Predictive Modeling of Bitcoin Transaction: Daily Analysis
Dharshini G
1
a
, Bhavadharani K
1
b
, Dhivya Bharathi T
2
c
and Arunkumar T
2
d
1
Kongu Engineering College, Erode, Tamil Nadu, India
2
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Erode, India
Keywords: Cryptocurrency-Bitcoin, Blockchain, Deep Learning, Prophet, LSTM, GRU.
Abstract: With the fast development of the cryptocurrency market, the accurate price prediction of cryptocurrency has
become a fault finding for traders. However, because of the difficult and unpredictable nature of price
movements which do not have a simple pattern. This makes it complex to examine sequential data points
covered over a long period of time. The prediction of cryptocurrency by researchers has explored various
approaches which includes Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) to forecast price movements.
Factors such as sudden market shifts, external events and investor sentiment contribute to unpredictability.
To forecast the price of bitcoin cryptocurrency with Prophet, Long short term memory (LSTM), gated
recurrent neural networks to segment the data which consists of daily and half-hourly data transactions were
used. In terms of evaluation metrics Mean Absolute Error (MAE), R-Squared, Mean squared error (MSE)
were used.
1 INTRODUCTION
Considering the high volatility of cryptocurrency and
potential for rapid appreciation, cryptocurrencies
have evolved into a prominent category of securities
in the global financial system, grabbing the curiosity
of both investors and researchers. The global trading
of Bitcoin, Ethereum, and other digital currencies
over a spectrum of platforms result in sophisticated
price swings that are influenced by a multitude of
factors, including sentiment among investors,
transaction volumes, and external regulatory
modifications. Although these markets are so
unreliable and non-linear, estimating the pricing of
bitcoin is still always pretty challenging promise.
Blockchain technology, which underpins
cryptocurrencies, provides a wealth of publicly
available transaction data. This data includes
variables such as transaction volume, mining
difficulty, and the total number of transactions, all of
which can offer insights into market behavior and
price trends. By leveraging this blockchain
transaction data, researchers have turned to advanced
time series forecasting models to predict market
prices in real-time.
This literature review focuses on the application
of three models—Prophet, Long Short-Term Memory
(LSTM), and Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) - to
cryptocurrency price prediction. Each of these
models has distinct strengths and weaknesses when
dealing with time series data, particularly in the
context of volatile markets. The review examines
how these models have been employed in similar
studies, compares their performance, and discusses
the challenges and future directions in cryptocurrency
price forecasting.
2 RELATED WORK
The research effort explores at how social media
activity, including data from Twitter and Google
Trends, might be used to forecast changes in the
prices of Bitcoin and Ethereum. It emphasises that
tweet volume, which is consistently overwhelmingly
optimistic despite market trends, is a more accurate
indicator of price fluctuations than sentiment
analysis. Price changes are accurately predicted using
a linear model that incorporates tweet volume and
Google Trends data, providing traders with useful
information for making decisions. The study comes
to the conclusion that keeping an eye on tweet volume
gives traders of cryptocurrencies a major advantage
by improving their capacity to predict market
G, D., K, B., T, D. B. and T, A.
Predictive Modeling of Bitcoin Transaction: Daily Analysis.
DOI: 10.5220/0013611300004664
Paper published under CC license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
In Proceedings of the 3rd Inter national Conference on Futuristic Technology (INCOFT 2025) - Volume 3, pages 173-180
ISBN: 978-989-758-763-4
Proceedings Copyright © 2025 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda.
173
moves(Abraham, Higdon, et al. , 2018). The survey
article on change point identification in historical data
is briefly represented in this paragraph. Change
points, or sudden changes in data patterns, are usually
employed to indicate state transitions and have a wide
range of uses, such as human activity detection,
healthcare inspection, climate analysis, and voice and
depict processing. It also describes potential hurdles
for the field's advancement and presents criteria for
analysing these algorithms. Researchers as well as
professionals interested in the analysis of time series
and its various applications will find this thorough
overview to be pertinent(Aminikhanghahi, and,
Cook, 2016).
It examines the privacy restrictions of Bitcoin in
an academic context by examining both simulated
and actual transactions. Approximately 40% of the
user database could be recreated even with the usage
of suggested privacy precautions. This paper provides
an in-depth assessment of Bitcoin's privacy concerns,
highlighting its problems with
transparency(Androulaki, Karame, et al. , 2013). The
research used a vector Auto regression (VAR) model
to examine what macroeconomic factors affected
Ghana's exchange rates between 2000 and 2019. Real
GDP granger causes exchange rate initiatives,
whereas other variables have indirect effects,
according to an analysis of the broad money supply
(M2), lending rates, inflation, and real GDP. The
analysis was supported by data from the Ghana
Statistical Service, World Development Indicators,
and the Bank of Ghana. In order to lower inflation,
boost output, and eventually stabilise the exchange
rate through higher GDP, the study suggests measures
that lower lending rates and the money supply.
(Antwi, Issah, et al. , 2020). A pair of methods for
effectively detecting segment neighbourhoods—
contiguous residue sets with common features—are
presented in the current investigation. These methods,
which support a variety of models and fit functions
which includes maximum likelihood and least
squares, estimate the model parameters essential
define these communities and establish their
boundaries. They provide versatility for a range of
applications by iteratively detecting significant
sequence properties. When one technique was used to
the influenza virus's haemagglutinin protein, a break
in the powerful heptad repeat structure suggested a
possible mechanism for conformational shift. This
demonstrates how useful the algorithms can be in
researching structural biology (Auger, Lawrence, et
al. , 1889). The increasing market value of digital
currencies and their potential to consolidate power
and lessen global dominance are examined in this
article. It draws attention to the erratic nature of
virtual currencies and the need for accurate
techniques for predicting their prices. Incorporating
characteristics like stock market the capitalisation,
trade volume, distribution, and delivery indicators, a
new forecasting model is presented. The method
shows how effective the model is in predicting the
values of digital currencies by using active LSTM
networks to examine benchmark datasets and long-
term trends. The results highlight how sophisticated
machine learning methods might enhance
cryptocurrency prediction(Biswas, Pawar, et al. ,
2021).
Wild Binary Segmentation (WBS), a novel
technique for estimating the quantity and positions of
authority of many change-points in data, is introduced
in this study. WBS uses a random globalisation
mechanism, which allows it to detect small jump
magnitudes and closely spaced change-points without
the need for a window or span parameter, in contrast
to normal binary segmentation. This method
preserves implementation simplicity and
computational efficiency. With suggested parameter
defaults, the authors suggest two stopping criteria:
thresholding and a reinforced Schwarz information
criterion. The R function wbs on CRAN offers WBS's
implementation, and comparative analyses
demonstrate its superior performance (Fryzlewicz, ,
et al. , 2014). According to the paper's assessment of
RNN models for cryptocurrency price prediction,
GRU has the lowest MAPE scores and is the most
precise for Bitcoin, Litecoin, and Ethereum. To
increase predicting accuracy, future research suggests
merging social media and trade volume (Hamayel,
and, Owda, 2021). The paper evaluates deep learning
models for predicting bitcoin prices, such as CNN,
LSTM, and BiLSTM, and concludes that they are
inadequate for capturing market complexity. To
increase forecasting accuracy, it recommends
investigating cutting-edge algorithms and feature
engineering.
Using significant supply and demand-related
aspects from blockchain data, this study investigates
the use of Bayesian Neural Networks (BNNs) for
modelling and forecasting Bitcoin price time series.
When comparing BNNs to other benchmark models,
empirical research shows how successfully they
anticipate prices and account for the extreme
volatility of Bitcoin. This demonstrates how BNNs
can be used to increase the forecasting accuracy of
price of bitcoin(Jang, Lee, et al. , 2017).
INCOFT 2025 - International Conference on Futuristic Technology
174
3 PROPOSED WORK
This section demonstrates the existing work relevant
to blockchain technology. We have discussed the
methods based on machine learning and deep
learning.
3.1 Time Series
By investigating past developments while
establishing an assumption that future trends will
appear similar, it is one of the most effective
approaches for anticipating circumstances with an
appropriate degree of future unpredictability. With
the goal to cope with forecasting obstacles with a time
component, time series forecasting additionally
incorporates data for efficient and effective
preparation.
3.2 Approaches For Bitcoin Prediction
Recurrent Neural Network: Neural networks that
are artificial were inspired by the information
receiving processes that operate in the human brain.
The computerized neurons that make up the neural
network are defined by its architecture. RNNs differ
from traditional neural networks in that they typically
consist of feedback loops. Therefore, it matters
whether the context of that data influences how well
a prediction can be generated. The recurrent
arrangement of an RNN's layers implies that each
neuron's present configuration depends on its
previous state, thereby giving the neural network a
limited amount of memory. A neural network with
recurrent operation can accept sequential data as
input, and its result and input networks may both be
sequences of different lengths that progressively visit
each cell.
Prophet: Prophet is a strategy to anticipate time
series data utilising an additive model. It combines
non-linear trends with seasonality on a daily, weekly,
and yearly schedule, alongside the effects from
breaks. Strong seasonal consequences within time
series and numerous seasons of historical information
are ideal considering their efficacy. Prophet generally
handles anomalies well and is impervious to
insufficient figures and trend fluctuations.
Random Forest Regressor: Regarding
regression-related responsibilities, an algorithm
based on Deep Learning referred to as Random Forest
Regressor is implemented. This collaborative
technique of learning integrates numerous decision
tree models in order to arrive at predictions. The
Random Forest Regression Technique creates a forest
of trees of decisions, whereas every one of them, after
training on a randomly assigned portion of the
training data including substitution (self-funded
sample), generates a distinct prediction. Either the
overwhelming percentage of the vote (for
categorisation) or the computation of each tree's
forecast (for regression) yields the final predicted
value of the Random Forest Regressor (RF
Regressor).
Long short-term memory: Recurrent neural
network (RNN) layers with Long Short-Term
Memory are specifically engineered to manage
sequential data. By adding gating methods, they solve
the vanishing gradient issue with conventional RNNs
and improve their ability to capture long-term
dependencies. The input gate (I), forget gate (F), and
output gate (O) make up its three gates. Over time,
the LSTM can recall or forget information thanks to
these gates, which regulate the information flow
across the cell state. Because of the extra gate (forget
gate), LSTM usually has more parameters than GRU.
This can increase the power of LSTM but also
increase its susceptibility to overfitting, particularly
on smaller datasets. LSTM has the capacity to
discover more intricate patterns and relationships in
the data because of its more intricate design. It works
effectively for assignments where documenting long-
term dependencies is essential.
Figure 1: LSTM architecture.
Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU): The two gates
that make up the simplified architecture of GRU are
the reset gate (R) and the update gate (Z). The reset
gate chooses what information should be erased from
the past, while the update gate decides how much of
the prior hidden state should be kept. Due to the forget
gate's absence, GRU has fewer parameters. It can be
less prone to overfitting and more computationally
efficient as a result, which makes it an excellent
option for smaller datasets. GRU is still capable of
efficiently capturing long-term dependencies despite
its simplicity. It is a common choice for a variety of
sequence modeling applications and works well in
many natural language processing jobs. GRU may be
Predictive Modeling of Bitcoin Transaction: Daily Analysis
175
more effective for larger datasets because it can train
more quickly with fewer parameters.
Figure 2: GRU architecture.
4 PROPOSED MODEL:
PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS
This section on three basic elements. They are
used to predict the price of cryptocurrency: 1)
Collection of dataset over a time; 2) Pre-processing;
3) Model building based on the algorithm
Figure 3 Proposed model for BTC transaction.
In our paper, we used similar methods which includes
Prophet, LSTM, GRU with different datasets with huge
amounts of data from Kaggle website. With all these
algorithms we have evaluated. These all the methods helped
to improve the accuracy.
5 TESTING THE PROPOSED
MODEL
An experiment tested with the DL models (RNN,
LSTM, GRU, Prophet) for forecasting BTC price.
5.1 Data Collection
The analysis used data that had been obtained from
the Bitcoin digital currencies in CSV format, consult
the Kaggle website. The dataset includes numerous
rows, such as mempool size, transaction rate, market
cap usd, average block size, market price usd,
exchange volume usd, average confirmation time,
hash rate, difficulty, miners revenue, total transaction
fees as illustrated in Fig. 5, the time span 2015-01-01
to 2023-09-02.Sample information retrieved from the
cryptocurrency records employed in the research,
with the investigation serving to be the only primary
variable and the present day market value for Bitcoin.
5.2 Data Preprocessing
Preprocessing steps are crucial for cleaning and
preparing the data before analysis or modeling. Raw
data often contains inconsistencies, formatting issues,
or non-numerical elements that need to be addressed
to ensure accurate results.
Data Cleaning: The dataset contains more
number of null values and they are preprocessed
by calculating the mean value of the missing
values and some formats are to preprocessed
Feature Selection: Converting the values to a
numerical format like float enables various
mathematical calculations, statistical analyses,
and machine learning algorithms that require
numerical data. Before doing some numerical
calculations we have to remove dollor signs,
commas.
Normalization or Standardization: The
preprocessing of the dataset involves using the
formulas for the standard scaler and minmax
scaler functions. The data has been scaled with
the aid of this function to provide values that lie
between zero to one.
Test-Train splitting: Use train_test_split to split
the sequences and targets into training and
testing sets (e.g., 80% training, 20% testing). The
training set is used to train your model, while the
test set is used to evaluate its performance on
unseen data. This helps you avoid overfitting,
which occurs when your model memorizes the
INCOFT 2025 - International Conference on Futuristic Technology
176
training data too well and doesn't generalize well
to new data.
5.3 Bitcoin Price Movement Prediction
using Deep learning models
The model processes historical data, including price,
volume, and market trends, to forecast future price
movements. The project helps traders and investors
make informed decisions by providing accurate price
predictions based on past patterns. The architecture of
the DL models: (1) Prophet (2) LSTM (3) GRU is
shown below:
Prophet : Facebook's Prophet model is a
sophisticated forecasting engine that can handle time-
series information effectively, especially during
instances involving significant trends, seasonality,
and anomalies. It is appropriate for datasets that can
show abrupt shifts or cyclical patterns, such as
transactions made on Bitcoin. The time sequence has
been divided down by the model into the following
three primary groups: trend, seasonality, and
holidays/events. While the volatility component
models recurrent patterns (such as weekly or annual
cycles), the trend factor captures the broader long-
term growth or decrease in the data. Furthermore,
users can define additional occurrences (for instance,
market announcements) that could influence the data;
the seasonal component takes responsibility for
everything.
A dataframe with two columns, y (the target
variable) and ds (the timestamp), makes up Prophet's
input. Regarding the forecasting of transactions made
using Bitcoin, y could indicate for either the market
price or the volume of transactions, while ds stands
for the daily timestamps. In order to forecast the
future, Prophet analyses this previous data and
discovers the underlying trends. It is a useful option
for cryptocurrency data since it can automatically
identify the trend and seasonal patterns of the time-
series and has the flexibility to take into account
varying growth rates and irregular patterns.
Prophet can produce projections for a given
number of future periods once the model has been
trained. In order to present a range of possible
outcomes, the output contains anticipated values
(yhat) for each future time step together with
uncertainty intervals (yhat_lower and yhat_upper). In
your situation, this entails forecasting future
transaction volumes or Bitcoin prices by utilising the
seasonality and pattern identified from historical data.
The output of the model is quite interpretable, which
facilitates understanding of the elements influencing
the forecasts and offers insightful information about
potential future transaction behaviour.
Long Short Term Memory: A particular kind of
recurrent neural network (RNN) called Long Short-
Term Memory (LSTM) is made especially to process
sequential data and identify long-term dependencies.
When data points are temporally sensitive, such as in
time-series forecasting jobs like predicting Bitcoin
transactions, it works quite well. Because LSTM
resolves the issue of vanishing and exploding
gradients, it can learn patterns across lengthy
sequences, in contrast to conventional RNNs. LSTMs
control the information flow by combining input,
forget, and output gates. This allows the network to
gradually retain or forget different types of
information based on how important they are to the
prediction.
A three-dimensional tensor with the shape of
(samples, time steps, features) is the input for an
LSTM. Every time step in your model correlates to a
point in the residual series that was derived from the
predictions of the Prophet model. To anticipate the
next point, the model uses sequences of ten points of
information from the residual series as input, for
example, if you set the time step to 10. The input units
in each LSTM layer have 50 memory cells (or
neurons), and the network is built in a way that sends
an ordered set of variables to the subsequent LSTM
layer or to the most dense layer, regardless of whether
the output is returned for each time step or solely the
last one as shown in Table I.
To improve the forecast, the Prophet model's
predictions are coupled with the LSTM output, which
is a projected future point. After that, MinMaxScaler
is used to scale the residuals back to their original
form, producing residual predictions that improve the
accuracy of Bitcoin transaction forecasts.
Table 1: Long Short Term Memory (LSTM).
Layer(type) Output shape Param #
lstm (LSTM) (None, 1, 50) 10,400
lstm_1 (LSTM) (None, 50) 20,200
dense (Dense) (None, 1) 51
Total params: 91,955
Trainable params: 30,651
Non-trainable params: 0
O
p
timizer
p
arams: 61,304
Gated Recurrent Unit: The Gated Recurrent
Unit (GRU) is a streamlined version of the LSTM
model, intended to identify sequential patterns in
time-series data while exhibiting reduced
computational complexity. Similar to LSTM, GRU
Predictive Modeling of Bitcoin Transaction: Daily Analysis
177
effectively manages long-term dependencies while
streamlining its internal architecture by minimising
the number of gates utilised. It uses just two gates—
an update gate and a reset gate—to manage the flow
of information. The update gate lets the model decide
how much past knowledge needs to be carried
forward, while the reset gate determines how much of
the past information to forget. This reduced
architecture makes GRU faster to train compared to
LSTM, while still being powerful for jobs like
forecasting Bitcoin transaction trends.
A Broader Regression (GRU) model handles a
series of residuals gathered from the Prophet model
using a three-dimension tensor input, comparable to
an LSTM. Each layer of the GRU contains 50 neural
networks that use the data to learn temporal
correlations. The result is a series of anticipated
residual values that demonstrate brief variations in
Bitcoin transaction data. These values are merged
with LSTM and Prophet forecasts to improve the
forecast throughout its entirety, as shown in Table II.
Table 2: Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU).
Layer(type) Output shape Param #
gru _2 (GRU) (None, 10, 50) 7,950
gru_3 (GRU) (None, 50) 15,300
dense_6 (Dense) (None, 1) 51
Total params: 69,905
Trainable params: 23,301
Non-trainable params: 0
O
p
timizer
p
arams: 46,604
6 EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
AND DISCUSSION
6.1 Model Training
In the first step, we trained with DL models on the
dataset, dividing it into two groups of eighty percent
training and twenty per cent testing, in order to
determine the optimal DL model. As will be
discussed within Section 6, the DL models were
evaluated and compared using four assessment
measures: MSE, MAE, and R-squared error.
6.2 Epochs
An algorithm's complete traversal through a training
dataset is called an epoch. When the information set
completes both forward and backward passes, it has
completed one pass. The aim of an epoch is used to
modify the model's parameters in order eliminate
error and enhance accuracy depending on the training
set. The algorithm iterates through the training dataset
based on the number of epochs; batch gradient
descent iterates through a single batch. Until the error
rate of the model is deemed acceptable, the process is
repeated. Therefore, we used 100 epochs.
Table 3: Loss Vs Val_loss of LSTM.
Epoch Loss Val_loss
1/100 0.0611 0.0076
2/100 0.0030 0.0036
3/100 0.0018 0.0025
4/100 0.0017 0.0024
5/100 0.0016 0.0023
Table 4: Loss Vs Val_loss of GRU.
Epoch Loss Val_loss
1/100 0.0423 0.0052
2/100 0.0018 0.0019
3/100 0.0012 0.0013
4/100 0.0010 0.0013
5/100 0.0009 0.0012
Figure 4: LSTM model loss for training and validation.
Figure 5: GRU model loss for training and validation.
INCOFT 2025 - International Conference on Futuristic Technology
178
Figure 6: BTC transaction prediction based on Prophet
model
.
Figure 7: BTC transaction prediction based on
Prophet+LSTM.
Figure 8. BTC transaction prediction based on
Prophet+LSTM+GRU.
Tables III to IV shows the validation loss and loss
of each epoch on LSTM and GRU. Fig 4 to 5,
indicates the model performance which decrease for
each epoch that performs optimally. The prediction
model of actual and predicted pharse are shawn in Fig
6 to 8.
6.3 Evaluation Metrics
We measure the forecast mistakes using the Mean
Absolute Error (MAE), Means Square Error (MSE)
and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) in order to
assess the effectiveness of model forecasting.
MAE =
|𝑧  𝑧̂|

(1)
MSE =
𝑧  𝑧̂

(2)
RMSE =

̂

(3)
Despite grabbing responsibility for their direction,
the MAE evaluates the mean magnitude of the falls in
a series of forecasting. Authenticity for variables that
are continuous is tracked.
6.4 Prediction Model Outcomes
This section preforms predictive modeling of Bitcoin
transaction dataset between 2015-01-01 and 2023-09-
02. Table 5 shows the overall outcome of our error
values. The comparison between actual and predicted
values of BTC transaction of daily analysis is shown
in Fig as well.
Table 5 shows that Prophet+LSTM has the lowest
MAE, MSE values and the greatest R-squared values
when compared to other. Prophet+LSTM is better
than Prophet and combination of Prophet, LSTM and
GRU.
Table 5: Summary Of Model Predictions.
Model MAE R2 MSE
Prophet 3752.754 0.8812 30643.45
Prophet+
LSTM
1274.5235 0.9818 46804.31
Prophet+
LSTM+GRU
4163.4421 0.8489 39044.20
7 CONCLUSION AND FUTURE
WORK
In this research, the market capitalization price of
transactional Bitcoin was used to predict the price
using some DL algorithms. The method described
here explains the suggested techniques to determine
an accurate and profitable implementation of the
digital currency bitcoin price prediction. The method
renders use of methods involving deep learning to
reach the established prediction goals. The project's
Predictive Modeling of Bitcoin Transaction: Daily Analysis
179
primary objective is to forecast the incredibly volatile
crypto price and provide profit for the investors. The
dataset is assembled, trained, and then examined in
order to carry out this. To do this, it will employ a
variety of deep learning models to discover which
methodology yields the greatest amount of accuracy.
We have predicted the daily transaction of Bitcoin.
The remaining process can be processed as the future
work which will be continued
In the future, the researcher intends to use more
hybrid DL models or deep learning algorithms to
improve the accuracy of BTC predictions. To obtain
a higher accuracy rate, the period size may also be
raised. In addition, deep learning techniques will look
into how tweets and emotion impact Bitcoin price.
REFERENCES
Abraham, J., Higdon, D., Nelson, J., & Ibarra, J. (n.d.).
Cryptocurrency price prediction using tweet volumes
and sentiment analysis. SMU Scholar.
https://scholar.smu.edu/datasciencereview/vol1/iss3/1
Aminikhanghahi, S., & Cook, D. J. (2016). A survey of
methods for time series change point detection.
Knowledge and Information Systems, 51(2), 339–367.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-016-0987-z
Androulaki, E., Karame, G. O., Roeschlin, M., Scherer, T.,
& Capkun, S. (2013). Evaluating user privacy in
Bitcoin. In Lecture notes in computer science (pp. 34–
51). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39884-1_4
Antwi, S., Issah, M., Patience, A., & Antwi, S. (2020a). The
effect of macroeconomic variables on exchange rate:
Evidence from Ghana. Cogent Economics & Finance,
8(1), 1821483.
https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2020.1821483
Auger, I., & Lawrence, C. (1989). Algorithms for the
optimal identification of segment neighborhoods.
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 51(1), 39–54.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8240(89)80047-3
Biswas, S., Pawar, M., Badole, S., Galande, N., & Rathod,
S. (2021). Cryptocurrency Price Prediction Using
Neural Networks and Deep Learning. IEEE.
https://doi.org/10.1109/icaccs51430.2021.9441872
Fryzlewicz, P. (2014). Wild binary segmentation for
multiple change-point detection. The Annals of
Statistics, 42(6). https://doi.org/10.1214/14-aos1245
Hamayel, M. J., & Owda, A. Y. (2021). A novel
cryptocurrency price prediction model using GRU,
LSTM and bi-LSTM machine learning algorithms. AI,
2(4), 477–496. https://doi.org/10.3390/ai2040030
Investigating the Problem of Cryptocurrency Price
Prediction: A Deep Learning approach. (n.d.).
https://rdcu.be/dM1sA
Jang, H., & Lee, J. (2017). An empirical study on modeling
and prediction of Bitcoin prices with Bayesian neural
networks based on blockchain information. IEEE
Access, 6, 5427–5437.
https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2017.2779181
Jay, P., Kalariya, V., Parmar, P., Tanwar, S., Kumar, N., &
Alazab, M. (2020). Stochastic neural networks for
cryptocurrency price prediction. IEEE Access, 8,
82804–82818.
https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2990659
Khedr, A. M., Arif, I., P, P. R., V., El‐Bannany, M.,
Alhashmi, S. M., & Sreedharan, M. (2021).
Cryptocurrency price prediction using traditional
statistical and machine‐learning techniques: A survey.
Intelligent Systems in Accounting Finance &
Management, 28(1), 3–34.
https://doi.org/10.1002/isaf.1488
Lahmiri, S., & Bekiros, S. (2018). Cryptocurrency
forecasting with deep learning chaotic neural networks.
Chaos Solitons & Fractals, 118, 35–40.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2018.11.014
Liu, Y., & Sun, L. (2008). Analysis of Cointegration
between Macroeconomic Variables and Stock Index.
IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/icnc.2008.689
Moser, M., Bohme, R., & Breuker, D. (2013). An inquiry
into money laundering tools in the Bitcoin ecosystem.
IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ecrs.2013.6805780
INCOFT 2025 - International Conference on Futuristic Technology
180