the bolls had ripened and opened. In some regions, a
third machine harvest was also performed. After this,
the leftover cotton on the ground and on the cotton
stalks was collected by harvesters. Due to the fact that
this two-stage technology led to longer harvesting
periods and increased harvesting costs, it is no longer
commonly used by modern farming operations.
Currently, in farming operations, machine
harvesting is conducted when 80-90% of the cotton
bolls are open. An analysis of the technological
process and agronomic indicators of the MХ-1.8
vertical spindle cotton harvesting machines (VSH
PТМ) reveals that the harvesting efficiency does not
exceed 80-85%. Additionally, cotton loss on the
ground is about 4-5%, and contamination of the
cotton in the bunker reaches 10-11%. These
agronomic indicators result in a cotton price that does
not meet the satisfaction of farmers and reduces the
effectiveness of the MХ-1.8 vertical spindle
machines. Consequently, farmers use the MХ-1.8
machines only in certain situations or when no better
alternatives are available (GOST 22587-91),
(Sablikov, 1985; Shpolyanskiy, 1985; Matchanov,
2010; Rizaev, 2017; Matchanov, 2018; Matchanov,
2023; Matchanov, 2024).
Due to the increasing cultivation of fast-ripening
and high-yielding cotton varieties in Uzbekistan,
horizontal spindle cotton harvesting machines (from
the USA and China) with high efficiency and
productivity have been widely used in the country's
farming operations and cotton clusters. These
machines are employed in fields where cotton bolls
are 80-90% or more open. When harvesting cotton
with these machines, the harvesting efficiency
indicators can reach up to 90-95% (Matchanov, 2010;
Matchanov, 2018; Matchanov, 2023; Matchanov,
2024).
Because of climatic conditions and weather
variations in Uzbekistan, cotton bolls often do not
open 80-90% of the time every year. Consequently,
even when cotton bolls are 50-60% open and the yield
in the field is 25-30 centners per hectare, harvesting
with horizontal spindle machines (HSM) has proven
to be ineffective based on current practical
experience. This is because, in such cases, harvesting
costs increase sharply and the quality of the harvested
cotton deteriorates. Specifically, HSMs collect cotton
with bolls that are not fully open and ripe.
Additionally, the cost of cotton harvested by HSMs is
significantly higher compared to vertical spindle
machines (VSM), making farmers uninterested in
using these machines.
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
In the 1960s and 1970s, the high-efficiency vertical
spindle cotton harvesting machines (VSH) were
developed through scientific research and
experimental design work carried out by the staff of
the Institute of Mechanics and Seismic Stability of
Structures of the Academy of Sciences of Uzbekistan
in collaboration with the "Toshselmash" factory
engineers. The ANTX-1.2 and ANTX-1.8 models of
VSH machines created during this period continue to
fully meet the demands of modern farming
operations, as evidenced by practical experience.
Therefore, recognizing the scientific significance of
these developments is considered an important task
(Matchanov, 2010; Rizaev, 2017).
Between 1975 and 1983, based on the ANTX-1.2
and ANTX-1.8 models of vertical spindle cotton
harvesting machines (VSH), a new model, the 3XVN-
1.8 "Dostlik," was developed in collaboration with
the staff of the "Toshselmash" factory and the
Tashkent Institute of Irrigation and Melioration
(TIQHM). State tests confirmed that this machine
could achieve up to 93-94% harvesting efficiency for
cotton bolls that were 85-90% open in a single pass.
The machine featured a cotton harvesting
apparatus with a three-row spindle drum (6 spindles
in a single row) and an automatic adjustment
mechanism for the working gap. It was produced on
an industrial scale at the "Toshselmash" factory and
passed state testing. After addressing some
constructive flaws identified during the state trials,
the machine was recommended for implementation in
agricultural practice. However, the main drawback
noted in the test report was that the contamination
level of the cotton in the machine's bunker was 2-3%
higher compared to serially produced VSH models
(Matchanov, 2010; Rizaev, 2017; Matchanov, 2018;
Karimov et al., 2019; Matchanov, 2023; Matchanov,
2024).
At TSTU scientific researchs was conducted to
address the shortcomings of the previously mentioned
cotton harvesting apparatus and to improve its design.
The following recommendations were developed
based on the results of this research (Karimov et al.,
2019; Khajiev et al., 2024):
1. To achieve a picking efficiency of 93-94%, it is
necessary to install drums with a diameter of 216 mm
(along the spindle rotation axis) on the new picking
apparatus, along with 10 spindles (with a spindle
spacing of 67.8 mm on the drum), and to place pairs
of drums that provide triple processing of the cotton
(6 drums in a single row of the picking apparatus).