The Impact of Organizational Culture on Employee Job Satisfaction
in Transnational Corporations: Challenges and Strategic Responses
Runyi Chen
School of Social and Public Administration, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, China
Keywords: Transnational Corporation, Organizational Culture, Job Satisfaction.
Abstract: Transnational corporation plays an important role in multiple aspects under globalization circumstances by
not only promote the integration and development of global economy, but also increase the communication
between different cultures Organizational culture represents a company’s opinion of value, and it’s
meaningful in increasing the employees’ job satisfaction and promote company development, and a good
organizational culture can improve employees’ job satisfaction in the balance between institutional norms and
humanistic care and individual development and collective goals. It has been found that organizational culture
can influence many factors that have a close relationship with the employees’ sense of belonging and
expectation, which can form the employees’ job satisfaction. A balanced organizational culture based on the
typical environment should be built in those corporations.
1 INTRODUCTION
Transnational corporations are those companies
which are based in their own country, establishing
branches or subsidiaries around the world through
investing in foreign countries and engaging in
international production and business activities. They
promote the flow of capital, technology, and
productivity internationally, and influencing
international economic relations. Those companies
play an important role in multiple aspects under
globalization circumstances by not only promoting
the integration and development of the global
economy but also increasing the communication
between different cultures. However, while
globalization brings more market and resources, more
competition and issues of culture differences occur.
Transnational corporations should be familiar with
the different environments and potential risk in their
scope to develop stably and provide attractive
products. On the other hand, a harmonious multi-
culture working place encourages the employees to
work efficiently and create more income. This poses
a requirement for the company to adapt and be
tolerant of different cultures.
Organizational culture represents a company’s
opinion of value, and it’s meaningful in increasing the
employees’ job satisfaction and promoting company
development. A successful organizational culture can
motivate the employees’ enthusiasm and creativity. It
can also enhance a sense of belonging to bring
satisfaction. From the early 20th century to the 1950s,
employees are considered as production tools. With
the emergence of research such as the Hawthorne
experiment during 1930s to 1960s however,
researchers found that productivity can be affected by
social psychological factors, and the employee sense
of belonging and informal organizations are
beginning to be valued. In the 1980s, researchers
found that as a shared value, belief and behavioral
norm, organizational culture decides how the
members think, act and solve problems in the group
(Denison, 1996). Since the digital age, diversity and
inclusiveness become increasingly valued, people
pay more attention to cultural factors in corporations.
46% of Generation Z and 47% of Millennials globally
refuse job opportunities due to culture and value
mismatches. The number was only 30% in 2019, and
theres also 49% young employees consider
organizational culture to be one of the top three
factors in their career choices (Deloitte, 2023). The
purpose of this study is to find out the relationship
between transnational corporations’ organizational
culture and job satisfaction, and how the relationship
affects a company’s growth. By understanding how it
works, advice on efficient management and cultural
construction policy could be put forward.
Chen, R.
The Impact of Organizational Culture on Employee Job Satisfaction in Transnational Corporations: Challenges and Strategic Responses.
DOI: 10.5220/0013995500004916
Paper published under CC license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Public Relations and Media Communication (PRMC 2025), pages 523-528
ISBN: 978-989-758-778-8
Proceedings Copyright © 2025 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda.
523
2 LITERATURE REVIEW
Organizational culture was defined as an information
system shared inside an organization, which includes
its opinion of value, belief and code of conduct
(Mansaray and Mansaray, 2020). Unlike an
organizational climate, which focuses on member’s
subjective experience and feelings of an
organization’s policy and program, organizational
culture pays more attention to the overall spiritual
outlook and value system. Therefore, qualitative
methods such as interview and case study were used
more often to reveal the essential characteristics.
According to research of organizational culture’s
measurement however, the differences reflect in
practice, including organizational rituals, heroes, or
symbols (Robert and Rousseau, 1988). These
common practices can be observed directly and
reflects the point of view of the organization’s
founder or leader, not the other individuals’. By
evaluating quantitative methods such as paying
attention to individuals’ reaction and the role of
norms and expectations, existing research has shown
how organizational culture plays its role (Kiefer et al.,
2021). Expectations and code of conduct not only
shape the employees’ behavior but also has an
influence on their sense of identification and
belonging. Multiple role employees play in family
and at work can cause work overload and role
conflicts. So, when the employees’ individual
behavior matches with the organization’s
expectations and norms, they may experience less
pressure and higher job satisfaction. It shows that
organizational culture is not only a steady state of
norms, but also an interactive process that can
influence the employees’ behavior and attitude
through ways like excitation mechanism and values.
As previous study has pointed out, culture is a set of
shared basic assumptions learned by a group when
solving external adaptation and internal integration
problems (Fridan and Maamari, 2024). It’s
established by the founder or early leader, forming
shared experiences by solving problems, and can be
reflected by an organization’s artifacts, espoused
values and basic underlying assumptions.
Organizational culture can provide identity
recognition and stability to the employees and reduce
anxiety by providing predictability of behavior. But
some organizational cultures like those have great
pressure and bureaucratism in management will help
create an inactive working atmosphere and have a
negative impact on performance (Judge et al., 2020).
A rigid organizational culture cannot provide
employees with a sense of security; therefore,
employees’ satisfaction will go done and pursuing
risk avoidance instead of effectiveness and new ideas.
Job satisfaction usually refers to employees’
emotional response or subjective attitude towards the
work environment, role content interpersonal
relationships and organizational policies (Sang et al.,
2019). In academic research, job satisfaction is
considered as an important variable that measures
employees’ attitude, since it originates from their
comments on the job and working experience. When
the job fits the employees’ individual needs and
interest and satisfies them in various fields like
working conditions and interpersonal cooperation,
the employees will show a high level of job
satisfaction. Otherwise, its level will go down.
Basically, the impact mechanism of job satisfaction
has shifted from single factor analysis to multiple
interaction research, and it influences employee
behavior through the mediating effect of
psychological capital, which includes factors like
self-efficacy, hope and optimism (Taylor, 2024).
Organizational culture influences employees’
feelings of the meaning of work through shaping
values and forms a cooperative effect with other
factors such as leadership, excitation and so on. On
the other hand, employees with high satisfaction are
more likely to maintain those cultural values, while
low satisfaction employees may passively resist and
spread negative subcultures. When the satisfaction of
most employees remains at a low level, the culture
itself will gradually change, and high turnover rates
can force companies to change the strategy. The
relationship between employee’s job satisfaction and
organizational culture is partly a process of mutual
influence, but cultural factors usually have stronger
structural influence and play a decisive role.
Currently, serval of the research has confirmed the
impact of organizational culture on job satisfaction.
This study focusses on how organizational culture
plays a role in influencing job satisfaction and further
impacts the unity and efficiency of the organization.
Research shows that psychological capital like
hope, effectiveness, resilience and optimism works
on relieving stress and reducing turnover rate
(Maharani et al., 2022). The employees who believe
in a sense of control over their career and have high
efficiency will have lower intention to quit. What’s
more, psychological capital also shows a positive
effect on employees’ job satisfaction and
performance. Overall organizational performance can
be improved by developing employees’
psychological capital to dealing with stress and
resignation issues. However, most research currently
default culture has a unidirectional impact on
satisfaction, and led by European and American
samples for research, which has a lack of cross-
cultural comparison.
PRMC 2025 - International Conference on Public Relations and Media Communication
524
3 CORPORATIONS
The organizational culture of transportational
corporations supports their globalization strategy. It
is supposed to be able to coordinate and adapt
different parts of the company, whose cultural
characteristics not only need to carry its motherland’s
traditional culture but also integrate the local
characteristics of the host country.
3.1 Cultural Diversity
A multicultural team can bring many advantages to
the international corporation, such as being familiar
with different markets, providing service with
cultural sensitivity and having longer business hours.
However, these advantages can be offset by issues
that come from cultural diversity. Culture conflict is
a process where different organizational cultures
compete or oppose each other when they meet. It
includes not only the conflict of culture differences
between the company and its host country, but also
the one that happens in employees who have different
culture background. Most of the culture conflicts
originate from the culture differences of countries,
corporations and individuals. Due to the differences
in power distance, individualism or collectivism and
long-term orientation among different countries,
there are conflicts in management styles. At the
corporation level, different companies have different
values, behavioral norms and management styles. In
the process of cooperation and integration that often
occurs in multinational corporations, these
differences may come out and lead to conflict. What’s
more, due to the differences of system and legal
environment, some controversy may be caused, such
as some countries accepting relational commerce,
while western countries rely more on formal contracts.
Those conflicts and issues may lead to personality
differences and language barriers among employees,
which can cause communication barriers (Gerhart,
2008). Language and nonverbal differences lead to
misunderstandings and reduce collaboration
efficiency. Moreover, managers from different
cultural backgrounds will find it difficult to reach a
consensus, which delays the execution of strategies.
3.2 Managing Complexity
Transnational corporations often have complexity in
personnel management. Culture differences which
influence cross cultural teamwork is one of the most
important factors that affect management. Non-native
speakers may have limited expression and
understanding even when using a common working
language. Effective cross-cultural communication is
the key to intercultural management. Apart from
communication issues, employees of different culture
backgrounds can also differ in the method of decision
making, leadership style, employee motivation and so
on (Bourguignon et al., 2019). That requires the
transnational company to have a global human
resource management ability, which holds an
inclusive attitude for employees to adapt to different
cultural environments.
On the other hand, transnational corporations also
face complexity in the whole management process.
Apart from power struggles within multinational
corporations (Mayer, 2010), different places will
have different rules of politics and laws, and customer
preference differences also need to be taken into
consideration for overall balance. Companies must be
familiar with those rules, such as the host country’s
admission of foreign investment, the structural
differences between the market and developed
country, or how the informal institution like family
business network in the target market restrict or
empower the company’s strategy. There is a mutually
circle between the challenges of personnel
management and overall management. Politic risks
will increase the company’s hesitation of expanding,
such as the decision on expatriation, and the
hesitation will cause the company to miss out on
market opportunities and resources. Cultural conflicts
may finally lead to team division and block the
execution of strategics. Companies need to keep
balance in management, ensuring unification while
also having flexibility to adapt to local markets.
4 EMPLOYEE JOB
SATISFACTION
As an important variable that affects job satisfaction,
organizational culture can shape the employees’
feelings and behavior during work. A positive
organizational culture can enhance their employees’
sense of belonging and meaning by creating an open
and collaborative atmosphere and clarifying its value
orientation. Giving support to employees’ career
development can also meet the needs in the growth of
both individual and the organization.
4.1 Enhancing Team Identity
To reduce cultural conflicts, companies can consider
providing a better working atmosphere and sense of
value. Organizational culture can create a typical
working environment by both explicit institutions and
implicit norms. Things like configuration of facility,
space layout and management system in the working
place can build the objective working conditions.
The Impact of Organizational Culture on Employee Job Satisfaction in Transnational Corporations: Challenges and Strategic Responses
525
Planning a workstation and a flexible attendance
system can reduce the employee’s physical fatigue
and pressure. On the mental side, the communication
mode and decision-making mechanism advocated by
culture can affect the emotion of employees directly.
Some management design is used to eliminate
oppression and enhance an individual’s sense of
control over the working environment, such as a
flatter management structure without too much layer
or an open feedback channel. The flat management
structure can shorten the time for information to pass
on, and the feedback channel ensures employees’
demand can be fully expressed. It’s easier for
employees to build a sense of security when the
organizational culture pays attention to respect and
tolerance, and they will be better adapting to the
working environment.
Organizational culture reaches the balance
between individual and collective goals though the
infiltration of its core concepts, and the advertising
and guidance not only stays in the text, but also in the
practical part, like decision making behavior,
resource allocation and the reply of crisis. Employees
who highly agree with the sense of value in the team
will have a significant positive correlation between
their sense of work and organizational identity.
4.2 Internal Construction
The employees’ expectation of individual growth can
be affected by the organizational culture through
resource allocation and the mechanism of opportunity
supply. A comprehensive training system should
cover skill enhancement, learning new knowledge
and mind expansion. Whether the organization
willing to invest in providing such systematic
learning resources shows its will on investing in
human capital. When the employee feels, the
promotion is related to the enhancement of personal
ability, the consistency between career goals and the
development of the organization enhanced, and the
job satisfaction increased. Companies can make
efforts in building a clear promotion channel or
diversified development way to support their
employees’ needs in development of both individual
and the organization.
By deciding role position and interaction rules in
the organization, organizational culture influences the
behavior patterns of a group. Having clear boundaries
of responsibilities and designing standardized
cooperation processes can reduce the problems in
communication and overlapping tasks and make
working more effective. What’s more, the
establishment of cultural consensus can resolve
cognitive conflicts caused by differences in values.
The effectiveness of conflict management
mechanisms depends on inclusiveness. Identity and
values should be fully considered during conciliation,
and by enhancing mutual understanding and respect,
solution accepted by each side could be found (Lok
and Crawford, 2004). Companies can set up formal
and informal communication platforms, such as
meetings over multiple divisions and communities
related to interests. Whether the appeal channel is
smooth enough and the neutrality of mediation
processes decides the construction of guarantee of
good interpersonal relationships. Team cohesiveness
can be fully turned into an important part of job
satisfaction when the members feel the sense of
effectiveness and belonging.
5 CHALLENGE AND COPING
STRATEGIES
Based on the content above, the challenges
transnational corporations faced in culture can turn
into some issues in management. Individuals of
different culture background have differences in
language and expression, nonverbal symbols and
logic. Some people try to give their opinions clear and
directly, while others prefer to imply and express
indirectly. This difference can meet regularly in an
international corporation, and it can cause the loss or
incorrect transmission of information, increase the
cost of communication and reduce efficiency. On the
other hand, traditional culture can shape people’s
behavior in work, then affect team cooperation mode.
For example, people come from individualistic
culture values making decisions and having goals on
one’s own, while those who come from collectivist
culture emphasize making decisions together and
shared responsibility. When these people cooperate in
the same organization, there may be conflicts because
of the differences of the division. The communication
breakdown and differences in cooperation provide
significant resistance to the operation of the
organization.
Deeper cultural differences may be reflected on
things like the attitude to authority and risk, or ethical
judgments. Some cultures may emphasize hierarchy
order and rules while others advocate for innovation
and an equal environment of communication. If
members of the company don’t have enough
sensitivity and attention to those differences and they
are not properly addressed, conflicts within the
organization will occur.
However, corresponding strategies can be made
for international corporations to face those challenges.
The management architecture can be designed to fit
in the adaptation of organizational culture and
leadership strategy. According to existing research,
when bureaucratic culture is combined with
PRMC 2025 - International Conference on Public Relations and Media Communication
526
transformational leadership, or innovative culture
meets a service-oriented leadership, employee
organizational commitment and job satisfaction will
be increased. The style of leadership needs to be
adapted to the characteristics of organizational
culture to maximize the company’s effectiveness
(Kazan, 1997). When conflict occurs, the different
types of management models are also adapted to the
certain culture. In the adversarial model, conflict is
treated as a process that needs to be solved by
competition, which reflects the characteristic of
individualism. Some organizations will solve the
conflict in a more harmonious way by avoidance and
tolerance, which may be based on a collectivism
culture background. The regulatory may be more
common in cultures that emphasize rules and order,
using bureaucratic methods to ensure the conflict
resolution conforms to established norms (Schein,
2010). Leaders of those transnational organizations
are demanded to have a sensitivity of culture to adjust
the atmosphere and establish a localized strategy. The
construction of organizational culture in transnational
corporations can start from two aspects: establishing
an adaptive organizational structure and developing
personal cultural accomplishment. Managers can
identify key contradictions in the corporation by
measuring cultural characteristics and satisfaction
through surveys to adjust the strategies.
6 CONCLUSION
Job satisfaction is the result of multiple factors, which
require organizations to meet the employees’ needs
through institutional design, as well as the flexible
leadership and cultural shaping abilities of the
manager. As an important factor that affects job
satisfaction, organizational culture can influence the
work atmosphere, career development opportunities,
interpersonal relationships and the sense of value
inside the company directly. Since those factors have
a close relationship with the employees’ sense of
belonging and expectation, they play a significant
role in influencing job satisfaction. In the working
environment of transnational corporations, where
they have the characteristic of multiple culture
background and complex management,
organizational culture also plays a coordinating role
by deciding the style of leadership and ways to
resolve conflicts. To increase job satisfaction and
develop cultural strategies that are more conducive to
management and working efficiency, managers of
transnational corporations should build an inclusive
working atmosphere and shape the value based on
analyzing both local and the host country’s culture.
Good organizational culture can improve employees’
job satisfaction in the balance between institutional
norms and humanistic care and individual
development and collective goals. The diversity on
culture and complexity in management make
transnational corporations a special place to integrate
management factors. Thus, the organizational culture
of those transnational corporations should be
designed to balance the differences and conflicts and
root on the company’s typical working environment.
REFERENCES
Akpa, Asikhia, & Nheji. (2021). Organizational culture and
organizational performance: A review of literature.
International Journal of Advances in Engineering and
Management (IJAEM) 3(1), 361–372.
Bourguignon, R., Garaudel, P., & Porcher, S. (2019).
Global framework agreements and trade unions as
monitoring agents in transnational corporations.
Journal of Business Ethics 159(3), 489–503.
Deloitte. (2023). 2023 Gen Z and Millennial Survey.
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited.
Denison D. R. [J]. (1996). What is the Difference Between
Organizational Culture and Organizational Climate? a
Native's Point of View on a Decade of Paradigm Wars.
Academy of Management Review 619-654.
Fridan & Maamari.(2024)."Impact of organizational
positive and negative culture on employee
performance", International Journal of Organizational
Analysis Vol. 32 No. 9, pp. 1850-1869.
Gerhart B (2008) Cross-cultural management research:
assumptions, evidence and suggested directions.
International Journal of Cross-Cultural Management
8(3): 259–74
Judge, Zhang, & Glerum. (2020). Job satisfaction. In
Essentials of job attitudes and other workplace
psychological constructs (1st ed.). Routledge.
Kazan MK (1997) Culture and conflict management: a
theoretical framework. International Journal of Conflict
Management 8(4): 338–60
Kiefer, Dinther, & Spitzmüller. (2021). Digital innovation
culture: A systematic literature review. In Innovation
through information systems 3, pp. 305-320).
Lok, P., & Crawford, J. (2004). The effect of organisational
culture and leadership style on job satisfaction and
organisational commitment. Journal of Management
Development 23(4), 321–338.
Maharani, S., Mono, U., & Perangin-Angin, A. B. (2022).
Managing cross culture diversity: Issues and challenges
in workplace. Austronesian: Journal of Language
Science & Literature 1(2), 74–83.
Mansaray & Mansaray. (2020). The connection between
national culture and organizational culture: A literature
review. Britain International of Humanities and Social
Sciences Journal (BIoHSJ) 2(1), 1-12.
Mayer C-H (2010) Cross-cultural business mediation: the
model of identity-based managerial mediation in
international management. In: Busch D, Mayer C-H,
The Impact of Organizational Culture on Employee Job Satisfaction in Transnational Corporations: Challenges and Strategic Responses
527
and Boness CM (eds) International and Regional
Perspectives on Cross-Cultural Mediation, vol. 5.
Studien zur Interkulturellen Mediation. Frankfurt: Peter
Lang, 155–73.
Robert A. Cooke, Denise M. Rousseau.
[J].(1988).Behavioral Norms and Expectations: A
Quantitative Approach To the Assessment of
Organizational Culture.Group & Organization
Management.1988,13(3).245-273.
Sang, L., Xia, D., Ni, G., Cui, Q., Wang, J., & Wang, W.
(2019). Influence mechanism of job satisfaction and
positive affect on knowledge sharing among project
members. Engineering, Construction and Architectural
Management 27(1), 245–269. doi:10.1108/ecam-10-
2018-0463
Taylor, J. W. (2024). Psychological Capital: Impact of
Hope, Efficacy, Resilience, and Optimism on
Employee Retention. University of Phoenix Career
Institute.
PRMC 2025 - International Conference on Public Relations and Media Communication
528