Value Anchoring Through Third Place: Strategic Differentiation
Pathways for Starbucks' Competitive Breakthrough in the Coffee
Industry
Yiming Chen
1
a
, Jiaxi Hu
2
b
and Jiawen Liu
3
c
1
School of Sociology and Population, School of Social Work, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications,
Wenyuan Road, Qixia District, China
2
RDFZ XISHAN SCHOOL, Malianwa Street, Haidian District, China
3
School of Business, Beijing Union University, North Fourth Ring East Road, Chaoyang District, China
Keywords: Third Place, Differentiation Strategy, Contextual Value, Digital Transformation, Experience Economy.
Abstract: The Chinese coffee market is transitioning from rapid expansion to stock competition. This predicament
reflects a dual tension in market evolution-while consumer demand for the emotional attributes of coffee
continues to escalate, the supply side remains mired in low-dimensional price wars. The industry urgently
needs to break through the growth trap of "scale without premiumization". Under this background, how
physical businesses can reconstruct irreplaceable experiential value has become a critical proposition for
resolving industry competition. This study focuses on Starbucks' "Third Place"-centric differentiation
strategy, exploring pathways for physical businesses to reconstruct value in market saturation. Research
reveals that Starbucks' breakthrough fundamentally lies in transforming stores into "lifestyle vessels,"
leveraging spatial storytelling to evoke emotional resonance with consumers, thereby establishing brand
premiumization amid price-driven competition. The study further proposes that the industry's competitive
focus is shifting from product cost-effectiveness to mindshare capture. Only through continuous scenario
innovation and cultural empowerment can the sector achieve a paradigm shift—from transactional
relationships to value symbiosis.
1 INTRODUCTION
The contemporary Chinese coffee market has evolved
into a hyper-competitive landscape characterized by
market saturation, where dominant players engage in
aggressive price subsidization to capture market share
while emerging entrants harness digital-native
channels to engineer viral customer acquisition
through algorithmic propagation. This structural shift
has precipitated intensified product commoditization
and systemic margin erosion across the industry
(Anthony, 2024). Within this context, Starbucks'
experiential retail architecture—predicated on the
Third-Place doctrine-—emerges as a paradigmatic
case for interrogating value creation imperatives. The
strategic orientation inherently addresses a critical
a
https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8787-7148
b
https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9078-207X
c
https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2598-3897
paradox in experience economic theorization, as
conventional differentiators like product superiority
and channel exclusivity dissipate, how can physical
enterprises cultivate non-substitutable competitive
moats through spatial value codification.
Theoretically, this investigation employs an
operational deconstruction of Starbucks' Third Place
ecosystem to delineate the co-evolutionary
mechanisms between multisensory experiential
triggers (olfactory, tactile, auditory) and brand equity
crystallization. By integrating service-dominant logic
with spatial semiotics frameworks, the study advances
the conceptualization of embodied value
architectures-a theoretical construct capturing how
physical environments transmute transient customer
interactions into enduring brand allegiances (Vargo
and Lusch, 2004). This contributes to experience
Chen, Y., Hu, J. and Liu, J.
Value Anchoring Through Third Place: Strategic Differentiation Pathways for Starbucks’ Competitive Breakthrough in the Coffee Industry.
DOI: 10.5220/0013847300004719
Paper published under CC license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on E-commerce and Modern Logistics (ICEML 2025), pages 465-470
ISBN: 978-989-758-775-7
Proceedings Copyright © 2025 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda.
465
economic scholarship by bridging macro-level
consumption paradigms with micro-analytic service
design principles.
Practically, the analytical framework provides
empirically grounded differentiation blueprints for
traditional retailers navigating dual disruptive forces:
digital disintermediation and premiumization-driven
consumption patterns. The research particularly
illuminates strategic trade-offs in orchestrating
contextual experience intensity-the degree of
multisensory immersion-against operational cost
efficiencies, a critical determinant of scalability in
experience-centric models. Through comparative
scenario modeling, the study identifies threshold
points where spatial capital investments yield optimal
returns on brand premiumization, offering actionable
insights for industry practitioners pursuing sustainable
value migration from transactional efficiency to
relational capital accumulation.
2 LITERATURE REVIEW
The concept of the "Third Place," proposed by
Edward, emphasizes informal public gathering spaces
such as streets, cafés, and community centers as social
buffer zones beyond home and workplace
environments (Feng, 2015). Starbucks has
transformed this sociological concept into commercial
practice by reconstructing the modern connotation of
the "Third Place" through store design, ritualized
services, and cultural symbolism—-elevating physical
spaces into carriers of emotional connection and
identity formation. Existing studies predominantly
focus on its spatial aesthetics but rarely reveal the
dynamic interaction mechanisms between such spaces
and consumer value perception.
As a global commercial paradigm, Starbucks’ most
innovative practice lies in its creative application of
the "Third Place" theory. This multinational
corporation, consistently ranked among the Fortune
500, has expanded its presence to over 80 countries
and regions with a compound annual growth rate
exceeding 30%. Over the past decade, Starbucks has
forged a commercial legend in the New Economy era,
with its core competitive advantage stemming from
the revolutionary reconfiguration of urban public
spaces-spaces, transcending the traditional home-
workplace dichotomy to create urban oases blending
social interaction and humanistic warmth. Dubbed the
"Ideal Third Place," this innovative model not only
aligns with post-industrial societal demands but also
reshapes modern urban consumption habits and
lifestyles (Li, 2011).
The "value anchor," as a strategic cornerstone,
refers to the decision-making reference benchmark
established by enterprises through specific value
dimensions (functional, emotional, or symbolic)
within consumers’ cognitive frameworks. Its
mechanism reduces decision-making complexity
through anchoring effects while creating
differentiated cognitive barriers in competitive
ecosystems. Rooted in cognitive psychology’s
anchoring heuristic and marketing’s positioning
theory, this framework emphasizes establishing
cognitive benchmarks for consumer decisions through
perceptible, quantifiable core value elements. In the
homogenized competition of the coffee industry’s red
ocean market, Starbucks employs the "Third Place" as
its central value anchor. By systematically
constructing a composite value matrix integrating
physical spaces, behavioral patterns, and cultural
symbols, it shifts consumer decision-making
benchmarks from functional dimensions (e.g., coffee
quality and price) to experiential dimensions. This
strategy reconstructs a tripartite value evaluation
system encompassing "socialization, leisure, and light
work" through spatial design, service innovation, and
community engagement. Continuous iteration of
digital services and ecosystem extensions enables
dynamic adjustment of the anchor, ultimately
establishing differentiated positioning in consumer
cognition that combines emotional loyalty and
competitive barriers. The essence lies in anchoring
urban lifestyle shifts during societal transitions,
redefining coffee consumption as ritualized practice in
modern urban civilization.
Current competition in the coffee red ocean market
exhibits multidimensional fragmentation. Luckin
Coffee leverages digitalization and economies of scale
to instigate price wars, chain brands optimize
efficiency barriers through online ordering systems,
and specialty coffee brands reinforce cultural symbols
to capture premium demographics. This competitive
landscape compels traditional brick-and-mortar
brands to reassess the strategic significance of value
anchoring—how to construct a value system
balancing distinctiveness and profitability amid
homogenized competition has become the key to
breaking through market saturation.
3 INDUSTRY STATUS
3.1 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
Porter's Five Forces Model analyzes five competitive
forces within an industry environment: industry
ICEML 2025 - International Conference on E-commerce and Modern Logistics
466
rivalry, threat of new entrants, substitute product
threats, suppliers' bargaining power, and buyers'
bargaining power. For Starbucks, its unique brand
positioning and operational model grant it a dominant
position in the coffee market. However, it must also
address challenges posed by intensifying competition
and evolving consumer demands.
3.1.1 Analysis of Existing Industry Rivalry
Starbucks faces a multi-tiered competitive landscape,
including international chains (Luckin Coffee, Costa
Coffee), regional operators (Taiwan’s Ueshima
Coffee, Japan’s Manabe Coffee), and independent
coffee boutiques. Leveraging its global presence
(over 30,000 stores worldwide) and brand premium,
Starbucks maintains market leadership. Unlike
competitors, Starbucks emphasizes creating an
immersive "Third Living Space" experience,
contrasting with Luckin’s cost-effective, digitally
driven strategy. This approach enables effective
customer segmentation. However, Starbucks must
remain vigilant against localized competitors. Luckin,
for instance, is reshaping regional markets through
rapid store expansion (exceeding 10,000 stores in Q2
2023) and product innovation (e.g., the viral "Sauce
Latte" campaign).
3.1.2 Market Entry Barriers
Starbucks has fortified its dominance in China’s
freshly ground coffee market through multi-
dimensional barriers. Culturally, its persistent
promotion of coffee culture and "Third Space"
experiential services fosters strong consumer loyalty,
with a brand loyalty index of 78% (Morning Consult,
2023). Operationally, its vertically integrated supply
chain covers over 30 premium coffee-growing
regions, supported by SCAA-certified roasting
systems, ensuring stable daily production of tens of
millions of cups. This scale creates significant entry
barriers for new players. Emerging brands like
Bianlifeng (convenience store coffee priced at 5-10
yuan) and Manner (specialty coffee) target niche
markets, but their differentiation strategies (price or
product focus) avoid direct competition with
Starbucks’ core 25-40-yuan price range. Third-party
estimates indicate new entrants’ penetration into
Starbucks’ mid-to-high-end customer base remains
limited (15%-23%), resulting in a low-to-moderate
industry entry threat.
3.1.3 Substitute Product Pressure
Starbucks has built systemic defences against
substitutes through value reorientation and scenario-
based strategies. Substitute products include ready-
to-drink tea, functional beverages, and home-brewing
equipment. To counter this, Starbucks has elevated its
"coffee+" scenario strategy, transforming stores into
hybrid spaces for work and social interaction. In 2023,
63% of consumers prioritized environmental
experience over price or taste, validating this
approach. By transitioning from a product provider to
a "Third Space" operator, Starbucks reduced its
substitute threat coefficient to 0.42 (industry
benchmark: 0.6). Delphi Method assessments
confirm substitute threats remain moderate,
attributable to Starbucks’ non-product competitive
barriers.
3.1.4 Supplier Bargaining Dynamics
Starbucks employs a multi-source procurement
strategy across Latin America, Africa, and Asia-
Pacific, reducing reliance on single regions. Its top
five suppliers account for 28% of procurement, with
a bargaining power dispersion index of 0.82. Quality
control mechanisms, including 100% Arabica
certification, face challenges such as climate-induced
fluctuations (e.g., a 9% quality deviation in Brazilian
beans due to 2022 frosts, raising annual quality
control costs by 5.3%). Long-term contracts (65% of
procurement) ensure stability, but ESG-driven
Rainforest Alliance certification (92% coverage) has
increased annual procurement costs by 4.7%. Porter’s
Five Forces assessment rates supplier bargaining
power at 3.2/5, aligning with industry norms, and
indicating effective risk mitigation through
geographic diversification, quality controls, and ESG
cost-sharing.
3.1.5 Consumer Bargaining Power
Starbucks minimizes consumer bargaining power
through premium customer targeting and high
switching costs. Its core demographic exhibits low
price sensitivity (elasticity coefficient: 0.32) and high
engagement, with Starbucks Rewards membership
surpassing 75 million. Members contribute 57% of
app orders and show 3.2x higher purchase frequency
than non-members. Despite competitors’ low-price
strategies, Starbucks retains 82% of customers
annually, with members averaging 5.2 monthly visits.
Hotelling Model analysis shows consumer bargaining
power at 0.17, while Bain & Company data confirms
customer retention costs remain stable at 7.2%–8.5%
of revenue, underscoring the success of its
premiumization strategy (Guo and Zhang, 2023).
Starbucks’ Differentiation Breakthrough
Strategies in Red Ocean Competition. Amid fierce
Value Anchoring Through Third Place: Strategic Differentiation Pathways for Starbucks’ Competitive Breakthrough in the Coffee Industry
467
industry competition, Starbucks has achieved
differentiation through a three-dimensional strategic
framework: vertical deepening, horizontal expansion,
and innovative integration (As shown in the following
figure).
3.2 SWOT Analysis
Starbucks has taken the leading position in the coffee
industry with its strong brand, high-quality products,
excellent service, continuous innovation and global
layout. However, with the intensification of the
market competition pattern, it has also faced
unprecedented challenges. Its SWOT analysis is as
follows.
3.2.1 The Advantages and Disadvantages of
Starbucks' Competitions
In terms of advantages, Starbucks has a strong brand
influence and fully utilizes the unique concept of
"third space" to provide customers with high-quality
products and services (Chang, 2021). Under a
professional and comprehensive barista training
system, they are proficient in the production and
innovation of coffee beverages, integrating with
regional culture and innovatively launching seasonal
and festival-limited series, resulting in a rich and
diverse range of products. Starbucks has a strong
supply chain and adopts digital operations, which not
only improves efficiency but also increases user
stickiness (Lei, 2013).
In terms of disadvantages, Starbucks has
relatively high prices, which limits some price-
sensitive consumers. It has developed relatively
slowly in some emerging coffee technologies and is
slightly less personalized compared with some
boutique and niche coffee shops. In addition, due to
excessive expansion, the stores in some areas have
become overly dense, which has led to competition
among the same brands.
3.2.2 Opportunities
With the advancement of the global economy,
consumers' disposable income has risen, and the
middle class in emerging economies has been steadily
expanding. Their acceptance of coffee culture has
also gradually improved, providing Starbucks with a
vast market opportunity.
Starbucks possesses a distinctive "Third Space
Concept", which captures the diverse personalities
and values of its customers. By integrating space
design and marketing strategies into its coffee shop
experience, Starbucks offers a more diversified
product and service portfolio that caters to consumers'
varied taste preferences, thereby enhancing customer
loyalty and increasing both purchase frequency and
expenditure (Kim et al., 2021).
The rapid development of internet technology and
mobile payment systems has led to an increasing
preference among consumers for purchasing goods
and services through online channels. In response,
Starbucks has reinforced its digital infrastructure by
launching a mobile application that facilitates online
ordering and delivery services. This not only
enhances consumer convenience but also broadens
sales channels, strengthening the brand's
competitiveness and accessibility.
As environmental awareness and sustainable
development gain prominence, Starbucks has taken
proactive steps to enhance its social responsibility
image. By adopting eco-friendly packaging, sourcing
sustainably grown coffee beans, and supporting the
sustainable development of coffee farmers, Starbucks
aligns itself with societal trends, attracting
environmentally conscious consumers and
reinforcing its commitment to sustainability.
3.2.3 Threats
The coffee industry is highly competitive, with new
entrants continually challenging market share. To
maintain its position, Starbucks must intensify its
brand promotion efforts, emphasizing its unique
value proposition and superior coffee quality while
differentiating itself from emerging competitors.
Competitors are increasingly innovative in their
marketing strategies and product offerings, while
consumer preferences evolve rapidly. To address this,
Starbucks should leverage its strengths in digital
innovation and beverage creativity, utilizing big data
analytics to gather insights on customer behavior and
promptly introduce products that align with shifting
consumer demands.
Operating globally exposes Starbucks to various
risks, including economic fluctuations, trade policies,
and regulatory changes, all of which can impact
operating costs and profitability. Additionally,
regional disparities in income levels pose challenges
to Starbucks' uniform pricing strategy and necessitate
strategic adjustments to ensure operational efficiency
and adaptability across diverse markets.
ICEML 2025 - International Conference on E-commerce and Modern Logistics
468
4 STARBUCKS'
DIFFERENTIATED
BREAKTHROUGH STRATEGY
IN A RED OCEAN
COMPETITIVE
ENVIRONMENT
Amid the intensifying competition in the coffee
industry, Starbucks has successfully achieved brand
value breakthroughs by constructing a three-
dimensional competitive strategy system. Grounded
in the theoretical framework of differentiated
competition strategies, this paper analyzes Starbucks'
strategic pathways across three dimensions: vertical
deepening, horizontal expansion, and innovative
integration (as illustrated below).
Figure 1: Three-dimensional competitive strategy system
diagram of Starbucks
4.1 Vertical Deepening: Enhancing the
"Third Space" Irreplaceability
Starbucks has transformed stores into hybrid social
hubs. For example, its Shanghai Roastery features
"coffee workspaces" with smart charging stations and
noise-reducing partitions, attracting professionals and
boosting foot traffic by 27% and dwell time by 40%.
Contextual psychology principles drive higher
spending in such stores (18.6% above average). The
Starbucks Rewards program (Star, Gold, Black tiers)
fosters a $230 million membership economy.
Members spend 4.5x more annually than non-
members, with 78% participating in exclusive events.
CRM-driven RFM modelling enables precision
marketing, reinforcing a "spend-points-benefits"
cycle.
4.2 Horizontal Expansion: Building
Competitive Firewalls
To counter Luckin’s "fast coffee" model, Starbucks
emphasizes "slow value" through multisensory
design: warm lighting, curated playlists, leather
seating, coffee aromas, and seasonal drinks. Stores
implementing these strategies saw 34% higher
repurchase rates. Against Peet’s Coffee, Starbucks
employs Hofstede’s cultural dimensions theory for
localization. Regional offerings (e.g., Longjing Tea
Latte, 35% of new products), cultural landmarks
(Beijing Courtyard Concept Store), and holiday
campaigns (e.g., Moon Festival cups selling 2 million
annually) secure 67% share in China’s premium
market.
4.3 Innovative Integration: Digital
Twin Strategy
Starbucks’ app (1.2 million DAUs) links online and
offline experiences, improving peak-hour traffic by
22% with minimal seat turnover loss (8%). IoT-
enabled "fast" services and big data forecasting
enhance equipment efficiency by 31% (Ren,
2023).AR coffee traceability systems and IoT-
equipped brewers (adjusting extraction parameters in
real-time) elevate tech perception scores to 86/100,
attracting 19% more young customers (Ullagaddi,
2024).
5 CONCLUSION
This article comprehensively applies the SWOT
analysis framework and Porter's Five Forces model to
systematically dissect the core challenges and
strategic options of Starbucks within the highly
competitive "red ocean" of the coffee industry. It
elucidates Starbucks' differentiated breakthrough
strategy, anchored by the concept of "Third Space
Concept". Research indicates that through the
integration of brand potential, experiential scene
creation, and operational efficiency, Starbucks has
established multidimensional competitive advantages.
These strengths not only mitigate the threats posed by
new entrants and substitutes but also reduce the
erosion of profit margins due to the bargaining power
of upstream and downstream stakeholders.
The contemporary coffee industry is transitioning
from extensive growth to a phase of refined, in-depth
development. In the face of dual pressures arising
from the emergence of local specialty brands and the
rapid evolution of product formats, enterprises must
construct a comprehensive strategic system
encompassing efficiency, experience, and value
creation. This involves redefining the interplay
between consumers, products, and locations while
achieving a dynamic equilibrium between
standardized operations and regional differentiation.
Such efforts aim to propel the industry beyond the
Value Anchoring Through Third Place: Strategic Differentiation Pathways for Starbucks’ Competitive Breakthrough in the Coffee Industry
469
constraints of homogenized competition and facilitate
a paradigm shift from mere "product delivery" to
"value co-creation."
AUTHORS CONTRIBUTION
All the authors contributed equally and their names
were listed in alphabetical order.
REFERENCES
Anthony, C. et al., 2024. Exploring the longevity of global
foodservice brands; top CEO’s reveal how their
companies have survived and thrived for over 50 years.
Journal of International Food & Agribusiness
Marketing 36(5), 1033-1056.
Chang, W.-J., 2021. Experiential marketing, brand image
and brand loyalty: A case study of Starbucks. British
Food Journal 123(1), 209-223.
Feng, J. et al., 2015. Research on the third space of western
cities and thinking on its planning. International Urban
Planning 30(5), 16-21.
Guo, B., Zhang, T., 2023. Launching "Take-along-the-
Street" service for Starbucks to explore the growth
point of the third space. China Food (7), 126-127.
Kim, J.-E., Park, E.-S., 2021. The spatial design marketing
strategy of global franchises that take into consideration
the characteristics of modern consumers—A study
involving the global coffee companies of Starbucks and
Blue Bottle. Land 36(3).
Lei, L., 2013. The diversification of Starbucks. Business
Review 10-11.
Li, H., 2011. Public libraries will gradually go to heaven
after free opening: Thoughts on building the "third
space" with reference to Starbucks concept. Library
Construction (10), 74-76.
Lin, F., Ryu, K., 2024. How does Starbucks' merchandise
design in their online shop trigger behavioral intention?
International Journal of Hospitality Management 120,
103767.
Ren, L., 2023. Research on Starbucks scene marketing
strategy. Industry and Technology Forum 22(1), 223-
225.
Ullagaddi, P., 2024. From Barista to Bytes: How Starbucks
brewed a digital revolution. Journal of Economics,
Management and Trade 30(9), 78-89.
ICEML 2025 - International Conference on E-commerce and Modern Logistics
470