Design of University Asset Procurement Optimization Scheme
Considering Multi-Objective Optimization
Huang Jian and Wang Yihan
Changchun Institute of Technologies, Jilin, 130012, China
Keywords: Multi-Objective Decision Theory, Taking into Account Multi-Objective Optimization, Procurement
Optimization Scheme, Universities, Assets.
Abstract: The procurement optimization scheme plays an important role in the asset procurement of universities, but
there is the problem of inaccurate optimization positioning. The traditional genetic algorithm cannot solve the
problem of procurement optimization in the asset procurement of universities, and the effect is not
satisfactory. In the management of modern educational resources, the procurement of university assets is a
crucial link. It is not only related to the teaching and research ability of the school, but also directly affects
the economic benefits and development sustainability of the school. Therefore, developing an efficient, cost-
effective and future-proof procurement plan is an important topic for every university administrator. This
article will discuss how to achieve multi-objective optimization of university asset procurement, and propose
an innovative and practical solution.
1 INTRODUCTION
First, we need to clarify the core concept of multi-
objective optimization (Ma and Sun, et al. 2023).
There are many goals involved in the process of
university asset procurement, including cost
minimization, quality maximization, supplier
stability, procurement efficiency, etc. To achieve the
optimal combination of these goals, scientific
methods and tools must be adopted (Liu and Wu,
2022). This usually requires the establishment of a
comprehensive evaluation model to quantify the
indicators, and then the use of multi-objective
decision theory to make trade-offs and choices (Li
and Qin, 2022).
2 RELATED CONCEPTS
2.1 Mathematical Description Taking
Into Account Multi-Objective
Optimization
For example, when considering the balance between
cost and quality, we can build a cost-benefit analysis
model that uses budget constraints and performance
requirements as constraints to find the best sourcing
point (Zheng, 2023). This requires not only a deep
understanding of asset prices in the market, but also
the ability to accurately assess the impact of asset
performance on future teaching and research.
(1
)
Among them, the judgment of outliers is
shown in Equation (2).
(2
)
Next, in order to ensure the stability of suppliers
and procurement efficiency, we can use the principles
of supply chain management to establish long-term
cooperative relations, and improve the transparency
and responsiveness of the procurement process
through information technology (Huang, 2021). For
example, the implementation of an e-procurement
system can greatly shorten the procurement cycle
(Liu, 2021), reduce the processing time of paper
documents, and also facilitate the tracking of order
status and timely adjustment of procurement
strategies.
lim( ) max( 2)
iij ij ij
x
yt y t
→∞
⋅=≥ ÷
(
iij
tol y t
2
max( ) ( 2 ) ( 4)
ij ij ij ij
tttmeant + +
M
352
Jian, H. and Yihan, W.
Design of University Asset Procurement Optimization Scheme Considering Multi-Objective Optimization.
DOI: 10.5220/0013543500004664
Paper published under CC license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Futuristic Technology (INCOFT 2025) - Volume 1, pages 352-357
ISBN: 978-989-758-763-4
Proceedings Copyright © 2025 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda.
(3
)
2.2 Selection of Procurement
Optimization Scheme
In addition, in order to meet the challenges of future
technological change, universities should consider
the flexibility and scalability of procurement (Liu
Yuanyuan, 2021). This means that when developing
a procurement plan, it is important not only to meet
current needs, but also to anticipate possible changes
in the future (Xu Yezhou, 2021). For example, it is
wise to purchase lab equipment that can be upgraded
and maintained, or to choose a computer system that
offers software update services.
(4)
In summary, through scientific methods,
advanced technology and close cooperation, the
multi-objective optimization of university asset
procurement solutions can effectively improve the
overall performance of procurement, and achieve the
multiple goals of cost savings, quality improvement,
supply stability and future adaptability (Li, 2021).
(5)
This not only brings significant economic benefits
to universities, but also provides a better learning and
research environment for students and teachers, thus
promoting the progress of the entire educational
industry.
(6
)
2.3 Analysis of Procurement
Optimization Scheme
Against the backdrop of tight budgets, universities
need to make smart asset purchases while ensuring
the quality of education and meeting the needs of
teaching and research. This involves multiple
considerations, such as the quality of the asset, price,
supplier selection, maintenance costs, and the useful
life of the asset (Yu, 2021). In addition, the
transparency of the procurement process, compliance
and timeliness need to be considered. These factors
intertwine to make procurement a complex decision-
making issue.
(7
)
Among them, it is stated
that the scheme needs to be proposed, otherwise the
scheme integration is required, and the result
is shown in Equation (8).
(8
)
In practice, multi-objective optimization also
requires an interdisciplinary teamwork. Procurement
departments work closely with the finance
department, academic affairs department, research
teams, and external suppliers to analyze data and
make the best decisions. This collaborative work
model helps to integrate information and resources
from all sides, making procurement activities more
efficient and rational.
(9
)
Finally, it's important to recognize that no
optimization is set in stone. With the changes in the
external environment and the development of internal
needs, the strategy of asset procurement of
universities should also be adjusted in a timely
manner. This requires regular evaluation of the
procurement effect, timely collection of feedback
information, and adjustment of optimization models
and decision-making parameters based on the
evaluation results.
(10
)
Multi-objective optimization is a mathematical
approach to finding the best trade-off solution
between multiple conflicting targets. In the asset
2
() 4 2 7
iii
Fd b ac t y
ξ
=−
()= ( )
ii i i
dy
g
txz Fd w
dx
⋅−

lim ( ) lim ( ) max( )
ii ij
xx
g
tFd t
→∞ →∞
+≤
() ( ) ( 4)
ii ij
gt Fd mean t+↔ +
22
() ( )
()
(4)
ii
i
ij
gt Fd
No t a b
mean t
+
=+
+
() ( )
1
(4)
ii
ij
gt Fd
mean t
+
+
()
i
Z
ht
() [ () ( )]
iii
Z
ht gt Fd=+
min[ ( ) ( )]
()
() ( )
ii
i
ii
gt Fd
accur t
gt Fd
+
+
2
min[ ( ) ( )]
() (
)
4()()
ii
ii
ii
gt Fd
accur t randon t
bacgtFd
+
=+
−+
Design of University Asset Procurement Optimization Scheme Considering Multi-Objective Optimization
353
procurement of universities, multiple goals such as
cost minimization, efficiency maximization, and
supply risk minimization can be set, and algorithms
can be used to analyze and deal with the
interrelationship between these objectives, so as to
obtain a series of feasible procurement solutions.
3 OPTIMIZATION STRATEGY
OF PROCUREMENT
OPTIMIZATION PLAN
Second, the introduction of multi-objective
optimization theory. Multi-objective optimization is a
mathematical approach to finding the best trade-off
solution between multiple conflicting targets. In the
asset procurement of universities, multiple goals such
as cost minimization, efficiency maximization, and
supply risk minimization can be set, and algorithms
can be used to analyze and deal with the
interrelationship between these objectives, so as to
obtain a series of feasible procurement solutions.
3.1 Introduction of Procurement
Optimization Plan
In order to effectively execute a multi-objective
optimization strategy, it is first necessary to establish
clear procurement goals and standards. This includes
the establishment of a comprehensive evaluation
system covering asset performance, price,
maintenance services, supplier reputation and other
aspects. Next, the quantitative model was used to
score and rank different procurement options, and
sensitivity analysis was used to investigate the impact
of changes in each factor on the final result.
Table 1: Procurement optimization requirements
Scope of
application
Grade Accuracy Procurement
optimization
Electronic
Equipment
I 85.00 78.86
II 81.97 78.45
Experimental
e
q
ui
p
ment
I 83.81 81.31
II 83.34 78.19
Supplier and
product
selection
I 79.56 81.99
II 79.10 80.11
The procurement optimization process in Table I.
is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1: The process of analyzing procurement
optimization scenarios
This paper can show the application effect of
multi-objective optimization in university asset
procurement through specific cases. For example, a
university has successfully balanced short-term
expenses and long-term benefits by building a
comprehensive scoring system that includes teaching
quality, scientific research support, cost control and
other goals, and has realized the upgrading of
equipment while ensuring the stability of teaching
and scientific research.
3.2 Procurement Optimization Plan
With the advancement of science and technology and
the development of data analysis tools, the future of
university asset procurement will be more intelligent
and refined. The introduction of machine learning,
artificial intelligence and other technologies will
provide more powerful data support for purchasing
decisions. At the same time, universities need to
develop procurement teams with interdisciplinary
knowledge to adapt to this trend.
Table 2: The overall situation of the procurement
optimization plan
Category Random
data
Reliability Analysis
rate
Electronic
Equipment
85.32 85.90 83.95
Experimental
equipment
86.36 82.51 84.29
Supplier and
product
selection
84.16 84.92 83.68
,ean 86.84 84.85 84.40
X6 83.04 86.03 84.32
P=1.249
Theory
Multiple
target
Simulation Colleges
Asset
Multiple goals
Property
INCOFT 2025 - International Conference on Futuristic Technology
354
3.3 Procurement Optimization Scheme
and Stability
Conclusion: In summary, multi-objective
optimization provides a scientific and systematic
decision-making framework for university asset
procurement. By setting targets, making accurate
quantitative assessments, and employing advanced
data processing techniques, we can not only improve
the efficiency of resource use, but also enhance the
strategic nature of asset procurement. In the future,
with the development of technology and the
accumulation of practical experience, multi-objective
optimization will play a greater role in the asset
procurement of universities.
Figure 2: Procurement optimization scheme with different
algorithms
In the era of knowledge economy, as an important
base for cultivating high-quality talents and scientific
research, the quality of education and innovation
ability is directly related to the quality of education
and the improvement of innovation ability. Therefore,
a forward-looking and reasonable university asset
Table 3: Comparison of the accuracy of procurement
optimization solutions of different methods
Algorithm Surve
y data
Procuremen
t
optimizatio
n
Magnitud
e of
change
Erro
r
Take into
account
multi-
objective
optimizatio
n
85.33 85.15 82.88 84.95
Genetic
algorithm
85.20 83.41 86.01 85.75
P 87.17 87.62 84.48 86.97
procurement plan is very important to support the
long-term development strategy of the university. The
purpose of this paper is to put forward a set of
systematic ideas and methods for university asset
procurement, in order to achieve optimal allocation of
resources and enhance the overall competitiveness of
universities.
First and foremost, any effective asset
procurement program must be based on an accurate
asset requirements analysis. Colleges and universities
should conduct regular asset inventory, clarify the
current asset stock and use status, and scientifically
predict the equipment renewal and new demand in a
certain period in the future in combination with the
school's development plan, professional setting and
scientific research project needs. In addition,
universities need to establish a dynamically adjusted
asset management system to ensure that asset
information is updated in real time and provide data
support for procurement decisions.
Figure 3: Procurement optimization with multi-objective
optimization in mind
Next, the procurement programme should
highlight the principle of cost-effectiveness. On the
premise of ensuring quality, select cost-effective
products through market competition mechanism.
3.4 Rationality of procurement
optimization scheme
Furthermore, sustainability is a principle that cannot
be ignored in modern university procurement. With
the improvement of social requirements for
environmental protection, green procurement has
become a trend. Universities should not only pay
attention to the energy-saving performance and
environmental protection standards of products when
purchasing, but also consider the environmental
responsibility and social responsibility performance
Design of University Asset Procurement Optimization Scheme Considering Multi-Objective Optimization
355
of suppliers, and encourage and support those
suppliers who practice the concept of sustainable
development.
In addition, the university asset procurement
program should strengthen follow-up management
and performance evaluation. Procurement is not a
simple transaction, but a complete process that
includes preliminary research, mid-term execution
and post-management.
Figure 4: Procurement optimization scheme with different
algorithms
3.5 The effectiveness of procurement
optimization programs
Finally, innovation is the core driving force for the
sustainable development of universities.
Incorporating innovative thinking into asset
procurement means moving beyond traditional
sourcing models and product selections. Universities
should actively explore opportunities for
collaboration with emerging technology companies,
such as using modern information technologies such
as cloud computing and big data to optimize
procurement processes, and even consider using
blockchain technology to achieve transparency and
traceability in the supply chain.
Figure 5: Procurement optimization scheme with different
algorithms
This move not only helps to establish the social image
of universities, but also conforms to the national
policy guidance of promoting green consumption.
Table 4: Comparison of the effectiveness of procurement
optimization solutions of different methods
Algorithm Surve
y data
Procureme
nt
optimizatio
n
Magnitud
e of
change
Erro
r
Take into
account
multi-
objective
optimizati
on
82.21 85.92 84.59 82.8
5
Genetic
algorith
m
83.73 84.23 84.41 83.5
5
P 84.20 87.39 84.76 83.9
0
In summary, an excellent university asset
procurement plan should be based on accurate
demand analysis, follow the principles of cost-
effectiveness and sustainability, strengthen follow-up
management and continuous innovation. Only in this
way can colleges and universities maximize the value
of every penny under the condition of limited
resources, and lay a solid material foundation for
cultivating talents and scientific research
development in the future society.
Figure 6: Optimize procurement optimization solutions
with multiple objectives in mind
This is not only reflected in the selection of a
single product, but also in the total cost of ownership
of the asset from the perspective of the whole life
cycle. For example, consider the energy consumption
of the equipment, the cost of maintenance, and the
cost of eventual end-of-life disposal. To this end,
INCOFT 2025 - International Conference on Futuristic Technology
356
universities can bring in professional third-party
evaluation agencies to participate in the procurement
process, and use financial analysis and risk
assessment methods to assist decision-making.
4 CONCLUSIONS
Therefore, colleges and universities should establish
a sound asset tracking and evaluation system to
conduct a comprehensive performance evaluation of
procurement results. This involves not only the
efficiency of equipment and the statistics of failure
rate, but also the survey of user satisfaction and the
collection of improvement opinions. Continuously
optimize asset procurement and management
processes through a continuous feedback loop.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Research on asset Purchasing Strategy of colleges and
universities based on Big Data, number:
JJKH20230727SK.
REFERENCES
Ma Jiangtao, Sun Qian,&Peng Minghui (2023) Exploring
the Optimization Plan for Asset Acceptance of Newly
Built Universities Modern Education Equipment in
China (1), 47-49
Liu Jing,&Wu Xiaocen (2022) Exploring the optimization
of asset related business processes in universities from
the perspective of industry finance integration
Accountant (11), 3
Li Xiaoyi,&Qin Ai (2022) Explore how to optimize asset
management in universities Finance and Economics
(24), 3
Zheng Hui (2023) The Path and Measures for Optimizing
Fixed Asset Management in Universities - Based on the
Internal Control Framework of COSO Financial
Management Research (2), 134-138
Huang Aifei (2021) Research on the Optimization of
Internal Control of Government Procurement Business
in Universities under the Background of
"Decentralization of Management and Service" Journal
of Fujian Open University (4), 65-69
Liu Yuanyuan (2021) Reflections and suggestions on
optimizing asset management in universities Industrial
Innovation Research (9), 3
Liu Yuanyuan (2021) Reflections and suggestions on
optimizing asset management in universities
Administrative Assets and Finance
Xu Yezhou (2021) Analysis of Strategies for Optimizing
the Management of Teaching Assets in Universities
Contemporary Accounting
Li Li (2021) Optimization of internal control over fixed
assets in universities Administrative Assets and
Finance (7), 2
Yu Bo (2021) The Application of Project Management in
the Fixed Asset Procurement System of Private
Universities - Research on the Construction of Fixed
Asset Procurement System of Private Universities
Based on Project Management Huaxi (24), 2
Design of University Asset Procurement Optimization Scheme Considering Multi-Objective Optimization
357