EduBot: An AI-Driven Educational Platform for Multi-Format

Content Processing

Viraj Walavalkar

, Nishant Desale

, Yashraj Dhole

, Janvi Sawalkar

, Nilesh Sable

and Anuradha Yenkikar

Computer Science and Engineering(AI) Vishwakarma Institute of Information Technology, Pune, India

Keywords: EduBot, Artificial Intelligence, Educational Technology, Natural Language Processing, Speech Recognition,

Retrieval-Augmented Generation, Summarization, Question and Answer Generation, Mind Mapping,

Learning Modules, Socratic Assistant, Content Creation, Multi-format Input Processing, Adaptive Learning.

Abstract: EduBot is an AI-driven learning platform that attempts to revolutionize the whole process of learning with a

very efficient input processing system for the formats: Those include, but are not limited to, MP3s, audio files,

image files, PDFs, links to YouTube and many others. The above very many content formats are transformed

into edifying resources by EduBot augmented with advanced AI models. It supports speech recognition and

relies on the LLaMA 3 for various NLP requirements, and employs Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)

to generate contextually aware results. EduBot offers small distillations of the content that was previously in

more complete forms, consecutive questions and answers, diagrams illustrating relations within concepts, and

paths to take while studying material. Its strength is in the Socratic assistant that insists on critical thinking

by pointing procedures at solutions for the problems. The interactive aspect guarantees that learners achieve

full depth of subjects that they are taught; thus, confidence in relation to competencies to grasp and retain key

concepts. EduBot consolidates a teacher’s task into one allencompassing interface pack that provides a

plethora of learning aids to help the teacher assemble his materials rapidly to enable content creation. Such

an approach towards the instructional design process will therefore integrate and clarify the process while at

the same time availing an automatic structured learning resource which the students have to develop within

their context. In the best of scenarios, EduBot should revolutionalise education regarding access, interest, and

efficiency among teachers and students..

1 INTRODUCTION

Fast development in technology threatens no one of

the sectors we generally describe as being

‘horrifically disrupted’. We truly care it, or at least we

tend to, because we are so special or so unique-we

really don’t care. Ever helpful it makes the old

learning styles obsolete these days and even replaced

with modern aids which make learning more

fascinating and individualistic. That is one of them,

the EduBot, nice as it has gone thus far in discussing

one of the first steps towards ‘smarter’ educational

https://orcid.org/ 0009-0002-7750-5966

https://orcid.org/ 0009-0007-3892-2579

https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6898-8939

https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1991-8714

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5855-4087

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9086-9695

outcomes through the intelligent processing of

formats such as audio, images, PDFs and You Tube

links. That was in that respect in the sense that such

information has up to now been more or less easily

Found information and as such, the processing

and condensing of educational content became a task

for students and teachers. Yet, modern solutions in

ed-tech resemble islands of sorts: they are supposed

to perform specific activities – summation or

generating questions as an outcome but there is no

system which comprises all of packages of

functionality. It is precisely this gap which EduBot

fills introducing into one framework the modules of

Walavalkar, V., Desale, N., Dhole, Y., Sawalkar, J., Sable, N. and Yenkikar, A.

EduBot: An AI-Driven Educational Platform for Multi-Format Content Processing.

DOI: 10.5220/0013615300004664

Paper published under CC license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)

In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Futuristic Technology (INCOFT 2025) - Volume 3, pages 329-337

ISBN: 978-989-758-763-4

329

educational tools, and possibilities of content creation

and sharing. This is why it would be of very high

value to forge a comprehensive learning milieu so

that students may learn with conflict-sensitive

interface and diverse learning tools. It was perhaps

the most impressive capability of EduBot: This is the

opportunity to generate condensed subject overviews,

Q&A sets in the context of specific requirements,

mind maps that are easy to comprehend and learn

structurally by adopting the state of the art NLP trends.

For example, if Whisper is available for an automatic

speech recognition application and LLaMA 3 for a

natural language understanding application, this push

gives this added boost to the output of the platform

that it knows the context and response needs of an

individual learner. The EduBot Socratic assistant

inclines towards augmenting the ‘‘thinking’’ in a

student—which is how learners are formed, in the

process, analytical thinkers while conducting the

discussion on their own learning process. Full

overview of EduBot has been introduced in this

paper; architecture, methodologies and technological

integrations used for casting a look at possible

implications have been discussed on the background

of the impact on the sphere of education. Looking at

this aspect as more developed in AI brings the

research objectives of the current study to ask in what

way such a feature can be used to come up with much

more interesting, varied, and unique engagement

experiences of students and/or teachers. All aspects

of the research paper on EduBot with reference to

ways and means in which the applicability of AI will

be an obvious proposition if an academic approach is

to be considered

2 LITERATURE SURVEY

Hwang and Chen (2019) (Hwang and Chen, 2019)

talked about the changes brought in education by use

of AI with ITS that could enhance the students’

interaction with the content being delivered. In their

study they devotes special attention to individual

learning environments and learning environment

model called learning companion. This fits well with

the goal of EduBot to deliver the course that suits the

learner’s needs as well as having a dynamic approach

toward different types of learning.

In the relevant analysis on the use of information

technologies in instructional context which was done

by Kulik (2003) (Kulik, 2003), it has proved that

technological tools improve the effectiveness of tutor

and educative processes. Kulik’s research evidences

for the idea that application of complexed

technologies in AI systems used in EduBot can

enhance the effectiveness of tutorials and

consequently the learning outcomes.

Today’s advancement in Natural Language

Processing (NLP) is key in the features of EduBot’s

system. Devlin et al. (2018) (Devlin et al., 2018)

presented BERT — Bidirectional Encoder

Representations from Transformers that significantly

changed the approach to text comprehending using

deep bidirectional transformers. The model’s

capability to capture contextual dependencies in text

has stimulated improvements on the areas of

automated text summarization and question

answering—to which EduBot is central.

“Transformer” was developed by Vaswani et al.,

(2017) (Vaswani et al., 2017) for performing efficient

sequence operation through self-attention functional

concepts. This model set the backdrop to most of the

contemporary NLP solutions that include the

functioning of EduBot in providing custom education

content based on context. Importantly, since the

framework adopted for EduBot is the Transformer

architecture, the learning materials produced are

structurally and contextually coherent.

In addition, Chen et al. (2020) (Chen et al. 2020)

investigated the application of the Retrieval-

Augmented Generation (RAG) model, which uses

Knowledge Retrieval and the generation task in

combination. This integration makes it easy to

develop the content to include the information which

isalleviated from the other sources to create the

output. EduBot harness here this model to avoid

drawbacks encountered with pure generative models

whereby student may be given wrong or outdated

information when posing a question.

RAG models were also explored by Lewis et al.

(2020) (Lewis et al. 2020), namely in terms of benefits

of integrating large-scale language models with

information retrieval frameworks. This they note

shows that their solution enhances the quality of

content produced since it combines factual

knowledge and generative capacity. This is in line

with the objectives of EduBot which endeavours to

generate academic content that is informative, useful

and current.

In their work, Karsenti et al. (2021) (Karsenti et

al. 2021) sought to understand advances in

technology towards promoting collaborative

learning. Their studies demonstrate the ways in which

AI supports cointeractive processes; here primarily, it

fosters students’ communication and produces

immediate feedback. The study supports the use of

INCOFT 2025 - International Conference on Futuristic Technology

330

Socratic assistants for students such as EduBot to

encourage critical use of information dialogically.

Zhang and his coworkers highlighted the role of

multimodality and the necessity to work with content

of different types: text, audio, and video. According

to their research the students are served well when

they are able to access and interface with multiple

formats into which knowledge delivery is made more

flexible and interesting. Regarding the effective

processing of different media types like PDF files,

YouTube video links, and audio files, EduBot finds

its immensity in the modern leaning environments.

Other researchers such as Wang, Xin, and Zhang

(2022) (Wang, Xin, et al. 2022) were concerned with

the use of AI in designing intelligent learning

environments. That is why their research focused on

adaptive learning environment, which serves students

and adapts to their needs. The AI-based individual

learning paths developed by EduBot are consistent

with their suggestions: a system that responds to a

student’s learning needs and pace.

Ferguson et al. (2020) (Ferguson et al. 2020) was

aimed at discussing the application of AI for

formative assessment and providing customized

feedback. They also discovered that some of the

benefits associated with use ofEducation Information

Technologies and AI in particular is that compared to

traditional form of learning, the students who learn

through the likes EduBot can be provided with quick

feedback. It is quite useful especially in environments

where the teacher may not be able to hawk over each

individual learner.

Graesser and colleagues (2019) (Graesser et al.

2019) explored whether learning companions based

on AI technologies can be beneficial to learners.

These companions, which operation is similar to the

function of EduBot, are informants, they give advice

and respond to questions in real time. They found that

having learning companions helps to increase the

degree of interaction and hence suggests enhances

learning.

Another aspect of the use of AI in corporate

training environments was also mentioned by Berger

et al. (2020) (Berger, et al. 2020). They explained

how AI applications could be used to develop

learning interfaces that would help the target

employee population. Because it is highly flexible,

EduBot can be applied not only as an element of

formal educational system but also in corporate

education, where individualized learning plays a

significant role in workforce training.

DeMillo (2021) explained how with the help of

AI it is possible to shape the learning environment

conducive to the needs of learners with disabilities.

Artificial intelligence can easily be configured to fit

all learning models to accommodate all the student’s

needs. Since EduBot adapts to the interface and

content presentation, it is a valuable resource for

teaching to diversify its audience.

In their study focused on exploring the effects

of AI in distance and online learning, Means et al.

(2021) (Means et al. 2021). The authors of their study

examined that potential of AI could provide better

interactive and personalized environment for learning

in virtual environment. From this research, EduBot

which uses AI in online learning affirms this

knowledge by availing an environment that lets the

learner practice and directly interacts with the tutor

same as in face-to-face lessons.

Holmes et al. (2021) (Holmes et al. 2021)

explored the role of AI in educations following the

current developments and trends, stating that there

will be more intense use of AI tools in education

contexts applying both near and distant futures.

Hence, their research has pointed out that with AVP

like EduBot the future of education delivery will

hugely rely on Artificial Intelligence tailored learning

delivery.

According to Paul and Elder (2020) (Paul and

Elder, 2020) understood on how critical thinking

skills should be enhanced among the learners. Taking

this view, Seemiller asserted that with AI-expression,

Socratic techniques could be particular to nurture

essential analytical effectiveness in learners. In

particular, addressing the findings of this research,

EduBot is aimed at the usage of the Socratic

questioning approach that promotes critical thinking

and meaningful learning.

3 MODEL ARCHITECTURE

3.1 Structure and Working

Being one of the most complex AI-based solutions in

the field of education, EduBot is to enhance learning

performance due to the multileveled structure. It

involves content process, usage interaction and

adaptive learning working in combination with the

multiprocessor system.

Main Elements and What links or relates Them

Well, this is where UI comes in, UI for short, that

is user interface. It is really the end point of user

interaction, at least for most productive purposes. For

as non user input within the system, users can enter

doubts as well as concepts that they want to share and

upload materials such as PDFs and YouTube links. In

this component, applicative design provides uI

EduBot: An AI-Driven Educational Platform for Multi-Format Content Processing

331

accessibility and thus the users can easily operate

within the platform. This component makes it

possible to have a smooth experience by constantly

inviting the masses to take part in educational

material.

User Database and Profile Management: This

module will facilitate the control of user profiles on

plethora of data derived from the user history, scores

which are potentially given to users on their

performance and pathways completed during

learning. Securing user information will thus make

the system ready to recommend the particular content

that one might need in learning during experience and

adaptive learning. The user database is very important

because it will show trends as to how users have

evolved at some point of time and has been

personalized based on the user.

API Integrations (Gemini and Groq): For the

extended functionalities, EduBot relies on external

application programming interfaces. What Gemini

API does therefore do is absorb the queries that end

users offer, proceed to analyze them and bring back

points to relevant education resources. Regarding

YouTube links Groq API now handles and users can

pull multimedium content. The integrations reveal

what material could be processed and used by

EduBot, thus diversifying experience with various

forms and types of education.

Pdf processing While uploading pdfs this would

extract relevant content for analytical purposes and

for interaction. the module works by applying

complex algorithms to extract textual content from

the PDF which was then to be fed to other subsystems

of the system. On this level PDF interaction offers

affordances by which the extracted content can be

further manipulated allowing for further

comprehension and engagement with the content of

the text.

Module for Handling User Response: This

module encompasses and handles inputs which could

be in form of questions, feedback on the contents as

well as responses to education content. It then elicits

an interaction of the users to the educative contents

and funnels it back to the User Database for reuse.

This way, it develops session continuation – which is

a user can revisit or go back his or her previous

interactions, because rigidity is kept along her or his

learning trail.

Real-time Adaptation Engine: The adaptation

engine in EduBot helps keep real time, adapting

content as well as the way users interacts with a user

based on his or her performance. In its native form it

has an ability to generate Socratic questions that put

the users to a particular question making them think

deeper on what they are learning, with digg.

Therefore it presents a challenging exercise for every

learner based on the level of proficiency of the

software’s skill level.

EduBot gives a very much sounder rating system

that determines the performance of a user through the

kind of interactions and the answers given. It ‘S

normally seen in the Leaderboard, which shows the

rankings of users according to the scores which they

have secured. Such an environment invokes a

competitive level that fosters participation with

improvement in learning achievements.

Understanding student performance and

participation, Progress Analytics and Feedback

Mechanism provide the advantage and disadvantage

of the user. Moreover, the Feedback Mechanism also

offer users recommendations according to their

performance, which could help learners to set

objectives and, in fact, monitor progress throughout

the years. It’s such kind of feedback loop that serves

significant in strengthening user motivation as well as

guiding him throughout his education.

The Mind Map Generator: EduBot components; It

is a tool that is powerful enough in the creation of

visual relationships about different concepts in. It

brings together ideas in a ways which help in the

understanding and memorization of concepts

regarding specific issue. The active engagement of

the user with them gives the possibility for the content

to be explained visually for effective learning.

Figure 1: EduBot System Architecture.

4 EXPERIMENTAL SETUP /

METHODOLOGY

Establishing EduBot, it was an intentionally designed

process of how different advanced AI models, back-

end tech, and UI elements would be incorporated to

INCOFT 2025 - International Conference on Futuristic Technology

332

create an easy to use educational aid. Methodology

section contains information regarding the

architecture of the system and discuses technologies

used as well as the flow of the process for data

handling and the strategies adopted to ensure

fulfillment of the functional and non functional

requirements.

4.1 System architecture

Designed to address the major input types, which

include text, audio, PDFs, images, and links to

YouTube, and to deliver all these as summaries, sets

of questions and answers, mind maps, and learning

modules, the architecture consists of the following

major elements:

● Frontend: The works through which

students use to upload their contents and

also with which they work on the produced

outputs by the educators. The front end has

been built with the latest web front end

technologies to ensure a good interface on

any gadget as it uses HTML, CSS, and

JavaScript.

● Backend: The Backend can be in Django

or Flask as since it takes the request from

the user then processes the input and

forwards commands to the AI models and

receives/stores data in database.

● AI Integration Layer: This comprises a

number of incorporated AI models that is

expected to transform the inputs into an

output.

○ Automatic Speech Recognition

(ASR) - Whisper: Speech

recognition which builds the

capability to transform audio

feed into text.

○ Llama 3: Tasks like

summarization, generation of

questions-answers, and any kind

of work which requires passage

comprehension, etc., based on the

modules learnt by the system.

○ RAG (Retrieval Augmented

Generation): Ensures that the

outcome, information retrieved,

answers found or conclusion

reached are pertinent to the

conversation going on.

○ Faiss: It is integrated for quick

comparable study and classifying

instructional information.

● Database Layer: MongoDB is used for

the variable and horizontally scalable

storage of numerical data of users;

educational content processed in the

learning management system; as well as

the content of the interaction history data.

4.2 Intake and Preprocessing Input Data

In the first stage, we received input data and cleaned

them in order to analyse. By so doing, EduBot allows

the introduction of any form of educational material

in various input formats. All input forms undergo a

distinct pipeline:

• PDFs and Typed Text: The text inputs can

also be decided using a general purpose PDF

library to parse or by simple text file

processing. The extracted text is then

directed further for further processing by the

LLaMA 3 model.

• Audio Data (YouTube Links, Podcasts,

Lectures): Whisper Model is the audio

input to text output processor. The obtained

text is input to LLaMA 3 to produce

summaries, questions and answers, and

study material in modules.

• Image Data: Optical character recognition

techniques are used, while the text is

recognized from images. The obtained text

is regarded as other text input data, and

goes through LLaMA 3.

• YouTube Links: For such links, LLaMA 3

handles such links, fetch an audio content

through APIs and then transcribes these

using Whisper. Only these texts are used to

produce the final output.

Once the input data is processed, it stores to a

MongoDB and the output can be obtained from the

MongoDB for further output.

4.3 Output Generation and Use of AI

Models

The output which is generated by the EduBot is of the

educational type once the data of the input has been

processed. The processes in generating outputs vary

depending on each type of output:

• Summary: Textual data is then fed to

LLaMA 3, and summarized to provide an

informative abridged version. The

contextual understanding is gained, and the

EduBot: An AI-Driven Educational Platform for Multi-Format Content Processing

333

main features in the incoming text are

emphasized so as to ensure that there is

always a summary that the users can always

refer to when using the paraphrased text.

• Q&A Generation: Based on the RAG

framework, the input data of EduBot will

make up Q&A pairs. It retrieves processed

data with RAG to provide answers and

questions which are semantically relevant.

• Mind Map Generation: The types of the

concepts being closely associated within the

input are defined using a clustering

algorithm along with Faiss, so they are

illustrated as a mind map to make the visual

material easier to comprehend.

• Module Building: It is divided by topical

modules and LLaMA 3 is organized into a

series of lessons complete with Q&A sets

with examples to support the

implementation of the module being taught.

• Example Generation: LLaMA 3 applies

its text generating mechanism and

comprehension features to formulate

examples that refers to a piece of

information contained in the data and

utilises comprehension strategies to identify

the concerns which it then provides

examples or actual use of to enhance

understanding of.

• Socratic Questioning: EduBot does

contain a Socratic questioning model that

will produce a stream of questions/framing

to guide deeply engaging rant and

understanding. This ability forces the user

to reconsider what they know and how they

are arriving at conclusions and indeed

makes the user much more involved in the

material than the regular learning process,

therefore much more interactive and

enclosed.

4.4 Database Management and Storage

Mongo DB will be the main storage of EduBot as it

contains unstructured data; text audio metadata and

logs of interaction. The database holds:

• The following is what all its users upload in

their raw format as well as the processed

format:

• Marty somewhere in the processed

outputs which include summarized

content, question-answer pair,

mind maps.

• The interaction history of the users

and activity logs which help the

system gradually adjust to the

certain demands.

• MongoDB Document structure

helps in accessing the particular

data more quickly, it was easily

scalable because the part of whole

is far easier to build.

5 AI MODEL TRAINING,

FINE-TUNING

Based on Whisper and LLaMA 3 high-precision

models, EduBot brings additional fine-tuning to be

used on educational material only. The following are

some of the area that involve fine-tuning:

• Fine-Tuning Whisper: Speaker adaptive

acoustic training of Whisper so that it can

transcribe lectures and podcasts as accurately

as informed by words specialized in the

domain

• LLaMA 3 Fine-Tuning: For this work, the

authors used the version of the LLaMA 3

model fine-tuned with a set of educational

material, which enabled it to generate high-

quality summaries, Q&A sets based on the

material, and independent academic

modules.

This fine-tuning may well improve the

performance of models according to a given set of

educational content whilst promoting quality

results.

6 USAGE AND INTERFACE

The frontend of EduBot is very easy to

understand and easy to use. Among its main features

are :

• Content Upload Portal: Allows inputs of

various formats such as texts, PDF, audio, as

well as links to YouTube. A user will use a

graphical user interface, specifically a

number of related clickable objects on a

screen.

• Dashboard of Generated Outputs: The

user will be able to see his outputs after the

processing has been done-that is, summaries,

Q&A sets, mind maps and modules in a user-

friendly dashboard format.

INCOFT 2025 - International Conference on Futuristic Technology

334

• Administrator Panel: Here is the

administrators and educators panel for

managing the user information, computer

performance and users activity.

• Accessibility Across Devices: This should

be achieved in a way that it is easy to be used

by both student and educators with as much

as possible of barriers being removed.

7 PERFORMANCE AND

TESTING

Monitor these performance indicators to assure

optimum performance and very good response time.

a. Latency: For standard sizes of inputs the

system shall be capable of providing output

such as summery/Q&A set within five

seconds.

b. Scalability: EduBot can support many

users simultaneously with high concurrent

connectivity and the use of other

horizontally scalable methods such as

addition of many cloud instances and load

splitting to many servers.

c. Model Evaluation: Ch., 2017)

Educational datasets are used to assess AI

model performance and make ongoing

Quantitative assessment of precision, relevance

and general quality of output generated by each

model.

8 SECURITY AND DATA

PRIVACY

Since it handles user data which are personal in

nature security and data privacy should be a top

priority in its operations.

a. Data Encryption: Thus, using the

SSL/TLS to ensure secure

communication between the user and the

system tends to remove hitches

concerning the unauthorized access.

b. Authentication: The role-based

authentication is a feature of EduBot; thus

only individuals with the right access

privileges can avail some educational and

administrative features.

c. Data Privacy Compliance: The system

can uphold data privacy regulation , for

example, protects the general data

protection regulation. This ensures any

data collected on users is safe and well

handled from the clients’ perspective.

9 RESULTS

It incorporates diverse elements of artificial

intelligence that optimise educational interaction with

content as well as its visualisation and feedback. Out

of the images provided in this experiment, this tool

was able to process and apply PDF and YouTube

video educational resources and mind map

applications for some of the concepts presented in the

images.

Figure 2: PDF-Mate

For instance in handling a PDF on dynamic search

algorithm, the system recognizes the example of the

Fibonacci sequence as an example of the dynamic

programming approach. Despite pointing out that this

example was not explained, it provides evidence of

an area which needs extra effort to be spent for

content understanding and extraction to be properly

accomplished.

Figure 3: MindMap

The most obvious feature may be the concept map

which will arrange thoughts in a dynamic nature such

as LIFO (Last-In-First-Out) for stacks which general

functions include the “push” and “pop” functions.

The tool additionally offers the comparison between

stacks with other data structures like arrays, links list

to enrich the understanding made through

breakdowns. Printed and in graphical form, the mind

maps cause the variable to be less of an issue for the

learners since they are then easily able to get an onset

view of principles, operations and usage areas.

EduBot: An AI-Driven Educational Platform for Multi-Format Content Processing

335

Figure 4: YouTube Genie

The use of the YouTube Genie integration has

extended the usefulness of the platform to multimedia

content. From the above demonstration, one can

realize it gives a video tutorial on how to get an API

key for Gemini AI just like how one can move

through the google’s section of API key and

regenerate keys from time to time. It summarises

knowledge content from the video resources into

written notes for majority of people that catered to

their preferred learning style and incorporates

multimedia into knowledge acquisition.

Figure 5: Chat History & MindMap

In addition to content processing, the option of

visualization and representation, the application

provides the system of an interactive engagement

based on the history of chats and the mind map. This

is more or less like a store, all previous encounters are

saved here and the learner can look into his learning

process, whatever questions that have been asked

earlier can be answered again, and so on I think it will

keep the learning process more or less continuous.

The mind map that triggers from the chat history

assists as a guide of issues discussed during any of the

interactions. This capability then turns linear

conversations into knowledge maps for users to easily

remember and switch between them.

Scoring and rewards mechanism is also included

in the interface the keep the audience engaged

continuously. The simpler the activity, the more

points the users earn, and the more different types of

content they come across during their actions-share

files, watch educational videos, and ask questions

using the Socratic assistant. Such a user as “Gemini”

has the score of 130 and the badge “Gold” as seen

from the dashboard. Such reward systems create for

an extremely social learning environment because the

users know they have to come back to the system,

time and again. Moreover, the scoring mechanism

helps guarantee continued participation in order to

maintain the continuing formation of learnings,

making the system more suitable for the attainment of

enduring learnings in the academic, business, or

learning-enabling environments.

10 FUTURE SCOPE

From this perspective, EduBot has a great value for

future development, which will bring more positive

changes and development to educational

technologies. Another area which could be further

developed is the multilingual capability: Thus, the

suitable extension for the EduBot solution would be

the opportunity to translate the material as well as to

generate the content in the targeted languages.

Sophisticated MT can guarantee concerns of

contextuality of language translation. Furthermore,

students engagement and individual approach can be

developed through the utilization of AI technologies

for tracking of the behavior, preferences and

performance where the learning path is proposed

based on the adaptive learning approach and is

tweaked according to the learners’ progress.

Compatibility with Augmented and Virtual Reality

(AR/VR) platforms could lead to creation of virtual

environments that could include such use cases as

virtual laboratory or complex 3D models of some

material. On the other hand, the components of

gamification can be branched out to cover such

elements of the game as a leaderboard, rewards for

achievements, team challenges, etc., to extend the

level of engagement and cooperation as well as

constructive competition. To increase practical use, it

could extend its function to be able to interpret other

types of content for example scanned handwritten

notes or dynamic media files. It can also integrate

with Learning Management Systems (LMS) such as

Moodle and Canvas doing so simplifying adoption

among educators and organizations improving

teaching and learning experiences. In addition,

improved Socratic assistant characteristics may give

a realistic image of the problem solving and foster

critical attitude and directed exploration. New

functionalities of data analytics and reporting will

allow educators to monitor a student’s performance

and improve the approach. Furthermore, AI-based

support to peer interactions might enhance group

INCOFT 2025 - International Conference on Futuristic Technology

336

work where students and EduBot work on case-based

assignments; EduBot providing guides and feedback.

11 CONCLUSIONS

EduBot is more of a learning helper which learns

from data with the assistance of high octane

intelligent data processing with large text, audio,

PDFs, images and YouTube links, and then it

generates summative results in forms of summaries,

Q-A pairs, mind maps and learning modules. Overall,

it takes little effort to navigate and this tempts the

students to operate it physically together with the

game aspects which State and purely encourages the

users to use the software. In its concerned user

representation, it uses EduBot to represent the proper

use of the newest Whisper model of automatic speech

recognition and LLaMA 3 for natural language

processing to answer them with the right contextual

content. In view of that, fine-tuning was directed

towards optimally addressing quality objectives for

issues relating to education content. Data storage was

flexible and also scalable using NoSQL MongoDB

while user interaction formats and data were also

diverse. Here it is possible to distinguish which aspect

would be more crucial between the performance

metrics and security measures and that is to show

reliability and capability to be GDPR compliant.

Thus, in general, with reference to connection

between content consumption and understanding,

EduBot makes consumption more effective and

relevant in all the above-mentioned different

educational situations and in regard to the

improvements that have been going on here.

REFERENCES

Y. Zhang, L. Liu, Z. Chen, and Q. Zhao, "A Survey on AI-

based Educational Tools: Advances and Challenges,"

International Journal of Educational Technology, vol.

18, no. 3, pp. 45-58, 2023. doi:

10.1016/j.ijet.2023.04558.

A. B. Smith and J. C. Johnson, "Integrating Natural

Language Processing in E-Learning Platforms,"

Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, vol. 39, no. 2,

pp. 110-125, 2023. doi: 10.1111/jcal.12687.

H. T. Nguyen, M. B. Tran, and R. D. Patel, "Automatic

Speech Recognition for Educational Purposes: A

Review," Education and Information Technologies,

vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 19-34, 2023. doi: 10.1007/s10639-

022-11001-7.

L. Zhou et al., "Reinforcement Learning for Personalized

Education: Challenges and Solutions," in Proceedings

of the 12th International Conference on Education

Technology, 2023, pp. 223-230.

M. R. Jones and F. K. Lim, "Gamification in Educational

Technology: The Role of User Engagement," Journal of

Educational Computing Research, vol. 61, no. 4, pp.

789-812, 2023. doi: 10.1177/07356331211012345.

S. A. Brown, T. C. Lee, and P. G. Rodriguez, "Database

Management for Educational Content: A MongoDB

Approach," Journal of Database Management, vol. 34,

no. 2, pp. 45-61, 2023. doi: 10.4018/JDM.20230401.

D. F. T. Hagan, A. A. Johnson, and R. K. Tan, "Ethics and

Data Privacy in AI Education Tools," Ethics and

Information Technology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 97-110,

2023. doi: 10.1007/s10676-023-09584-0.

J. Devlin et al., "BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional

Transformers for Language Understanding,"

arXiv:1810.04805 [cs.CL], 2018.

O. Vaswani et al., "Attention is All You Need," in

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems,

2017, pp. 5998-6008.

J. D. Huang, "Fine-Tuning Transformer Models for

Educational Applications," in Proceedings of the 2023

International Conference on Artificial Intelligence,

2023, pp. 210-218.

P. F. Brown, S. A. Della Pietra, V. J. Della Pietra, and R. L.

Mercer, "The Mathematics of Statistical Machine

Translation: Parameter Estimation," Computational

Linguistics, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 263-311, 1993.

A. Kunchukuttan, M. Choudhury, and P. Bhattacharyya,

"Named Entity Recognition for Hindi-English Code-

Mixed Social Media Content," arXiv:1804.07983

[cs.CL], 2018.

K. Papineni, S. Roukos, T. Ward, and W. J. Zhu, "BLEU:

A Method for Automatic Evaluation of Machine

Translation," in Proceedings of the 40th Annual

Meeting of the Association for Computational

Linguistics, 2002, pp. 311-318.

I. Sutskever, O. Vinyals, and Q. V. Le, "Sequence to

Sequence Learning with Neural Networks," in

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems,

2014, pp. 3104-3112.

M. T. Luong, H. Pham, and C. D. Manning, "Effective

Approaches to Attention-Based Neural Machine

Translation," arXiv:1508.04025 [cs.CL], 2015.

A. Vaswani et al., "TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine

Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systems,"

arXiv:1603.04467 [cs.DC], 2018.

Kulik, James. (2003). Effects of Using Instructional

Technology in Elementary and Secondary Schools:

What Controlled Evaluation Studies Say.

Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2020). Critical Thinking: Concepts

and Tools (48 p.). Lanham, MD: Rowan and Littlefield.

EduBot: An AI-Driven Educational Platform for Multi-Format Content Processing

337