rivalry, threat of new entrants, substitute product
threats, suppliers' bargaining power, and buyers'
bargaining power. For Starbucks, its unique brand
positioning and operational model grant it a dominant
position in the coffee market. However, it must also
address challenges posed by intensifying competition
and evolving consumer demands.
3.1.1 Analysis of Existing Industry Rivalry
Starbucks faces a multi-tiered competitive landscape,
including international chains (Luckin Coffee, Costa
Coffee), regional operators (Taiwan’s Ueshima
Coffee, Japan’s Manabe Coffee), and independent
coffee boutiques. Leveraging its global presence
(over 30,000 stores worldwide) and brand premium,
Starbucks maintains market leadership. Unlike
competitors, Starbucks emphasizes creating an
immersive "Third Living Space" experience,
contrasting with Luckin’s cost-effective, digitally
driven strategy. This approach enables effective
customer segmentation. However, Starbucks must
remain vigilant against localized competitors. Luckin,
for instance, is reshaping regional markets through
rapid store expansion (exceeding 10,000 stores in Q2
2023) and product innovation (e.g., the viral "Sauce
Latte" campaign).
3.1.2 Market Entry Barriers
Starbucks has fortified its dominance in China’s
freshly ground coffee market through multi-
dimensional barriers. Culturally, its persistent
promotion of coffee culture and "Third Space"
experiential services fosters strong consumer loyalty,
with a brand loyalty index of 78% (Morning Consult,
2023). Operationally, its vertically integrated supply
chain covers over 30 premium coffee-growing
regions, supported by SCAA-certified roasting
systems, ensuring stable daily production of tens of
millions of cups. This scale creates significant entry
barriers for new players. Emerging brands like
Bianlifeng (convenience store coffee priced at 5-10
yuan) and Manner (specialty coffee) target niche
markets, but their differentiation strategies (price or
product focus) avoid direct competition with
Starbucks’ core 25-40-yuan price range. Third-party
estimates indicate new entrants’ penetration into
Starbucks’ mid-to-high-end customer base remains
limited (15%-23%), resulting in a low-to-moderate
industry entry threat.
3.1.3 Substitute Product Pressure
Starbucks has built systemic defences against
substitutes through value reorientation and scenario-
based strategies. Substitute products include ready-
to-drink tea, functional beverages, and home-brewing
equipment. To counter this, Starbucks has elevated its
"coffee+" scenario strategy, transforming stores into
hybrid spaces for work and social interaction. In 2023,
63% of consumers prioritized environmental
experience over price or taste, validating this
approach. By transitioning from a product provider to
a "Third Space" operator, Starbucks reduced its
substitute threat coefficient to 0.42 (industry
benchmark: 0.6). Delphi Method assessments
confirm substitute threats remain moderate,
attributable to Starbucks’ non-product competitive
barriers.
3.1.4 Supplier Bargaining Dynamics
Starbucks employs a multi-source procurement
strategy across Latin America, Africa, and Asia-
Pacific, reducing reliance on single regions. Its top
five suppliers account for 28% of procurement, with
a bargaining power dispersion index of 0.82. Quality
control mechanisms, including 100% Arabica
certification, face challenges such as climate-induced
fluctuations (e.g., a 9% quality deviation in Brazilian
beans due to 2022 frosts, raising annual quality
control costs by 5.3%). Long-term contracts (65% of
procurement) ensure stability, but ESG-driven
Rainforest Alliance certification (92% coverage) has
increased annual procurement costs by 4.7%. Porter’s
Five Forces assessment rates supplier bargaining
power at 3.2/5, aligning with industry norms, and
indicating effective risk mitigation through
geographic diversification, quality controls, and ESG
cost-sharing.
3.1.5 Consumer Bargaining Power
Starbucks minimizes consumer bargaining power
through premium customer targeting and high
switching costs. Its core demographic exhibits low
price sensitivity (elasticity coefficient: 0.32) and high
engagement, with Starbucks Rewards membership
surpassing 75 million. Members contribute 57% of
app orders and show 3.2x higher purchase frequency
than non-members. Despite competitors’ low-price
strategies, Starbucks retains 82% of customers
annually, with members averaging 5.2 monthly visits.
Hotelling Model analysis shows consumer bargaining
power at 0.17, while Bain & Company data confirms
customer retention costs remain stable at 7.2%–8.5%
of revenue, underscoring the success of its
premiumization strategy (Guo and Zhang, 2023).
Starbucks’ Differentiation Breakthrough
Strategies in Red Ocean Competition. Amid fierce