enables modular growth because more nodes can be
added with minimal effort. The accuracy and neatness
of the connections confirm the correctness of the
Network-on-Chip (NoC) topology design and
guarantee that data will be delivered to the correct
destination nodes without unnecessary delays.
5 CONCLUSIONS
In this work, a modular and scalable Network-on-
Chip (NoC) architecture was designed, verified, and
validated using VHDL, which was simulated through
ModelSim. The Designed Integrated System included
other fundamental blocks like the clock distribution
network, the 32-bit accumulator, the node switching
logic, and the WSN control. Verification of all
modules was completed through functional
verification, while timing and physical verification
were done to ensure all fundamental milestones were
achieved: meeting design constraints, power budget,
and compliance to design rules. The simulations
confirmed functionality with respect to clock
generation, data accumulation, node switching, and
WSN control; all of which are requirements for high-
performance and embedded designs. The entire
system showcased low latency and power
consumption with flexibility, demonstrating
applicability to larger SoC platforms and real-time
systems. In the future, the design could benefit from
implementing the chip into silicon, advanced low-
power techniques such as clock gating and multi-
voltage domains, increasing the node expansion, and
adding adaptive traffic routing algorithms.
Furthermore, adding fault tolerance and security
features would strengthen the reliability of the NoC
for mission-critical uses like IoT industrial
applications and autonomous systems. To conclude,
the created NoC framework offers extensible
prospects for additional pre-commercial and
scholarly exploration, thereby facilitating the
construction and refinement of more sophisticated
on-chip communication networks.
REFERENCES
Brown, J.K., et al., 2020. 27.1 A 65nm energy-harvesting
ULP SoC with 256kB Cortex-M0 enabling an 89.1µW
continuous machine health monitoring wireless self-
powered system. In: IEEE International Solid-State
Circuits Conference (ISSCC). pp.420–422.
Cheng, Y.H., Huang, L.B., Cui, Y.J., Ma, S., Wang, Y.W.
and Sui, B.C., 2022. RV16: An ultra-low-cost
embedded RISC-V processor core. Journal of
Computer Science and Technology, 37, pp.1307–1319.
Chou, T.H., Yu, S., Bose, S., Cook, J., Park, J. and
Johnston, M.L., 2023. Wireless, multi-sensor system-
on-chip for pH and amperometry powered by body
heat. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and
Systems, 17(4), pp.782–794.
Duran, C., et al., 2016. A 32-bit RISC-V AXI4-lite bus-
based microcontroller with 10-bit SAR ADC. In: IEEE
Latin American Symposium on Circuits and Systems
(LASCAS). pp.315–318.
Hasegawa, T., et al., 2017. SOTB (Silicon On Thin Buried
Oxide): More than Moore technology for IoT and
automotive. In: IEEE International Conference on IC
Design and Technology (ICICDT). pp.1–4.
Lim, W., Lee, I., Sylvester, D. and Blaauw, D., 2015. 8.2
Batteryless sub-nW Cortex-M0+ processor with
dynamic leakage-suppression logic. In: IEEE
International Solid-State Circuits Conference (ISSCC).
pp.1–3.
Lin, L., Jain, S. and Alioto, M., 2018. A 595pW 14pJ/cycle
microcontroller with dual-mode standard cells and self-
startup for battery-indifferent distributed sensing. In:
IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference
(ISSCC). pp.44–46.
Lukas, C.J., et al., 2023. 15.2 A 2.19µW self-powered SoC
with integrated multimodal energy harvesting, dual-
channel up to -92dBm WRX and energy-aware
subsystem. In: IEEE International Solid-State Circuits
Conference (ISSCC). pp.238–240.
Myers, J., et al., 2015. 8.1 An 80nW retention 11.7pJ/cycle
active subthreshold ARM Cortex-M0+ subsystem in
65nm CMOS for WSN applications. In: IEEE
International Solid-State Circuits Conference (ISSCC).
pp.1–3.
Sarmiento, M., et al., 2021. A sub-µW reversed-body-bias
8-bit processor on 65-nm silicon-on-thin-box (SOTB)
for IoT applications. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and
Systems II: Express Briefs, 68(9), pp.3182–3186.
Sarmiento, M., et al., 2022. Systems on a chip with 8-bits
and 32-bits processors in 0.18-um technology for IoT
applications. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and
Systems II: Express Briefs, 69(5), pp.2438–2442.
Schiavone, P.D., et al., 2017. Slow and steady wins the
race? A comparison of ultra-low-power RISC-V cores
for Internet-of-Things applications. In: International
Symposium on Power and Timing Modeling,
Optimization and Simulation (PATMOS). pp.1–8.
Schoeberl, M., 2011. Leros: A tiny microcontroller for
FPGAs. In: International Conference on Field
Programmable Logic and Applications (FPL). pp.10–
14.
Serrano, R., et al., 2021. A low-power low-area SoC based
in RISC-V processor for IoT applications. In:
International SoC Design Conference (ISOCC).
pp.375–376.
Tran, T.A. and Ishibashi, K., 2022. High-accuracy and
long-range energy harvesting beat sensor with LoRa.
In: IEEE Sensors. pp.1–4.