3.2 Difficulty of Content Supervision
and Spread of False Information
The World Wide Web is a favorable environment for
the mass dissemination of unsubstantiated rumors
(Del Vicario et al., 2016). With the rapid development
of social media platforms and artificial intelligence-
generated content (AIGC) technology, the difficulty
of content supervision is increasing, and the spread of
false information is becoming more and more serious.
AIGC technology can generate a large amount of
content efficiently and at low cost, thus lowering the
threshold to produce false information. In addition,
AI can imitate and learn human language, and much
of the content generated is often very confusing,
which is difficult to distinguish between true and false
information in social media networks, making it
difficult to identify and suppress false information in
social media networks.
AIGC technology exacerbated the explosive
growth of information volume and brought great
pressure to platform content regulation. Traditional
manual review information is difficult to cope with
such a massive amount of information flow, and
relying on algorithms for content review also has
obvious shortcomings. AI moderation systems often
struggle to understand complex contexts because AI
has trouble understanding the emotion of content as
humans do, which can lead to misjudgments. For
instance, disinformation may bypass the moderation
mechanism using suggestive language, image
mosaicking, or semantic ambiguity, which further
increases the difficulty of supervision (Gorwa et al.,
2020). Second, false information spreads extremely
fast on social media. False information is often more
likely to attract users' attention than real information
because its content is usually more emotional and
novel, which will attract users more and promote the
spread of false information (Vosoughi et al., 2018).
Users unwittingly expand the spread of false
information through reposts, likes, and comments due
to their lack of discrimination or intention. In
addition, while pursuing user engagement, the
recommendation algorithm will give priority to the
content that users are interested in according to their
preferences.
3.3 Protection of Content Creators'
Rights and Interests
With the popularization and development of UGC
and AIGC technology, the protection of the rights and
interests of content creators has also become a topic
of concern. In the context of the rapid development of
the Internet, creators' intellectual property rights,
creative freedom and income from creation are all
facing challenges.
First, insufficient protection of intellectual
property rights is one of the core problems of the
rights and interests of creators. In the UGC mode,
creators' original content is often subjected to
unauthorized reprinting, plagiarism, and even
commercial use, and the intellectual property rights
of creators are difficult to protect, creators themselves
often lack effective means of recourse and rights
protection, because there are too few ways and
support provided to them. With the development of
AIGC technology, this problem is more complicated.
Artificial intelligence can use a large amount of
public data to train imitate and generate new content,
but these training data may contain copyrighted
works, thus triggering the controversy of "secondary
infringement".
The freedom of creators to create content is also
limited to some extent. To avoid controversy or cater
to specific aesthetic tendencies, some content review
or recommendation mechanisms will restrict or block
certain types of content without reason, making it
difficult for creators' content to be spread and their
freedom of expression to be infringed. In addition, the
large-scale emergence of AI-generated content may
lead to the original works being submerged in many
repeated or templating content and the content created
by AIGC will be widely disseminated, but the original
content will be limited.
In addition, on social media platforms, creators
can generate revenue by creating content, but they
often face the problem of unfair distribution of
revenue. Many social media platforms distribute
content through algorithms, and creators' income is
highly correlated with content exposure. However,
these platforms often dictate distribution rules and
may favor higher-traffic content or mass-market
titles, making it difficult for small or deep creators to
earn a reasonable financial return. Moreover, in the
era of AIGC content dominance, automatically
generated content may be used for commercial
purposes on a large scale, and there is no need to
pursue copyright issues, so many platforms are more
willing to use AIGC, while creators in the original
data set are difficult to get any share. This unequal
distribution of revenue will discourage creators,
which in turn will affect the diversity and quality of
content on the platform.