the Development of Elderly Education (2016-2020)
calls for the formation of a pattern of elderly
education around five levels: institutional
mechanism, resource supply, development path,
support services and sustainability.
3.2 Policy Objects
Place China's gerontological education policy objects
change with the evolution of its policy objectives. In
the 1980s, policies aimed at serving retired cadres
mainly included retired cadres and relevant
departments involved in gerontological education,
and policy documents during this period were
ambiguous about the policy objects, giving only a
general plan without a clear definition; in the 1990s,
gerontological education policies were subject to
international influences, and the policy objects were
further defined. In the 1990s, the policy on education
for the elderly was influenced by the international
community, and the scope of the policy object was
further expanded, i.e., it was expanded to cover all
groups of elderly people on the basis of the previous
one, and universities for the elderly and radio and
television broadcasting were clearly defined as
important forms of education for the elderly, and at
the same time, the main departments responsible for
the education for the elderly were identified. After the
year 2000, the targets of the policy on education for
the elderly were basically defined, and the policy for
this period, while continuing the existing policy, also
emphasized the role of social forces in the policy that
could not be ignored. So far, the government
management and production of public services, social
acceptance of management, citizens benefit from the
policy object system is basically finalized.
4 THE PROBLEMS OF THE EL-
DERLY EDUCATION POLICY
4.1 One-Sided Curriculum Content
The value orientation of China's geriatric education
policy is limited by the social welfare perspective. In
the policy text, although there have been laws and
policy documents written to protect the rights and
interests of the elderly in education, so that it has risen
to the level of national will, however, in the
subsequent relevant documents do not specifically
state that the rights and interests of the elderly are
guaranteed, but more to improve the life of the
elderly, pay attention to their physical and mental
health as the value of the focus of the elderly
education policy, for example, in the Notice on the
Issuance of Elderly Education Development Plan
(2016-2020) issued by the General Office of the State
Council. For example, in the Circular of the General
Office of the State Council on the Issuance of the
Development Plan for Elderly Education (2016-
2020), it is stated that “education on ideology and
morality should be actively carried out to help the
elderly improve their quality of life and realize the
value of their lives”. In the implementation of the
policy, the curriculum design of geriatric education is
user-oriented, favoring “happy education”, and the
content of the curriculum is concentrated in the life
section, such as the use of smartphones, and the
recreation section, such as the teaching of singing,
and the design of the curriculum related to the
realization of value and personal growth, such as the
redevelopment of the work skills of the elderly, and
the reexploration of personal values are missing. The
design of courses on value realization and personal
growth, such as redevelopment of work skills and re-
exploration of personal values, is missing.
4.2 Multi-Tiered Management
The implementation of China's gerontological
education policy suffers from the drawbacks of
multiple administrations. Elderly education in China
is mainly provided by senior citizen universities,
community-based senior citizen education sites,
enterprise-run for-profit organizations, and senior
citizen education institutions set up by social forces,
which are managed by the Bureau for the Elderly, the
Ministry of Culture, the Ministry of Education, and
other departments. Although it is emphasized in the
policy documents that the above departments have the
main responsibility in the implementation of the
gerontological education policy, the policy
documents do not provide a clear definition of the
respective responsibilities of each department (Wu,
2020). Due to the lack of a lead department, the policy
implementation department lacks vertical
coordination and planning, and thus lacks foresight in
strategic planning. The “compartmentalized” inter-
governmental relationship has led to a lack of
willingness to cooperate horizontally, resulting in a
lack of integration of resources, such as duplication
of resources. The lack of a clear definition of
departmental responsibilities in the policy documents
leads to ambiguity in the implementation of the
policy, and the overlapping of departmental functions
provides a reason for the relevant departments to pass
the buck to each other. Based on the field research on