2 LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Theories of Personality Across
Cultures
The personality of individuals is often shaped by the
culture and region they belong to. Numerous theories
depict how personality varies across different
contexts. First, there are some broadly accepted
theories such as Big Five and Eysenck’s dimensions
which provide a foundational basis of the personality.
Secondly, enhancements are driven by Indigenous
psychology models that position personality traits in
the ethnic background of beliefs and values (Consoli
et al., 2020). This highlights that while there are
different aspects in every culture, there is no single
theory that corresponds to all the changes associated
with the individual. The Big Five Model posits five
universal traits: Openness, conscientiousness,
extraversion, agreeableness and neuroticism. Inter-
cultural data corroborate the model's applicability yet
show cultural differences (Chamorro-Premuzic,
2016). For instance, the aspect of extraversion is
perceived as high in individualistic societies while it
has less significance in societies that culturally focus
on unity. This raises questions about the universal
applicability of the Big Five and corroborates that its
significance might be limited to Western cultures.
Additionally, Eysenck’s Dimensions include
extraversion, neuroticism, and psychoticism, which
highlights a strong genetic-related basis for
personality traits. These dimensions are more or less
international but the importance and the relevance of
the particular trait can be different for different
cultures (Chamorro-Premuzic, 2016). For example, in
Western cultures, extroverted people are sociable,
while introverted people are valued more for self-
restraint in the Eastern cultures. This supersedes the
way in which culture affects the value assigned to
different traits of individuals. Lastly, the Indigenous
Psychology Models state that individuals cannot be
interpreted without understanding the cultural
perspective (Ramady, 2016). For instance, the
Chinese concept of Renqing (compassion) and the
African concept of Ubuntu (communal
interdependence), are all relations that are not
integrated in any Western theory and highlight the
relational aspects of psychology such as those with
nature and spirituality. Therefore, these theories
suggest that individually and collectively, personality
applies universally and across cultures. However,
there are certain variations in how it is manifested and
applied across cultures.
2.2 Cultural Influences on Personality
Traits
Using theories such as the Hofstede’s cultural
dimensions and Schwartz’s value theory is useful to
understand in which ways culture impacts personality
traits. Cultures’ values behavior and personalities can
be measured by the six dimensions that Hofstede put
forward, these include power distance, individualism-
collectivism, masculinity-femininity, uncertainty
avoidance, and long-term orientation and indulgence-
restraint (Moonen, 2017). For example, cultures with
high power distance values stress, autonomy, and in
some ways reflect on agreement and consciousness
scores. Additionally, a high uncertainty avoidance
culture can also predict anxiety and may hence be
associated with high neuroticism. This depicts how
certain cultures breed specific traits in individuals
while others limit those. On the other hand, Moonen
has put forward a theory of basic human values that
can help explain personality in cultural environments
by conceptualizing ten cultural dimensions including
obedience, pleasure, and respect for the past
(Moonen, 2017). In communal societies, where
conformity is the norm, respondents exhibit traits
such as conscientiousness and agreeableness, while in
individualistic societies, which promote self-
direction, respondents are encouraged to experience
openness to experience. Therefore, it can be stated
that it is beneficial to evaluate personality more from
cultural alternatives rather than metrics that engross
personality only.
Cross-cultural comparison between
individualism and collectivism usually depicts
personality trait differences. European and American
societies are associated with individualism, where
people possess certain personality characteristics, for
example, extroversion and openness (Chamorro-
Premuzic, 2016). On the other hand, collectivistic
cultures, especially in East Asia, support harmony
emphasizing agreeableness and lower levels of
extraversion, which corresponds with aspects of
modesty and togetherness. Additionally, there are
some other special characteristics, that reveal
contextual variations within personality, such as
conscientiousness, neuroticism, and so on. In East
Asian societies, conscientiousness can be indeed seen
as relevant to cultural values of hard work and polite
manner (Zotzmann et al., 2019). Neuroticism,
however, is found to be higher in high-stress areas,
for instance in some East Asian countries where high
neuroticism might be brought by stress and societal
demands rather than actual temperament. These
results imply that culture plays an important role in