bond, which results in a denser structure of the
material and a consequent increase in bulk modulus.
In addition, the inhibition effect on the volume
expansion of silicon shows an enhanced trend as the
carbon concentration increases. Carbon compounds
come in a variety of forms, including graphite,
graphene (Gr), carbon nanotubes (CNTs), carbon
nanofibres (CNFs), graphene oxide (GO), reduced
graphene oxide (rGO), and so forth.
Graphene, renowned for its flexibility and
conductivity, mitigates silicon's volume changes,
enhances electron transfer, and isolates particles from
the electrolyte, suppressing excessive SEI formation.
Besides, its defects and edges provide additional sites
for lithium storage, accelerating Li
+
transport in the
anode and thus significantly improving the
multiplicity performance of the battery. However, it
is challenging to attain optimal dispersion via
straightforward mechanical mixing because of
graphene's neutral property. The introduction of GO
can effectively address the dispersion issue because
irregularly dispersed SiNPs are more likely to
undergo electrochemical sintering and agglomeration
throughout the charging and discharging process. So,
Ko et al.(2014) proposed the use of chemical vapor
deposition (CVD) technology to prepare porous GO
with silicon skeleton as an anode material for the LIB,
which significantly improved the cycle stability. The
material was tested to maintain an average capacity
of 1103 mAh/g after 1000 cycles with a Coulombic
efficiency of up to 92.5% on the first cycle. However,
CVD technology is expensive and not suitable for
large-scale industrialization.
Electrostatic spinning technology, on the other
hand, offers a simple and economical method of
preparing carbon fibres. As a result, silicon is often
embedded in carbon fibers as an anode material for
LIB. Gómez-cámer et al. (2011) utilized a SiO
x
layer
to strengthen the bonding of SiNPs to the CNFs
surface, which significantly enhanced the ion and
electron transport efficiency. However, this anode’s
capacity decayed from 2500 to 500 mAh/g after 500
cycles, due to excessive SEI formation and poor
stability. Ji et al. (2009), on the other hand, attempted
to convert the polyacrylonitrile/SiNPs solution into
SiNPs-embedded CNFs composites by
electrospinning, but the cycling stability dropped to
0.5 mAh/g, 51% of initial after 50 cycles, showing the
inadequacy of this method in suppressing the
generation of unstable SEI layers. Dirican et al.
(2015) went on to enhance the cycling stability by
depositing amorphous carbon on SiNPs-embedded
CNFs using the CVD method. However, the
aggregation of SiNPs and the problem of carbon fiber
fracture due to silicon swelling remain key challenges
to be addressed in this field.
Despite the high specific capacity and relatively
mature process of silicon-carbon composite
structures, their industrial production and cycling
performance still need to be further improved.
2.4 Yolk-Shell Structure Anode
While depositing SiNPs on the outer layer of carbon
materials can significantly improve the anode's
performance, the research on improving the LIB
anode's efficiency shows that each charge/discharge's
efficiency falls short of more than 99%. The reason
for this is that during the cycling process, a portion of
the silicon particles is near the fluid, causing the
particles to grow and shrink with each charge and
discharge. This prevents the SEI film from existing
steadily and causes it to be continually destroyed and
regrown. Therefore, the core-shell structure was born.
Despite the conventional core-shell design utilizing
silicon as the core with a carbon shell coating, it lacks
a buffer zone for silicon's volume expansion.
Consequently, researchers have innovated by
adopting a yolk-shell architecture, where silicon
serves as the yolk and carbon as the shell. This
approach introduces a gap between the carbon shell
and silicon particles, allowing for unconstrained
expansion and contraction of silicon while preventing
damage to the carbon shell due to volume variations
in the silicon particles. The anode designed by Liu et
al. (2012) is similar, which is shown in Figure 2. After
testing, yolk-shell anode demonstrated initial
capacity of 2800 mAh/g, retaining 74% (1500
mAh/g) after 1000 cycles, achieving 99.8%
Coulombic efficiency.
Figure 2: Structure of the yolk-shell type anode (Dirican et
al., 2015).
Liu et al. (2014) further optimized the previous
yolk-shell design in a follow-up study by adopting a
pomegranate-like layered architecture. This structure
featured SiNPs in a conducting carbon coating in a
yolk-shell-like configuration, and the entire structure
was encased in a thicker carbon shell at the micron
level. The strength of the SEI layer is increased by the
thicker carbon shell, which also has a significant
impact on the conductivity of electrons and Li
+
.
Durability testing revealed a capacity retention rate of