
handle timeouts through the chosen orchestration ap-
proach and alleviate the impact of memory limitations
through its modularity. Furthermore, the modularity
ensures the expandability of the system, e.g. for inte-
grating new sensors or classifiers for additional kinds
of defects.
While the development and deployment of the
digital twin and other general architecture compo-
nents is already completed, the data acquisition and
model training is still in an early stage. Initial manual
investigation of the vibration and phase current data
show correlations between the measurements and the
state of the pump, but further experiments regarding
the pressure measurements are necessary as it proves
to be difficult to identify small scale leakages based
on the acquired data. At the time of writing, base-
line measurements using correctly functioning pumps
have been completed and long-term test for the first
defect category have started.
Once the data acquisition phase is completed, a
variety of different models and methods has to be
tested to determine the best approach for the pre-
sented use-case and additional long-term tests have
to be executed to validate the obtained results. Fu-
ture investigations should also focus on testing the
transferability of this approach to other product cat-
egories, e.g. turbines or gearboxes. As a first step
towards generalization, it is planned to apply the ap-
proach for other models of pumps once satisfactory
results have been achieved for the pumps addressed
in this work. Since the characteristics of the vibration
and other measurements change based on the design
of the pump, some amount of retraining will be neces-
sary to transfer the results to different pumps or other
product categories.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors thank the German Federal Ministry for
Economic Affairs and Climate Action (BMWK) for
financial support of the project ProDiNA through
project funding FKZ 01MN23016A. The project
ProDiNA is a joint effort of the August-Wilhelm
Scheer Institute for Digital Products and Processes
gGmbH, the Miele & Cie. KG, the adesso SE, the
dive solutions GmbH, and the Leibniz-Institute for
New Materials gGmbH.
REFERENCES
Abhaya, A. and Patra, B. K. (2023). An efficient method for
autoencoder based outlier detection. Expert Systems
with Applications, 213:118904.
Adams, R. P. and MacKay, D. J. C. (2007). Bayesian online
changepoint detection.
Ali, A., Pinciroli, R., Yan, F., and Smirni, E. (2020). Batch:
Machine learning inference serving on serverless plat-
forms with adaptive batching. In SC20: International
Conference for High Performance Computing, Net-
working, Storage and Analysis, pages 1–15.
Barrak, A., Petrillo, F., and Jaafar, F. (2022). Serverless on
machine learning: A systematic mapping study. IEEE
Access, 10:99337–99352.
Breunig, M. M., Kriegel, H.-P., Ng, R. T., and Sander, J.
(2000). Lof: identifying density-based local outliers.
SIGMOD Rec., 29(2):93–104.
Djemame, K., Parker, M., and Datsev, D. (2020). Open-
source serverless architectures: an evaluation of
apache openwhisk. In 2020 IEEE/ACM 13th Inter-
national Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing
(UCC), pages 329–335.
Dong, C., Tao, J., Chao, Q., Yu, H., and Liu, C. (2023). Sub-
sequence time series clustering-based unsupervised
approach for anomaly detection of axial piston pumps.
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measure-
ment, 72:1–12.
Goldstein, M. and Dengel, A. (2012). Histogram-based out-
lier score (hbos): A fast unsupervised anomaly de-
tection algorithm. KI-2012: poster and demo track,
1:59–63.
Hardin, J. and Rocke, D. M. (2004). Outlier detection in
the multiple cluster setting using the minimum covari-
ance determinant estimator. Computational Statistics
& Data Analysis, 44(4):625–638.
Hassan, H. B., Barakat, S. A., and Sarhan, Q. I. (2021). Sur-
vey on serverless computing. Journal of Cloud Com-
puting, 10(1):39.
He, Z., Xu, X., and Deng, S. (2003). Discovering cluster-
based local outliers. Pattern recognition letters, 24(9-
10):1641–1650.
Hu, D., Zhang, C., Yang, T., and Chen, G. (2022). An intel-
ligent anomaly detection method for rotating machin-
ery based on vibration vectors. IEEE Sensors Journal,
22(14):14294–14305.
Jiang, W., Ma, L., Zhang, P., Zheng, Y., and Zhang, S.
(2023). Anomaly detection of axial piston pump based
on the dtw-rck-if composite method using pressure
signals. Applied Sciences, 13(24):13133.
Kieu, T., Yang, B., Guo, C., and Jensen, C. S. (2019).
Outlier detection for time series with recurrent au-
toencoder ensembles. In Proceedings of the Twenty-
Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial In-
telligence, IJCAI-19, pages 2725–2732. International
Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organiza-
tion.
Kojs, K. (2023). A survey of serverless machine learning
model inference.
Liu, F. T., Ting, K. M., and Zhou, Z.-H. (2008). Isolation
forest. In 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference
on Data Mining, pages 413–422.
Liu, Y., Li, Z., Zhou, C., Jiang, Y., Sun, J., Wang, M., and
He, X. (2020). Generative adversarial active learning
A Concept for Accelerating Long-Term Prototype Testing Using Anomaly Detection and Digital Twins
253