Tesla’s Innovation Management Strategy and Market Strategy

Optimization Analysis

Dianzhang Miao

Bay Campus, Swansea, SA10 6JW, U.K.

Keywords: Innovation Management, Market Strategy Optimization, Electric Vehicles, Sustainable Technology, Tesla Inc.

Abstract: Tesla’s effect on the automotive and energy industries has revolutionized innovation and competition in the

automotive sector in the 21st century. This study follows a systematic theoretical literature review approach

to identify Tesla’s innovation management and market strategy of technology, sustainability, and consumer

orientation. Further, the study assesses Tesla’s vertical integration, agile R&D, and digital marketing

examination of secondary sources, business sources, and case studies. Key findings show that the source of

Tesla’s success is based on radical innovation complemented by operational growth factor but not without its

issues such as fluctuating supply chain and regulatory concerns. The study provides recommendations that

can be implemented to improve the organization’s performance, such as diversification of product offerings,

better collaboration with stakeholders, and leveraging of artificial intelligent market data analysis. This

research contributes to the discourse on sustainable innovation management and offers insights for firms

navigating technology-driven markets.

1 INTRODUCTION

The global electric vehicle industry is experiencing

unprecedented growth, fueled by aggressive climate

policies, falling battery costs, and a surge in consumer

demand for sustainable transportation. This

momentum is further amplified by advancements in

charging infrastructure, government subsidies, and a

competitive race among automakers to phase out

internal combustion engines, as over 20 countries

now mandate 100% zero-emission vehicle sales by

2035. The global electric vehicle (EV) market,

projected to grow at a compound annual rate of 23%

from 2023 to 2030, has transformed Tesla into a

linchpin of sustainable mobility (Grand View

Research, 2024). Tesla, Inc. has emerged as a

dominant force in the EV and renewable energy

industries, reshaping global automotive markets

through its disruptive innovation strategy. Founded in

2003 by Martin Eberhard and Marc Tarpenning, and

later propelled by Elon Musk’s leadership, Tesla

introduced the Roadster in 2008, proving that EVs

could deliver high performance and long-range

capabilities. This innovation laid the foundation for

subsequent breakthroughs, including the Model S,

Model 3, Model X, and Model Y, which have

collectively positioned Tesla as the global EV leader.

As of 2023, Tesla accounted for over 18% of the

global EV market share, with sales exceeding 1.8

million vehicles annually (Zandt, 2025). Beyond

automobiles, Tesla’s foray into solar energy and

battery storage solutions, such as Powerwall and

Megapack, underscores its ambition to revolutionize

the renewable energy sector. However, sustaining its

competitive edge demands continuous strategic

optimization, particularly as legacy automakers, such

as Volkswagen, Ford, and General Motors and

emerging startups like Rivian and Lucid Motors

accelerate their EV production and market

penetration.

Innovation has been Tesla’s primary driver of

success, enabling it to dominate the EV market with

an 18% global share in 2023 and achieve a $67 billion

brand valuation (Interbrand, 2023). However,

evolving industry dynamics, such as intensifying

competition from BYD, which surpassed Tesla in Q4

2023 with 526,000 EV sales, and geopolitical risks

like China’s 60% control over lithium processing,

present challenges that necessitate proactive market

strategy adjustments (Zandt, 2025). This study aims

to explore Tesla’s innovation management strategy

and market strategy optimization, focusing on its

technological advancements, direct-to-consumer

224

Miao, D.

Tesla’s Innovation Management Strategy and Market Strategy Optimization Analysis.

DOI: 10.5220/0013988900004916

Paper published under CC license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)

In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Public Relations and Media Communication (PRMC 2025), pages 224-229

ISBN: 978-989-758-778-8

sales model, global expansion efforts, and

sustainability initiatives, which have collectively

reduced battery costs by 56% since 2016. The key

research questions address Tesla’s core innovation

strategies, competitive challenges, and potential

improvements for market sustainability, particularly

in light of regulatory shifts like the EU’s ICE ban

delay and supply chain vulnerabilities. This research

is significant for both academics and industry

practitioners, as it contributes to the theoretical

understanding of disruptive innovation and strategic

agility while providing actionable insights for

corporate leaders navigating the increasingly

competitive EV landscape. Given Tesla’s influence in

shaping the future of sustainable transportation,

analyzing its strategic trajectory can offer valuable

lessons for policymakers, investors, and competitors

striving to advance the global energy transition.

2 TESLA’S CASE DESCRIPTION

2.1 Tesla’s Innovation Ecosystem

Tesla’s innovation strategy is anchored in vertical

integration, a model that allows the company to

control every aspect of its value chain, from raw

material sourcing to end-user software updates (Lee,

2024). Central to this approach are its Gigafactories,

which produce batteries, powertrains, and vehicles

under one roof, enabling economies of scale and

reducing dependency on external suppliers. For

example, Nevada’s Gigafactory that now holds the

distinction as the largest lithium-ion battery

manufacturing plant in the world manufactures

battery capacity of 37 GWh in 2022 that can fuel over

1.8 million electric vehicles annually (Ozsevim,

2024). This also applies to software where Tesla’s

Autopilot and FSD rely on data from 4M connected

vehicles to improve algorithms and update driving

capabilities via OTA. However, Tesla has a faster

R&D cycle and can produce batteries in-house, as it

did with the recent switch to the 4680 battery cell,

which would increase the car’s range by 54% and

decrease production costs by 56% (Morris, 2021).

This integrated ecosystem not only improves

operational efficiency but also indicates Tesla as a

company with a focus on sustainable technology

solutions for energy storage, including Powerwall and

Megapack, which brought $3.9 billion in revenue in

2022.

2.2 Market Penetration Tactics

Tesla’s market strategy disrupts traditional

automotive norms by eliminating dealerships and

adopting a direct-to-consumer sales model, granting

the company unparalleled control over pricing,

customer experience, and brand consistency. This

approach bypasses intermediary markups and fosters

transparency, enabling Tesla to maintain premium

positioning while strategically adjusting prices in

response to market demands. Coupled with Elon

Musk’s visionary secret master plan branding, which

emphasizes a long-term roadmap for sustainable

energy, Tesla has cultivated a cult-like following,

securing its rank as the world’s most valuable

automotive brand in 2023. The company’s pricing

strategy masterfully balances exclusivity and

accessibility: high-end models like the Model S and

X cater to luxury buyers, reinforcing Tesla’s image as

a tech innovator, while the Model 3 and Y target the

mid-tier segment, accounting for 75% of 2023 sales

and democratizing access to EVs (Lee, 2024). Digital

marketing tactics, including Musk’s viral social

media engagement and referral programs that reward

loyal customers, amplify organic reach, reducing

customer acquisition costs by 30% compared to

traditional advertising. Beyond sales, Tesla’s

expansive Supercharger network, over 45,000

chargers globally, addresses critical infrastructure

barriers to EV adoption, alleviating range anxiety and

enhancing brand loyalty (Morris, 2021). This

integrated ecosystem of convenience and innovation

has driven a 23% year-over-year growth in vehicle

deliveries, reaching 1.37 million units in 2023,

solidifying Tesla’s dominance in an increasingly

competitive market.

2.3 Global Expansion Challenges

Despite its dominance in North America and Europe,

Tesla faces significant hurdles in Asia, particularly in

China, the world’s largest EV market. While Tesla’s

Shanghai Gigafactory produced 710,000 vehicles in

2022, accounting for 52% of its global output, the

company faces stiff competition from domestic

players like BYD and NIO, which collectively hold

60% of China’s EV market (Ozsevim, 2024).

Regulatory barriers, such as China’s data localization

laws and subsidies favoring local manufacturers,

further complicate Tesla’s expansion. For instance,

BYD’s vertically integrated supply chain and

government support enabled it to surpass Tesla in Q4

2023 with 526,000 EV sales (Lee, 2024).

Furthermore, political risks such as trade wars

Tesla’s Innovation Management Strategy and Market Strategy Optimization Analysis

225

between countries and recent restrictions on

exportation of materials such as lithium between the

United States and China affect the protection of

Tesla’s supply chains. In response, Tesla has entered

into lithium agreements in Australia and invested in

the facilities in Nevada (Morris, 2021). However,

these efforts require significant capital and time,

highlighting the need for strategic agility in

navigating Asia’s complex market dynamics.

3 ANALYSIS OF ISSUES

IMPACTING TESLA

3.1 Innovation-Cost Trade-Offs

Tesla’s disruptive innovation culture that saw the car

maker invest significant amounts on R&D, 12% of its

revenue in 2022 has brought to the market cutting-

edge products such as the 4680 battery cell that is

expected to provide 54% increase in range while at

the same time reducing manufacturing costs by 56%

(Lee, 2024). However, the trade-off between

innovation and cost efficiency remains a persistent

challenge. Recent studies emphasize the risks of

radical innovation without parallel incremental

improvements. Amit & Zott (2020) suggested that a

balanced portfolio of incremental and disruptive

innovations is critical for sustainability. Empirical

findings by Santa‐Maria et al. (2022) revealed that

firms that engage in radical innovation are

characterized by higher levels of Financial Risk than

firms engaging in lean innovation. Toyota’s kaizen

approach of the balance between cost and revenue

supports it to sustain a 10% operating margin rather

than Tesla’s 8% in 2023. Further, a review by Setyadi

et al. (2025) highlighted that AI-driven

manufacturing optimizations can reduce energy costs

by 30% and material waste by 20%. Integrating AI-

driven lean production with disruptive innovations at

Tesla would enhance cost-cutting without

undermining the company’s technological

superiority. One of the major financial risks that Tesla

faces is its high level of external financing such as

equity raises and debt financing. As pointed out by

Gambardella et al. (2021), organizations with high R

& D intensity require complementary business

strategies to support profitability such as licensing of

IP or formation of strategic partnerships to share the

cost of innovation.

3.2 Market Saturation Risks

Tesla confronts growing risks of market saturation in

its core premium EV segments, compounded by an

over-reliance on the Model 3 and Model Y. The

premium EV market in developed economies is

nearing saturation, with Tesla’s Model 3 and Model

Y accounting for 75% of its 2023 sales (Zandt, 2025).

This over-reliance on two models heightens

vulnerability to competitive disruptions. Ford’s

Mustang Mach-E, capturing 7% of the U.S. EV

market in 2023, exemplifies how competitors are

challenging Tesla’s dominance (Cox Automotive,

2023). Recent literature highlights the importance of

portfolio diversification in mitigating market

saturation risks. A study by McKinsey & Company

(2024) stresses that automakers must expand product

lines to match evolving consumer preferences,

particularly the growing demand for SUVs and

pickup trucks. Tesla’s Cybertruck issues and the

company’s high prices show that market entry delays

are a serious threat, especially with the success of

Ford F-150 Lightning and the Rivian R1T. Moreover,

this marked Limitedness of the company in

commercial EVs is also one of the issues that have

been considered to be missed opportunities.

According to Patil et al.’s (2024) findings, the

commercial EV market will grow at a CAGR of 25 %

up to 2030, mainly due to the expansion of the

logistics and e-commerce industries. Expanding

Tesla’s Semi and electric van offerings could mitigate

risks associated with over-reliance on premium

consumer models.

3.3 Regulatory Dependencies

Tesla faces mounting risks from its reliance on

regulatory incentives, with shifting policies exposing

vulnerabilities in its revenue model and long-term

financial stability. Tesla’s financial performance is

significantly influenced by regulatory incentives,

with carbon credits and subsidies contributing 15% of

its 2022 revenue (Huang, 2023). However, shifting

policies threaten this revenue stream. The European

Union’s delay in phasing out internal combustion

engines (ICE) and the Inflation Reduction Act’s

stricter EV tax credit eligibility could reduce Tesla’s

financial benefits. Setyadi et al. (2025) emphasized

that firms overly dependent on policy-driven

revenues must develop self-sustaining models.

Volkswagen’s strategy of integrating renewable

energy into its operations, reducing its reliance on

external incentives, exemplifies a proactive approach.

Recent findings by Rossi and Bianchi (2024)

PRMC 2025 - International Conference on Public Relations and Media Communication

226

highlighted those automakers investing in renewable

energy projects, such as solar-powered charging

infrastructure, can enhance long-term resilience.

Tesla’s Energy division containing Powerwall and

Megapack saw 40% of year-over-year increase last

year and still makes up only 8% of the company’s

total revenue (Grand View Research, 2024). The

expansion of these services can diversify the revenues

and help to decrease the level of dependence on

regulations.

3.4 Supply Chain Fragility

Tesla’s just-in-time (JIT) supply chain, while

efficient, is highly vulnerable to geopolitical

disruptions and resource shortages (Jin, 2022).

China’s dominance in lithium processing, with 60%

of global supply and the U.S.-China trade war have

impacted Tesla’s material costs and production

timelines. In 2022, lithium prices surged by 400%,

significantly increasing battery production costs.

Ivanov and Dolgui (2021) emphasized supply chain

resilience as crucial for mitigating such risks. Tesla

has taken steps to address these vulnerabilities,

securing lithium supply deals in Australia and

investing in Nevada-based mining projects. However,

these efforts require substantial capital and long lead

times. A systematic review by Setyadi et al. (2025)

highlighted the role of AI and blockchain in

enhancing supply chain transparency and efficiency.

Firms implementing AI-driven logistics optimization

report up to 25% reductions in supply chain

disruptions. Tesla’s potential adoption of these

technologies could mitigate vulnerabilities by

improving predictive analytics for supply chain

management. Additionally, Tesla’s reliance on

single-source suppliers for critical components like

semiconductors has exacerbated its fragility. The

global chip shortage of 2021 delayed Tesla’s

production (Lang et al. 2021). Implementing dual-

sourcing strategies and investing in closed-loop

recycling for battery materials could further enhance

resilience, aligning with circular economy principles

(Tiseo et al., 2023).

4 SUGGESTIONS

4.1 Open Innovation Partnerships

Tesla can mitigate its high R&D costs by adopting

Chesbrough’s Open Innovation model, collaborating

with startups and academia to co-develop

technologies like AI-driven autonomy and solid-state

batteries. For instance, partnering with firms like

QuantumScape, a leader in solid-state battery

research, could accelerate breakthroughs while

sharing financial risks. Recent studies by Portuguez-

Castro (2023) emphasized that open innovation

ecosystems enhance agility, as seen in BMW’s

collaboration with 1,300 startups through its Startup

Garage program, which reduced R&D costs by 20%.

However, cultural and strategic challenges remain

due to the company’s historical approach to not share

proprietary technology such as Supercharger network

IP. Laursen and Salter (2023) warned that when firms

are overly dependent on external partnerships,

competitive advantage is likely to be weakened. To

balance this, Tesla could adopt a hybrid approach

which encompasses licensing non-core technologies

while retaining control over critical IP like battery

chemistry.

4.2 Product Line Diversification

Tesla’s over-reliance on the Model 3/Y necessitates a

diversified product portfolio, including affordable

EVs. While the global commercial EV market is

expected to reach at a growth rate of 25,125,000 with

a market value of 3125, 000) and commercial

vehicles. The global commercial EV market,

expected to be around 3113.7 billion in pre-order for

electric delivery vans by 2024 (Grand View

Research). Tesla’s Cybertruck delayed and lack of

presence in the electric van segment underscored.

MacDuffie et al. (2021) suggested that there is a need

for localized low-cost models that can be adopted in

emerging markets such as India where the adoption

rate of EV is 154% annually. For instance, for

$15,000 Seagull EV, BYD sold 11% of the new car

market share in China in 2023 (Ozsevim, 2024). Tesla

could replicate this by leveraging its Gigafactories in

Mexico and Indonesia to produce budget models,

though challenges like sparse charging infrastructure

in these regions demand parallel investments.

4.3 Data-Driven Marketing

With data from 4 million connected vehicles, Tesla

has an unparalleled opportunity to refine its

marketing strategy through predictive analytics and

hyper-personalization. Machine learning algorithms

can analyze driving patterns, charging behavior, and

in-car app usage to segment customers and deliver

tailored advertisements. For example, data revealing

that 40% of Tesla owners charge during off-peak

hours could inform partnerships with utility

companies to offer time-of-use discounts, enhancing

Tesla’s Innovation Management Strategy and Market Strategy Optimization Analysis

227

customer retention and satisfaction. In their study,

Hoffman et al. (2022) stated that businesses using

real-time data analytics record a 25% conversion rate,

which could be used by Tesla to improve its

marketing efficiency. However, issues such as how

Tesla managed to mishandle driver camera footage in

recent weeks and months present other reputation

risks. To address these concerns, blockchain data

anonymization can be implemented in Tesla so as to

meet regulation such as GDPR and CCPA while at

the same time building trust from the consumers.

4.4 Policy Advocacy Networks

Tesla’s reliance on regulatory incentives, which

contributed 15% of its 2022 revenue, underscores the

need for strategic policy alliances to stabilize revenue

streams amid shifting political landscapes. Forming

coalitions with renewable energy giants like NextEra

Energy and Ørsted could amplify Tesla’s lobbying

power, advocating for uniform EV subsidies and

charging infrastructure mandates. For instance, the

U.S. National EV Charging Initiative, backed by Ford

and Siemens, secured $7.5 billion in federal funding,

demonstrating the effectiveness of cross-industry

collaboration. Research by Meckling and Nahm

(2022) revealed that such coalitions are 60% more

effective in shaping climate policies than solo efforts,

as they present a unified front to policymakers.

However, Tesla’s adversarial stance toward unions

and regulators, such as its clashes with the NLRB

over labor practices, risks alienating potential allies

and undermining its credibility. To build trust, Tesla

could align with global initiatives like the EV100

coalition, which advocates for corporate EV

adoption, while transparently reporting its carbon

footprint reductions.

5 CONCLUSION

Tesla’s ascent as a dominant player in the electric

vehicle (EV) and renewable energy industries is a

testament to its innovation-driven market strategy. By

pioneering high-performance battery technology,

direct-to-consumer sales, and vertically integrated

energy solutions, Tesla has redefined industry

standards, forcing traditional automakers to

accelerate their EV transitions. However, despite its

success, Tesla faces increasing pressure from legacy

automakers, emerging EV startups, and shifting

regulatory landscapes. Competitors such as

Volkswagen, General Motors, and BYD are

aggressively expanding their EV offerings,

leveraging their extensive production capacities and

dealer networks. Meanwhile, newer entrants with

advanced battery innovations and autonomous

driving capabilities, such as Rivian, Lucid Motors,

and NIO, are challenging Tesla’s first-mover

advantage. To sustain its leadership, Tesla must

broaden its product portfolio beyond premium

passenger vehicles. Expanding into affordable mass-

market models, commercial electric fleets, and

advanced energy storage solutions would diversify

revenue streams and reduce the risks associated with

market saturation.

As the EV revolution accelerates, adaptability and

continuous innovation will be crucial for long-term

industry success. Tesla’s ability to embrace open

innovation, integrate AI-driven automation in

manufacturing, and expand its energy division will

determine its resilience in an evolving market. In a

landscape where technological advancements must

align with financial viability, regulatory compliance,

and consumer trust, Tesla must refine its strategic

agility to navigate challenges while maintaining

profitability. Companies that fail to anticipate shifting

consumer preferences, geopolitical risks, and

sustainability demands risk losing their competitive

edge. Tesla’s trajectory provides a valuable

framework for businesses facing technological

disruptions, emphasizing the importance of proactive

innovation, diversified expansion, and operational

resilience. By refining its market strategy and

adopting a more customer-centric, globally adaptive

approach, Tesla can reinforce its leadership while

playing a pivotal role in the transition toward a

sustainable, electrified future.

REFERENCES

Alan, D., Baddeley, Richard, J., & Allen, et al. 2014.

Evidence for two attentional components in visual

working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology

Learning Memory & Cognition 40(6):1499.

Cowan, N. 1996. Short-term memory, working memory,

and their importance in language processing. Topics in

Language Disorders 17(1): 1-18.

Fang, X. 2009. Short-term memory in efl listening

comprehension. Asian Social Science 4(4):103.

Hai, S. et al. 2016. A computerized evaluation of sensory

memory and short-term memory impairment after rapid

ascent to 4280 m. Biological Medicine and

Envrionment Science: English Version 29(6): 4.

Kondo, H.M. & Kochiyama, T. 2017. Normal aging slows

spontaneous switching in auditory and visual

bistability. Neuroence 152-160,

PRMC 2025 - International Conference on Public Relations and Media Communication

228

Lee, A. 2014. Effects of syllable-length on short-term

memory of number sequences a cross-linguistic study

of Korean and Japanese bilinguals.

Amit, R., & Zott, C. 2020. Business model innovation

strategy: Transformational concepts and tools for

entrepreneurial leaders. John Wiley & Sons.

Gambardella, A., Heaton, S., Novelli, E., & Teece, D. J.

2021. Profiting from enabling technologies?. Strategy

Science 6(1): 75-90.

Grand View Research. 2024. Electric Vehicle Market Size

& Trends.

https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-

analysis/electric-vehicles-ev-market

Hoffman, D. L., Moreau, C. P., Stremersch, S., & Wedel,

M. 2022. The rise of new technologies in marketing: A

framework and outlook. Journal of Marketing 86(1): 1-

Huang, W. 2023. Understanding Tesla's financial strength:

analysis of financial reports and dupont

analysis. Highlights in Business, Economics and

Management 6: 250-261.

Ivanov, D., & Dolgui, A. 2021. A digital supply chain twin

for managing the disruption risks and resilience in the

era of Industry 4.0. Production Planning &

Control 32(9): 775-788.

Jin, H. 2022. Explainer: How Tesla weathered global

supply chain issues that knocked rivals. Reuters.

https://www.reuters.com/markets/europe/how-tesla-

weathered-global-supply-chain-issues-that-knocked-

rivals-2022-01-04/

Lang, J. W., Reber, B., & Aldori, H. 2021. How Tesla

created advantages in the ev automotive paradigm,

through an integrated business model of value capture

and value creation. Business & Management Studies:

An International Journal 9(1): 385-404.

Laursen, K., & Salter, A. 2023. What we know about open

innovation, unresolved issues, and a checklist for future

research. Journal of Industrial and Business

Economics 50(4): 743-764.

Lee, D. 2024. BYD Revenue Eclipses Tesla for First Time

as EV Giants Go Head to Head. Bloomberg.com.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-10-

30/byd-revenue-eclipses-tesla-for-first-time-as-ev-

giants-go-head-to-head?embedded-checkout=true

MacDuffie, P. J., Fujimoto, T., & Heller, D. A. 2021.

Building supply-chain continuity capabilities in a post-

pandemic world. Wharton School, University of

Pennsylvania.

McKinsey & Company. 2024. Shifting gears: Car

consumers’ evolving perceptions.

https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-

insights/themes/shifting-gears-car-consumers-

evolving-perceptions

Meckling, J., & Nahm, J. 2022. Strategic state capacity:

how states counter opposition to climate

policy. Comparative Political Studies 55(3): 493-523.

Morris, J. 2021. When is the tesla battery revolution really

coming? Forbes.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesmorris/2021/08/31

/when-is-the-tesla-battery-revolution-really-coming/

Ozsevim, I. 2024. Electric Dreams: Tesla’s gigafactory

network and EV battery production blueprint.

https://www.automotivemanufacturingsolutions.com/e

v-battery-production/teslas-ev-battery-production-and-

global-gigafactory-network/45873.article#:~:

Patil, G., Pode, G., Diouf, B., & Pode, R. 2024. Sustainable

Decarbonization of Road Transport: Policies, Current

Status, and Challenges of Electric

Vehicles. Sustainability 16(18): 8058.

Portuguez-Castro, M. 2023. Exploring the potential of open

innovation for co-creation in entrepreneurship: A

systematic literature review. Administrative

Sciences 13(9): 198.

Rossi, L., & Bianchi, G. 2024. Sustainable solutions:

Integrating renewable energy and electric vehicles for

cleaner operations. Journal of Energy Research and

Reviews 16(3): 52-63.

Santa‐Maria, T., Vermeulen, W. J., & Baumgartner, R. J.

2022). How do incumbent firms innovate their business

models for the circular economy? Identifying micro‐

foundations of dynamic capabilities. Business Strategy

and the Environment 31(4): 1308-1333.

Setyadi, A., Soekotjo, S., Lestari, S. D., Pawirosumarto, S.,

& Damaris, A. 2025. Trends and Opportunities in

Sustainable Manufacturing: A Systematic Review of

Key Dimensions from 2019 to

2024. Sustainability 17(2): 789.

Zandt, F. 2025. Tesla and BYD Claim a Third of the Global

BEV Market. Statista.

https://www.statista.com/chart/27733/battery-electric-

vehicles-manufacturers/

Tesla’s Innovation Management Strategy and Market Strategy Optimization Analysis

229