Nonetheless, these instruments are complementary:
FAST excels at survey science, EHT focuses on
extreme gravity, and JWST offers deep spectral
analysis. Future advancements may include hybrid
systems combining radio and optical/infrared
capabilities, space-based interferometers for high-
frequency VLBI, and AI-driven data processing.
These innovations will enhance sensitivity, resolution,
and survey efficiency. Multi-messenger astronomy,
integrating gravitational waves and neutrino
detections, will also expand the scope of
observational astronomy. Collectively, these
developments promise deeper insights into cosmic
origins, structure, and evolution.
7 CONCLUSIONS
To sum up, this study analysed the principles,
instrumentation, and contributions of three cutting-
edge telescopes: FAST, EHT, and JWST. These
facilities represent a leap forward in observational
capacity, from detecting faint radio emissions and
capturing black hole silhouettes to observing the early
universe in the infrared spectrum. The study
compared their capabilities and limitations,
highlighting their complementary roles in modern
astronomy. Looking ahead, innovations in telescope
design and data integration promise to further unravel
the mysteries of the cosmos. The continued
development and deployment of such observatories
are vital for advancing both theoretical and applied
astrophysical science.
REFERENCES
Durrant, C. J., 2019. The Historical Development of
Astronomical Instruments. Cambridge University Press.
Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, 2019. First M87
Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the
Supermassive Black Hole. The Astrophysical Journal
Letters, 875(1), L1.
Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, 2022. First
Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The
Image of the Galactic Center Black Hole. The
Astrophysical Journal Letters, 930(2), L12.
Fish, V. L., Johnson, M. D., Lu, R. S., et al., 2014. Imaging
an event horizon: mitigation of scattering toward
Sagittarius A. The Astrophysical Journal, 795(2), 134.
Gardner, J. P., Mather, J. C., Clampin, M., et al., 2006. The
James Webb Space Telescope. Space Science Reviews,
123, 485–606.
Jiang, P., Yue, Y., Gan, H., et al., 2019. Commissioning
Progress of the FAST Telescope. Science China
Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy, 62(959502), 1–10.
Li, D., Nan, R., Chen, C., et al., 2018. The Rapid
Development of FAST Science. Nature Astronomy,
2(10), 1020–1027.
McElwain, M. W., Feinberg, L. D., Perrin, M. D., et al.,
2023. The James Webb Space Telescope Mission:
optical telescope element design, development, and
performance. Publications of the Astronomical Society
of the Pacific, 135(1047), 058001.
Nan, R., Li, D., Jin, C., et al., 2011. The five-hundred-meter
aperture spherical radio telescope (FAST)
project. International Journal of Modern Physics
D, 20(06), 989-1024.
Pontoppidan, K. M., Barrientes, J., Blome, C., et al., 2022.
The JWST early release observations. The
Astrophysical Journal Letters, 936(1), L14.
Smirnov, O. M., 2011. Radio Interferometry: Theory and
Practice. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 527, A106.
Smith, R. W., 2020. Hubble and the Space Telescope Era.
Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage, 23(2),
127–139.
Steinhardt, C. L., Jespersen, C. K., Linzer, N. B., 2021.
Finding high-redshift galaxies with JWST. The
Astrophysical Journal, 923(1), 8.
Trimble, V., 2018. Historical Overview of Astronomical
Observatories. Annual Review of Astronomy and
Astrophysics, 56(1), 1–30.
Tyson, N. D., Liu, C., Irion, R., 2016. Astrophysics for
People in a Hurry. W. W. Norton & Company.
Wang, P. F., Chen, N., Nan, R., et al., 2021. FAST
Discovery of 201 New Pulsars. The Astrophysical
Journal, 915(2), 105.
Wright, E. L., 2008. Infrared Astronomy Overview.
Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific,
120(866), 885–903.
Zhang, Y. G., Li, C., Wen, L., et al., 2022. Repeating Fast
Radio Bursts Observed by FAST. Nature, 606(7912),
873–877.