Navigating Data Privacy Challenges in the Era of Big Data: Strategies

and Solutions for Safeguarding Personal Information

Sivakumar Ponnusamy

, M. A. Amarnath

, K. Deepa

, S. K. Lokesh Naik

Balaji D.

and Rohit Kumar Verma

Department of Computer Science and Engineering, K.S.R. College of Engineering, Tiruchengode, Namakkal, Tamil Nadu,

India

Department of Computer Science and Engineering, J.J. College of Engineering and Technology, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil

Nadu, India

Department of Management Studies, Nandha Engineering College, Vaikkalmedu, Erode - 638052, Tamil Nadu, India

Department of Computer Science and Engineering, MLR Institute of Technology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

Department of MCA, New Prince Shri Bhavani College of Engineering and Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Department of Computer Science (MCA), Himachal Pradesh University Regional Centre Dharamshala, Distt. Kangra,

Himachal Pradesh, India

Keywords: Data Privacy, Big Data Security, Encryption, Anonymization, Data Governance.

Abstract: Today big data has transformed the modern world today, big data has disrupted everything, including

industries and societies, making it increasingly difficult for the privacy and security of personal data to be

maintained. In this work, we investigate the data privacy issues in a big data world, and discuss potential

threats introduced by big-data techniques in massive data acquisition, storage and processing. It explores the

most pressing privacy issues, including unauthorized access, data breaches, and the ethical use of information.

The research suggests different scenarios and solutions to remedy the risk of using the data including

encryption, anonymisation and strong governance structures. This paper contributes to the technical literature

on personal information preservation, and the analysis of constantly evolving NP.

1 INTRODUCTION

The availability of big data technologies has led to a

radical shift in business, government, and non-profit

organizations, providing new capabilities for insight

and efficiency. But those fears are compounded on

some of the uses to which that data could be put. Like

everything in our lives, from our romantic

relationships to our professional lives, the intimate

details of them have been digitized and the data we

generate in them has generated us in return. These

changes have highlighted the importance of strong

data privacy regimes that prevent sensitive data from

being abused, accessed without permission, and

risked of being compromised.

The management of personal data is even more

complicated today since new advanced technology,

like AI, Machine Learning, Big Data and Cloud

Services, is widely used. These systems require vast

amounts of data to develop analyses and predictions,

yet raise new kinds of dangers, which can undermine

users’ privacy. And the absence of universal

governmental regulations and standards can add

complexity when trying to provide data protection

across borders and instead result in personal

information being exposed to levels of risk that can

differ between states.

This study investigates the primary problems of

privacy in the big data era and analyses how future

applications and current applications collide with the

protection of personal information. By examining

existing approaches and perspectives for the future,

this paper seeks to contribute to the continued

discussion about ensuring privacy in the era of big

data.

294

Ponnusamy, S., Amarnath, M. A., Deepa, K., Naik, S. K. L., D., B. and Verma, R. K.

Navigating Data Privacy Challenges in the Era of Big Data: Strategies and Solutions for Safeguarding Personal Information.

DOI: 10.5220/0013862900004919

Paper published under CC license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)

In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Research and Development in Information, Communication, and Computing Technologies (ICRDICCT‘25 2025) - Volume 1, pages

294-300

ISBN: 978-989-758-777-1

2 PROBLEM STATEMENT

With the ever-increasing volume and the types of data

produced around the world, protecting personal data

has become one of the most challenging problems in

the digital era. Although great progress has been

made with big data technologies the methods to

protect privacy are failing to respond to the

challenges of today’s data and analysis environments.

With the speed at which data is collected and shared,

the risks to personal privacy have never been greater

with unauthorized access, breaches and misuse of

personal data increasing across the world. Current

personal data protection practices are often just not

able to stand up to the onslaught of new threats and

personal information abuse. In addition, inconsistent

international laws and complex legal systems pose

additional hurdles to guard customer privacy across

different markets. This study aims to pinpoint,

discuss, and evaluate major information security (IS)

challenges in order to ensure personal data protection

in the age of big data, and to suggest potential

solutions for damage reduction and a safer digital

tomorrow.

3 LITERATURE SURVEY

Data privacy in the era of big data has been attracting

a great deal of research and industry interest in recent

years. With the rise of big data, one of the key

challenges is the increased threat to the privacy of

individuals leading researchers to find a variety of

methods to protect sensitive data. Differential

privacy, as demonstrated in Jiang et al. (2021), and is

one of the widely discussed methods in the domain. It

makes data aggregation and analyses possible,

meanwhile no individual report point can be re-

identified, which is a security mechanism in terms of

privacy-preserving in big data area.

Federated learning, as investigated by Zhang

\emph (et al. (2025) and Gadekallu et al. (2021), has

been developed as yet another promising option.

Such a federated approach in fact allows models to be

trained on multiple devices or servers without

centralizing the sensitive data, and hence it reduces

the data-exposure risk. The decentralized approach in

federated learning means that the data stays local -

yet valuable insights can still be obtained, which

would be crucial for typical big data applications.

Despite this progress, the problem of how to

anonymize data and yet maintain its utility is still an

open problem. Yang et al. (2024) present

anonymization methods in the context of AI, in which

datasets are altered by machine learning algorithms

so that individuals can no longer be singled out but

data loses as little as possible of its value. These

approaches are attracting attention because they

promise to optimize the trade-off between privacy

and utility in data analysis.

Narayanan et al. (2024) highlight the necessity of

data governance frameworks that encom-pass

rigorous privacy and security guarantees. The

frameworks are also vital for the prevention of such

violation even before the authorities like the GDPR

(which already is a global standard in data protection

are needed). Khalil et al. (2023) also support that data

security should be a part of the overall lifecycle of

big-data, from collecting the data to analyzing them,

so that privacy may be effectively maintained. This

includes addressing issues pertaining to unauthorized

access, misuse and ethical use of the data.

The emergence of blockchain technology, as

mentioned in Chen et al. (2019), have opened new

doors to improve the privacy of data. This secure

characteristic of blockchain (immutability and

decentralization) provides an appropriate

infrastrucuture to preserve the integrity of the data

and sensitive data in a secure manner. Likewise,

Anderson and Kim (2021) claim that blockchain can

be utilized to develop tamper proof records, which are

essential to instill confidence in data driven and

generated systems.

But as we place more trust in machine learning

and AI models to chew on enormous sets of data,

experts worry that valuable personal data will be

exposed unintentionally. Brown & Johnson (2021)

examine access management issues in big data

settings and underscore the need for secure systems

to control the who and the when for accessing

sensitive data. This emphasis on access control is

consistent with the work of Garcia et al. (2018) who

study the weaknesses of big data environments and

the importance of ongoing control of security.

Although these different methods can all be used

for obtaining efficient solutions, they are not without

their challenges that need to be addressed. Current

solutions typically do not scale properly considering

the amount of data to handle and the threat

sophistication. Both Toxigon (2025) and The Verge

(2025) suggest that as companies gather a

considerable amount of personal data, they act as the

prime prey for cybercrime. Failure to do so results in

diminishing ability to manage these threats, for which

innovative and agile privacy-preserving solutions are

desperately needed.

Navigating Data Privacy Challenges in the Era of Big Data: Strategies and Solutions for Safeguarding Personal Information

295

Given these challenges, the creation of a

universal and widely adopted data privacy framework

remains a key consideration. Johnson and Smith,

2018) Standardized practices and international

collaboration are key to enabling consistent and

effective protections of personal data. While

advances like encryption and federated learning are

steps in the right direction, the race to innovate calls

for constant vigilance as well vigilance and

adaptability to new forms of threats.

Finally, while academia and the IT industry have

made considerable inroads in understanding and

confronting the difficulties associated with handling

data privacy in big data scenarios, there remains a lot

of work to be done. Further exploring next-generation

privacy techniques and laying groundwork for robust

data governance frameworks will be crucial to

safeguard personal information in the face of

increasingly complex digital environments."

4 METHODOLOGY

A multiple step, interdisciplinary approach is adopted

in order to explore the challenges and possible

solutions to data privacy in big data era that uses a

blend of qualitative and quantitative methods. The

first phase is a comprehensive literature review,

which forms the basis for defining problems,

existing frameworks and possible approaches to data

privacy. We review academic papers, published

industry reports, and technology whitepapers across

the year 2021 to 2025, on privacy-preserving

methodologies, governance models and upcoming

technologies such as federated learning, encryption,

and blockchain.

Figure 1 shows the Addressing Data

Privacy in Big Data Environments.

The second phase in the methodology is

concerned with the utility of these privacy preserving

methods. We compare scalability and use cases of

different proposed privacy models, including

differential privacy, homomorphic encryption, and

parallelisation of anonymisation with respect to real-

world big data size and rise of efficiency. This

application involves examination of case studies and

experimentation data around best-in-class

organisations deploying these techniques. The

success of these strategies is judged in terms of the

distance of data protection, effect on data utility, and

the cost incurred.

Table 1 shows the Comparative

Analysis of Privacy-Preserving Techniques.

Figure 1: Addressing data privacy in big data environments.

Table 1: Comparative analysis of privacy-preserving techniques.

Technique

Privacy

Level

Data

Utility

Scalability

Implementation

Cost

Use Case

Example

Differential

Privacy

High

Modera

High Medium

Statistical Data

Sharing

Federated

Learning

Very High High Medium High

Distributed ML

Training

Data

Anonymization

Moderate High High Low

Healthcare Data

Release

Homomorphic

Encryption

Very High Low Low Very High

Secure Cloud

Computing

ICRDICCT‘25 2025 - INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN INFORMATION,

COMMUNICATION, AND COMPUTING TECHNOLOGIES

296

The third phase is a review of privacy legislation

and regulation. We ground global privacy regulations

like GDPR in a systematic review to understand their

effects on privacy practices around the world. In this

phase, we also consider the difficulties that

organizations encounter in order to be compliant

with these laws, particularly in the case of cross-

border data sharing. To help shape our coverage,

we’ll be interviewing industry experts, lawyers and

policy makers to hear their thoughts on changes in

the data privacy legal framework and enforcement

structures.

The concluding phase in the methodology involves a

practical application via development of a prototype

system using federated learning and blockchain

technology for improving data privacy. The prototype

will be tested in the lab, with synthetic data sets, to

determine how effectively it guards privacy while

conserving the data’s accuracy and usefulness. This

system will demonstrate solutions, providing an

empirical test of their practicability in realistic

situations.

Table 2 shows the Global Privacy

Regulation Comparison.

Table 2: Global privacy regulation comparison.

Regulation Region Scope Compliance Complexity Enforcement Strictness

GDPR Europe Personal Data Protection High High

CCPA

California,

Consumer Privacy Rights Medium Medium

PDP Bill

(India)

India Data Protection & Consent Evolving Moderate

PIPEDA Canada

Commercial Org Privacy

Policies

Low Low

By integrating this variety of approaches, the study

expects to be able to provide a thorough examination

on data privacy in the era of big data, and bridge the

gap between theories and applications. Such

multidisciplinary approach guarantees an in-depth

knowledge of the limitations, prospects, and further

research lines in the on-going quest to preserve

personal data in today's data-driven world.

Figure 2

shows the Trends in GDPR Compliance Across

Global Regions.

Figure 2: Trends in GDPR compliance across global

regions.

5 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The results of this work revealed the complex issues

involved in data privacy in bigdata era, and provided

several approaches that can address these issues. One

of the main contributions of the research is the

observation that there is a trade-o between privacy

protection and data utility. Methods such as

differential privacy are able to preserve individual

anonymity, but frequently at the cost of significantly

degrading the data’s utility for analysis. Encryption

techniques as well as anonymization techniques in

some cases, have not proven sufficient to protect

with confidence against re- identification attacks,

notably when datasets are large, and so prone to

whether sufficiently detailed with demographic

information or behavioural data resales have been

anonymized to begin with.

Figure 3 shows the

Comparison of Privacy Techniques Based on

Effectiveness and Data Utility.

Navigating Data Privacy Challenges in the Era of Big Data: Strategies and Solutions for Safeguarding Personal Information

297

Figure 3: Comparison of privacy techniques based on

effectiveness and data utility.

Federated learning was developed as a potential

remedy to this problem. Due to its decentralized

property, Federated learning supports data processing

without sending raw data to the centralized servers,

which in turn, substantially mitigates the risks of

leaking sensitive data. The prototype system

developed in the course of this study has shown the

possibility of maintaining the privacy of data and at

the same time obtaining useful insights into the data.

But the scalability of the system is still questionable,

as federated learning have a great demand for

computing resources to handle the data processing

and aggregation at the distributed networks.

Table 3

shows the Federated Learning Prototype Evaluation

Results.

Table 3: Federated learning prototype evaluation results.

Metric

Value

Achieved

Evaluation

Description

Data Privacy

Score

92%

Based on reduced

exposure during

training

Model

Accuracy

88%

Accuracy of

prediction on

nthetic test data

Communicati

on Overhead

Moderate

Data exchanged

during model

dates

Deployment

Scalability

Low

Challenge due to

node heterogeneity

The adoption of blockchain technology also

appeared promising to improve data privacy by

assuring data integrity and preventing data tampering.

With a blockchain-enabled indestructible ledger

system, data transactions can be safely managed and

access permissions can be recorded in clear,

minimizing the potential for unsolicited access. But

the energy-intensive and cost associated to

operationalize the blockchain at large scale can make

widespread deployment for privacy-sensitive

applications problematic.

On the regulatory side, the report discovered that

despite the tremendous progress made in the

establishment of a global standard by GDPR and

other privacy laws, reaching the required level of

compliance is a complicated, and in many cases a

time consuming, process particularly for

organizations that operate across multiple

jurisdictions. Legal and industry experts said in

interviews that the fractured regulatory environment

around privacy has left companies and individuals

confused and unsure about what they are supposed to

do, especially when moving data across borders. This

regulatory complexity further emphasizes the

importance of more uniform global standards to

provide consistent privacy protection practices

across borders.

Figure 4: Comparative evaluation of blockchain and

federated learning for privacy enhancement.

The study also uncovered the increasing need for

data governance frameworks to guarantee the long-

term privacy of data. Firms that adopted rigorous

governance practices for the use of data – such as

access checks, regular audits, and data utilization

transparency - were better equipped to address

privacy exposure. Yet the fact that these best-practice

frameworks are not more commonly adopted is

evidence that many organizations still find it difficult

to get privacy right, either for want of resources or

because they do not know how to proceed.

Figure 4

ICRDICCT‘25 2025 - INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN INFORMATION,

COMMUNICATION, AND COMPUTING TECHNOLOGIES

298

shows the Comparative Evaluation of Blockchain and

Federated Learning for Privacy Enhancement.

The findings taken together suggest the

importance of a balanced strategy on data privacy

that addresses technological, regulatory and

organizational dimensions of data protection. Though

promising solutions are offered by such emerging

technologies as federated learning and blockchain,

scalability, operational costs, and regulatory

constraints are among the challenges that must be

solved for these solutions to become mainstream. In

future, more research needs to be undertaken to

advance these technologies, more efficient privacy

preservation technologies for big data need to be

developed, and more elaborate global data protection

regulations need to be formulated which can address

the fast development of big data and privacy issues.

6 CONCLUSIONS

With volumes of big data rapidly shaping the digital

fronts, and the privacy of data to the fore, securing

data has been a challenge that needs tackling and

continued innovation. In this study, we have taken a

multidimensional look at data privacy in the big data

world, identifying what are the key problems and

considering what are the potential solutions that can

genuinely protect our personal data. By investigating

existing privacy preserving techniques (e.g.,

differential privacy, federated learning, and

blockchain) and analyzing the global privacy

legislations, this paper has discussed the state of art,

and the challenges that remain.

Despite that existing solutions are showing the

promise for privacy preservation, the accuracy-

privacy tradeoff still poses challenges. The rise of

decentralized approaches such as federated learning

and integrity-preserving platform decentralization

using blockchain suggest a tremendous promise, but

the scalability and operational issues must be

overcome to support these solutions at large scale.

Moreover, the regulatory environment, while in a

state of changing, remains complicated with respect

to uniform measures to safeguard data across borders.

The results highlight the urgency of global privacy

practices and more robust governing structures to

advance data privacy at a broader level.

The future of privacy in the big data world

requirements maintaining equilibrium among

innovation and privacy, so that technological

advances are not at the expense of individuals.

Unfortunately, to reach this equilibrium, research,

interdisciplinarity, and effective policy are all crucial.

This work adds to this rulemaking conversation by

offering perspectives on the technical, legal, and

operational aspects of commercial data privacy, and

suggests the way ahead towards establishing more

secure and accountable data environments.

REFERENCES

Adenubi, A. O., Oduroye, A. P., & Akanni, A. (2023). Data

security in big data: Challenges, strategies, and future

trends. International Journal of Research in Education

Humanities and Commerce, 5(2).

https://ijrehc.com/vol-5-issue-2/data-security-in-big-

data-challenges-strategies-and-future-trends/

ijrehc.com

AI, growing data risks expand the role of chief privacy of-

ficer. (2024, September 15). The Wall Street Journal.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/ai-growing-data-risks-

expand-the-role-of-chief-privacy-officer-f4f251c8WSJ

Anderson, T., & Kim, S. (2021). Data governance and com-

pliance frameworks for big data analytics. Journal of

Data Governance and Compliance, 8(3), 201–218.

ijrehc.com+1Journal of Student Research+1

Apple's complicated plan to improve its AI while protecting

privacy. (2025, April 15). The Verge.

https://www.theverge.com/news/648496/apple-

improve-ai-models-differential-privacyThe Verge

Brown, C., & Johnson, R. (2021). Complexity of access

management in big data environments. Journal of Cy-

bersecurity, 8(2), 145–160.ijrehc.com

Chen, H., Liu, Z., & Wang, L. (2019). Blockchain for en-

hanced data integrity in big data environments. Journal

of Information Security, 16(2), 112–128.ijrehc.com

Chen, H., & Wang, Q. (2020). Big data analytics: Chal-

lenges and opportunities. Journal of Big Data Research,

5(1), 45–60.ijrehc.com

Confidential computing. (2025, April 8). Wikipedia.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confidential_computing

Wikipedia

Gadekallu, T. R., Pham, Q.-V., Huynh-The, T.,

Bhattacharya, S., Maddikunta, P. K. R., & Liyanage, M.

(2021). Federated learning for big data: A survey on op-

portunities, applications, and future directions. arXiv.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.04160arXiv

Garcia, L., et al. (2018). Threats and vulnerabilities in big

data ecosystems. Journal of Cybersecurity, 5(3), 210–

225.ijrehc.com

GDPR is important but EU has turned privacy protection

into a bureaucratic mess - here's why we need to slash

red tape. (2025, April 13). The Sun.

https://www.thesun.ie/news/15040550/gdpr-privacy-

protection-bureaucratic-mess-european-union-ireland/

The Irish Sun

Here's what potential 23andMe buyers could do with your

genetic data. (2025, April 14). Business Insider.

https://www.businessinsider.com/23andme-what-hap-

pens-to-genetic-data-buyers-sale-bankruptcy-security-

2025-4Business Insider

Navigating Data Privacy Challenges in the Era of Big Data: Strategies and Solutions for Safeguarding Personal Information

299

Jiang, H., Gao, Y., Sarwar, S. M., GarzaPerez, L., & Robin,

M. (2021). Differential privacy in privacy-preserving

big data and learning: Challenge and opportunity.

arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.01704arXiv

Johnson, R., & Smith, J. (2018). Importance of data security

in big data analytics. Journal of Cybersecurity, 6(3),

210–225.ijrehc.com

Khalil, M. K., Al Balushi, M. K. A. L., Al Amri, A. A. S.,

Al Qassabi, S., & Naidu, V. R. (2023). Data privacy and

security challenges in big data analytics: A review of

current solutions and future directions. Journal of Stu-

dent Research. https://www.jsr.org/index.php/path/arti

cle/view/2260Journal of Student Research

Narayanan, U., Veettil, N. P., Krishnankutty, R. T., Sunny,

L. E., & Paul, V. (2024). Mitigating privacy and secu-

rity risks in the era of big data: A comprehensive frame-

work of best practices and protocols. Journal of Com-

puter Science, 20(9), 1121–1145.

https://doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2024.1121.1145

thescipub.com

Security and privacy in big data life cycle: A survey and

open challenges. (2020). Sustainability, 12(24), 10571.

https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10571MDPI

Toxigon. (2025). Data privacy in 2025: Key trends and

challenges ahead. Toxigon Blog. https://toxigon.com/d

ata-privacy-in-2025-key-trends-and-challenges-ahead

Toxigon

Weakening encryption would make European security

worse - the VPN industry reacts to the EU's plan for

end-to-end encryption backdoors. (2025, April 13).

TechRadar. https://www.techradar.com/vpn/vpn-pri-

vacy-security/weakening-encryption-would-make-eu-

ropean-security-worse-the-vpn-industry-reacts-to-the-

eus-plan-for-end-to-end-encryption-backdoors

TechRadar

Yang, L., Tian, M., Xin, D., Cheng, Q., & Zheng, J. (2024).

AI-driven anonymization: Protecting personal data pri-

vacy while leveraging machine learning. arXiv.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.17191arXiv

Zhang, Y., Liu, J., Wang, J., Dai, L., Guo, F., & Cai, G.

(2025). Federated learning for cross-domain data pri-

vacy: A distributed approach to secure collaboration.

arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.00282arXiv

ICRDICCT‘25 2025 - INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN INFORMATION,

COMMUNICATION, AND COMPUTING TECHNOLOGIES

300