exposed to events where they are not able to
improve anything with their own effort, leaving
them a necessity to rely on others. In this case,
as schema is gaining others’ appreciation
becomes a survival strategy instead of a mental
pursuit, causing them to feel an extreme sense of
helplessness when these supports are absent,
shaping the schema , since in functional schema
theory, mental functioning is believed to be
caused by ongoing awareness, as nervous system
continuously update the peripheral and focal
awareness, forming a organized self-model
which is referred to the term “schema” (Iran-
Nejad and Winsler, 2000).
These maladaptive schemas are reinforced
over time through continued negative
experiences in relationships. While individuals
with BPD struggle to maintain stable
interpersonal connections, their schemas of
reliance on others and worthlessness are
continually activated and reinforced since they
consider normal reactions in communication as
hints of being abandoned. Since disagreement
widens the distance with others, the absence of
attachment between them means that they are
less likely to gain assistance. These assistances
122 are believed not to occur among normal
social relationships. With this leading to the
helplessness, which is also a result of the
distortion in schema. These distorted schemas
thus become self-perpetuating, as individuals
with BPD interpret events through the lens of
their deep-rooted cognitive patterns.
4.2 Development of Certain Schemas in
BPD
In addition to childhood experiences, cognitive
biases also play a significant role in the
formation and reinforcement of schemas in BPD.
For instance, all-or-nothing thinking, which
refers to the belief that a person is either
completely good or completely bad. Although
this belief may have its benefits like helping the
person with BPD to avoid every people that are
believed to potentially be threatening to himself,
this belief divides the majority in an environment
into a completely bad category, leaving the
person with BPD himself in a lonely situation,
which reinforce the sense of being deserted.
Moreover, emotional reasoning is also a
critical factor. Since to some extent, people with
BPD may be able to sense internal natural
reaction to the happening events as normal
people but fail to interpret the underlying
meaning of their sense, they usually repress it
until they cannot keep ignoring it. This leads to
a situation where they express these senses just
to make them feel more self-consistent, instead
of coping with it, leaving the events themselves
unsolved, making the overall situation worse.
What’s more, if they feel abandoned, they may
assume that abandonment is truly happening
which contemporarily makes them feel better
since it proves the validity of their judgement,
however, placing them to a nonexistent situation
which thus has no solution, reinforcing their
belief in their weakness. This leads to impulsive
actions to prevent abandonment, reinforcing the
maladaptive cycles of behavior and further
entrenching negative cognitive schemas.
4.3 Cognitive Biases in BPD
Catastrophizing is another cognitive bias, which
involves anticipating the worst possible outcome
in any given situation, no matter how unlikely it
may be. This may be resulted from the frequency
of being placed into trouble in their previous
experience that they have to prevent any
possibility that they may get into them again.
However, as preventing catastrophic events has
its costs, including efforts and materials, and
even the peaceful mood since catastrophic
events are something worth being anxious about.
In this case, in physical aspect, person with BPD
may continuously stay in a situation lack of
things as they devote them into a nonexistent
problem, while in mental aspect, they are
constantly being anxious and has less chance to
realize its invalidity due to the self-fulfilling
prophecy, leading the cognitive schema to be
reinforced as the predictions are correct
compared to the consequences.