differentiation, as strong positive and negative
responses can cancel each other out, and it may fail to
capture the reasons behind low scores. Lastly, this
study focused on six brand personality dimensions,
which may not fully reflect all aspects of brand
personality. Future research could explore additional
dimensions or alternative frameworks to provide a
more comprehensive understanding of the impact of
brand personality on consumer behavior. Despite
these limitations, the study offers valuable insights
into how brand personality influences purchase
intention and provides a foundation for further
research.
6 CONCLUSIONS
This study explores the influence of POPMART's
brand personality dimensions on consumers' purchase
intention, revealing several key findings. Sincerity,
Excitement, and Ruggedness are identified as
significant positive drivers of purchase intention,
indicating that consumers value honesty, fun, and
uniqueness in POPMART's brand identity. In
contrast, Sociability demonstrates a significant
negative impact, highlighting potential concerns over
excessive emphasis on community-driven traits that
may alienate consumers or diminish the perceived
exclusivity of collectible products. Competence and
Sophistication are not found to influence purchase
intention significantly, suggesting that POPMART's
target audience, primarily Generation Z, prioritizes
playful, emotionally engaging traits over
professionalism or luxury.
The study contributes to the literature by applying
Aaker’s (1997) brand personality framework to the
experiential and youth-oriented context of blind box
consumption, offering insights into how specific
brand personality traits resonate with Generation Z
consumers. It also emphasizes the dual nature of
Sociability, enriching discussions around its role
within the Excitement dimension.
For practitioners, the findings underscore the
importance of focusing on honesty, excitement, and
uniqueness when developing branding strategies.
However, brands should balance Sociability
carefully, fostering positive social interactions
without overwhelming consumers. Moreover,
aligning marketing strategies with the preferences of
Generation Z is crucial for enhancing emotional
connections and driving purchase intention.
Despite its contributions, the study is not without
limitations. The sample was limited to Generation Z
consumers in Macau, and the small sample size may
restrict the generalizability of the findings. Future
research could expand the sample size, explore
diverse cultural contexts, and incorporate
experimental or longitudinal designs to establish
causal relationships. Additionally, further studies
could investigate alternative brand personality
dimensions to provide a more comprehensive
understanding of their influence on consumer
behavior. Nonetheless, this study lays a foundation
for future research and offers valuable insights for
brands seeking to enhance consumer engagement
through strategic brand personality development.
REFERENCES
Aaker, J.L., 1997. Dimensions of brand personality. J.
Market. Res. 34(3), 347.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3151897
Ahmad, A., Thyagaraj, K.S., 2014. Understanding the
influence of brand personality on consumer behavior.
Deleted J. 3(1), 38–43.
https://doi.org/10.12720/joams.3.1.38-43
Balabanis, G., Karpova, A., 2024. The personality of
luxury. A new measure and the effects of brand
personality distinctiveness and congruence on
consumer responses. J. Bus. Res. 189, 115107.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115107
Charoenwiwatchai, R., 2024. The role of consumer
psychology in the marketing strategies of pop mart in
Thailand. Doctoral dissertation, Mahidol University.
De La Paz Toldos-Romero, M., Orozco-Gómez, M.M.,
2015. Brand personality and purchase intention. Eur.
Bus. Rev. 27(5), 462–476. https://doi.org/10.1108/ebr-
03-2013-0046
Geuens, M., Weijters, B., De Wulf, K., 2009b. A new
measure of brand personality. Int. J. Res. Mark. 26(2),
97–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2008.12.002
Gong, X., Yee, C.L., Lee, S.Y., Saif, A.N.M., Liu, M.,
Anonthi, F., 2024. Unveiling the enigma of blind box
impulse buying curiosity: the moderating role of price
consciousness. Heliyon 10(24), e40564.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40564
Guo, W.E., Dong, B., Palmatier, R.W., 2024b.
Understanding surprise: Toward a theory of surprise
marketing. J. Retail.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2024.11.001
Hamilton, R., Thompson, D., Bone, S., Chaplin, L.N.,
Griskevicius, V., Goldsmith, K., Hill, R., John, D.R.,
Mittal, C., O’Guinn, T., Piff, P., Roux, C., Shah, A.,
Zhu, M., 2018. The effects of scarcity on consumer
decision journeys. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 47(3), 532–550.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-018-0604-7
Keller, K.L., 2001. Building customer-based brand equity:
A blueprint for creating strong brands. Market. Sci.
Inst.
http://anandahussein.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2015/09/arti
cle-4.pdf
Kovacheva, A., Nikolova, H., 2023. Uncertainty marketing
tactics: An overview and a unifying framework. J.