Harnessing the Power of Ensembled Deep Learning and Graph Neural
Networks for Multidimensional Insights
Paramjot Kaur Sarao
1 a
, Manish Sharma
1 b
and Anupriya
2 c
1
Institute of Engineering, Chandigarh University, Mohali, Punjab, India
2
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Chandigarh University, Mohali, India
Keywords:
Ensemble Methods, Deep Learning, Graph Neural Networks, Link Prediction, Bagging, Stacking.
Abstract:
Ensemble methods have long been recognized for their ability to enhance the performance and robustness of
machine learning models. With the advent of deep learning and Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), the inte-
gration of ensemble techniques has opened new avenues for research and application. This paper explores
the synergistic potential of combining deep learning ensembles with graph neural networks (GNNs) to en-
hance performance on complex graph-structured data tasks. The paper first examines traditional ensembling
methods adapted for deep learning, including bagging, boosting, and stacking approaches tailored to neural
architectures. We then delve into novel ensemble techniques specifically designed for GNNs, addressing the
unique challenges posed by graph-structured data. This covers diverse applications, from computer vision and
natural language processing to recommendation systems and bio-informatics. It concludes by identifying open
challenges, promising research directions, and potential real-world impacts of ensembling deep learning and
GNN models, providing a roadmap for future work in this rapidly evolving field.
1 INTRODUCTION
In recent years, deep learning and graph neural net-
works (GNNs) have revolutionized the field of ar-
tificial intelligence, achieving unprecedented perfor-
mance across a wide range of tasks. Concurrently,
ensemble methods, which combine multiple mod-
els to improve overall predictive performance, have
proven to be powerful techniques in machine learn-
ing.Deep learning has demonstrated remarkable suc-
cess in areas such as computer vision, natural lan-
guage processing, and speech recognition. However,
challenges persist in terms of model uncertainty, over-
fitting, and the need for large amounts of labeled
data. Graph Neural Networks, on the other hand,
have emerged as a promising approach for learning on
graph-structured data, with applications ranging from
social network analysis to molecular property predic-
tion. Despite their success, GNNs face unique chal-
lenges related to scalability, heterogeneity, and the dy-
namic nature of real-world graphs.
Ensemble methods(Dietterich, 2000) offer a potential
a
https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4219-7362
b
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0129-400X
c
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2245-4092
solution to many of these challenges by leveraging
the power of multiple diverse models. By combining
predictions from different models, ensembles can re-
duce overfitting, improve generalization, and provide
more robust predictions. In the context of deep learn-
ing and GNNs, ensemble techniques can be adapted
and extended to address domain-specific issues and
exploit the unique structures of neural networks and
graph data.This paper aims to provide a comprehen-
sive overview of the current state of research in en-
sembling deep learning models and GNNs. We will
explore various ensemble strategies, including bag-
ging, boosting, and stacking, as well as more recent
innovations tailored to neural architectures and graph-
structured data. The paper will cover theoretical foun-
dations, practical implementations, and empirical re-
sults across different application domains. Further-
more, we will discuss the challenges and open ques-
tions in this field, such as balancing model diver-
sity and computational efficiency, adapting ensemble
methods to dynamic and heterogeneous graphs, and
developing interpretable ensemble models. By syn-
thesizing recent advancements and identifying future
research directions, this paper aims to serve as a valu-
able resource for researchers and practitioners work-
ing at the intersection of ensemble learning, deep neu-
Sarao, P. K., Sharma, M. and Anupriya,
Harnessing the Power of Ensembled Deep Learning and Graph Neural Networks for Multidimensional Insights.
DOI: 10.5220/0013589400004664
Paper published under CC license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Futuristic Technology (INCOFT 2025) - Volume 2, pages 203-211
ISBN: 978-989-758-763-4
Proceedings Copyright © 2025 by SCITEPRESS – Science and Technology Publications, Lda.
203

ral networks, and graph-based machine learning.
2 BACKGROUND
2.1 Deep Learning
Solely working on the concept or architecture of Ar-
tificial Neural Networks(Wilamowski, 2009), deep
learning is a specialized form of machine learning.
It employs multi-layered neural networks to progres-
sively learn and represent data at increasing levels
of abstraction. This approach allows the model to
grasp intricate patterns by building upon simpler con-
cepts learned in earlier layers.The architecture of deep
learning models consists of numerous computational
layers between the input and output, each performing
various linear and non-linear transformations. These
layers work in a hierarchical, sequential, or recurrent
manner to extract features from raw data at multi-
ple levels of complexity. In essence, a deep learning
model can be viewed as a series of inter-connected,
continuous transformations that map input data to out-
put predictions. This mapping is achieved by learn-
ing from a comprehensive set of input-output pairs,
known as training data. The learning process involves
iteratively adjusting the parameters of each transfor-
mation in the network using optimization algorithms,
which fine-tune the model based on its performance.
This layered approach enables deep learning models
to automatically discover and engineer relevant fea-
tures from raw data, eliminating the need for man-
ual feature extraction. As a result, deep learning
has demonstrated remarkable capabilities in handling
complex, high-dimensional data across various do-
mains, including computer vision, natural language
processing, and speech recognition.
2.1.1 Key Architectures Include
Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs: Convolu-
tional Neural Networks (CNNs) are specialized deep
learning architectures designed primarily for pro-
cessing grid-like data, especially images (Li et al.,
2021).They consist of convolutional layers that ap-
ply filters to detect features, pooling layers that re-
duce spatial dimensions, and fully connected layers
for final output as shown in figure 1. CNNs lever-
age local connectivity, parameter sharing, and transla-
tion invariance to efficiently extract hierarchical fea-
tures from input data. This architecture significantly
reduces the number of parameters compared to fully
connected networks, making them highly effective for
tasks like image classification, object detection, and
facial recognition. CNNs have revolutionized com-
puter vision and have also been adapted for other do-
mains, including natural language processing and sig-
nal analysis.
Figure 1: Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) Architec-
ture (Phung and Rhee, 2019).
Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs: Recurrent
Neural Networks (RNNs) are a class of deep learning
models designed to process sequential data as shown
in figure 2. They feature loops that allow information
to persist, enabling them to maintain a ”memory” of
previous inputs. This architecture makes RNNs par-
ticularly suited for tasks involving time series, natu-
ral language, or any data with temporal dependencies.
Key features include a hidden state that updates with
each input, the Ability to handle variable-length se-
quences and shared parameters across time steps.
However, basic RNNs struggle with long-term depen-
dencies due to vanishing/exploding gradients. This
led to the development of more advanced variants
like LSTM (Long Short-Term Memory) (Scher and
Messori, 2021) and GRU (Gated Recurrent Unit) net-
works (Salem and Salem, 2022), which better capture
long-range dependencies in sequences.
Figure 2: Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) Architecture
(Ma et al., 2019).
Transformers: Transformers are a powerful
deep learning architecture designed for sequence-to-
sequence tasks, particularly in natural language pro-
cessing. Key features include: Self-attention mech-
anism: Allows the model to weigh the importance
of different parts of the input. Positional encoding:
Maintains sequence order information. Multi-head
attention: Enables learning from multiple represen-
tation subspaces. Feed-forward networks: Process
the attention output. Layer normalization and resid-
ual connections: Improve training stability. Trans-
INCOFT 2025 - International Conference on Futuristic Technology
204

formers excel in tasks like machine translation, text
summarization, and question-answering. They’ve led
to breakthrough models like BERT and GPT. Unlike
recurrent neural networks, Transformers process en-
tire sequences in parallel, allowing for more efficient
training on large datasets.
2.2 Graph Neural Networks (GNNs)
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) (Wu et al., 2020)
are a class of neural networks designed to operate on
graph-structured data. Unlike traditional neural net-
works, which typically handle data in grid formats
such as images or sequences, GNNs are tailored to
manage data where entities (nodes) and their relation-
ships (edges) form a graph. The key features of GNN
includes-Node and Edge Features which represent en-
tities relationships between entities in the graph re-
spectively.Both nodes and edges can have associated
features that provide additional context or informa-
tion.Message Passing Mechanism-GNNs update node
representations by aggregating information from their
neighbors. This process involves two main steps:
message passing (or aggregation) and node update.
Message Passing means nodes receive messages from
their neighbors, which are functions of the neighbors’
features while node update means updating the fea-
tures by nodes based on the aggregated messages.
2.2.1 Basic GNN Layer
A typical GNN layer can be described by the follow-
ing operations: Message Function: Computes mes-
sages between nodes based on their features and the
features of the connecting edge.
m
vu
= Message(h
v
, h
u
, e
vu
) (1)
where m
vu
is the message from node u to node v,
h
v
, h
u
are the feature vectors of the respective nodes
e
vu
is the feature edge between these nodes.
Aggregation Function: Aggregates messages from all
neighboring nodes.
m
v
= Aggregate(m
vu
: u ∈ N(v)) (2)
where N(v) denotes the set of neighbors of node v.
Update Function: Updates the node’s feature vector
based on the aggregated message.
h
′
v
= U pdate(h
v
, m
v
) (3)
where h
′
v
is the updated feature vector of node v.
There are many architectures that work on the con-
cept of GNNs namely Graph Convolutional Networks
(GCN), Graph Attention Networks (GAT), Graph Iso-
morphism Networks (GIN), Spatial-Temporal Graph
Figure 3: General Design of GNN model(Zhou et al., 2020).
Neural Networks (ST-GNN), Message Passing Neu-
ral Networks (MPNN), Graph Recurrent Neural Net-
works (GraphRNN), Graph Autoencoders (GAE),
Relational Graph Convolutional Networks (R-GCN),
GraphSAGE, ChebNet (Spectral-Based GNN), Dy-
namic Graph Neural Networks (DGNN), Hypergraph
Neural Networks (HGNN), Graph Transformers, Dif-
fusion Convolutional Neural Networks (DCNN) and
Topology-Based GNNs.But,
2.2.2 Key Architectures Include
Graph Convolutional Networks (GCNs) Graph Con-
volutional Networks are a type of neural network
specifically designed to operate on graph-structured
data (Jin et al., 2021). They generalize the convolu-
tion operation commonly used in Convolutional Neu-
ral Networks (CNNs) to graphs, allowing for effective
feature learning and representation in non-Euclidean
domains such as social networks, molecular struc-
tures, and knowledge graphs. Basic Architecture: A
typical GCN consists of multiple layers, each per-
forming the graph convolution operation. The archi-
tecture includes:
Input Layer: Initial node features H(0) , which could
be raw features or embeddings.
Hidden Layers: Multiple GCN layers that iteratively
update the node features based on their neighbors.
Output Layer: Produces the final node representations
used for downstream tasks like node classification,
link prediction, or graph classification.
GCNs generalize the convolution operation to graphs.
They aggregate information from a node’s neighbors
to update its representation. The basic layer of a GCN
can be defined as:
h
k+1
v
= σ (4)
Graph Attention Networks (GATs) Graph Attention
Networks are a type of Graph Neural Network (GNN)
that leverages attention mechanisms to address the
limitations of traditional GNNs like Graph Convolu-
tional Networks (GCNs) (Vrahatis et al., 2024).Tra-
ditional GNNs, such as GCNs, use fixed or pre-
defined weights for aggregating information from
neighbors.GAT addresses these issues by introduc-
ing an attention mechanism to dynamically assign
importance (weights) to each neighbor, allowing the
Harnessing the Power of Ensembled Deep Learning and Graph Neural Networks for Multidimensional Insights
205

model to learn which neighbors are most relevant
for the task.Key Concepts of GAT Node-Level Atten-
tion: GAT computes attention scores between a node
and each of its neighbors to decide how much infor-
mation to aggregate from each neighbor. Attention
scores are learnable and depend on the node’s and
neighbor’s features. Learnable Weights: The atten-
tion mechanism introduces trainable parameters that
adaptively learn the importance of neighbors during
training. Self-Attention Mechanism: Inspired by the
success of attention mechanisms in sequence models
(e.g., Transformers), GAT employs a similar idea tai-
lored for graphs. Parallel Multi-Head Attention: GAT
often uses multi-head attention to stabilize learning
and capture diverse patterns by attending to multiple
aspects of the data.
Architecture of GAT: 1.Input: Graph with nodes V,
edges E, and node features X ∈ R
N∗F
,where N is the
number of nodes, and F is the feature dimension.
2. Attention Mechanism: For a node i and its neigh-
bor j, the attention score ∝
i j
is computed as:
∝
i j
= so f tmax
j
(LeakyReLU(
−→
a [W h
i
∥ W h
j
])) (5)
,where h
i
, h
j
: Feature vectors of nodes i and j,
W: Weight matrix to transform features,
−→
a : Learnable attention vector,
[· ∥ ·]:Concatenation of feature vectors,
so f tmax
j
:Normalization to ensure attention scores
across neighbors sum to 1.
3. Feature Aggregation: The updated feature for node
i is computed as:
h
i
′
= σ(Σ
j∈N(i)
∝
i j
W h
j
) (6)
, where σ : Nonlinear activation function (e.g., ReLU,
ELU).
4.Multi-Head Attention: Multiple attention mecha-
nisms are applied in parallel, and the outputs are ei-
ther concatenated or averaged:
h
i
′
=∥
K
k=1
σ(Σ
j∈N(i)
∝
k
i j
W
k
h
j
) (7)
, where K: Number of attention heads.
3 ENSEMBLING TECHNIQUES
Ensembling techniques are a set of methods in ma-
chine learning that combine the predictions of multi-
ple models to produce a more robust, accurate, and
generalizable final prediction. The core idea is that
aggregating the strengths of diverse models can mit-
igate individual weaknesses, reduce overfitting, and
improve predictive performance. These techniques
are widely used in both classification and regression
tasks, as well as in specialized domains like deep
learning and graph-based learning.
3.1 Key Ensembling Techniques
The folloing are the key ensembling techniques
(Ganaie et al., 2022).
1. Bagging (Bootstrap Aggregating): Bootstrap
aggregating, also known as bagging, is a machine
learning technique as shown in figure 4 that improves
the accuracy and stability of classification and regres-
sion algorithms. It’s an ensemble learning method
that uses a group of models to work together to pro-
duce a better final prediction. The goal is to reduce
variance and prevent overfitting.
Figure 4: Bagging (Bootstrap Aggregating.)
2. Boosting: The technique involves training the
weak learners sequentially, with each predictor trying
to correct the errors of the previous one, with greater
emphasis on difficult-to-learn examples as shown in
figure 5. Boosting techniques help avoid underfitting
of the model. Some examples include: AdaBoost,
Gradient boosting, LightGBM and CatBoost.
Figure 5: Boosting.
3. Stacking: Stacking, or stacked generalization,
is an advanced ensembling technique that combines
the predictions of multiple base models (or learners)
using a meta-model (or meta-learner). The figure 6
shows that the meta-model learns how to best inte-
grate the predictions of the base models to produce a
more accurate final prediction.
Figure 6: Stacking.
INCOFT 2025 - International Conference on Futuristic Technology
206

4 LITERATURE REVIEW
For some disease categorisation problems, quantum
computing offers a more effective model than tradi-
tional machine learning techniques. Alzheimer’s dis-
ease categorisation problems do not fully utilise the
capabilities of quantum computing. To categorise
Alzheimer’s illness, we presented an ensemble deep
learning model in this paper that is built on quantum
machine learning classifiers. For the classification of
AD disease, the datasets from the Alzheimer’s Dis-
ease Neuro-imaging Initiative I and II are combined.
To classify them as non-demented, mildly demented,
moderately demented, and very mildly demented, au-
thors integrated significant features that were derived
from the merged images using the modified versions
of the VGG-16 and ResNet50 models. Then,the au-
thors fed these features into the Quantum Machine
Learning classifier and evaluated the performance by
using six metrics; accuracy, the area under the curve,
F1-score,precision, and recall(Jenber Belay et al.,
2024). The authors explored the various types of skin
cancer, including squamous cell carcinoma (SCC),
basal cell carcinoma (BCC), and melanoma. It has
also provided a system for skin cancer detection us-
ing convolutional neural network (CNN) techniques,
specifically the multi-model ResNet (M-ResNet) ar-
chitecture. Researchers have provided a ResNet ar-
chitecture with improved skin cancer detection per-
formance that can handle deep networks. To detect
skin cancer, the suggested method employs a com-
prehensive pipeline. To increase the model’s ability to
generalise, the dataset first undergoes pre-processing
(PP) techniques such image resizing, normalisation,
and augmentation methods. Improved accuracy, sen-
sitivity, and specificity are achieved in skin cancer
LEARNING Classification SYSTEM (SC-LCS) jobs
as a result of the multi-model assembly(Sardar et al.,
2024).
In order to better categorise malware variants into
their respective families and increase classification
accuracy, this study (Adamu et al., 2024) suggests a
novel malware ensemble architecture that integrates
deep learning methods with a variety of malware fea-
tures. It increases its sensitivity to related malware
families and improves its classification accuracy by
extracting visual features from raw bytes (data) and
malware’s opcode frequency. The Microsoft Malware
Classification Challenge benchmark dataset is used to
validate the suggested strategy, and its effectiveness in
contrast with that of other approaches. The findings
demonstrate that the suggested method performs bet-
ter than current techniques and detects disguised mal-
ware with a higher accuracy rate (99.3 perecnt). Ad-
ditionally, experimental results demonstrate that the
suggested method is more accurate in categorising
malware variants and more sensitive to comparable
malware families.
In cybersecurity, malware data classification is essen-
tial for identifying and removing harmful software
from computer systems. Because deep learning tech-
niques can automatically learn characteristics from
raw data, they have been used to improve data cate-
gorisation performance. These methods are prone to
overfitting, though, which may reduce their general-
isability.
The table 1 describe the literature survey on ensem-
bles in deep learning and graph neural networks, in-
cluding insights, results, limitations and challenges.
This research addresses the problem by present-
ing a novel malware ensemble framework that im-
proves the classification accuracy of malware variants
by classifying them into their respective families us-
ing deep learning methods and different malware at-
tributes. It increases its sensitivity to related malware
families and improves its classification accuracy by
extracting visual features from raw bytes (data) and
malware’s opcode frequency. (Adamu et al., 2024).
In graph-structured data, graph neural networks, or
GNNs, (Wei et al., 2023) have found widespread use.
However, annotated data is frequently absent from
current graph-based systems. To make inferences on
a large amount of test data, GNNs must learn latent
patterns from a small amount of training data. Over-
fitting and suboptimal performance are typically the
results of GNNs’ greater complexity and single point
of model parameter initialisation. Furthermore, it is
well known that adversarial attacks can target GNNs.
With enhanced accuracy, generalisation, and adver-
sarial robustness, we advance the ensemble learning
of GNNs in this study. We present a novel technique,
GNN-Ensemble, for building an ensemble of random
decision graph neural networks based on the ideas of
stochastic modelling.
5 PROPOSED SYSTEM
ARCHITECTURE
The proposed system integrates deep learning (DL)
models with Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) to
leverage both the feature extraction and relational
learning. The architecture is designed to ensemble
predictions from both approaches, ensuring comple-
mentary strengths are utilized.
Input Data Module-the topmost layer in the dia-
gram represents the system’s entry point for data. It
accepts multiple types of data (structured, unstruc-
Harnessing the Power of Ensembled Deep Learning and Graph Neural Networks for Multidimensional Insights
207

Table 1: Summary of Existing work.
Title Insights Results Limitations Challenges
Deep Ensemble learning
and quantum machine
learning approach for
Alzheimer’s disease detection (Jenber Belay et al., 2024)
Ensemble deep learning
combines multiple models
to enhance performance.
In the study, a quantum
machine learning-based
ensemble model achieved
high accuracy in
Alzheimer’s disease
classification.
Accuracy of 99.89,
F1-score of 98.37
achieved. Outperformed
state-of-the-art
methods in Alzheimer’s
disease detection.
Full potential of
quantum computing
not fully utilized.
Disparities in
data observed
after training for
10 epochs
Full potential of quantum
computing not utilized
for AD classification.
Boosting performance
of deep learning
models through
training epochs.
Ensemble Deep Learning
Methods for Detecting
Skin Cancer (Sardar et al., 2024)
The paper explores ensemble
deep learning methods,
particularly the multi-model ResNet
architecture, for detecting
various types of skin cancer,
enhancing accuracy,
sensitivity, and specificity
in classification tasks.
Improved skin cancer
detection using
multi-model
ResNet architecture.
Promising results
in accurately identifying
different types
of skin cancer.
——-
Early identification
crucial for effective
treatment outcomes.
Deep learning algorithms
show promising
results in skin cancer
detection
Malware Classification
Using Deep Learning
and Ensemble Framework (Adamu et al., 2024)
The paper proposes an
ensemble framework combining
deep learning and multiple
malware features to
classify malware
variants accurately, achieving
a high detection rate of
99.3 percent for obfuscated
malware.
Achieved 99.3 percent
accuracy in detecting
obfuscated malware
. Outperformed existing
methods in
malware classification
accuracy.
Susceptibility to overfitting
Generalisability decrease
due to deep
learning techniques.
Overfitting in
deep learning techniques
affecting generalisability.
Need for improved
accuracy in classifying
malware variants.
Super Deep Learning
Ensemble Model
for Sentiment Analysis (Garg and Subrahmanyam, 2023)
The paper introduces a
Super Deep Learning
Ensemble Model (SDL-EM)
for sentiment analysis,
combining various
deep learning architectures
to enhance accuracy and
performance through
ensemble learning techniques.
Superiority over
state-of-the-art
models in accuracy
and metrics.
Elevated performance
and generalization
capabilities demonstrated
in experiments.
Conventional deep learning
models struggle with accuracy
and resilience. Inherent
deficiencies and
biases affect conventional
deep learning models.
Conventional deep learning
models face accuracy
and resilience limitations.
Inherent deficiencies and
biases hinder conventional
deep learning models.
Deep Learning Ensemble
Method for Plant
Disease Classification (Jain et al., 2023)
The paper introduces a
Deep Learning Ensemble
Method (NLRSGD-Ensemble)
combining CNN,
logistic regression,
and stochastic gradient
descent for accurate plant
disease classification,
achieving 97.7
percent accuracy.
Achieved 97.7 percent
accuracy in plant disease
classification experiments.
Used CNN (NLRSGD-Ensemble)
method for deep
image attribute
extraction.
——–
Crop-borne illnesses
impact net productivity.
Early detection and
warning to farmers
can solve the problem.
GNN-Ensemble:
Towards Random Decision
Graph Neural Networks (Wei et al., 2023)
GNN-Ensemble
constructs random decision
Graph Neural Networks to
improve accuracy,
generalization, and
adversarial robustness
by combining multiple
GNNs
trained on different
substructures and
sub-features.
Improved accuracy,
generalization, and
adversarial robustness
in GNNs. GNN-Ensemble
reduces overfitting
and enhances
classification performance.
Overfitting and sub-optimal
performance due to model
complexity. Vulnerability
to adversarial attacks.
Overfitting and sub-optimal
performance due to model
complexity. Vulnerability
to adversarial attacks
on GNNs.
Ensemble Learning
for Graph
Neural Networks (Wong et al., 2023)
Ensemble Learning for
Graph Neural Networks
(ELGNN) combines multiple
GNN models to enhance
accuracy, reduce bias
and variance, and
improve robustness
in analyzing
graph-structured data.
Ensemble learning improves
GNN performance,
robustness, accuracy,
and reduces bias.
ELGNN model combines
diverse GNNs to
mitigate noisy data impact.
Ensemble learning mitigates
impact of noisy data.
ELGNN enhances
accuracy and reduces
bias and variance.
Improve performance and
robustness of
Graph Neural Networks
(GNNs) Mitigate impact
of noisy data
on GNN capabilities.
Ensemble Methods for
Neural Network-Based
Weather Forecasts (Scher and Messori, 2021)
The paper discusses
ensemble methods for neural
network-based
weather forecasts,
exploring perturbation
techniques like random
initial perturbations,
retraining, random dropout,
and singular vector
decomposition to improve
forecast accuracy.
Ensemble methods
improve neural network
weather forecasts.
Retraining method shows
highest improvement
in ensemble mean
forecasts.
Neural network forecasts
have lower skill
compared to numerical
models. Generating
ensemble with good
spread-error relationship
is challenging.
Generating ensemble
with good spread-error
relationship. Neural network
forecasts skill lower than
numerical weather
prediction models
tured, and graph-structured). Deep Learning Models
- this branch extracts meaningful features from data
such as images, text, or tabular formats.Graph Neu-
ral Networks- this branch processes graph-structured
data, capturing relationships between entities (nodes)
and interactions (edges).Intermediate Fusion Layer- it
combines feature representations from both the deep
learning and GNN branches into a single, unified rep-
resentation.The diagram shows the convergence of
data paths from the DL and GNN blocks:
INCOFT 2025 - International Conference on Futuristic Technology
208

Figure 7: Proposed Architecture.
Concatenation: Directly stack features from both
models.
Cross-Attention: Facilitate interactions between
DL and GNN features for enhanced contextual un-
derstanding.And produces a combined feature vec-
tor, ready for prediction or ensembling. Ensem-
bling Layer- it aggregates predictions from the
DL and GNN pipelines, improving accuracy and
robustness.Output- Final predictions enriched by the
combined strengths of DL and GNN.
6 CHALLENGES
Despite their potential, combining ensembled deep
learning and Graph Neural Networks (GNNs)
presents notable challenges. Future directions should
focus on developing lightweight, scalable ensemble
frameworks that integrate GNNs and deep learning
seamlessly, leveraging techniques like model distil-
lation and federated learning. Advancements in dy-
namic graph modeling, automated hyperparameter
tuning, and transfer learning for cross-domain gen-
eralization will further expand applicability. Stan-
dardized tools and libraries are also needed to sim-
plify implementation and comparisonas shown in ta-
ble 2. By addressing these challenges, ensembled
approaches can unlock unprecedented capabilities in
Table 2: Challenges and Solutions.
Sno Challenges
Faced
Solution Via ensem-
bling
1 Overfitting
Ensembling multiple
models reduces
overfitting by
averaging out
model-specific biases
and errors.
2
Scalability
to Large
Datasets
Ensembles can
distribute the
computational load
by training smaller,
specialized models
on subsets
of the data.
3
Sensitivity
to Noisy
Data
Ensembles can
mitigate noise
sensitivity by
incorporating
diversity in the
models.
4
Interpretability
Ensembles provide
an opportunity to
combine interpretable
models (e.g.,
shallow GNNs or
feature-based
decision trees)
with high-performing
5
Transferability
Across
Domains
Ensembles can
leverage transfer
learning techniques
by combining
models trained on
different domains.
6
Lack of
Standardized
Frameworks
The development
of hybrid
frameworks that
integrate
deep learning
(e.g., PyTorch,
TensorFlow) with
GNN-specific libraries
(e.g., DGL,
PyTorch Geometric)
allows seamless
combination
and experimentation.
solving complex relational problems across diverse
domains.
Harnessing the Power of Ensembled Deep Learning and Graph Neural Networks for Multidimensional Insights
209

7 CONCLUSION
Ensemble methods in deep learning and GNNs of-
fer significant improvements in accuracy, robustness,
and generalization. Despite challenges in computa-
tional complexity, interpretability, and scalability, the
combination of these techniques holds great promise
for advancing AI applications across various domains.
In drug discovery, they can predict molecular proper-
ties by integrating feature-based learning from deep
models with relational insights from GNNs. Social
network analysis benefits from this combination for
tasks like community detection and influence maxi-
mization. In fraud detection, financial networks mod-
eled as graphs allow ensembles to identify anoma-
lies by combining structural patterns with feature-
based predictions. Recommender systems can im-
prove accuracy by combining user-item interaction
graphs processed by GNNs with user feature em-
beddings learned by deep networks. For cybersecu-
rity, ensembles can enhance intrusion detection by in-
tegrating communication patterns from GNNs with
temporal trends captured by recurrent deep models.
In traffic management, urban graphs with intersec-
tions and roads can be analyzed to optimize routes and
predict congestion. Supply chain optimization uses
ensembles to model complex logistics networks, im-
proving demand forecasting and route planning. In
biological research, protein interaction networks can
be studied for structure and function prediction, com-
bining GNNs for spatial dependencies and deep mod-
els for sequence patterns. Stock market prediction
can integrate company relationship graphs with finan-
cial trend data for enhanced market movement predic-
tions. Lastly, smart city planning utilizes ensembled
methods to optimize urban infrastructure by combin-
ing graph-based spatial analysis with deep learning
models for sensor data. Together, these approaches
create robust and scalable solutions for tackling com-
plex, real-world problems.
8 FUTURE SCOPE
Future research should focus on developing efficient,
interpretable, and scalable ensemble techniques to
fully realize their potential. Innovations in dynamic
graph modeling will allow these methods to adapt
to real-time changes in data, enabling applications in
dynamic social networks, evolving financial systems,
and real-time traffic management. Advancements in
transfer learning and domain adaptation will make
these ensembles applicable across diverse fields, en-
abling cross-domain insights and improving perfor-
mance on sparse datasets.With the rise of edge com-
puting and IoT, deploying lightweight, distributed en-
sembles capable of operating on large-scale, decen-
tralized graph data will become crucial for applica-
tions in smart cities, personalized healthcare, and cy-
bersecurity. Techniques such as automated model
selection, hyperparameter optimization, and explain-
ability will make ensembled approaches more acces-
sible and interpretable, fostering their adoption in
high-stakes domains like medicine and law. Further-
more, leveraging quantum computing for ensemble-
based GNNs and deep learning could redefine their
computational limits, enabling breakthroughs in areas
like quantum chemistry and cryptography.
REFERENCES
Adamu, U., Awan, P. I., and Younas, M. (2024). Mal-
ware classification using deep learning and ensemble
framework. Available at SSRN 4705897.
Dietterich, T. (2000). Ensemble methods in machine learn-
ing. International workshop on multiple classifier sys-
tems.
Ganaie, M. A., Hu, M., Malik, A. K., Tanveer, M., and Sug-
anthan, P. N. (2022). Ensemble deep learning: A re-
view. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelli-
gence, 115:105151.
Garg, S. B. and Subrahmanyam, V. (2023). Super deep
learning ensemble model for sentiment analysis. In
2023 International Conference on Computing, Com-
munication, and Intelligent Systems (ICCCIS), pages
341–346. IEEE.
Jain, S., Jaidka, P., and Jain, V. (2023). Deep learning
ensemble method for plant disease classification. In
2023 International Conference on Communication,
Security and Artificial Intelligence (ICCSAI), pages
383–387. IEEE.
Jenber Belay, A., Walle, Y. M., and Haile, M. B. (2024).
Deep ensemble learning and quantum machine learn-
ing approach for alzheimer’s disease detection. Scien-
tific Reports, 14(1):14196.
Jin, D., Yu, Z., Huo, C., Wang, R., Wang, X., He, D., and
Han, J. (2021). Universal graph convolutional net-
works. Advances in Neural Information Processing
Systems, 34:10654–10664.
Li, Z., Liu, F., Yang, W., Peng, S., and Zhou, J. (2021).
A survey of convolutional neural networks: analy-
sis, applications, and prospects. IEEE transactions on
neural networks and learning systems, 33(12):6999–
7019.
Ma, S., Xiao, B., Hong, R., Addissie, B., Drikas, Z., An-
tonsen, T., Ott, E., and Anlage, S. (2019). Clas-
sification and prediction of wave chaotic systems
with machine learning techniques. arXiv preprint
arXiv:1908.04716.
Phung, V. H. and Rhee, E. J. (2019). A high-accuracy
model average ensemble of convolutional neural net-
INCOFT 2025 - International Conference on Futuristic Technology
210

works for classification of cloud image patches on
small datasets. Applied Sciences, 9(21):4500.
Salem, F. M. and Salem, F. M. (2022). Gated rnn: The gated
recurrent unit (gru) rnn. Recurrent Neural Networks:
From Simple to Gated Architectures, pages 85–100.
Sardar, M., Niazi, M. M., Nasim, F., et al. (2024). Ensem-
ble deep learning methods for detecting skin cancer.
Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), 13(1).
Scher, S. and Messori, G. (2021). Ensemble methods for
neural network-based weather forecasts. Journal of
Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 13(2).
Vrahatis, A. G., Lazaros, K., and Kotsiantis, S. (2024).
Graph attention networks: a comprehensive review of
methods and applications. Future Internet, 16(9):318.
Wei, W., Qiao, M., and Jadav, D. (2023). Gnn-ensemble:
Towards random decision graph neural networks. In
2023 IEEE International Conference on Big Data
(BigData), pages 956–965. IEEE.
Wilamowski, B. M. (2009). Neural network architectures
and learning algorithms. IEEE Industrial Electronics
Magazine, 3(4):56–63.
Wong, Z. H., Yue, L., and Yao, Q. (2023). Ensemble
learning for graph neural networks. arXiv preprint
arXiv:2310.14166.
Wu, Z., Pan, S., Chen, F., Long, G., Zhang, C., and Philip,
S. Y. (2020). A comprehensive survey on graph neural
networks. IEEE transactions on neural networks and
learning systems, 32(1):4–24.
Zhou, J., Cui, G., Hu, S., Zhang, Z., Yang, C., Liu, Z.,
Wang, L., Li, C., and Sun, M. (2020). Graph neu-
ral networks: A review of methods and applications.
AI open, 1:57–81.
Harnessing the Power of Ensembled Deep Learning and Graph Neural Networks for Multidimensional Insights
211