Analysing ML, DL Approaches for Real-Time Maintenance
Forecasting in Industrial Scenarios
Pranita Bhosale
1,2 a
and Sangeeta Jadhav
3a
1
D. Y. Patil Institute of Technology, Pimpri-Chinchwad, Pune, India
2
E&TC Department, Army Institute of Technology Dighi Hills, Pune, India
3
Department of IT Engineering, Army Institute of Technology, Dighi Hills Pune, India
Keywords: Predictive Maintenance, Plastic Extruder Machines, Temperature Sensors, Machine Learning (ML),
Probabilistic Neural Network (PNN), Real-Time Data.
Abstract: Predictive maintenance became increasingly crucial in large machines like extruder machines to ensure
optimal performance & prevent costly downtimes. Monitoring temperature is particularly critical in extruder
machines as it directly impacts product quality. To address this, real-time data from a plastic extruder machine
equipped with four temperature sensors taken into account to ensure precise temperature control for high-
quality output. The study analysed a dataset comprising 19679 rows of data, stored in an Excel sheet, using a
range of ML and DL algorithms. Primary focus was evaluating performance of these algorithms in predictive
maintenance tasks. Among the algorithms tested, the Probabilistic Neural Network, a type of ML algorithm,
demonstrated promising results. PNN achieved accuracy of 99.70%. PNN showed several advantages when
compared to other popular algorithms such as Backpropagation Neural Network, Convolutional Neural
Network, Support Vector Machine, Long Short Term Memory, and Bidirectional LSTM. PNN requires
minimal parameter tuning compared to complex algorithms like LSTM & Bi-LSTM, simplifying
implementation process. In conclusion, the research highlights the effectiveness of the PNN algorithm in
predictive maintenance tasks for extruder machines based on temperature sensor data. Its performance and
simplicity makes it a promising choice for real-time maintenance prediction, offering potential cost savings
and operational efficiency improvements in industrial settings.
1 INTRODUCTION
Maintenance management is one of the pivotal
operations in each industry since it enables better
performance and flexibility of equipment.
Operational Maintenance (OM) practices that follow
quick and inexpensive predetermined approaches to
problems based on analysis done over time often fails
to capture the situations that occur at the time leading
to un- scheduled downtimes and increased costs.
Also, the real time needs maintenance primarily
emphasized in periods where breakdowns in
equipment would cost delays in production or great
losses.
In contrast with others, through supporting day-
to-day operation this also focuses ensuring that all
existing issues related to equipment are repaired
1a
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6796-0872
2a
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0610-0374
before they worsen as in most situations where there
is a breakdown. Maintenance, be it corrective,
preventive or real-time involves the identification of
the presence of a defect followed by the necessary
repair actions. Real-time maintenance management
consists of data analysing, equipment monitoring, and
fast responding to all performance-related issues
emerging during the process.
Such alterations, however, cannot be made if only
periodic maintenance management systems are
utilized whereby a palate of issues is waited for until
they arise then rectified. But true to its name ‘real’
implies that effects of cutting back on resources at the
expense of safety of a facility or assets is minimized
through active restraint on damage potentially caused
by the cutting back. A strong predictive maintenance
764
Bhosale, P. and Jadhav, S.
Analysing ML, DL Approaches for Real-Time Maintenance Forecasting in Industrial Scenarios.
DOI: 10.5220/0013585300004664
Paper published under CC license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Futuristic Technology (INCOFT 2025) - Volume 1, pages 764-770
ISBN: 978-989-758-763-4
Proceedings Copyright © 2025 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda.
mechanism that cans add-on temperature trends,
diagnosis maintenance needs is the way to go.
The Probabilistic Neural Network (PNN) is a type
of machine learning algorithm known for its
effectiveness in handling noisy data and robustness
against outliers. Its architecture allows for efficient
processing of large datasets, making it suitable for
real-time maintenance predictions. PNN requires
minimal parameter tuning compared to more complex
algorithms, simplifying the implementation process.
This makes PNN an attractive option for industries
seeking to enhance their maintenance strategies
without incurring significant complexity. In this
paper, we explore the use of PNN for predictive
maintenance by analysing a dataset of temperature
readings from a plastic extruder machine. By
comparing PNN’s performance with other popular
algorithms such as Backpropagation Neural Network
(BPNN), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN),
Support Vector Machine (SVM), Long Short Term
Memory (LSTM), and Bidirectional LSTM (Bi-
LSTM), we demonstrate the advantages of using
PNN in this specific application. Our findings
highlight PNN’s potential to improve maintenance
prediction accuracy, ultimately contributing to cost
savings and operational efficiency in industrial
settings.
2 LITERATURE SURVEY
Predictive Maintenance (PdM) plays an important
role in the digital era of Industry 4.0. Researchers has
performed an extensive research devoted to PdM.
Research highlighted its potential benefits and
effective implementation strategies.
The study enhanced power transformer fault
diagnosis using an improved Probabilistic Neural
Network (PNN) model optimized with an enhanced
Gravitational Search Algorithm (GSA) featuring
chaos sequences (Wang, 2024). The study introduced
a parallel neural network (PNN) architecture for
accurate remaining useful life (RUL) estimation of
bearings, integrating 1D time series and 2D image-
based features for enhanced prediction efficiency
(Niazi, 2023). This study explored predictive
maintenance for lead-acid batteries in heavy vehicles
using LSTM neural networks and RSF models with
sparse, irregular operational data (Sergii, 2023). This
study integrated AI- driven monitoring algorithm
achieved high accuracy (0.97 with XG-Boost),
enhancing equipment reliability, reducing downtime,
and improving operational efficiency (Chen, 2023).
This study enhanced predictive maintenance in
Industry 4.0 by integrating machine workload data
into a Prognostics and Health Management (PHM)
algorithm (Converso, 2023). This systematic
literature review examined predictive maintenance
(PdM) in military contexts, highlighting challenges,
principles, application scenarios, and technical
methodologies (Jovani, 2023). This paper introduced
the adaptive Gaussian mixture scheme refined
probability distributions (Zhang, 2022), achieving
Quantitative and qualitative analyses highlighted the
potential and challenges, advocating for improved
data schemas and interoperability to advance PdM in
infrastructure facilities effectively (Seyed, 2022).
This study investigated the use of probabilistic neural
networks (PNNs) (Nashed, 2022). Results from case
studies on cover-plated beams and process pipework
demonstrated that these models effectively captured
variability in data distribution parameters, offering
more accurate fatigue predictions compared to
deterministic approaches. This paper surveyed ML
and DL methods for fault detection and diagnosis
(FD/D) in induction motors (IMs) within Industry 4.0,
highlighting DL’s dominance since 2015 (Drakaki,
2022). This study developed a predictive
maintenance system for the manufacturing industry,
utilizing historical sensor data to forecast equipment
failures and optimize maintenance schedules (Kane,
2022). The study proposed a high-level architecture
for AI-enabled EIS, highlighting challenges like cost
optimization and data interoperability, while
underscoring AI’s potential to enhance system
efficiency and innovation (Zdravkovic, 2021).
This paper proposed an efficient fault detection
and diagnosis model for PV systems, achieving
98.5% accuracy using three sequential PNN models
(H. Zu, 2020). This survey paper reviewed predictive
maintenance methodologies, highlighting the benefits
over traditional methods like cost savings and
preventing failures (Tyagi, 2020). This study
conducted a systematic review of literature on
predictive maintenance (PdM) within Industry 4.0,
focusing on machine learning and reasoning
applications (Dalzochio, 2020). This paper developed
machine learning- based Prognostic and Health
Management (PHM) models using sensor data to
diagnose faults in transformer systems within smart
grids (Li, 2018). HD Pass employed Apache Spark
for real-time predictive maintenance of HDDs in data
centres, aiming to pre-empt failures and optimize
reliability, resulted in reduced downtime, extended
equipment life, and enhanced operational efficiency
in cloud computing environments (Chuan_Jun Su,
2018). The researcher developed a method for rapid
fault detection and localization in power transmission
Analysing ML, DL Approaches for Real-Time Maintenance Forecasting in Industrial Scenarios
765
lines using three-phase voltage data to derive the
Concordia pattern and classify faults with a
Probabilistic Neural Network (PNN) (S. Mishra,
2016). The researcher introduced Self-Adaptive
Probabilistic Neural Net- works (SaPNN), which
autonomously adjusted the Spread parameter for
enhanced predictive accuracy in transformer fault
diagnosis (Yi-JH, 2016). The researcher developed a
fault diagnosis method for gears using vibration
analysis and wavelet transform for predictive
maintenance (Devendiran, 2015). The researcher
developed a MATLAB-based approach using
Independent Component Analysis (ICA) and
supervised learning classifiers, notably PNN, to
improve condition monitoring in power plants by
effectively detecting and categorizing bearing
malfunctions in noisy environments (Hameed, 2013).
The researcher developed two innovative approaches
for predicting meteorological time series data: an
Evolving Polynomial Neural Network (EPNN) and a
hybrid polynomial neural network with genetic
algorithm (PNN-GA), both achieving high accuracy
and outperforming traditional models (Mellit, 2010).
The researcher developed a neural network-based
method for monitoring machine health at the Refinery
of Milazzo’ in Italy, successfully identifying faults
not covered in the training data (Crupi, 2004). The
researcher identified that traditional maintenance
scheduling was inadequate for high- reliability
industries, which required predictive maintenance
using advanced monitoring to predict failures and
prioritize maintenance (Mohammad Azam, 2002).
3 DATASET
Previously we worked on sample data set but this time
target was to work with real time data. For that
purpose, I have to finalize one equipment for further
research work. And positively we got the opportunity
to monitor the ma- chine health. The dataset used in
this study is sourced from ‘Radhan Plastics’, a
company established in 2008 as a Partnership Firm.
‘Radhan Plastics’ specializes in manufacturing films,
tubing, rolls, bags, and covers from materials such as
EVA (Ethyl Vinyl Acetate), VCI (Vapour Corrosion
Inhibitor), Bubble, LDPE. Their products are
available in various designs, colours, sizes, and
shapes to meet di- verse customer needs. These
products find extensive application in : Rubber
compounding, Pharmaceuticals, Food industry,
Agriculture, Industrial packaging, Auto
component/spares packing, Other industrial
packaging applications The company’s
manufacturing facility is located in the picturesque
area of ‘Pirangut’, near Pune, India. Their clientele
spans across India, including cities such as Roorkee,
Mumbai, Jammu, Bangalore, and Hyderabad. Hence
work to present in this seminar was to test the
algorithms with real time data. This sample data file
contains 3 main groups of data as:
1. Total Number of Sensors: 04
2. Data Recorded: 3 Months per minute [Dec.2022–
Feb.2023]
3. Total count: 50302
Figure 1: Category as per Machine Status
Figure 2: Distribution of Data Set
Here, three months of data utilised. With the help of
time-based splitting, the data divided into train and
test, where 2 months of data used as train dataset and
rest used as test dataset.
Figure 3: Dashboard of Data set
The above figure shows the dashboard. Dataset is
categorized as Production Log and Machine
Temperature. The upper part “Production Log” used
for OEE calculation. Bottom part, Machine
Temperature, with tracking these 4 sensors predicts
the failures.
INCOFT 2025 - International Conference on Futuristic Technology
766
Bottom side machine temperature dashboard with
recid, machine id, machine name, with 4 temperature
sensors. They named as temp1, temp2, temp3, temp4.
Automatic comment gets generated whenever
machine gets switched off [Reasons are unknown], to
identify these reasons PdM is needed.
Table I: Machine Tags With Description
Sr.
No.
Tags Description
01 ex06 Extruder Machine Name
02 recid
The serial number, updated at new
entry
03 Roller id
It can be either A or B, each has
different features
04 Roller count
Number of rolls produced for the job
card during the shift
05
Assessed
length
Roll length [ranges from 10 m to 9.53
km]
06 Actual kg
Weight of the roll [range is 10 kg to
92.1 kg]
Here, the dataset is shown for complete 1 year for
OEE as well as PdM Calculations. The figure is
showing data recorded for 18th April. Last entry of
18th April is at 11 PM of 35.8 kg at that time message
popped up as machine is switched off.
Figure 4: Dashboard of Data set of 1 Year
The data for this study considered from ‘Radhan
Plastics’ online platform known as the “OEE
Analysis Dashboard”. This dashboard provided real-
time data in .csv format, which can be downloaded
for further analysis. The dataset includes information
from four temperature sensors used to monitor the
temperature of a plastic extruder machine. Plastic
Extruder Machine: It is used in manufacturing to melt
and shape plastic materials into continuous profiles or
shapes by forcing them through a die. It plays a
crucial role in industries such as packaging,
construction, and automotive, producing items like
pipes, sheets, and filaments.
Next figure shows csv file data recorded for 28th
February. Range of temperature sensor is [-1 to 240
degree Celsius]. Maximum limit is 240 degree
Celsius, for this particular reading machine should
provide an alert before any failure occurs. Through
the timestamp data, information extracted as start of
shift and of shift and unplanned downtime during the
shift. This helps in calculating various loses at field.
Figure 5: Working Principle of Plastic Extruder Machine
Deep learning, a subset of machine learning
derived from artificial neural networks, is
characterized by multiple non- linear processing
layers. Its goal is to learn hierarchical representations
of data. The field is rapidly evolving, with new
models being developed frequently. The deep
learning community is highly collaborative, offering
numerous high- quality tutorials and books. Thus, this
text provides only a brief overview of key deep
learning techniques used in machine health
monitoring. The review covers four major deep
architectures—Auto-encoders, CNNs, RNNs, and
their variants. Researchers have developed predictive
maintenance algorithms using both machine learning
and deep learning. Initially, two machine learning
algorithms were created for testing purposes to
compare their results with those of deep learning
algorithms. These algorithms are now being tested
with real-time data. The selected machine learning
and deep learning algorithms include BPNN, CNN,
SVM, Bi-LSTM, LSTM, and PNN.
Figure 6: Dataset CSV File
4 METHODOLOGY
In this research, MATLAB R2023b software will be
utilized to test all the selected algorithms. The dataset
comprises 19,679 rows, each containing data from
Analysing ML, DL Approaches for Real-Time Maintenance Forecasting in Industrial Scenarios
767
four temperature sensors. Initial testing indicates that
the Probabilistic Neural Network (PNN) performs
better for this specific dataset. The research will
involve the following steps:
4.1 Data Pre-Processing
Data pre-processing involved cleaning and
normalizing the dataset to ensure consistency and
accuracy. This step included handling any missing or
anomalous values, which could have otherwise
skewed the results. The dataset was then split into
training and testing subsets to allow for model
validation and performance assessment.
Figure 7: Methodology
4.2 Algorithm Implementation
The implementation phase involved setting up the
chosen machine learning and deep learning
algorithms: BPNN, CNN, SVM, Bi-LSTM, LSTM,
and PNN. Each algorithm was configured with
appropriate parameters and hyper-parameters tailored
to the specific characteristics of the dataset.
MATLAB 2023b was used to code and run these
algorithms.
4.3 Model Training & Testing
During model training, each algorithm was trained on
the training subset of the data to learn the underlying
patterns. After the training, the models were sending
for testing subset to estimate their predictive
accuracy. We do have various performance matrices
to test the model accuracy. Performance metrics like
accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score were used to
assess the models.
4.4 Performance Comparison
The performance of each and every algorithm got
compared with each other. The comparison is
performed to determine which model is best. This
comparison involved analysing various performance
metrics and identifying strengths and weaknesses of
each algorithm. The goal was to find the most
effective model for predictive maintenance.
4.5 Real-Time Data Testing
In the final phase, the best-performing algorithms
were applied to real-time data to validate their
effectiveness in a live environment. This testing
helped ensure that the models could handle real-world
conditions and provide reliable predictions for
machine health monitoring. The performance in this
phase confirmed the practical applicability of the
models.
5 RESULTS & DISCUSSION
The following table shows the results of various
algorithms, where each was run five times with a
learning rate of 0.001 and a maximum epoch size of
1000. The table highlights that the Probabilistic
Neural Network (PNN) achieved the highest accuracy
at 99.70%. Thus, for the applied real-time dataset
consisting of 19,679 rows of 4 temperature sensors
from a plastic extruder machine, PNN was observed
to be the best- performing model.
Table 2:: Model Performance Comparison
(Learning Rate: 0.001, Epoch: 1000)
Models /
Max
E
p
ochs
1
2
3
4
5
BILSTM 58.20 49.26 58.20 58.20 58.20
BPNN 58.20
LSTM 71.29 77.18 73.32 79.91 65.39
CNN 91.30 92.13 91.19 91.74 91.30
PNN 99.70
INCOFT 2025 - International Conference on Futuristic Technology
768
Figure 8: Confusion Matrix o f BILSTM, LSTM, CNN,
BPNN.
6 CONCLUSIONS
The Predictive maintenance is very much essential. It
ensures optimal performance as well as prevents
costly down-times. The costly downtimes
considering machines like extruder machines are very
crucial as it requires a consistent product quality. This
study is purposely focused on use of real-time data.
The data is from four temperature sensors fitted in a
plastic extruder machine. The temperature sensor
ensures precise temperature control and high-quality
output. The dataset analysed comprised 19,679 rows
of data. A range of machine learning (ML) and deep
learning (DL) algorithms were tested. Tested
algorithms are as follows:
Probabilistic Neural Network (PNN),
Backpropagation Neural Network (BPNN),
Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Support
Vector Machine (SVM), Long Short Term Memory
(LSTM), and Bidirectional LSTM (BiLSTM). Each
algorithm tested for the five consecutive times with a
learning rate of 0.001 and a maximum epoch size of
1000.
The results proved that PNN, ML algorithm
achieved the remarkable accuracy of 99.70%. This
makes it the best- performing model for the applied
real-time dataset. PNN’s ability to handle noisy data
and its robustness against outliers contributed to its
superior performance. Additionally, PNN’s
architecture allowed for efficient processing of large
datasets and required minimal parameter tuning
compared to more complex algorithms like LSTM
and BiLSTM.
REFERENCES
Wang, Yanyu & Qiu, Peng & Liu, Yang & Guo, Yishen &
Peng, Cheng. 2024. IGSA-PNN-based Methods for
Power Transformer Fault Diagnosis, Journal of
Physics: Conference Series.
Niazi, Sajawal Gul & Nawaz, Ali & Huang, Tudi & Bai,
Song & Huang, Hong-Zhong, 2023. Prediction of
Remaining Useful Life of Bearings using a Parallel
Neural Network, Proceedings of the 33rd European
Safety and Reliability Conference (ESREL 2023),
1792-1799.
Sergii Voronov, Mattias Krysander and Erik Frisk, 2023,
Predictive Maintenance of Lead-Acid Batteries with
Sparse Vehicle Operational Data, International
Journal of Prognostics and Health Management, ISSN
2153-2648, 2020 008
Chen, Hong-Ming, et al., Hot-Pressing Furnace Current
Monitoring and Predictive Maintenance System in
AEROSPACE APPLICATIONS.” Sensors 23.
Converso, Giuseppe, et al. Predicting failure probability in
Industry 4.0 production systems: A workload-based
prognostic model for maintenance planning, Applied
Sciences 13.3,1938.
Jovani Dalzochio, Rafael Kunst, Jorge Luis Victoria
Barbosa, Pedro Clarindo da Silva Neto, Edison
Analysing ML, DL Approaches for Real-Time Maintenance Forecasting in Industrial Scenarios
769
Pignaton, Carla Schwengber ten Caten, and Alex de
Lima Teodoro da Penha,V2023. Predictive
Maintenance in the Military Domain: A Systematic
Review of the Literature, ACM Comput. Surv. 55, 13s,
Article 267 (December 2023), 30 pages, 2023.
Zhang, Bin, and Yung C. Shin, A probabilistic neural
network for uncertainty prediction with applications to
manufacturing process monitoring, Applied Soft
Computing 124 (2022): 108995,2022.
Seyed Mostafa Hallaji, Yihai Fang, Brandon K. Winfrey,
Predictive maintenance of pumps in civil
infrastructure: State-of-the-art, challenges and future
directions, Automation in Construction, Volume 134,
104049, ISSN 0926-5805,2022.
Nashed, Mohamad Shadi, Renno, Jamil, Mohamed, M.
Shadi, Mod- elling fatigue uncertainty by means of
nonconstant variance neural networks, Fatigue &
Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 45,
9, ISSN - 8756-758X, 2468, 24802022, 2022.
Drakaki, Maria & Karnavas, Yannis & Tziafettas, Ioannis
& Linardos, Vasilis & Tzionas, Panagiotis,Machine
Learning and Deep Learning Based Methods Toward
Industry 4.0 Predictive Maintenance in Induction
Motors: State of the Art Survey. Journal of Industrial
Engineering and Management, 2022.
Kane, Archit P., et al.Predictive maintenance using
machine learning.” arXiv preprint arrive: 2205.
09402, 2022.
Zdravkovic´, M., Panetto, H., & Weichhart, G. 2021, AI-
enabled Enterprise Information Systems for
Manufacturing, Enterprise Information Systems,
16(4), 668–720, 2021.
H. Zhu, S. A. Z. Ahmed, M. A. Alfakih, M. A. Abdelbaky,
A. R. Sayed and M. A. A. Saif, Photovoltaic Failure
Diagnosis Using Sequential Probabilistic Neural
Network Model, in IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 220507-
220522, 2020.
Tyagi, Vinayak, et al. A survey: Predictive maintenance
modeling using machine learning techniques,
Proceedings of the International Conference on
Innovative Computing & Communications
(ICICC),2020.
Dalzochio, Jovani & Kunst, Rafael & Pignaton de Freitas,
Edison & Binotto, Alecio & Sanyal, Srijnan & Favilla,
Jose & Barbosa, Jorge, 2020 Machine learning and
reasoning for predictive maintenance in Industry 4.0:
Current status and challenges. Computers in Industry,
2020.
Li, A.; Yang, X.; Dong, H.; Xie, Z.; Yang, C. Machine
Learning-Based Sensor Data Modeling Methods for
Power Transformer PHM. Sensors 2018, 18, 4430,
2018.
Chuan-Jun Su, Shi-Feng Huang, Real-time big data
analytics for hard disk drive predictive maintenance,
Computers & Electrical Engineering, Volume 71,
2018, Pages 93-101, ISSN 0045-7906, 2018.
S. Mishra et al., Classification of power system faults using
voltage Concordia pattern feature aided PNN. 2016
IEEE 6th International Conference on Power Systems
(ICPS) (2016): 1-6, 2016.
Yi J-H, Wang J, Wang G-G. Improved probabilistic neural
networks with self-adaptive strategies for transformer
fault diagnosis problem. Advances in Mechanical
Engineering. 2016;8(1),2016.
Devendiran, S., and K. Manivannan, Vibration signal based
multi-fault diagnosis of gears using roughset
integrated PCA and neural networks, Int. J. Mech.
Mechatron. Eng 15.01,2015.
Hameed, Shameer V., and K. M. Shameer, Proactive
Condition Monitoring Systems for Power Plants,
International Journal of Scientific and Research
Publications 3.11 (2013): 1-5,2013.
Mellit, Adel & Drif, Mahmoud & Ali, Malek, 2010, EPNN-
based prediction of meteorological data for renewable
energy systems. Revue des Energies Renouvelables.
13. 25-47. 10. 54966 / jreen . v13 i1. 176 ,2010.
Crupi, Vincenzo, Eugenio Guglielmino, and G. Milazzo,
Neural- network-based system for novel fault
detection in rotating machinery, Journal of Vibration
and Control 10.8 (2004): 1137-1150, 2004.
Mohammad Azam, Fang Tu, and Krishna R. Pattipati,
Condition- based predictive maintenance of industrial
power systems, Proc. SPIE 4733, Component and
Systems Diagnostics, Prognostics, and Health
Management II, 16 July 2002.
INCOFT 2025 - International Conference on Futuristic Technology
770