system reliability. Many devices today are either
dependent on the cloud, causing latency and
connectivity problems, or are not smart enough to
anticipate possible health risks at the earliest.
Furthermore, for example, they do not have user-
friendliness with uncomfortable issues (e.g., battery
issues and complicated interfaces) that are not
available for long-term elderly use. The present
scenario demands an IoT integrated wearable
system, which can constantly and non-invasively
track multiple vital parameters, compute real-time
analytics on the spot and provide predictive health
analysis, all while being easy to wear, light weight
and adapted to the variety of living environments.
3 LITERATURE SURVEY
In recent years there is a growing interest in research
for I0T wearable systems for elderly health
monitoring as a result of the demand for real-time,
non-invasive and smart healthcare solutions. Al
Dahoud (2024) presented a low-cost monitoring IoT
wearable for elderly monitoring, however, the study
did not include the validation with real-world
measurements which this study attempts to address.
Ali and Khan (2023) also demonstrated a simple IoT-
based health monitoring prototype, emphasizing
scalable systems that allow round-the-clock data
availability. Arshad et al. (2022) investigated hybrid
deep learning for gait event prediction from a single
sensor, but our method extends to multi-vital
tracking. The safety dressing by Balachandra et al.
(2023) has formed the basis of this work's unified
approach that integrates health prediction and alert
features. Bhatia and Sharma (2023) highlighted
system validation with narrow parameters, the reason
additional crucial parameters were included in our
design.
Chatterjee and Bhattacharya (2023) applied AI for
real-time health monitoring but reported heavy
computational requirements, an issue alleviated in our
work via edge intelligence. Chen and Wang (2024)
demonstrated an AI-IoT integration for long-term
care, but the system requirements are still highly
dependent on cloud storage, which ours could
strengthen with the local processing. Gupta Singh
(2024) concentrated on emergency response but
without predictive modeling, an aspect enhanced in
our approach. Hossain and Muhammad (2024)
developed a Firebase dependent cloud-based
monitoring system, which does not support off-line
systems, unlike our model. Solution for fall detection
using blockchain was introduced by Islam and Saha
(2023) that motivated our system’s secure and
privacy-preserving work.
Javed and Putra (2024) presented a theoretical
view on medical IoT, which we complement with
practical implementation. Kumar and Thapliyal
(2021) proposed a smart home-based monitoring
system, whereas our wearable is not tied to
infrastructure. 209 Lee and Kim (2023) focused on
environmental sustainability in health devices
without performance indicators as in our assessment.
Li and Zhang (2024) presented an edge-cloud design,
which our \mdlname is based on, balancing the
tradeoff between the latency and efficiency. As
referenced by Liu and Chen (2023), better quality of
life as a result of enhanced IoT was the prelude to the
usability-focused design of this project.
Nath and Thapliyal (2021) also emphasized the
importance of smart environments, but our approach
moves away from that reliance. Patel and Park (2024)
surveyed industrial applications, providing direction
on adopting implementation-level features in our
system. Rahman and Islam (2023) confirmed wear
able monitoring devices for remote care and our
model extends it by employing the multi-sensor
fusion. Saha and Islam (2023) discussed blockchain
in wearables that directed us towards lightweight
encryption. [CheckK1] Sharma and Bhatia (2023)
stressed performance validation, a principle we have
followed here regarding the faithfulness of the
system.
Moin et al. (2022) presented EMG-based
interfaces which were not as viable for elderly users,
and we employed less sophisticated but more
comfortable biosensors. Pal et al. (2023) with fall
detection and ours with predictive vital monitoring.
Yang et al. (2022) considered a federated learning
approach for health devices, but did not have real-
world implementation, which we provide. Zhang and
Wang (2023) presented an edge-based approach not
including energy profiling which we build on. Lastly,
Zhou et al. (2021) and XU et al.
This literature review exposes the scattered
attempts toward the interdisciplinary science of IoT-
enabled elderly health but underlies the demand for
an integrated, intelligent, and wearable easy-to-wear
inclusive platform the aim that this article pursues.
4 METHODOLOGY
The approach used in this study concentrates the
development and deployment of the elderly health
monitoring IoT-centric system that includes the IoT-
based wearable for the elderly health monitoring. The