from industrial sites to forest environments, urban
and household scenarios. The model YOLO-based
demonstrated precision and recall values close to
perfect even at the conditions of low illumination,
smokes at occlusion, and dynamism in weather
conditions. In experiments, such a low-latency high-
performance framework could directly analyze
multiple input sources of high frame rates onto these
miniature edge devices constituting IoT sensors and
surveillance cameras. A huge amount of data flow
went through the system while still managing to
provide the desired scale of performance.
Resource optimization leads to a lightweight
model with efficient preprocess without losing any
precision in case of detection for its ease-of-
deployment with constrained- resource devices. With
comparative benchmarks, EdgeFireSmoke detected
more compared to the traditional detection system, in
terms of detection rate, response time, and
adaptability of varying environmental conditions. In
addition, real-time alerting systems as well as the
logging mechanism increased its usability; it brought
actionable insights into the hands of the user. The
given results confirm that EdgeFireSmoke is reliable,
efficient, and robust for fire and smoke detection, that
makes it a really valuable tool for safeguarding life
and assets in critical safety applications.
7 CONCLUSION AND FUTURE
WORKS
The EdgeFireSmoke has been well defined by the
advancement that fire and smoke detection by real-
time means are possible through light versions of
CNN models by virtue of edge computing. The strong
capabilities of such high accuracy with responses in
real time, along with adaptability into any setting,
make for a highly reliable solution for this risk to be
mitigated by fire. This system can maximize the use
of resources and is useful when integrated with edge
devices, for example, drones, sensors, and cameras in
supporting fast detection and alerting while being
light on resources. Full logging and analytics
facilities make this system extremely valuable for the
assessment after the event, garnering precious
insights. Future work: The system would improve
further by incorporating multimodal data, for
example heat, gas, or acoustic sensors in enhancing
detection accuracy while suppressing false alarms. It
is in the more complex situation that advanced deep
learning methods like transformer-based models are
used to enhance the performance of the system.
Predictive analytics can be included for risk detection
of fire occurrence based on patterns within
environmental data. The system called
EdgeFireSmoke will serve as a bedrock for future
innovations and challenges in fire safety technologies
as it responds to growing concerns through innovative
solutions.
REFERENCES
A. Boukerche and E. Nakamura, "Localization systems for
wireless sensor networks", IEEE Wireless
Communications, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 6-12, 2007. doi:
10.1109/mwc.2007.4407221.
D. S. Thomas, D. T. Butry, S. W. Gilbert, D. H. Webb, and
J. F. Fung, "The Costs and Losses of Wildfires,"
National Institute of Standard and Technology (NIST),
Tech. Rep., 2017.
F. Khelifi, A. Bradai, K. Singh, and M. Atri, "Localization
and Energy-Efficient Data Routing for Unmanned
Aerial Vehicles: Fuzzy-Logic-Based Approach," IEEE
Communications Magazine, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 129-133,
2018. doi: 10.1109/mcom.2018.1700453.
K. Hoover, L. A. Hanson, "Wildfire Statistics 2019 | Centre
for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters,"
Federal Assistance for Wildfire Response and
Recovery, 2019. Fas.org. (2019).
[Online] Available at: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/IF10
244.pdf [Accessed 26- May-2019].
M. Y. Arafat and S. Moh, "Location-Aided Delay Tolerant
Routing Protocol in UAV Networks for Post- Disaster
Operation," IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 59891- 59906,
2018. doi: 10.1109/access.2018.2875739.
M. Y. Arafat and S. Moh, "Routing Protocols for
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Networks: A Survey," IEEE
Access, vol. 7, pp. 99694 - 99720, 2019. doi:
10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2930813.
M. Y. Arafat, S. Poudel and S. Moh, "Medium Access
Control Protocols for Flying Ad Hoc Networks: A
Review," IEEE Sensors Journal, pp. 1-1, 2020. doi:
10.1109/jsen.2020.3034600.
M. Y. Arafat, M. Habib and S. Moh, "Routing Protocols for
UAV-Aided Wireless Sensor Networks," Applied
Sciences, vol. 10, no. 12, p. 4077, 2020. doi:
10.3390/app10124077.
N. H. Motlagh, T. Taleb, and O. Arouk, "Low-Altitude
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles-Based Internet of Things
Services: Comprehensive Survey and Future
Perspectives," IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 3,
no. 6, pp. 899922, 2016. doi: 10.1109/jiot.2016.26121
19.
Q. Guo, Y. Zhang, J. Lloret, B. Kantarci and W. Seah, "A
Localization Method Avoiding Flip Ambiguities for
micro-UAVs with Bounded Distance Measurement
Errors," IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, pp.
1-1, 2018. doi: 10.1109/tmc.2018.2865462
S. Yang, D. Enqing, L. Wei and P. Xue, "An iterative
method of processing node flip ambiguity in wireless