between children and make the inter-understanding,
then the public may more easily evoke empathy.
5 LOSS AVERSION, COST AND
INCOME CONTROL,
TRIANGLE OF SOCIETY
The main reason for violence against children,
whether physically, emotional or of other kinds, is
that the cost of perpetrating it is too low and the
children's capacity to resist it is too low.
Because of the potential for simultaneous
victimization in the school home, it is necessary to
ensure that individual children have the opportunity
to learn and think about ways to protect themselves
on their own. This can be done outside the school and
home under the protection of a recognized security
agency such as a hospital or police station. Children
themselves have a certain ability to commit and resist
violence, and publicizing and improving self-
protection ability of children and promoting self-
control of children aggression may also enable the
public and children themselves to better understand
the reality and make use of their own resources to
build a harmonious society. Improving the
regulations on the protection of minors and increasing
the incentives for reporting, as well as increasing the
mechanism of tripartite visits to the home, school and
community, may be more conducive to improving
minors' right to protection. Most people will give
favors to others who are closer to them socially (Jones
& Rachlin, 2006), perhaps increasing children
relational connection to society at large has a better
chance of arousing public concern and empathy for
children. For push this work, there is research (Harris
& Fiske, 2006) shows that low-warmth and low-
capacity populations are prone to misogyny, so the
creation of images of children is also necessary. This
can be done by packaging a cute outer appearance
with inner potential.
6 CONCLUSION
The issue of child protection has a long history,
rapidly developing and continuously improving since
the rise of human rights awareness.
Currently, in civilized countries, school-age
children are both protected under the existing order
and potential shapes of future order, more likely to
determine the fate of human civilization. While
appropriate pressure and correction are necessary, on
the other hand, violence inflicted on children, whether
external or internal, physical or emotional, may lead
to adverse effects on children themselves and
potential crises for society.
REFERENCES
Beck D., Whitmore L., MacSweeney N., Brieant A., Karl
V., de Lange A.-M. G., Westlye L. T., Mills K. L., &
Tamnes C. K. 2025. Dimensions of early-life adversity
are differentially associated with patterns of delayed
and accelerated brain maturation. Biological Psychia-
try, 97: 64–72.
Dewald J. F., Meijer A. M., Oort F. J., Kerkhof G. A., &
Bögels S. M. 2010. The influence of sleep quality, sleep
duration and sleepiness on school performance in chil-
dren and adolescents: A meta-analytic review. Sleep
Medicine Reviews, 14: 179–189.
Gillespie S. M., Jones A., & Garofalo C. 2023. Psychopathy
and dangerousness: An umbrella review and meta-anal-
ysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 100: 102240.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2022.102240
Harris L. T., & Fiske S. T. 2006. Dehumanizing the Lowest
of the Low. Psychological Science, 17: 847–853.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01793.x
Jones B., & Rachlin H. 2006. Social Discounting. Psycho-
logical Science, 17: 283–286. https://doi.org/10.
1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01699.x
Koenigs M., Young L., Adolphs R., Tranel D., Cushman F.,
Hauser M., & Damasio A. 2007. Damage to the prefron-
tal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgements. Nature,
446: 908–911. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05631
Law E. C., Han M. X., Lai Z., Lim S., Ong Z. Y., Ng V.,
Gabard-Durnam L. J., Wilkinson C. L., Levin A. R.,
Rifkin-Graboi A., & others. 2023. Associations between
infant screen use, electroencephalography markers, and
cognitive outcomes. JAMA Pediatrics, 177: 311–318.
LeBourgeois M. K., Hale L., Chang A.-M., Akacem L. D.,
Montgomery-Downs H. E., & Buxton O. M. 2017. Dig-
ital media and sleep in childhood and adolescence. Pe-
diatrics, 140: S92–S96.
Lee Y., & Song H.-J. 2024. The influence of observers on
children’s conformity in moral judgment behavior.
Frontiers in Psychology, 15: https://doi.org/10.3389/
fpsyg.2024.1289292
Madigan S., Browne D., Racine N., Mori C., & Tough S.
2019. Association between screen time and children’s
performance on a developmental screening test. JAMA
Pediatrics, 173: 244–250.
Rideout V., Peebles A., Mann S., & Robb B. 2022. The
Common Sense Census: Media Use by Tweens and
Teens, 2021.
Shih M., Pittinsky T. L., & Ambady N. 1999. Stereotype
Susceptibility: Identity Salience and Shifts in Quantita-
tive Performance. Psychological Science, 10: 80–83.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00111
Twenge J. M., & Campbell W. K. 2018. Associations be-
tween screen time and lower psychological well-being