescence: a systematic review. Rev. Esp. Pedagogía
75(267), 11 (2023)
F. J. Elgar, D. A. Waschbusch, M. R. Dadds, N.
Sigvaldason. Development and validation of a short
form of the Alabama Parenting Questionnaire. J. Child
Fam. Stud. 16, 243–259 (2007)
G. Chung, J. Phillips, T. M. Jensen, P. Lanier. Parental
Involvement and Adolescents’ AA: Latent Profiles of
Mother and Father Warmth as a Moderating Influence.
Fam. Process 59(2) (2019)
I. Albulescu, A.-V. Labar, A. D. Manea, C. Stan. The
Mediating Role of Anxiety between PSs and Academic
Performance among Primary School Students in the
Context of Sustainable Education. Sustainability 15(2),
1539 (2023)
J. Deighton, S. T. Lereya, P. Casey, P. Patalay, N.
Humphrey, M. Wolpert. Prevalence of mental health
problems in schools: poverty and other risk factors
among 28,000 adolescents in England. Br. J. Psychiatry
215(3), 565–567 (2019)
J. R. Buri. Parental authority questionnaire. J. Pers. Assess.
57, 110–119 (1991)
J. Taylor. A personality scale of manifest anxiety. J.
Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 48, 253–290 (1953)
K. Lindholm-Leary, G. Borsato. Academic achievement.
Educating English language learners: A synthesis of
research evidence 176–222 (2006)
K. M. Harris, U. J. Richard. National Longitudinal Study of
Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health), 1994-2018
[Public Use]. Umich.edu (2018)
M. Choong. The Effect of PSs on Development of
Adolescent’s Social Anxiety. J. Educ. Humanit. Soc.
Sci. 8, 1810–1816 (2023)
M. G. Craske. Anxiety disorders: psychological approaches
to theory and treatment. Westview Press (1999)
M. Silva, E. Dorso, A. Azhar, K. Renk. The Relationship
among PSs Experienced during Childhood, Anxiety,
Motivation, and Academic Success in College Students.
J. Coll. Stud. Retent.: Res. Theory Pract. 9(2), 149–167
(2007)
N. Darling, L. Steinberg. PS as Context: An Integrative
Model. Interpersonal Development 161–170 (2017)
R. P. Rohner. Handbook for the Study of Parental
Acceptance and Rejection, 3rd ed.; Rohner Research
Publications: Storrs, CT, USA (1990)
R. P. Rohner. Parental Acceptance-Rejection/Control.
Questionnaire (PARQ/Control.); Rohner Research
Publications: Storrs, CT, USA (1989)
R. Shri. Anxiety: causes and management. J. Behav. Sci.
5(1), 100–118 (2010)
S. E. Mousavi, W. Y. Low, A. H. Hashim. Perceived PSs
and Cultural Influences in Adolescent’s Anxiety: A
Cross-Cultural Comparison. J. Child Fam. Stud. 25(7),
2102–2110 (2016)
S. Wilder. Effects of parental involvement on AA: a meta-
synthesis. Routledge EBooks 137–157 (2023)
W. Fan, C. M. Williams. The effects of parental
involvement on students’ academic self efficacy,
engagement and intrinsic motivation. Educ. Psychol.
30(1), 5374 (2010)
APMM 2025 - International Conference on Applied Psychology and Marketing Management
676