stemming from ambiguous or insufficient IP
licensing agreements. This risk forms mainly due to a
lack of thorough due diligence during the pre-
cooperation stage. Brands may fail to meticulously
review the IP's authorization status, neglect to clarify
details such as the scope of authorization, the duration
of the license, and the associated fees, or overlook
potential loopholes in the agreement.
The consequences of unclear authorization can be
severe. Legal disputes over copyright infringement
may arise, which not only incur financial losses for
the brand in terms of potential compensation but also
severely damage the brand's reputation. Such legal
issues can also disrupt the normal operation of co-
branded product development and marketing, leading
to delays and additional costs. Moreover, it can
undermine the brand's credibility among consumers
and business partners, affecting future business
opportunities.
4.3 Risk of Post-Cooperation
Management Deficiency
The risk of post-cooperation management deficiency
in IP co-branding is the potential failure to optimize
brand strategies and maintain brand value after the
collaborative project is completed. This risk occurs
when brands lack an effective post-cooperation
evaluation and feedback mechanism. Without a
scientific system to assess the performance of co-
branded products in terms of sales, brand awareness,
and customer satisfaction, and without actively
seeking consumer feedback, brands are unable to
identify the strengths and weaknesses of the co-
branding efforts.
The impact of this risk is that brands miss the
opportunity to learn from the co-branding experience,
resulting in repeated mistakes in future collaborations.
Without proper optimization based on post-
cooperation analysis, brands may struggle to meet the
evolving needs of consumers, leading to a decline in
market competitiveness. Over time, this can gradually
erode the brand's position in the market and impede
its long-term growth and development.
5 CONCLUSIONS
Based on the brand value theory framework, this
study deeply analyzes the impact mechanism of IP
co-branding on brand value and conducts empirical
analysis through multiple classic cases. The research
results show that IP co-branding can significantly
enhance brand value through three paths: cognitive
reconstruction, emotional deepening, and economic
transformation. In terms of cognitive reconstruction,
by virtue of the cultural symbol attribute of IP, the
brand can break through traditional cognitive
boundaries and achieve differentiated development.
For example, the co-branding of Luckin and The
Rose's Story successfully reconstructed consumers'
perception of the brand, enhancing brand awareness
and reputation. In terms of emotional deepening, IP
co-branding can trigger consumers' emotional
resonance, strengthen the connection between the
brand and consumers, and improve brand loyalty.
Chow Tai Seng's co-branding with Jay Chou's otaku
culture IP successfully extended fans' emotions for
the idol to the brand products, realizing the transfer
and connection of emotions. In terms of economic
transformation, IP co-branding endows products with
unique IP premium ability, which is directly
transformed into product added value and market
competitiveness. The co-branding cooperation of
Starbucks × LINE FRIENDS, the sales of limited-
edition products exceeded expectations, achieving the
effective transformation of brand economic value.
However, IP co-branding also has the risk of value
dilution. For example, in the co-branding events of
MINISO and Chiikawa, as well as Ningji and
Detective Conan, due to inappropriate content
presentation and disrespect for the IP image, fans
have negative emotions towards the brand, reducing
brand favorability and loyalty. To effectively avoid
these risks, it is crucial to establish a scientific
cooperation evaluation system and a whole-process
risk control mechanism. In terms of cooperation
evaluation, an IP adaptability evaluation model
should be constructed from dimensions such as brand
tone matching, fan overlap, and cultural connotation
fit. The Delphi method is used to aggregate expert
wisdom, and consumer research data is introduced for
verification to ensure the adaptability of the IP and
the brand. In terms of the risk control mechanism, it
should cover legal compliance review before
cooperation, content review and public opinion
monitoring during cooperation, and effect evaluation
and consumer feedback closed-loop after
cooperation, comprehensively and systematically
managing and controlling risks to protect the interests
and image of the brand.
Looking ahead, research on IP co-branding will
move towards broader horizons under the dual
impetus of technological innovation and social
transformation. With the maturation of technologies
such as the metaverse, AI, and blockchain, new forms
of co-branding, including virtual IPs and digital