M. Spilker, F. Prinsen, and M. Kalz (2019)
analyzed the impact of technology-enhanced
academic conferences on professional development,
highlighting benefits such as improved accessibility,
interactive learning, and global reach, while
addressing challenges like equitable access and
interaction quality. Similarly, MyConfree, developed
by Metta Santiputri Nindy et al. (2018), leverages
PHP, CodeIgniter, and MySQL to streamline
workflows with features like paper submissions, call-
for-paper announcements, and traditional review
processes, demonstrating how technology simplifies
conference management.
Other systems further emphasize innovation in
conference workflows. Cheng Zheng et al. (2008)
introduced a collaborative platform with tools for
real-time updates, session scheduling, and participant
registration to improve coordination. K. Ahmad et al.
presented a system tailored for higher education,
offering features like author notifications and
deadline alerts. OpenConf, introduced by the Zakon
Group (2001), simplifies tasks such as peer reviews,
attendee registration, and scheduling with its user-
friendly interface, reducing administrative burdens
and improving the experience for organizers and
participants alike.
A. Malinowski and B. Wilamowski, in their work
titled “Paper Collection and Evaluation through the
Internet” (Proceedings of the 27th Annual
Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics
Society, Denver) , addressed limitations in standalone
web-based conference management systems. These
systems often lack fault tolerance, and the capacity to
support distributed users. To overcome these
challenges, they proposed a collaborative conference
management system that utilizes advanced
collaboration technologies to improve fault tolerance,
scalability, and user accessibility.
Rigaux Ph., in “An Iterative Rating Method:
Application to Web-based Conference Management”
(Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Symposium on
Applied Computing), proposed a method for
collecting user preferences or ratings on a large set of
items without asking each user to rate each one. The
approach relies on an iterative process, where each
step, or ballot, involves users rating a sample of items.
A collaborative filtering algorithm predicts the
missing ratings along with their confidence levels,
which are initially set to zero. Subsequent ballots
improve the prediction accuracy, and the system
administrator determines when to stop the iteration
upon reaching a satisfactory level. This method was
applied to assign reviewers to papers prior to the
review phase in conference management and was
implemented in the MYREVIEW web-based system.
A web-based academic conference management
system called ConfSys (Huang et al., 2008) is
introduced. ConfSys is intended to assist program
chairs, general chairs, and program committees in
overseeing the operations of scholarly conferences
and to offer conference-related services to authors
and attendees. It can post papers, assign them to
reviewers automatically, let the chairs change the
assignment, debate and rate papers, create the
program, register for conferences, gather presentation
slides, and more. These features facilitate rapid and
simple conference management.
Ware M., in “Online Submission and Peer‐
Review Systems” (Learned Publishing, Vol. 18, No.
4, pp. 245-250, 2005), explored the adoption of online
systems for managing submissions and peer reviews
in academic publishing. The study highlighted the
benefits of such systems, including streamlined
submission processes, efficient reviewer
assignments, and improved communication between
authors, reviewers, and editors. Organizing scientific
conferences involves managing paper submissions
and reviews, which are crucial yet often complicated
tasks. Existing systems are complex, with many
unused features, and typically rely on hosting
services, raising concerns about data security. This
study presents the Online Paper Submission System
(OPSS) (Rotikan, Reymon. 2016), an online
application created to streamline the process of
submitting and reviewing papers.
3 PROPOSED SYSTEM
3.1 Workflow of Proposed System
The workflow of AI-Enabled Academic Conference
Management System consists of the following major
steps: Step 1: Abstract Submission – Authors submit
abstracts through a user- friendly web interface,
ensuring ease of access. Step 2: Domain
Classification – These abstracts are classified into
specific domains using advanced machine learning
techniques like SVM, KNN, and Random Forest,
enabling accurate domain categorization. Step 3:
Reviewer Assignment – Domain-specific reviewers
are assigned to evaluate the abstracts and provide
feedback. Step 4: Full Paper Submission – Abstracts
that meet the required standards lead to the
submission of full papers for further review. Step 5:
Full Paper Evaluation – These full papers undergo a
thorough evaluation process, and feedback is sent to
the authors via email. Step 6: Collaboration – Video