Review on the Impact of Homework Amount on Chinese High School
Students' Learning
Lipeng Song
School of Southeast Asian Studies, Guangxi Minzu University, Nanning, 530000, China
Keywords: Homework Amount, Chinese High School Students, Learning Effectiveness, Optimal Homework, Homework
Management.
Abstract: In China, high schools often assign a large amount of homework. High school students, who are in a critical
period of physical and mental growth, are easily affected by the amount of homework. This study focuses on
homework amount and high school students' learning effectiveness. The results show that Chinese high school
students generally have a large amount of homework with a single type, especially in key classes. There is an
optimal amount of homework, and too much or too little homework may affect students' learning. Excessive
homework leads to various negative outcomes. Insufficient homework cannot consolidate knowledge and
improve abilities. Teachers should vary homework, manage time, address differences, and guide self-learning.
Research can develop dynamic models and analyze exam reforms' impact on homework and learning. The
study can expand to areas with weak educational resources, compare urban-rural differences, and improve
homework feedback for effective tutoring and high-quality high school education.
1 INTRODUCTION
In the Chinese education system, high school
education, as a crucial bridge connecting compulsory
education and higher education, has always attracted
much attention. However, behind this high level of
attention, schools and teachers are under tremendous
pressure. On the one hand, in order to stand out in the
fierce National College Entrance Examination,
schools strive to improve the enrollment rate to shape
their own brand image. On the other hand, teachers
face the pressure of performance assessment, and
their teaching achievements are closely related to
personal career development. In this context, many
high schools tend to assign a large amount of
homework, hoping to achieve "qualitative change"
through "quantitative change". However, high school
students are in a critical period of physical and mental
growth. Under the pressure of a large amount of
homework for a long time, they are extremely likely
to feel tired and anxious, their learning enthusiasm is
damaged, and they may even develop a negative
attitude towards learning. Therefore, it is of great
significance to deeply explore the internal
relationship between the amount of homework and
high school students' learning effects for optimizing
educational practice, protecting students' physical and
mental health, and promoting their long-term
development. This paper uses the literature review
method to explore the impact of homework amount
on Chinese high school students' learning.
2 INTRODUCTION OF
RESEARCH OBJECTS
This study focuses on two key variables: the amount
of homework and the learning effectiveness of high
school students. The amount of homework refers to
the total quantity of various learning tasks that
teachers assign to high school students after class
according to the teaching syllabus and course
objectives. Its scope is extremely wide, including not
only common written homework (such as exercise
book questions and test papers of various subjects,
which are used to consolidate the theoretical
knowledge learned in class), but also various practical
projects (to cultivate students' practical operation and
problem-solving abilities). In the actual measurement
process, the time students spend on these homework
tasks is generally used as the main indicator. Further
subdivision, the amount of homework can be divided
into objective homework amount and subjective
homework amount. The objective homework amount
342
Song, L.
Review on the Impact of Homework Amount on Chinese High School Students’ Learning.
DOI: 10.5220/0013984900004912
Paper published under CC license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Innovative Education and Social Development (IESD 2025), pages 342-346
ISBN: 978-989-758-779-5
Proceedings Copyright © 2025 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda.
refers to the actual quantity of assigned homework,
while the subjective homework amount refers to the
students' perceived homework burden, which is
affected by factors such as individual learning ability,
learning efficiency, and interest in homework.
Learning effectiveness refers to a series of observable
and measurable results achieved by students through
activities such as knowledge acquisition, skill
cultivation, and thinking development in the learning
process (such as academic performance, knowledge
mastery, thinking ability, autonomous learning ability).
These results not only reflect the current learning state
but also concern future development potential.
3 THE SITUATION OF HIGH
SCHOOL HOMEWORK
AMOUNT IN CHINA
Xie (2008) research shows that due to the pressure of
college entrance examination, Chinese high school
students generally face a large amount of homework
and need to spend a lot of time on it. 78.53% of the
students spend 3-4 hours completing extracurricular
homework every day. In addition, the types of
homework are relatively monotonous. As many as
66.34% of the students think that written homework
accounts for 80 - 90% of all the homework assigned
by teachers, and there is fewer practical homework.
Chen et al. (2014) selected three high schools in
Ningbo City by convenience sampling method, and
then randomly selected 103 subjects from each grade
of senior one, senior two, and senior three in each
school. They collected data by questionnaire survey.
The survey found that most high school students
spend more than 1 hour on homework, and even
10.7% of high school students spend 4 hours on
writing homework every day. 67% of high school
students felt that they could complete the homework
every day, but they needed to work hard. Only 5.8%
of high school students could easily complete the
daily homework. Chang & Guo (2011) selected 70
high school freshmen from a high school in Yongfeng
County, Jiangxi Province, and conducted a
questionnaire survey on the issue of homework
amount. The survey results showed that 78.6% of
high school students thought that the homework
amount was too much or relatively large, 21.4% of
high school students thought that the homework
amount was moderate, and no high school student
thought that the homework amount was small.
Compared with the homework amount in the
compulsory education stage, as many as 90% of high
school students thought that the high school
homework amount had increased a lot, only 10% of
high school students thought that the homework
amount had not increased much, and no high school
student thought that the high school homework
amount had decreased compared with that in junior
high school and primary school. Hou (2020) research
investigated the freshmen in a key high school
science competition experimental class during the
first year of high school. The results showed that the
students had to spend at least 4 hours and 30 minutes
completing the homework from Monday to Friday,
and at least 4 hours and 50 minutes on weekends.
Most students needed 6 hours to complete all the
homework.
In the research on subjective homework amount,
Xie (2008) found that most students thought that
compared with liberal arts homework, mathematics,
physics, and chemistry homework were more
difficult, took more time to complete, and were more
difficult to finish. Among 673 high school students in
Shenzhen, 78.75% of the students thought that
mathematics was difficult, followed by chemistry
(65%) and physics (30%), while the proportions of
students who thought that politics, Chinese, history,
and geography homework were difficult were only
11.25%, 10%, 6.25%, and 2.5% respectively.
Through interviews with high school students, it was
found that the reason why high school students
generally thought that mathematics, physics, and
chemistry homework were difficult was that these
subjects combined many knowledge points, the
knowledge system was relatively complex, and they
needed to recall them one by one. Solving a problem
often required careful consideration. In addition,
mathematics, physics, and chemistry homework
required a lot of calculations, and the question types
were relatively flexible.
Through a series of related studies, a common
phenomenon can be found. That is, regardless of the
grade, students generally report that they need to deal
with a large number of written homework with high
difficulty when facing academic tasks. These
homework tasks largely occupy students' a lot of
after-school time and bring them considerable
learning pressure. When further focusing on the
homework amount of students in key classes for in-
depth exploration, the research results show that the
situation is worse. It can be inferred that compared
with ordinary class students; key class students may
indeed bear heavier homework tasks. The main
reason behind this may be that the teaching mode of
key classes is often guided by higher academic
standards.
Review on the Impact of Homework Amount on Chinese High School Students’ Learning
343
4 THE IMPACT OF HOMEWORK
AMOUNT ON STUDENT
LEARNING AND THRESHOLD
EXPLORATION
Studies by Muhlenbruck et al. (2000), Pllana (2022),
Xu (2008), Chang et al. (2014) and others have shown
that there is an optimal amount of homework. When
this amount is reached, students' learning effects are
the best, and too much or too little homework may
affect students' learning. Liu (2015) research
explored the threshold of a reasonable amount of
homework. She selected students from the high
school department of a district school in Shenzhen to
issue questionnaires. Statistical data analysis showed
that the upper limit of the time when high school
students felt that the total homework of all subjects
was moderate every day was 3 hours. 45.3% of high
school students thought that it was moderate to
complete the homework within 1-2 hours, and 37.8%
of high school students thought that it was moderate
to complete the homework within 2-3 hours. When
the amount of homework exceeded 3 hours, the
proportion of students who felt that the homework
was too much increased from 37% to 75.5%.
Therefore, high school students should complete the
homework of all subjects within 3 hours every day.
Excessive homework has a significant negative
impact on students' learning. Chang et al. (2014)
investigated and analyzed 2342 students and found
that there was a negative correlation between the long
time spent on homework and foreign language course
performance. This negative correlation was
consistent in different languages and performance
measurement indicators (the GPA given by teachers
in the six ordered parts of the course and the
standardized ability test scores at the end of the
course), and it was still significant after controlling
for potential covariates (such as language learning
talent, demographic variables, and emotional factors).
This indicates that after considering other factors that
may affect performance, the long time spent on
foreign language homework still has a significant
negative impact on performance. Excessive
homework will encroach on students' individualized
learning time. Taking language learning as an
example, students need to participate in
individualized activities, such as oral practice, but
excessive homework may lead to students lacking
enough time to carry out these activities, thus
affecting their learning performance. In addition,
excessive homework may also weaken students'
autonomous learning ability, making students overly
dependent on the tasks assigned by teachers and
lacking opportunities for autonomous learning, which
is not conducive to cultivating autonomous learning
ability. Too much homework will also compress
students' extracurricular activity time, making them
have no time to participate in extracurricular activities
that can stimulate creativity or improve social and
teamwork abilities. The learning channels are only
limited to the classroom, resulting in their inability to
acquire more extensive and diverse extracurricular
knowledge, thus hindering students' all-round
development. Hu (2001) compared the daily lives of
middle school students in China, Japan, and the
United States and found that nearly 70% of Chinese
middle school students did not participate in any
extracurricular group activities, and only 10.5% of
Chinese high school students joined extracurricular
sports activity groups (34.5% of Japanese high school
students and 53.3% of American high school
students). Chang & Guo (2011), Xie (2008)
emphasized the adverse effects of excessive
homework amount on the physical and mental health
of high school students. A large amount of
extracurricular homework encroaches on high school
students' sleep time, and their bodies are in a state of
fatigue for a long time, which is not conducive to the
absorption of knowledge. When students are
overburdened, they may develop a rebellious
mentality, lose interest in learning, complete
homework by copying from each other, and even
have phenomena such as weariness of learning and
dropping out of school.
Insufficient homework also has a negative impact
on students' learning effectiveness. Zhang & Chen
(2004) research pointed out that insufficient
homework amount could not achieve the goal of
consolidating, clarifying, deepening, and absorbing
knowledge for students. In this case, students'
knowledge acquisition only stays at the surface level,
and it is difficult to deeply understand its essence, let
alone use it flexibly. In addition, the knowledge
forgetting rate will also increase significantly.
Moreover, Pllana (2022) proposed that homework
helped students to study learning resources more
independently and cultivated students' self-discipline
and sense of responsibility. Since homework is
carried out regularly, students can choose a suitable
time at home to complete the homework in a planned
way. When students study at the same time every day
and every week, learning will become a part of their
lives. Too little homework amount may lead to
students' lack of autonomous learning awareness and
time management ability. When the amount of
homework is too small, students do not need to
IESD 2025 - International Conference on Innovative Education and Social Development
344
reasonably arrange the time to complete the
homework, and it is difficult to develop autonomous
learning awareness and good time management
habits. They may waste the remaining time at will
after completing a small amount of homework instead
of using the time to preview, review, or expand
learning. This may reduce students' learning interest
and motivation. When students easily complete the
homework, they cannot experience the joy of success
through efforts to overcome difficulties, lack a sense
of achievement, and then lose interest and motivation
in learning, and their learning enthusiasm decreases.
5 CONCLUSION
Current research shows that there is a significant
correlation between high school students' academic
burden and their learning effectiveness. An
appropriate amount of homework can positively
promote learning effects and help students
consolidate knowledge and improve skills. However,
when the amount of homework exceeds a certain
limit, the learning effectiveness will not increase but
decline. Specifically, an excessive homework burden
will occupy a large amount of students' after-school
time, leading to physical and mental exhaustion,
which may then trigger learning burnout, negative
behaviors such as perfunctoriness and
procrastination, and reduce the efficiency of
knowledge absorption. On the other hand, it can be
inferred from current research that excessive
homework may compress the space for students'
autonomous exploration and thinking, limit the
development of their innovative and critical thinking,
and is not conducive to the improvement of students'
comprehensive qualities. When the amount of
homework is too small, students lack sufficient
practice opportunities, which limits the application
and expansion of knowledge, making it difficult to
achieve the goals of strengthening memory and
deepening understanding. The mastery of knowledge
only stays at the surface level, and the forgetting rate
is high. Insufficient homework also makes students
unable to experience the sense of achievement after
overcoming difficulties in the learning process,
affecting their learning enthusiasm.
In the assignment of homework, teachers should
focus on diversifying the types of homework,
increasing practical homework such as experiments
and investigations, cultivating students'
comprehensive abilities, and reducing the repetitive
and mechanical content in written homework. The
homework time should be controlled within 3 hours,
and the homework time of each subject should be
reasonably allocated to avoid excessive homework in
a certain subject. Teachers should pay attention to
individual differences among students, understand
their learning abilities, interests, and subject
advantages, and make personalized adjustments to the
difficulty and amount of homework. Teachers should
guide students to reasonably arrange their homework
time and cultivate their autonomous learning
awareness and time management ability. For
example, teachers teach students how to make a
learning plan and encourage them to self-monitor and
evaluate their learning effects to improve learning
efficiency.
Future research can focus on constructing a
precise homework amount model, comprehensively
considering factors such as students' learning styles,
subject characteristics, and psychological states to
dynamically adjust the homework amount. At the
same time, it can combine the dynamics of the college
entrance examination reform to analyze the changes
in homework amount and students' learning
effectiveness under different subject combinations. In
addition, the geographical scope of the research can
be expanded to include more areas with weak
educational resources and compare the differences
between urban and rural areas. Deepen the research
on the homework feedback mechanism to achieve
rapid feedback and effective tutoring, so that
homework can truly serve the growth of students and
contribute to the high-quality development of high
school education.
REFERENCES
Chang, C.B. et al. 2014. Relationships of Attitudes Toward
Homework and Time Spent on Homework to Course
Outcomes: The Case of Foreign Language Learning.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 1049:1063.
Chang, Q.Z. & Guo, B.Y. 2011. A Study on the Academic
Burden of High School Students under the Background
of New Curriculum. Forum on Contemporary Educa-
tion, 74:76.
Chen, C.F. et al. 2014. A Comparative Study of Learning
Burden and Extracurricular Activities between Chinese
and Swedish High School Students. Journal of Huzhou
Teachers College, 97:102.
Hou, Y.P. 2020. Time limited and quantitative assignment
of homework for high school students. Teaching and
Management, 31:33.
Hu, X. 2001. Comparison of Daily Life of Middle School
Students in China, Japan, and the United States. Con-
temporary Young Research, 45:48.
Liu, X.Q. 2015. A Study on the Intervention of Homework
Volume for Middle School Students: Taking the High
Review on the Impact of Homework Amount on Chinese High School Students’ Learning
345
School Department of a District School in Shenzhen as
an Example. Educational Research, 122:132.
Muhlenbruck, L. et al. 2000. Homework and achievement:
Explaining the different strengths of relation at the ele-
mentary and secondary school levels. Social Psychol-
ogy of Education, 295:317.
Pllana, D. 2022. Suitable Homework Boosts Highschool
Learning Effects. World Journal of Education, 40:47.
Ren, B.G. 2006. Correlation analysis between high school
students' homework time and English learning perfor-
mance. Teaching and Research of English in Primary
and Secondary Schools, 13:16.
Xie, H.L. 2008. Teacher Cultural Analysis of the Problem
of High School Students' Homework Burden (Master's
Thesis). Southwest University, 11:14.
Xu, J. 2008. Models of Secondary School Students’ Interest
in Homework: A Multilevel Analysis. American Edu-
cational Research Journal, 1180:1205.
Zhang, L.P. & Chen, H.J. 2004. Research on the Relation-
ship between Homework and Learning Efficiency of
Senior One Students. Shanghai Research on Education,
47:50.
IESD 2025 - International Conference on Innovative Education and Social Development
346