2 THEORETICAL BASIS AND
RESEARCH DESIGN
2.1 Intimate Relationships and Lack of
Gender Trust
Regarding the definition of trust, this study focuses
on conceptualizing it as one party believing that the
other is benevolent and honest (Larzelere & Huston,
1980). In a broad sense, intimate relationships are not
limited to specific identity types but refer to mutual
dependence between both parties, often concentrated
in the family domain. Narrowly defined intimate
relationships refer to intimate relationships between
lovers or spouses, and this article focuses on the latter.
In the study of trust in intimate relationships, Rempel
et al. constructed a trust model that decomposes it into
three elements: predictability, dependency, and faith.
Among them, faith is the most important and direct
one, reflecting the partner's intrinsic motivation.
Reliability is equally important in intimate
relationships, indicating whether a partner is reliable
and trustworthy. Predictability focuses on the
expectation of behavior, which serves as an important
basis for dispositional attribution to influence
reliability and the development of faith (Rempel et
al., 1985).
The initial research on the lack of gender trust
originated from an exploration of the essential
understanding of marriage and uncertainty among
low-income single mothers (Edin, 2000). Subsequent
research has proposed the concept of gender distrust,
which conceptualizes negative evaluations of the
opposite sex and focuses on distrust of relationship
commitment and sexual exclusivity (Copp et al.,
2017). It is seen as a culture that spreads among
economically disadvantaged groups, with obvious
gender characteristics and is often used to explain the
reasons why single women reject marriage - women's
distrust of men often stems from their lack of
economic support, infidelity, use of violence,
irresponsibility towards children, alcohol or drug
abuse, deliberate destruction of women's efforts to
change their destiny, and other negative experiences
(Edin, 2000; Edin & Kefalas, 2005; Levine, 2013).
Studies have shown that other factors such as race,
intimacy status, individual relationship experience,
family relationships, and community environment
can also affect gender distrust (Copp et al., 2017;
Estacion & Cherlin, 2010). Nomaguchi et al. pointed
out that parental gender distrust and poor parent-child
relationships have a significant impact on female
adolescents. In contrast, factors that have a significant
impact on male adolescents include neighborhood
poverty rates and sexual experience (Nomaguchi et
al., 2011).
However, in domestic research in China, the lack
of gender trust and gender distrust do not overlap with
research in other countries. For example, Du's study
found that gender distrust among Chinese working
youth is more diverse and localized, and economic
disadvantage has not become the main factor
affecting their gender distrust. Research shows that in
the current modern Chinese society, trust mechanisms
have not yet been established, and traditional social
relationship trust is still needed as a guarantee. The
game between individual and family working youth
is manifested as a conflict between situational trust
and structural distrust, focusing on the non-linear
trajectory of modernization of intimate relationships
(Du, 2019). Li proposed that social media, especially
the Internet, is one of the main reasons for the absence
of gender trust in China. Gender distrust from the
personal perspective is affected by the media
environment, rising to the public domain problem,
and the dual oppression of patriarchy and capital
market, resulting in the absence of gender trust in
China (Li, 2022). Another two studies also laterally
confirmed this point (Wang et al., 2023; Liu, 2021).
2.2 Gender Trust Under Patriarchal
Theory
After conducting interviews with the interviewees
and obtaining preliminary results to further explore
and analyze the underlying mechanisms of the lack of
gender trust among female college students, the
patriarchal theory proposed by Walby is introduced
(Walby, 1990). This theory proposes to view
patriarchy as a social structure and practical system
of male domination, oppression, and exploitation of
women, manifested in six aspects - the production
mode of patriarchy, patriarchal relations in paid labor,
patriarchal relations in the state, male violence,
patriarchal relations related to sexuality, and
patriarchal relations in cultural institutions such as
religion, media, and education. These six aspects
support each other and together form the subordinate
status of women (Walby, 1990).
Specifically, in the production relations within the
family, women's labor is requisitioned by their
husbands or cohabitants; housewives belong to the
productive class, and husbands belong to the
exploitative class. The patriarchal relationship in paid
labor excludes women from better jobs and isolates
them in inferior jobs that are considered lacking in
skills. The state, like capitalists and racists, is
patriarchal. As a place of struggle rather than a large
The Current Situation and Reasons for the Intimate Relationship Choice of Chinese Female College Students from the Perspective of