The Impact of Technology on Italian Students During the COVID-19
Pandemic: Learning, Emotions, Behaviour and Support
Maria Claudia Buzzi
1,* a
, Marina Buzzi
1b
, Barbara Leporini
2,3 c
, Luca Bastiani
4d
,
Francesca Denoth
4e
, Michela Franchini
4f
, Stefania Pieroni
4g
and Sabrina Molinaro
4h
1
IIT, National Research Council, via Moruzzi 1, Pisa, PI, Italy
2
Department of Computer Science, University of Pisa, PI, Italy
3
ISTI, National Research Council, via Moruzzi 1, Pisa, PI, Italy
4
IFC, National Research Council, via Moruzzi 1, Pisa, PI, Italy
Keywords: Educational Technology, COVID-19, School Education, Distance Learning, Human-Computer Interaction.
Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly affected our lives in almost every area, including school. Students
have experienced a transformation in their learning environments with the widespread shift, almost always
from face-to-face to online lessons, that has impacted their academic performance and feelings of isolation.
This paper examines the impact of technology on the learning, social, and human aspects of Italian students
during the COVID-19 pandemic, which accelerated their immersion in the digital world. To this aim, the
paper analyses the positive and negative aspects of technology usage during the pandemic on students' lives,
specifically on academic performance, emotional well-being, behaviours, and the support they received
during this period. Data from 152 Italian students aged 18 and above were collected to understand how
technology helped them cope with school activities, isolation, and psychological well-being. Students
appreciated the convenience and accessibility of digital lessons and materials, but they also faced challenges
such as concentration difficulties, reduced social contact, and accessibility issues. The results confirm but also
expand previous research findings. Statistical analysis highlights that higher levels of support are associated
with better academic performance, and better Internet connectivity is linked to higher students' autonomy.
1 INTRODUCTION
The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant
impact on school life worldwide, with 90% of
students affected by its restrictions (Gore et al., 2021).
Schools were suddenly closed and replaced by
distance learning, revealing both benefits and
limitations (Nguyen et al., 2020). This shift from
face-to-face to online lessons significantly impacted
student academic performance, affecting enrolment,
a
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7818-0601
b
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1725-9433
c
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2469-9648
d
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3467-7362
e
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7825-1753
f
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5272-341X
g
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8130-4967
h
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7221-0873
* Corresponding author: mariaclaudia.buzzi@cnr.it
withdrawal, and failure rates (Dekhane et al. 2024).
Students appreciated the possibility of not traveling to
school and being able to access educational content
anywhere and anytime. However, discomfort,
accessibility problems, difficulty concentrating, and
other issues also emerged (Pfefferbaum & North,
2020; Sitarz et al., 2021). This study investigates the
role of technology in supporting Italian students aged
18 and above during the COVID-19 pandemic, with
special attention to scholastic performance, emotions,
Buzzi, M. C., Buzzi, M., Leporini, B., Bastiani, L., Denoth, F., Franchini, M., Pieroni, S. and Molinaro, S.
The Impact of Technology on Italian Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Learning, Emotions, Behaviour and Support.
DOI: 10.5220/0013778900003985
Paper published under CC license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies (WEBIST 2025), pages 557-564
ISBN: 978-989-758-772-6; ISSN: 2184-3252
Proceedings Copyright © 2025 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda.
557
behaviour, and support received. Data from 152
students in Italy were collected via an online survey.
The paper is organized into six sections: Introduction
(Section 1), Related Work (Section 2), Study
Description (Section 3), Results (Section 4), Main
Findings (Section 5), and Conclusions (Section 6).
2 RELATED WORK
Since the rapid spread of COVID-19 in 2020,
governments worldwide have adopted restrictive
measures to stop virus transmission. Educational
institutions were suddenly closed, with nearly all
activities shifted online. In recent years, many studies
have investigated the impact of COVID-19 isolation
on students, highlighting negative effects on both
physical and mental health (Dragun et al., 2021; Forte
et al., 2021; Takács et al., 2023).
Several works have also reported findings about
the use of technology during the COVID-19
pandemic. A 2024 study from South Korea
investigated student learning preferences and
satisfaction. Responses from 302 Korean students
suggest that students who took offline classes had
significantly higher learning satisfaction than those
who took online classes (Han et al., 2024). A
qualitative study in Vietnam analysed students’
perceptions towards hybrid learning implementation
during the pandemic on a sample of 250 students.
Results revealed that students were well-prepared
with technology, and their perceived benefits
included flexibility, effectiveness, student
engagement, convenience, and personalization, while
negative aspects were technical issues and distant
interaction (Thi et al., 2023). A study in the United
Arab Emirates to identify the most significant
pedagogical, psychological, and technological factors
that impacted on students’ online learning experience
amid COVID-19, concluded that there is a positive
relationship between the instructors’ teaching style
and use of technology, and the students’ perception of
successful online delivery (Ahmed et al., 2023).
Beyond positive aspects, there are also concerns
about the use of technology during the pandemic.
Donnelly & Winkelmann (2024) affirmed that the
sudden transition to remote learning during the
COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a significant
increase in reliance on instructional technology.
Neethipudi & Fann (2024) confirmed that distancing
due to the COVID-19 pandemic has caused
adolescents to increase their dependency on
technology. Findings from a study on Dutch students’
satisfaction with online classes during the COVID-19
pandemic suggested that students who perceive
themselves as having higher technological skills are
more likely to reject online education, as they see
significant shortcomings in how classes are
administered compared to the potential for real
innovation (Matczak et al., 2023). Moreover, the shift
to a highly interactive digital environment may have
contributed to social isolation, digital educational
inequality, and tensions around the
commercialization of higher education (Zhen, 2025).
Digital educational inequality has also impacted
students with disabilities. A recent study analysed the
difficulties of using information and communication
technology (ICT) for 122 students with disabilities
and 314 students without disabilities. Results showed
that students with disabilities were more positive
about using ICT and showed significantly higher
levels of resistance. However, a comparison of the
amount of change in perceptions before and after the
course revealed that students with disabilities showed
significantly more improvement in negative items
before the course (Kishira & Sasaki, 2024).
Our study aimed to analyse how technology
impacted and supported students during the lockdown
in Italy, focusing on Distance Learning and
Scholastic Performance, Emotions, Behaviour, and
Support Received. Focusing on the technology
impact allowed us to widen previous studies with a
perspective not already addressed. Moreover, our
study includes many high school students (over 50%
of the sample), while most studies focus on children
or college students.
3 THE STUDY
We have performed an exploratory study through an
online web survey, created with LimeSurvey,
completely anonymous and composed of five
sections: General Data, Technology and Distance
Learning, Emotions, Behaviour, and Support
Received.
The questionnaire content and the study were
authorized by the Research Ethics and Integrity
Committee of CNR, the largest public Italian research
organization (authorization n. 23078/2022). Data
processing complies with current regulations, such as
the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). No
personal data of participants has been collected, and
they explicitly provided consent to participate. The
questionnaire usability and content were validated by
piloting them with some teachers not involved in its
design process, and then with two students, one male
and one female (aged 18 and 20, respectively). The
WEBIST 2025 - 21st International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies
558
questionnaire was distributed over two months,
utilizing social media and school mailing lists. The
time for its completion is around 10-15 minutes.
3.1 The Sample
A total of 152 participants completed the online
questionnaire. The sample was balanced with 79
females (52%), 71 males (46.7%), and 2 students who
preferred not to specify their gender (1.3%).
Participants' ages are shown in Tab. 1. The majority
of participants in the sample were high school
students (85 users, 55.92%), followed by university
(or higher education) students (63 users, 41.45%) and
4 Professional training course students (2.63%).
Table 1: Sample ages.
Sample # %
18 56 36.8
19 32 21.1
20 25 16.4
21 13 8.6
22 15 9.9
23 4 2.6
24 1 0.7
>= 25 years 6 3.9
Total 152 100
A last question investigates the degree of autonomy
when performing different activities: School and
study, Sport activities, Recreational activities/free
time, and Commuting (school-home, home-gym,
etc.). Most participants (> 86% for all areas) affirmed
they are autonomous. It therefore seems that the
sample does not include (or in a minimal percentage)
students with autonomy problems.
3.2 Statistical Analysis
A descriptive analysis was conducted to evaluate the
answers provided to each questionnaire dimension.
Furthermore, a structural equation model (SEM) was
generated to explore the interrelationships among key
variables assessed through the questionnaire.
Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to test
an overall measurement model that included
correlated latent variables. The CFA process
determines whether the hypothesized structure
provides a good fit to the data or whether a
relationship between the observed variables and their
underlying latent, or unobserved, constructs exists.
High coefficient values mean that the observed
variable contributes or weighs a lot in the
construction of the latent variable. Overall model fit
was assessed using different statistics. First, aχ2
analysis was used. Other indices were the root mean
square error of approximation (RMSEA: values
between 0.05 and 0.10 indicate an acceptable fit, and
values < 0.05 indicate a good fit) and standardized
root mean square residual (SRMR: values < 0.10
indicate a good fit). Comparative Fit Index (CFI) and
Tucker Lewis Index (TLI) were also calculated
(values > 0.90 indicate a good fit). The level of
significance was set at P < .05. All statistical analyses
were performed using Stata/SE 13.1 and SPSS
Version 24. Categorical variables are expressed as
percentages, while continuous variables are
expressed as the means and standard deviations
(SDs).
4 RESULTS
4.1 Descriptive Analysis
This section presents a summary of the answers
provided to each questionnaire dimension.
Distance Learning and Scholastic Performance.
During the COVID-19 lockdown, almost all students
had at least one device for distance learning (DL):
only 1 student (0.7%) did not have any device. Mostly
used devices were computers (95.4%) and mobile
phones (93.4%), followed by tablets (37.5%).
Technological devices were used for studying (75%),
Socialization (67.1%), and Physical activity (32.9%).
The Internet connection used for DL allows the
students to follow the lessons well in most cases
(92.7%). Most participants confirmed they had a quiet
place to take DL classes (81.6%). Video conferencing
tools were considered adequate by most students
(60%), but more than 10% of participants found them
poor. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, most
participants had sufficient academic results (98%).
The pandemic had a balanced effect on academic
performance that remained on average unchanged:
41.45% of students maintained their academic
performance during DL, 28.95% adapted well and
even improved, while 29.6% have worsened their
performance.
The preference between in-person lessons and DL
was slightly in favour of in-person lessons. Most
penalized lessons by DL were Physical Education
(80.3%), Science/Chemistry/Physics Laboratories
(52%), and Technical-Scientific subjects (40.8%).
Preferences regarding DL (multiple answers were
allowed) reported that most students would like to
have the lessons recorded so they can then review the
material (81.6%) and to have both remote and in-
The Impact of Technology on Italian Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Learning, Emotions, Behaviour and Support
559
person learning (80.3%). Few participants (3.3%)
prefer to only use distance learning.
Emotions
Most participants confirmed some changes (>90%) in
their lives as a result of the pandemic. Family
relationships at home during the COVID-19
lockdowns were better for 31.6%, and worse for
23.7% participants. A set of questions was aimed at
understanding whether the students had experienced
emotional changes during the lockdown periods.
Results indicated that the pandemic had a significant
negative impact, with increases in: feeling of safety
(67.8%), quantity of fears (73.7%), tiredness and
listlessness (66.4%), nervousness (54.6%), and
loneliness (68.4%).
Behaviour
The pandemic had a balanced impact on participants'
physical activity levels that remained, on average,
unchanged. Conversely, it had a stronger effect on
average hours spent in front of a screen for leisure
activities, which increased for more than 85% of
participants. Almost all participants engaged in time
outside (98%) in their free time before the pandemic,
especially for sport, practiced by 63.2% of students,
but during the pandemic, many participants were
unable to find a way to continue their previous
outdoor activities (40.8%). The remaining ones found
a way, possibly by shifting to online mode, to practice
the activities totally (13.8%), partially (19.1%), or
only for some of them (26.3%). Further questions
investigated whether the students had experienced
changes in some behaviours during the lockdown
periods. Results indicated that the pandemic had a
significant impact on:
Going out decreased for 77.6% users
Desire to socialize decreased for 40.8% users
Relationships decreased for 40.8% users
Eating increased for 30.3% participants
Crying increased for 48.7% participants.
Support Received
The first question was on who provided support
(multiple answers were allowed). As expected, family
(67.1%) and friends (65.8%) were the most frequently
chosen options. Interestingly, about a third of the
sample (34.9%) reported that they kept themselves
active with sports and other recreational activities to
receive support. The last question asked whether
students had started during the lockdown new
recreational activities that they had not done before.
Most users (94.6%) did not start any.
4.2 Model-Driven Analysis
Model-driven analysis aims at investigating whether
the support received during COVID-19 and personal
autonomy were related to other aspects, such as
Internet connection and academic performance. The
standardized paths of two latent variables and their
respective observed variables are specified in Figure
1. Rectangles represent observed variables while
ellipses represent latent variables. The structural
model fit indices indicated that the proposed model fit
the data (RMSEA = 0.079; SRMR = 0.089; CFI =
0.903; TLI = 0.912). The significant and positively
related standardized paths (P < .05) were between the
“Support received” latent variables and “Academic
performance” observed variables (β = 0.271, P <
0.001). The use of Tablet = 0.693) and Smartphone
= 0.690) represents the most important observed
variables related to the “Support received” latent
variable. A negative relationship was observed
between the “Autonomy latent variables and
“Academic performance” observed variables = -
0.176, P < 0.047). Autonomy, on the other hand, was
positively correlated with Internet connection =
0.189, P < 0.031). Regarding the “Autonomy” latent
variable, the most important observed variables were
Sport activities = 0.817) and Recreational activities
= 0.768). However, no significant relationships
were found between “Autonomy” and “Support
received” = -0.067, P <0.501), or between “Internet
connection” and “Academic performance”(β = -
0.024, P < 0.760). Key Relationships indicate: a) a
positive relationship between "Support received" and
"Academic performance" (β = 0.271, P <0.001), thus
higher levels of support are associated with better
academic performance. Tablets = 0.693) and
smartphones (β = 0.690) are the most influential
observed variables within the "Support received"
latent variable; b) a negative relationship between
"Autonomy" and "Academic performance" (β = -
0.176, P <0.047). This indicates that higher autonomy
might be associated with lower academic
performance; c) “Autonomy" is positively correlated
with "Internet connection" (β = 0.189, P <0.031),
suggesting that better Internet connectivity is linked
to higher autonomy. Sport activities = 0.817) and
recreational activities = 0.768) are the most
important observed variables within the "Autonomy"
latent variable; d) no significant relationship was
found between "Autonomy" and "Support received"
= -0.067, P <0.501). Similarly, no significant
relationship was observed between "Internet
connection" and "Academic performance" = -
0.024, P < 0.760).
WEBIST 2025 - 21st International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies
560
5 DISCUSSION
Our study aimed to analyse how technology impacted
and supported students during the lockdown in Italy,
focusing on Distance Learning, Scholastic
Performance, Emotions, Behaviour, and Support
Received. Including technology features allowed us
to take a perspective that previous studies had not
addressed. Moreover, our study includes many high
school students (over 50% of the sample), while most
studies focus on children or college students. The
literature acknowledges that COVID-19 restrictions
negatively impacted students' mental health and
fostered unhealthy management of individual time
and space (Millán-Jiménez et al., 2021; Morganti et
al., 2022; Riboldi et al., 2023). Results from our study
confirm previous findings on significant
consequences of lockdown on students' mental and
physical health, but also add some insights. More
details regarding the four topics investigated are
presented in the following sections.
5.1 Distance Learning and Scholastic
Performance
Literature confirmed several issues due to pandemic
restrictions on students’ academic performance: lack
of a quiet place to study, distractions, inadequate
access to course materials, insufficient digital skills,
and poor network bandwidth with unstable Internet
connections (Carlana et al., 2023; Contini et al., 2025;
Dekhane et al., 2024; Moulin & Soncin, 2025).
Considering the average, our sample reported
balanced changes in scholastic performance both
positively and negatively, with 28.9% users who
performed better and 29.6% who performed worse.
However, the sample academic performances were
quite good before the COVID-19 pandemic (76.3%
users with excellent or good performance levels), and
this could have affected the results. Although most
participants evaluated positively the use of distance
learning (as in previous studies: Ahmed et al., 2023;
Thi et al., 2023), they slightly prefer in-person lessons
over DL, as confirmed by the literature (Csorba &
Dabija, 2024; Pfefferbaum & North, 2020; Sitarz et
al., 2021). These results reflect the diversity of user
needs: some students are more comfortable with
video conferences (e.g., emotive people, people with
difficulties in social skills, or who do not suffer from
isolation), while others are not (e.g., people with
attention deficits, people missing contact with peers).
Literature indeed confirms that students with special
needs often struggle to interact adequately when
using distance learning (Zhen, 2025) and video
conference tools (Kishira & Sasaki, 2024; Leporini et
al., 2023; Matczak et al., 2023).
In this context (Distance learning), the use of
technology has been fundamental to allow students to
continue their school career as well as interact with
teachers and classmates.
5.2 Emotions
Most participants (90.8%) declared their lives had
changed due to the pandemic, and more than two-
thirds reported feeling less safe. In addition, during
lockdowns, fear (73.7%), feelings of tiredness and
listlessness (66.4%), nervousness (54.6%), and
loneliness (68.4%) affected most participants. These
findings align with literature (de Figueiredo et al.,
2021; Millán-Jiménez et al., 2021; Morganti et al.,
2022). Students experienced both positive and
negative emotions during COVID-19, with negative
emotions being significantly related to internalizing
problems (Sun & Fredrick, 2024).
In this context (Emotions), the use of technology
supported the maintenance of social contacts and any
requests for emotional support.
5.3 Behaviours
According to literature (Magklara & Kyriakopoulos,
2023; Okuyama et al., 2021), data on physical activity
revealed changes: 34.8% of the sample increased
their level of physical activity, and 40.2% became
less active. Similarly, time spent in front of a screen
for leisure activities increased for most users (>85%).
Previous findings confirmed that time spent using
electronic devices had the highest increase (Gallè et
al., 2020) and increased adolescents' dependency on
technology (Neethipudi & Fann, 2024). Before
COVID-19, very few participants (2%) did not spend
time outdoors during their free time. Collected data
indicates that the pandemic significantly impacted
users' recreational activities, with many students
(40.8%) unable to practice their activities at all. Data
also highlights an impact on participants' desire to go
out (77.6% less than before), to socialize (decreased
for almost 41% of the sample), and to cry (increased
for 48.78% of students). These results are in line with
previous studies (Forte et al., 2021; Magson et al.,
2020; Takács et al., 2023). For most participants
(62.5%), eating habits remained unchanged during
the pandemic. However, among those who
experienced changes, an increase in food
consumption was more common (34.3%). These
results are consistent with previous findings (de
Figueiredo et al., 2021; Parker et al., 2023).
The Impact of Technology on Italian Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Learning, Emotions, Behaviour and Support
561
Figure 1: The structural equation (SEM), comparative fit index; root mean square error of approximation; SRMAR,
standardized root mean square residual; TLI, Tucker-Lewis Index. *P<.05: significant correlation between variables.
In the Behaviours context, the use of technology
has been important to allow people to continue some
type of physical activity even while staying at home,
for entertainment and leisure activities, as well as to
satisfy the desire to socialize.
5.4 Support Received
Support was mainly provided by family, friends, and
romantic partners. A third of the sample (33.6%)
empowered themselves with sports or recreational
activities. Teachers supported 20.4% of participants:
considering school as the main institution for
students, this agrees with Davoody et al. (2025), for
whom institutions have a crucial role to assist
students in overcoming challenges. Psychotherapists
provided support to a few students (3.3%), while
14.5% participants did not receive any support at all.
In this context, intuitively, the use of technology
played a key role during the pandemic, allowing
students to maintain (or establish new) social
relationships, to continue their activities, and to
receive emotional and psychological support.
However, in order to understand if technology has
had a specific impact on participants, we have further
analysed correlation data. The statistical analysis
revealed significantly positively related standardized
paths (P < .05) between the “Support received” latent
variables and “Academic performance” observed
variables (β = 0.271, P < 0.001). The use of Tablet (β
= 0.693) and Smartphone = 0.690) represents the
most important observed variables related to the
“Support received” latent variable. The positive
impact of support on academic performance
underscores the importance of providing adequate
resources and assistance. On the other hand, the
negative relationship between autonomy and
academic performance might suggest that while
independence is valuable, it needs to be balanced with
guidance and support for optimizing academic
outcomes. This could also be a reason for the negative
relationship between "Autonomy" and "Academic
performance," indicating that higher autonomy might
be associated with lower academic performance:
students with higher values of autonomy and less
supervision may have been overwhelmed by the
pandemic situation and turned too much to social and
leisure activities instead of studying.
5.5 Study Limitations
The sample size (#152) is limited, but the insights
gained can be valuable for guiding future, more
comprehensive studies. Furthermore, the distribution
of scholastic performance in the sample is not
balanced: only 2% of participants had low academic
performance before COVID-19, which thus affects
the results. With this narrow representation, it is not
possible to understand if the pandemic restrictions
accounted differently for low, medium, and high
academic performance students. Different findings
could be obtained by including in the sample social
and cultural conditions not considered in our study.
6 CONCLUSIONS
This study provides insights into how students coped
WEBIST 2025 - 21st International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies
562
with the challenges of the COVID-19 lockdown and
investigated how technology influenced students'
lives during the restrictions, particularly in terms of
scholastic performance, emotions, behaviour, and
support received.
Technology and Internet connection can be
important to sustain people during critical periods,
helping them cope with restrictions and providing a
comfortable way for maintaining a social life and
alleviate discomfort. The sample students (and people
in general) during the pandemic exploited technology
to continue their school activities, stay connected
with peers and relatives, receive and provide support,
and more generally continue their lives and cope with
the isolation. The statistical analysis showed that
better Internet connectivity is linked to higher
autonomy. The collected data highlights students'
resilience and the importance of social connections
and personal interests in supporting mental health
during restricted times. Family and friends were
crucial for emotional support during the lockdown,
but technology also had an important role. The
pandemic indeed led to a notable increase in online
leisure activities for most participants, likely due to
restrictions on outdoor activities and in-person social
interactions. Results also confirmed previous findings
on time spent using electronic devices, which greatly
increased during the pandemic.
Our findings provide a foundation for
understanding the impact of technology and support
systems on students during challenging times, and
highlight areas that may benefit from further
investigation, such as whether increased screen time
might affect students' academic performance or social
skills in the long term.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank all the participants for their valuable
contribution.
REFERENCES
Ahmed, V., Alzaatreh, A. & Saboor, S. (2023). Students’
Perceptions of Online Teaching in Higher Education
Amid COVID-19. Journal Sci Educ Technol 32, 629–
642 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10069-6
Carlana, M., La Ferrara, E. & Lopez, C. (2023).
Exacerbated Inequalities: The Learning Loss from
COVID-19 in Italy. In AEA Papers and Proceedings,
113, pp. 489–93. www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257
/pandp.20231010
Contini, D., Della Giusta, M., Di Tommaso, M. L. &
Piazzalunga D. (2025). The COVID-19 pandemic:
learning loss and educational inequalities in Italy. In
Economics 2025, pp. 296–309, https://doi.org/
10.4337/9781035302765.00026
Csorba, L. M. & Dabija, D. C. (2024). The impact of the
COVID-19 pandemic on students’ future online
education behaviour. In Heliyon, Vol. 10, Issue 20,
2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39560
Davoody, N., Stathakarou, N., Swain, C. & Bonacina, S.
(2025). Exploring the Impact of the COVID-19
Pandemic on Learning Experience, Mental Health,
Adaptability, and Resilience Among Health
Informatics Master’s Students: Focus Group Study. In
JMIR Medical Education, Vol. 11, 2025, https://doi.
org/10.2196/63708
de Figueiredo, C.S., Sandre P.C., Portugal L.C.L., Mázala-
de-Oliveira T., da Silva Chagas L., Raony Í., Ferreira
E.S., Giestal-de-Araujo E., Dos Santos A.A. & Bomfim
P.O. (2021). Covid-19 pandemic impact on children
and adolescents' mental health: Biological,
environmental, and social factors. In Prog
Neuropsychoph. Biol Psychiatry. Mar 2;106:110171.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33186638/
Dekhane, S., Park, H., Jonassen, L. & Jin., W. (2024).
Virtual Peer Mentoring to Develop a Sense of
Belonging During Covid-19 - A Pilot Study. In ACM
SIGCSE 2024. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 283–288
https://doi.org/10.1145/3626252.3630962
Donnelly, J. & Winkelmann, K. (2024). STEM Students’
Sensemaking of Instructional Technology After the
COVID-19 Pandemic. In J Sci Educ Technol
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10956-024-
10181-1
Dragun, R., Veček, N.N., Marendić, M., Pribisalić, A.,
Đivić, G., Cena, H., Polašek, O. & Kolčić, I. (2021).
Have Lifestyle Habits and Psychological Well-Being
Changed among Adolescents and Medical Students
Due to Covid-19 Lockdown in Croatia? In Nutrients
2021, 13, 97. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13010097
Forte A, Orri M, Brandizzi M, Iannaco C, Venturini P,
Liberato D, Battaglia C, Nöthen-Garunja I, Vulcan M,
Brusìc A, Quadrana L, Cox O, Fabbri S, Monducci E.
"My Life during the Lockdown": Emotional
Experiences of European Adolescents during the
COVID-19 Crisis. In Int J Environ Res Public Health.
2021 Jul 18;18(14):7638. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.
gov/articles/PMC8303213/
Gallè, F., Sabella, E. A., Ferracuti, S., De Giglio, O.,
Caggiano, G., Protano, C., Valeriani, F., Parisi, E. A.,
Valerio, G., Liguori, G., Montagna, M. T., Romano
Spica, V., Da Molin, G., Orsi, G. B., & Napoli, C.
(2020). Sedentary Behaviors and Physical Activity of
Italian Undergraduate Students during Lockdown at the
Time of CoViD-19 Pandemic. In Int. J of
environmental research and public health, 17(17),
6171. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176171
Gore, J., Fray, L., Miller, A., Harris, J. & Taggart, W.
(2021). The impact of Covid-19 on student learning in
New South Wales primary schools: An empirical study.
The Impact of Technology on Italian Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Learning, Emotions, Behaviour and Support
563
In Aust. Educ. Res., 48, 605–637 https://doi.org/10.
1007/s13384-021-00436-w
Han, J., Ryu, C. E. & Nadarajan, G. (2024). Exploring
Factors Affecting Student Learning Satisfaction during
Covid-19 in South Korea. Frontiers of Educational
Technologies (ICFET 2024). ACM, 8 pages.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3678392.3678406
Kishira, H. & Sasaki, G. (2024). Information and
communication technology use by students with
disabilities in higher education during the COVID-19
pandemic. In Journal UAIS n. 23, 1723–1737 https://
link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10209-023-00997-w
Leporini, B., Buzzi, M., & Hersh, M. (2023). Video
conferencing tools: Comparative study of the
experiences of screen reader users and the development
of more inclusive design guidelines. ACM Transactions
on Accessible Computing, 16(1), 1-36. https://doi.org/
10.1145/3573012
Magklara, K., & Kyriakopoulos, M. (2023). The impact of
the COVID-19 pandemic on children and young people.
Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki, 34(4), 265–268.
https://doi.org/10.22365/jpsych.2023.024
Magson, N.R., Freeman, J.Y.A., Rapee, R.M., Richardson,
C.E., Oar, E.L. & Fardouly, J. (2020). Risk and
Protective Factors for Prospective Changes in
Adolescent Mental Health during the Covid-19
Pandemic. J. Youth Adolesc. 2020, 50, 44–57.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33108542/
Matczak, A., Akdogan, H. & Ashmore, D. (2023). The
paradox of technology in online education during the
Covid-19 pandemic: the experiences of safety and
security students in a Dutch university. High Educ 86,
1269-1292
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00971-0
Migliorini, L., De Piccoli, N., Cardinali, P., Rollero, C.,
Marzana, D., Arcidiacono, C., ... & Di Napoli, I. (2021).
Contextual influences on Italian university students
during the Covid-19 lockdown: Emotional responses,
coping strategies and resilience. Community
Psychology in Global Perspective, 7(1), 71-87.
https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2021-77663-004
Millán-Jiménez, A., Herrera-Limones, R., López-
Escamilla, Á., López-Rubio, E., & Torres-García, M.
(2021). Confinement, comfort and health: Analysis of
the real influence of lockdown on university students
during the Covid-19 pandemic. Int. J of environmental
research and public health, 18(11), 5572.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115572
Morganti, A., Brambilla, A., Aguglia, A., Amerio, A.,
Miletto, N., Parodi, N., ... & Capolongo, S. (2022).
Effect of housing quality on the mental health of
university students during the Covid-19 lockdown. Int.
J of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(5),
2918. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35270609/
Moulin, L. & Soncin, M., (2025). Persistent impacts of the
COVID-19 pandemic on student outcomes in Italy.
Research in Economics, Vol. 79, Issue 2, 2025,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rie.2025.101031
Neethipudi, O.K., & Fann, C.M.S. (2024). Impact of
technology during Covid-19 pandemic on adolescents’
identity development. Int. J. of Research
Granthaalayah, 12(1), 131–140 https://doi.org/10.29121/
granthaalayah.v12.i1.2024.5484
Nguyen, M. H., Gruber, J., Fuchs, J., Marler, W., Hunsaker,
A., & Hargittai, E. (2020). Changes in Digital
Communication During the Covid-19 Global
Pandemic: Implications for Digital Inequality and
Future Research. Soc Media Soc. 2020 Sep
9;6(3):2056305120948255. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.
nih.gov/34192039/
Okuyama J., Seto S., Fukuda Y., Funakoshi S., Amae S.,
Onobe J., Izumi S., Ito K. & Imamura F. (2021). Mental
Health and Physical Activity among Children and
Adolescents during the COVID-19 Pandemic. The
Tohoku Journal Exp Med. 2021 Mar; 253(3):203-215.
https://doi.org/10.1620/tjem.253.203
Parker, J., Kaur, S., Medalla, J. M., Imbert-Sanchez, A., &
Bautista, J. (2023). Dietary trends among young adults
during the Covid-19 lockdown: socioeconomic and
gender disparities. BMC nutrition, 9(1), 107.
https://bmcnutr.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s4
0795-023-00759-0
Pfefferbaum, B., & North, C. S. (2020). Mental health and
the Covid-19 pandemic. New England Journal of
Medicine, 383(6), 510-512. https://www.nejm.org/doi/
full/10.1056/NEJMp2008017
Riboldi, I., Capogrosso, C. A., Piacenti, S., Calabrese, A.,
Lucini Paioni, S., Bartoli, F., ... & Taylor, C. (2023).
Mental Health and Covid-19 in University students:
findings from a qualitative, comparative study in Italy
and the UK. Int. J of environmental research and public
health, 20(5), 4071. https://www.mdpi.com/1660-
4601/20/5/4071
Sitarz, R., Forma, A., Karakuła, K., Juchnowicz, D., Baj, J.,
Bogucki, J., & Karakuła-Juchnowicz, H. (2021). How do
polish students manage emotional distress during the
Covid-19 lockdown? A web-Based cross-sectional
study. Journal of clinical medicine, 10(21), 4964.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34768484/
Sun, L., & Fredrick, S. (2024). Youth emotional
experiences during Covid-19: Relations with
internalizing problems and social support. Child
Indicators Research, 17(3), 1355-1377. https://doi.org/
10.1007/s12187-024-10123-8
Takács J, Katona ZB & Ihász F. (2023) A large sample
cross-sectional study on mental health challenges
among adolescents and young adults during the Covid-
19 pandemic at-risk group for loneliness and
hopelessness during the Covid-19 pandemic. J. of
Affective Disorders, Vol. 325, 770-777, https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.jad.2023.01.067
Thi, A., Pham, V. & Pham, C.M. (2023). Students’
Perceptions towards Hybrid Learning during the Covid-
19 Pandemic. ACM ICDTE '22. 25–30
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3568739.3568744
Zhen, F. (2025). The impact of COVID-19 on the
achievement of public school students in British
Columbia: A multilevel analysis on the results from the
province-wide standardized assessment. Heliyon, Vol.
11, Issue 4, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heli
yon.2025.e42851
WEBIST 2025 - 21st International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies
564