3 PROPOSED DESIGN
Realizing the fact that more hardware can greatly af-
fect the effectiveness of an algorithm while not sig-
nificantly affecting its accuracy, the study introduces
a new posit format which is a combination of posit
arithmetic and Half-Unit Biased (HUB) method
known as HUB posit format. The optimized number
of functional units reduces hardware overhead (i.e.,
area and delay) in this efficient design and improves
operating frequency considerably. Multipliers are im-
proved by up to 12% and adders by up to 15% at
higher clock frequencies. Significantly, HUB posit is
ideal for high performance and energy-efficient
computing because it solves key problems with posit
arithmetic and is enabling hardware integration with
state-of-the-art designs.
Figure 1: Architecture Design Proposed Design.
The system architecture for a computational sys-
tem that applies a Hub approach is depicted in the di-
agram. Data is entered into the system and processed
using the Hub Posit format. After that, an adder unit
and a multiplier unit that carry out arithmetic opera-
tions are applied to the Hub Posit data. The output
layer combines the outcomes of various activities and
applies a synthesis process to produce the final out-
put. Performance metrics are used to assess the sys-
tem's performance. This architecture implies that the
particular units (Adder, Multiplier) are in charge of
carrying out the actual computations, while the Hub
method serves as a framework for organizing and
processing data inside the system.
Figure 2: Flow Diagram of Proposed Design.
A computing unit's system architecture using the
Hub Posit format is shown in the flowchart. A HUB
posit module in the system processes user input be-
fore sending the information to a processing unit.,
Arithmetic functions are carried out by the processing
unit's multiplier and adder. In order to detect expo-
nent overflow and underflow situations, the system
additionally has overflow management techniques.
The system gives zero if there is an underflow and
infinity if there is an overflow. After that, the user is
shown the outcome which is subsequently saved in a
database.
4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The HUB posit format shows 35% to 296% improve-
ment in hardware efficiency, 13% to 96% reduction
in area-delay product and up to 100% increase in op-
erating frequency compared to the best binarized neu-
ral network softmax with same bit-width (32-, 64-,
128- and 256-bit). Interleaved features preserve accu-
racy while significantly minimizing computing over-
head, achieving up to 12% and 15% improvements
for multipliers and adders respectively when com-
pared to standard posit units. The architecture enables
higher clock frequencies, allowing it to excel in deep
learning, embedded devices, scientific simulations,
and high-performance computing. The HUB posit de-
sign scales well at higher bit-widths, ensuring opti-
mal performance on data-heavy applications, and
maintaining a healthy balance between the speed of
computation, hardware/unit cost, and accuracy. These
advancements pave the way for HUB posit's