
the results of a creative project, AI algorithms have
the capability to replace humans in a few places and
even destroy creative integrity and authenticity. This
is one of the main reasons why humans prefer human
collaborators over creative AI partners, Which begs to
question the place of AI-human creative partnerships
and the preservation of the human touch in creative
endeavors.
Furthermore, keeping in mind the ethical consid-
erations while using AI tools is very important. AI-
generated content and its effects on creativity and
originality can become very significant if not used
properly. plagiarism and wrong information is often a
trait of AI generated content and this tends to impact
the a creative projects authenticity and integrity. Strict
and precise rules with strong moral framework is the
only was to ensure responsible use AI tools and re-
ducing risk. The use AI will only go up from here on
out as it will take up a major role in content creation.
The discussion also touches on the more general
implications of AI in creative fields, such as its effect
on best practices in already matured industries, job
roles and how the public perceives creative projects
like movies and poetry. as we have discussed previ-
ously, AI tools help the overall productivity and effi-
ciency but can also make few skill obsolete which can
cause job displacement and affect real human lives.
Additionally, Using an AI algorithm for intensive pur-
poses like vfx and filmmaking can require expensive
hardware. Addressing the fair distribution of AI ben-
efits among all socioeconomic groups is equally im-
portant.
10 CONCLUSION
To conclude, utilizatin of AI in a collaborative
form in the creative industry, particularly, poetry, art,
filmmaking, writing, education, etc, has proven to be
a perfect use of the technology. To this extent, the
creative process has been enhanced and made more
imaginative, productive and innovative.
Yet these ethical tensions and doubts around the
truly transformative human-AI relationship open up
some difficult questions: Adopting a singular focus
that concentrates on the content being generated by
AI raises other troublesome ethical predicaments. For
starters, we need to devise appropriate ways to ad-
dress plagiarism. In the age of machine-assisted writ-
ing, how can we differentiate ’cheating’ from creative
expression - from, in fact, a different mode of au-
thorship altogether? Misinformation is another thorny
ethical problem, as AI-generated text increases expo-
nentially. And what if, in developing sophisticated
writers, AI software undermines artistic expression
per se? The future is not - and never has been - ours
to control.
Moreover, we want to avoid art that exclusively re-
lies on an AI, where it simply replaces human creativ-
ity altogether, leaving no meaning or artistic agency
for the human behind the code. So, these are some
tentative ideas about the idea that ‘art is whatever the
artist says it is’, but what else can we do? First of all,
it’s possibly a problem approach by posing a question
at all; perhaps, instead, it is at times a definitive state-
ment. Perhaps, the lack of a substantive criterion for
art is the precise point being expressed with such in-
tensity. Ultimately, defining criteria for art frequently
focuses on the intentions of the agent behind the art.
To make sure AI is used responsibly in the future,
there is a need to define ethical, fair use before prob-
lems start occurring, and to manage what have been
called – with some fear – the inevitable displacements
caused by automation. Such issues include the dis-
placement of human labour through automation, the
fear of which is high on the political and self-help
agenda, the obsolescing of skills, and equity in access
to the fruits of creativity. Could increasing automa-
tion and reliance on smart cities make our lives brit-
tle? Above all, how will power and wealth be shared
in the creative economy of the future? The problem is
one of the classic ideas of economics: who gets what;
and, what happens if you need to adapt to new reali-
ties. What are the back-up and exit strategies?
Ultimately, the integrating of AI into creative do-
mains is a paradigm shift, with opportunities and pit-
falls. If we address them with thoughtfulness, we can
incorporate AI into creative pursuits to increase cre-
ativity, innovation and human expression in the digital
age.
REFERENCES
Arias-Rosales, A. (2022). The perceived value of human-
ai collaboration in early shape exploration: An ex-
ploratory assessment. Plos one, 17(9):e0274496.
Ashktorab, Z., Liao, Q. V., Dugan, C., Johnson, J., Pan, Q.,
Zhang, W., Kumaravel, S., and Campbell, M. (2020).
Human-ai collaboration in a cooperative game setting:
Measuring social perception and outcomes. Proceed-
ings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction,
4(CSCW2):1–20.
contributors, W. (2024). The dog and the boy.
Correspondent, D., Correspondent, D., and Chronicle, D.
(2017). Deccan chronicle.
Daniele, A. and Song, Y.-Z. (2019). Ai+ art= human. In
Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on
AI, Ethics, and Society, pages 155–161.
INCOFT 2025 - International Conference on Futuristic Technology
494