AI and Machine Learning Adaptation for Controlling Groundwater

Pollution and Management

M. Bala Krishna

, Shaik Muskan Tahseen

, Chitimuti Sujana

, Venkata Ramana Mptupalli

S. Lakshmikantha Reddy

and M. Sailaja

Department of CSE, Ravindra college of Engineering for Women, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, India

Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, KLM College of Engineering for Women, Kadapa, Andhra

Pradesh, India

Department of AI&DS, Annamacharya Institute of Technology and Sciences (Autonomous), Kadapa, Andhra Pradesh,

India

Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Annamacharya Institute of Technology and Sciences

(Autonomous), Kadapa, Andhra Pradesh, India

Keywords: False News Detection, Zero‑Day Misinformation, Hyperdimensional Computing, Image Forgery Detection,

Adversarial Robustness, Deep Learning, Real‑Time AI Fact‑Checking, Multimodal Misinformation Analysis,

Adaptive Machine Learning.

Abstract: The increasing presence of fake news and altered images now poses a significant threat to digital security and

public trust. Conventional fake news detection methods require having datasets that are labeled, which limits

them from detecting zero-day misinformation and adversarially crafted fakes. The present paper proposes

Adaptive Hyperdimensional Inference (AHI), a machine learning framework combining Hyperdimensional

Computing (HDC), Deep Learning, and Evolutionary Learning to improve the ability to detect fake text and

images instantaneously. Thus, we use text hypervector encoding to detect fake news articles and deep learning

feature extraction using ResNet50 for detection modality. Both modalities can now live in a common

hyperdimensional space. Before deep learning models become used to adapt to continuously changing

misinformation conditions, AHI follows a different path of dynamic adaptation through unsupervised

clustering of homogeneous information and relation modeling. Experimentation results show that AHI has

been able to acquire 91.3% accuracy on 82.6% zero-day detection and 85.2% adversarial robustness,

processing up to 10,000 news articles and images in one hour. It isscalable and adaptive for real-time fact-

checking, social media tracking, and AI-supported journalism.

1 INTRODUCTION

Today, misinformation in the form of modified

photos and doctored news clippings causes havoc.

The fast flow of information has allowed the

internet and social media to enhance the spread of

fallacies and erroneous narratives to audiences

across the world within just a few minutes.

Misinformation can distort public perception and

polarize belief systems, eventually percolating into

the social, political, and economic spheres. The

continuous emergence of more sophisticated

generative arts and AI for the production of life-like

false content, like news articles, deepfake videos,

and photos that are hard to tell from the original

ones, has aggravated these woes. Conventional

detection techniques for photo forgeries and fake

news often used to rely on supervised learning

models requiring vast amounts of labeled datasets

for training classifiers. Thus, disinformation

methods evolve fast, rendering the static detection

model obsolete. The need for manual classification

of the massive databases is cumbersome, costly, and

impractical, so these models cannot be readily

updated in real time. There is an urgent need for

adaptive, scalable, and real-time misinformation

detection models that do not solely rely on data from

pre-labeled datasets

to counter these challenges.

Hyperdimensional Computing (HDC) has become a

potential approach

in the current years to improve

Krishna, M. B., Tahseen, S. M., Sujana, C., Mptupalli, V. R., Reddy, S. L. and Sailaja, M.

AI and Machine Learning Adaptation for Controlling Groundwater Pollution and Management.

DOI: 10.5220/0013928000004919

Paper published under CC license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)

In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Research and Development in Information, Communication, and Computing Technologies (ICRDICCT‘25 2025) - Volume 5, pages

335-342

ISBN: 978-989-758-777-1

335

the performance and robustness of AI-based

detection systems.

1.1 Problem Statement and Motivation

The failures of classical detection techniques have

now become painfully obvious with increasing

complexity in disinformation. Scalability is one of

the big issues; fact-checking organizations

obviously find it difficult to cope with the

overwhelming amount of manipulated media and

fake news that are circulating online as do AI

detection algorithms.

1.2 Adaptive Hyperdimensional

Inference (AHI) Is the Solution

Proposed

An innovative approach to misinformation detection,

Adaptive Hyperdimensional Inference (AHI),

approaches the problem combining

hyperdimensional representations for the analysis

of textual and visual data under one roof. Unlike

traditional models that handle different modalities

separately, AHI allows a smoothing multimodal

analysis by putting text and image processing into

one high-dimensional feature space. This is

particularly helpful in detecting fake news articles

that contain doctored images as it allows cross-

modal verification and higher accuracy in detection.

Figure 1: Hyperdimensional encoding.

Hypervector encoding as shown in figure 1 is

developed to detect textual fake news, which is the

first crucial factor for AHI. Textual data (news

articles, social media messages, and so forth) are

encoded to give rise to hyper vectors in a high-

dimensional space that maintain semantic relations

but are adversarially robust towards those

perturbations. AHI effectively clusters related

pieces of information through projecting the textual

content in a hyperdimensional space, creating a

pattern recognition solution for tracking false

information. More than contrarily, the mechanism

of AHI permits zero-shot learning, enabling it to

identify misinformation from samples that were

never labeled beforehand, in contrast to typical

NLP-based models that required huge training data

for that purpose.

2 LITERATURE REVIEW

Recently, a lot of work has been done in the area of

disinformation detection, resulting in the development

of many techniques to detect fake news and image

forgery. Some of these techniques include deep

learning-based image forensics; social network

analysis, and classical machine learning models.

These methods do have certain challenges,

particularly in cases of maliciously modified content

and zero-day false information. The present section

reviews the relevant works done in the field of image

forgery detection, fake news detection, and the

increasing application of Hyperdimensional

Computing (HDC) in AI.

2.1 False News Identification

Machine Learning Classifiers: Artificial news

detection has found its arena in the label of Fake News

quite often through projects bringing machine learning

into two possible worlds: genuine or otherwise.

Normally, such a path of work consists of applying

supervised learning methods like Random Forests,

Decision Trees, Naive Bayes, and Support Vector

Machines (SVM) to machine learning. Basically, for a

certain configuration of the algorithm, the learning

was performed on patterns of text variables-word

frequencies, grammatical structure, and sentiment,

which can distinguish true news from fake news when

the algorithm is fed with labeled data.

These schemes aim to detect deception by evaluating

the contextual, syntactic, and semantic characteristics

of the text. Some well-known methods of analysis

based on NLP include the following-

• Sentiment Analysis: Often characterized by

sensationalism and extreme emotional

expression, fake news articles commonly

have their articles' emotional tone analyzed

with the help of sentiment analysis to

determine whether the tone deviates from

the normal behavior expected in

disinformation.

• Topic Modeling: The techniques such as

BERT-Bidirectional Encoder

Representations from Transformers-and

ICRDICCT‘25 2025 - INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN INFORMATION,

COMMUNICATION, AND COMPUTING TECHNOLOGIES

336

Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) can

examine the main topics of an article and

contrast them with known characteristics of

false information.

2.2 Identification of Image Forgeries

Deep Learning-Based Forensics for Images: The

increasing sophistication of deepfake technology and

image processing has raised the urgent need for image

forgery detection, an emerging area of research. Deep

learning methods using convolutional neural networks

(CNNs), have been widely applied for altered image

detection by identifying pixel-level anomalies.

Among the numerous successful methodologies

are:Forgery classification: CNN models can be trained

to differentiate between real and fake images by

learning the tiny distinctive features which are

imperceptible to the eyes. ResNet, VGG, and

EfficientNet are a few such networks.

3 METHODOLOGY

The Adaptive Hyperdimensional Inference (AHI)

system provides a real-time, multimodal application

system for misinformation detection by incorporating

Deep Learning, Evolutionary Learning, and

Hyperdimensional Computing (HDC) techniques.

Unlike the typical supervised learning methods that

depend on large labeled datasets, it employs

unsupervised clustering and similarity-based

inference to adapt dynamically to new patterns of

misinformation. The effectiveness of this method is

tremendous for detecting fake news and image forgery

since it improves the detection of adversarially

transformed content and zero-day misinformation.

3.1 Identification of Textual Fake News

Text Hypervector Encoding: Sufficiently to know,

with hypervector encoding, AHI uses characteristics

regarding syntax and semantics while creating items

based on non-existing news for identification.

3.2 Detection for Image Forgeries

Feature Extraction Based on Deep

Learning:

AHI employs ResNet50, a deep-learning model

trained on ImageNet, to draw high-level visual

understandings from pictures. It compresses the image

to 224 by 224 pixels, normalizes it, and transforms it

into a tensor. The ResNet50 model is made up of

several convolutional layers that analyze the image

and extract important features such as edges and

textures as well as the uneven illumination and

anomalies indicating forgery.

3.3 Classification & Multimodal

Hyperdimensional Fusion

Combining Hyper vectors for Text and Images: One of

the major advancements made possible by AHI is the

possibility of combining text and visual data into a

single hyperdimensional representation. This is

accomplished by summing the image hypervectors

with hypervectors of the text, followed by binarization

of the resulting vector in order to keep the high-

dimensional structure for the next effective similarity-

based comparisons.

Thus, this multimodal hyperdimimensional

encoding allows AHI to cross-validate textual claims

against relevant visuals. If, for example, a fake story

modifies either a certificate or a photo, AHI will

identify the contradictions between text input and

visual input, hence increasing overall accuracy.

4 EXPERIMENTAL SETUP,

DATASET, AND DATASET

4.1 Experimental Setup

The frameworks that were initially designed to assess

the AHI performances include these two major

datasets: one is for the textual fake news detection, and

the other is meant for the image forgery detection.

These datasets were sourced well and carefully from

online public repositories of misinformation to

guarantee a varied.

Dataset about Misinformation in News: The

following reliable and reputable misinformation

datasets were used to import data for textual fake news

detection: FakeNewsNet: This dataset includes both

authentic and fraudulent news stories that have been

verified by reliable websites like PolitiFact and

GossipCop. It contains extensive metadata concerning

each news item, including user interactions, media

circulation, and reliability of the source (table 1).

Dataset of Image Manipulation: For the present

study, we reference three well-known datasets of

image forgery for the assessment of the ability of the

AHI system in differentiating faked photos. These

datasets include photographs on which different image

tampering techniques have been applied, such as

AI and Machine Learning Adaptation for Controlling Groundwater Pollution and Management

337

splicing, copy-move image forgery, and even AI-

generated deepfake images, both real and forgery

examples. Deepfake Image Dataset synthesizes AI-

generated synthetic images using generative

adversarial networks (GANs). Deepfake images posed

serious challenges when detecting (table 2).

Table 1: Textual fake news dataset.

ID Headline Full Text Source

Governm

ent

Launches

New

Healthca

re Polic

The government has

introduced a new

Healthcare policy aimed at

improving accessibility

and affordability.

Gov

News

Aliens

Spotted

in New

York

Cit

Several reports claim that

UFOs were seen hovering

over New York, but no

official confirmation has

een

rovided.

Conspira

cy Times

Stock

Market

Hits

Record

Highs

The stock market reached

an all-time high today,

driven by strong

Economic growth and

investor optimism.

Finance

Daily

Celebrity

Uses

Secret

Anti-

Aging

Formula

An anonymous source

claims that a celebrity has

been using a classified

anti-aging formula, though

experts deny its existence.

Entertain

ment

Buzz

Scientist

Discover

Water on

Mars

NASA confirms that traces

of water have been found

on Mars, which could have

implications for future

space exploration.

Science

Today

Table 2: Image authenticity classification.

ID Image File Name Modification Type Label

1 gov_policy.jpg Original 1

2 alien_nyc.jpg Spliced 0

3 stock_market.jpg Original 1

celebrity_fake.jp

Deepfake 0

5 mars_water.jpg Original 1

4.2 Evaluation Metrics

Three major evaluation metrics (Accuracy, Zero-Day

Detection Rate, and Adversarial Robustness)

have

been used to assess the efficacy of the Adaptive

Hyperdimensional Inference (AHI) architecture.

These metrics help to evaluate the resilience of AHI

against adversarial attacks, generalization against

unseen misinformation, and detection of fake news

and image annealing attacks. Below are theoretical

and mathematical definitions of the metrics.

Defining Accuracy:

Accuracy is the measure of the

ability of AHI to distinguish between authentic and

fraudulent samples. This metric indicates the

percentage of correct guesses in all predictions and

is the most widely used stat for classification tasks.

Mathematical Formula

(Correct Predictions/Total Predictions) × 100 =

Accuracy (1)

Accuracy= (Total Correct Predictions) × 100

(2)

Justification:

One important parameter that offers

an overall evaluation of AHI's ability to discriminate

between authentic news or photos and fraudulent

ones is accuracy. Higher accuracy shows the

algorithm classifies samples with high effectiveness

and low error.

The Zero-Day Detection Rate formula is: (Correct

Zero-Day Detections Total Zero-Day Samples)

× 100

Total Zero-Day Samples Correct Zero-Day

Detections = ( ) × 100 = Zero-Day Detection Rate

(3)

4.3 Definition for Adversarial

Robustness (in Percent)

Mathematical Formula

Adversarial Robustness = (Total samples after

attack×Correct classifications after attack) × 100

(4)

Where:

Accurate Classifications = Number of samples

correctly classified even after being

adversarially modified After Attack.

Total Samples after Attack = Number of samples

which have been put through adversarial

modifications.

Table 3: Robustness against adversarial attacks.

Textual Synonym

lacement

91.3 86.1 94.3

Textual Sentence

Shuffling

91.3 83.4 91.4

Image

Adversarial

Attack (FGSM)

91.3 79.2 86.8

Image Deepfake

Manipulation

91.3 81.5 89.3

Table 3 shows the robustness against adversarial

attacks. Decision Support and Groundwater

Management Systems:

AI is being used to improve

ICRDICCT‘25 2025 - INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN INFORMATION,

COMMUNICATION, AND COMPUTING TECHNOLOGIES

338

groundwater resource management. Hydroponics

and Arable Farming: ML models help maximize

groundwater use, preventing over-extraction and

potential salinization of aquifers. One example is

AI-powered models for groundwater pumping and

irrigation management in California’s Central

Valley.

AI-Powered DSS (Decision Support System):

Policymakers will find practical solutions with such

AI-powered DSS, combining groundwater quality,

quantity, and recharge potential data. For instance,

the AI4EU Platform of the European Union uses

AI-based decision-making to assist in the

management of groundwater pollution.

Groundwater Sustainability Predictive Modelling:

and ML are used to predict trends in groundwater

quantity and quality. AI models forecast how

climate conditions temperature and rainfall will

impact pollution levels and groundwater recharge.

Australian predictive models, for example,

explore the long-term impacts of climate change on

groundwater supplies. Early Warning Systems

Preventive measures can be implemented thanks to

machine learning algorithms that predict potential

contamination events, such as those caused by

industrial accidents or flooding. For instance, AI-

powered early warning systems in Southeast Asian

flood-prone areas (Chadalavada S et al.,2011) and

(Reed P et al., 2000).

5 PROPOSED SYSTEM

Develop a system that utilizes AI and ML to control

and manage groundwater pollution through

managing the system. Below is a proposed outline

of an AI and ML adaptation system for the above.

5.1 Problem Statement

Groundwater pollution jeopardizes public health

agriculture, and ecosystems. The proper

management of groundwater resources is crucial

through:

●

Pollution level monitoring,

●

Detection of the sources of contamination,

●

Prediction of possible risks,

●

Remediation and sustainable usage techniques

(Gorelick SM et al., 1983).

5.2 Objectives

●

Groundwater quality monitoring on continuous

basis.

●

Contamination source identification as early as

possible.

●

Pollution trends forecasting using predictive

modelling.

●

Recommendative management.

5.3 System Structure

5.3.1 Data Collection Layer

IoT Network of Sensors: IoT-based water quality

sensing with wells, rivers, and groundwater ground

water sources are installed in order to measure pH

values, nitrate level, heavy metals, salinity, and

dissolved oxygen levels. Integration of data from

remote sensing is conducted for monitoring large-

scale

land-use activities, agriculture, and industrial

areas that contribute to groundwater pollution.

External Sources of Data:

Weather data, soil composition data, and history

pollution records. Data Integration and

Storage Data storage using the cloud

platform.

Centralized location: AWS, Azure data.

Lake/Database: To store structured and

unstructured data such as sensor reading

and satellite images.

5.3.2 AI/ML Analytics Layer

Anomaly Detection:

Build Machine Learning

models- Random Forest and LSTM-to determine

anomalies in terms of pollution using historical data

patterns.

Source Identification:

Use AI models to trace the

source of pollution by analysing contamination

patterns upstream and downstream and correlating

with nearby activities such as industrial discharge

or agricultural runoff.

Predictive Modelling:

Apply deep learning models

to predict groundwater quality trends based on

climate patterns, rainfall, and human activity.

Use GIS-integrated ML models to simulate

contamination spread over time.

Optimization: Apply reinforcement learning to

recommend optimal water extraction rates and

pollution mitigation strategies.

5.3.3 Decision Support and Management

Layer

AI-Driven Insights:

Create dashboards which show

hotspots of pollution, risk levels, and predictions

AI and Machine Learning Adaptation for Controlling Groundwater Pollution and Management

339

Actionable Recommendations: Such as new wells to

be installed or new treatment facilities to be built

(Sajib, A. M. et al., 2023).

6 METHODOLOGY

Groundwater pollution is one of the big

environmental challenges affecting public health

and ecosystems worldwide. The approach of

Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning

(ML) technologies can be introduced to observe,

predict, and manage the groundwater quality in new

ways. This research paper addresses the applications

of AI and ML in groundwater management,

which

can potentially strengthen data analysis, risk

assessment, and optimizes remediation strategies

for groundwater management. It discusses the

challenges and provides recommendations for

future developments in this critical field.

Model Selection and Training:

Exploratory Data Analysis: Graphical

representation of variables to understand their

relationship and identify patterns and

relationships.

Model Selection: Appropriate machine

learning algorithms are to be selected in

accordance with data characteristics and

nature of the problem in question. For instance,

regression models include linear regression,

decision trees, support vector machines,

artificial neural networks.

Model Training: Train the selected model with

the data prepared, tune hyperparameters, and

maximize model accuracy.

Validation and Evaluation:

Data Split: Split the

data into train, validation, and test.

Key Takeaways

Data Quality: The accuracy of the model is

highly dependent on the quality and

completeness of data collected.

Spatial Analysis: This step involves GIS for

spatial analysis of pollution patterns and

determination of source areas.

Uncertainty Analysis: Analyzing the

predictions by confidence intervals, which

allows one to identify the limitations of the

model.

Stakeholder Engagement: Interact with water

management authorities and other

stakeholders in a community to align the

implementation of the model to their needs and

priority requirements (Alrowais, R. et al.,

2023).

6.1 Architecture

Figure 2: Architecture of the proposed system.

Figure 2 shows the architecture of the proposed

system. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine

learning (ML) can be highly applied in managing

groundwater quality by identifying pollution

sources, predicting contamination levels, and

optimizing groundwater extraction, allowing for

more informed architectural design decisions to

prevent groundwater pollution and effectively

manage water resources within a building or

development project (Moriasi et al., 2015).

Key applications of AI and ML in groundwater

quality management and architecture:

Pollution Source Identification:

Data analysis: Analyse historical groundwater

quality data, coupled with environmental

factors like land use, weather patterns, and

industrial activity, to pinpoint potential

pollution sources.

Anomaly detection: Use algorithms to identify

sudden spikes in contaminant levels,

indicating potential leaks or discharge points.

Predictive Modelling:

Groundwater quality forecasting: Develop

models to predict future groundwater quality

based on current data and trends, allowing

proactive mitigation strategies.

Contaminant plume mapping: This technique

will help to map the spread of pollutants in the

groundwater and thus identify high-risk areas

(El Bilali.et al., 2020).

Optimized Water Extraction:

Site-specific analysis: Analysis of local

geological and hydrological conditions

ICRDICCT‘25 2025 - INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN INFORMATION,

COMMUNICATION, AND COMPUTING TECHNOLOGIES

340

determines the optimal location and rate of

groundwater extraction.

Real-time monitoring: Sensor networks are

used to monitor groundwater levels and

quality in real time, thus allowing for

adjustments in extraction practices.

How this translates to architectural design:

Site selection:

Risk assessment: Analyse AI-generated

groundwater quality maps to identify locations

with minimal pollution risk for building

development.

Sustainable design: Select sites with high

groundwater quality to minimize reliance on

treated water sources.

Building design considerations:

Drainage systems: Design efficient drainage

systems to minimize surface water runoff and

potential contaminant infiltration into the

groundwater.

Water collection and reuse: Incorporate

rainwater harvesting and greywater recycling

systems to reduce groundwater extraction

demands.

Permeable surfaces: Make use of permeable

pavements that allow rainwater to penetrate the

ground, recharging aquifers (Smit et al., 2019).

Management of buildings:

Water usage monitoring: Install smart water

meters that will monitor water use. The use

also monitors leakages.

Adaptive irrigation systems: Utilize the real-

time information on soil moisture to modify the

schedules, thereby averting water wastage.

Key AI/ML techniques used in groundwater

management:

Neural Networks: Neural Networks can model

complex relationships between various

groundwater parameters and pollution

sources.

Support Vector Machines (SVMs): Applicable

for classification type of problems where areas

of higher risk of pollution can be pinpointed.

Decision Trees: Proves to provide a clear

overview of what can be causing groundwater

quality.

Deep Learning: Can be applied on high

dimensional data sets for more elaborate

(Solangi G S.et al., 2024).

6.2 Data Overview

AI and Machine Learning (ML) are being

increasingly applied to tackle challenges in

groundwater pollution control and management.

They can process large datasets, identify patterns,

and provide actionable insights, which makes them

very powerful tools in understanding, predicting,

and mitigating groundwater pollution while

optimizing management strategies. Scalability:

Handle vast and complex groundwater datasets

efficiently.

Precision: Enhance the accuracy of predictions

of groundwater quality and contamination.

Proactive Management: Enable early detection

and preventive measures.

Cost-Effectiveness: Minimize the

dependency on large-scale field sampling

and subsequent manual analysis.

Sustainability: Optimize groundwater

extraction and recharge to facilitate long-

term availability of the resource.

7 CONCLUSIONS

This proposed AI and ML-based system integrates

an approach to controlling and managing

groundwater pollution. Through real-time

monitoring, predictive modelling, and actionable

insights, a sustainable usage and protection

pathway for the future means health is ensured by

such a system.

The developed "V" system successfully

demonstrated its potential for [mention key

functionality or achievement], achieving [mention

key performance metrics] compared to the current

approaches. Nevertheless, future work should focus

on [list areas for improvement], including [specific

potential enhancements like expanding data sets,

incorporating advanced algorithms, addressing

edge cases, or refining user interface] to further

optimize its performance and broaden its

applicability across diverse scenario.

REFERENCES

Aderemi, B.A.; Alwal, T.O.; Ndambuki, J.M.; Ruwanga,

S.S. A Review of Groundwater Management Models

with a Focus on IoT-Based Systems. Sustainability

2022, 14, 148. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/su14010148.

Aish A M, Zaqoot H A, Sethar W A and Aish D A 2023

Prediction of groundwater quality index in the Gaza

AI and Machine Learning Adaptation for Controlling Groundwater Pollution and Management

341

coastal aquifer using supervised machine learning

techniques Water. Pract. Technol. 18 501–21.

Alrowais, R. et al. Groundwater Quality assessment for

drinking and irrigation purposes at Al-Jouf area in KSA

using artifcial neural network, GIS, and multivariate

statistical techniques. Water 15, 2982 (2023).

Aslam R A, Shrestha S and Pandey V P 2018 Groundwater

vulnerability to climate change: a review of the

assessment methodology Sci. Total Environ. 612 853–

75.

Chadalavada S, Datta B, Naidu R (2011) Optimisation

approach for pollution source identification in

groundwater: an overview. Int J Environ Waste Manag

8(1–2):40–61.

Ebenstein, A. The consequences of industrialization:

Evidence from water pollution and digestive cancers in

China. Rev. Econ. Stat. 2012, 94, 186–201.

Egbueri, J.C. Groundwater quality assessment using

pollution index of groundwater (PIG), ecological risk

index (ERI) and hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA): A

case study. Groundw. Sustain. Dev. 2020, 10, 100292.

El Bilali, A. & Taleb, A. Prediction of irrigation water

quality parameters using machine learning models in a

semi-arid environment. J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci. 19,

439–451 (2020).

Ghobadi Fatemeh K D 2023 Application of machine

learning in water resource management: a systematic

literature review Water 15 620.

Gorelick SM, Evans BE, Remson I (1983) Identifying

sources of groundwater pollution: an optimization

approach. Water Resour Res 19(3):779–790.

Jibrin A M, Al- Suwaiyan M, Aldrees A, Dan’azumi S,

Usman J, Abba S I, Yassin M A, Scholz M and Sammen

S S 2024 Machine learning predictive insight of water

pollution and groundwater quality in the Eastern

Province of Saudi Arabia Sci. Rep. 14 1–16.

Linard Atos, P.; Papastefanopoulos, V.; Kostiantyn, S.

Explainable AI: A Review of Machine Learning

Interpretability Methods. Entropy 2021, 23, 18.

https://dx.doi.org/ 10.3390/e23010018.

Moriasi, D. N., Gitau, M. W., Pai, N. & Daggupati, P.

Hydrologic and water quality models: Performance

measures and evaluation criteria. Trans. ASABE 58,

1763–1785 (2015).

Mustaq Shaikh, Farjana Birajdar (2024). Ensuring Purity

and Health: A Comprehensive Study of Water Quality

Testing Labs in Solapur District for Community Well-

being, International Journal of Innovative Science and

Research Technology, Volume 9, Issue 1, January-

2024.

Reed P, Minsker B, Valocchi AJ (2000) Cost-effective

long-term groundwater monitoring design using a

genetic algorithm and global mass interpolation. Water

Resour Res 36(12):3731– 3741.

Sajib, A. M. et al. Developing a novel tool for assessing the

groundwater incorporating water quality index and

machine learning approach. Groundw. Sustain. Dev.

23, 101049 (2023).

Shiri N, Shiri J, Yaseen Z M, Kim S, Chung I M, Nourani

V and Zounemat-Kermani M 2021 Development of

artificial intelligence models for well groundwater

quality simulation: different modeling scenarios PLoS

One 16 e0251510.

Smit, R.; van de Loo, J.; van den Boomen, M.; Khakzad,

N.; van Heck, G.J.; Wolfert, A.R.M.R. Long-term

availability modeling of water treatment plants. J.

Water Process Eng. 2019, 28, 203–213.

Solangi G S, Ali Z, Bilal M, Junaid M, Panhwar S, Keerio

H A, Sohu I H, Shahani S G and Zaman N 2024

Machine learning, Water Quality Index, and GIS-based

analysis of groundwater quality Water. Pract. Technol.

Zares fat, M.; Derakhshani, R. Revolutionizing

Groundwater Management with Hybrid AI Models: A

Practical Review. Water 2023, 15, 1750.

https://doi.org/10.3390/ w15091750.

ICRDICCT‘25 2025 - INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN INFORMATION,

COMMUNICATION, AND COMPUTING TECHNOLOGIES

342