are indispensable for a conclusive portrayal of the
effects of CYP induction and inhibition, a
requirement that is particularly salient for the
attainment of regulatory approval. It is fortuitous that
ongoing innovations in research methodologies have
sharpened the ability to detect potential drug
interactions that are mediated by CYP enzymes early
in the drug development cycle, thereby mitigating
unforeseen adverse effects in clinical settings. Early
recognition of such interactions is crucial, steering the
course of drug development away from entities that
exhibit strong inhibitory or inductive effects on CYP
enzymes. Nonetheless, we must acknowledge the
presence of yet unidentified agents, possibly present
in our diet, herbal treatments, and environmental
exposures.
The profound enhancement of our understanding
of CYP-mediated interactions has refined the drug
development paradigm and the implementation of
computational tools and databases to support
medication prescribing practices has greatly
facilitated their clinical deployment. These
advancements are particularly vital considering the
vast repository of data on DDIs, which presents a
formidable challenge for clinicians to master single-
handedly. It is pertinent to note that while the design
of drugs has traditionally cantered on improving
metabolic stability to diminish CYP-related
interactions, it is also essential to consider the
potential for interactions mediated by biological
transport mechanisms.
Although the capability to predict CYP inhibition
and induction is generally reliable, exceptional cases
continue to emerge that defy expectations. For
instance, the synergistic interaction between non-
activating compounds and the PXR, resulting in
receptor activation, exemplifies the complexity of
predicting drug interactions. These synergies may
manifest among pharmaceutical agents or in
scenarios of exposure to complex environmental
mixtures, relevant in toxicology. Hence, despite the
substantial body of knowledge regarding CYP
inhibition and induction accrued over the years,
ongoing research is imperative. The landscape of
drug interaction remains dynamic, with the ever-
present prospect of unearthing new insights.
REFERENCES
Pelkonen, O.; Turpeinen, M.; Hakkola, J.; Honkakoski, P.;
Hukkanen, J.; Raunio, H. (2008). Inhibition and
induction of human cytochrome P450 enzymes:
Current status. Arch. Toxicol. 82, 667–715.
Li Y, Meng Q, Yang M, Liu D, Hou X, Tang L, Wang X,
Lyu Y, Chen X, Liu K, Yu AM. (2019). Current trends
in drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics. Acta
Pharmaceutica Sinica B. Nov 1;9(6):1113-44.
Lin, J. H. (2006). CYP induction mediated drug
interactions: Invitro assessment and clinical
implications. Pharm. Res. 23,1089–1116.
Schuetz, J.D.; Schuetz, E.G.; Thottassery, J.V.; Guzelian,
P.S.; Strom, S.; Sun, D. (1996). Identification of a novel
dexamethasone responsive enhancer in the human
CYP3A5 gene and its activation in human and rat liver
cells. Mol. Pharmacol. 49, 63–72.
Pascussi,J.M.;Drocourt,L.;Gerbal Chaloin, S. ; Fabre, J.
M. ; Maurel, P. ; Vilarem, M. J. Dual effect of
dexamethasoneon CYP3A4 gene expression in human
hepatocytes. (2001). Sequential role of glucocorticoid
receptor and pregnane X receptor. Eur. J. Biochem. 268,
6346–6358.
Chen, Y.; Zeng, L.; Wang, Y.; Tolleson, W.H.; Knox, B.;
Chen, S.; Ren, Z.; Guo, L.; Mei, N.; Qian, F.; etal.
(2017). The expression, induction and pharmacological
activity of CYP1A2 are post-transcriptionally regulated
by microRNA hsa-miR-132-5p. Biochem. Pharmacol.
145, 178–191.
Bernasconi, C., Pelkonen, O., Andersson, T.B., Strickland,
J., Wilk-Zasadna, I., Asturiol, D., Cole, T., Liska, R.,
Worth, A., Müller-Vieira, U. and Richert, L. (2019).
Validation of in vitro methods for human cytochrome
P450 enzyme induction: Outcome of a multi-laboratory
study. Toxicology in Vitro, 60, pp.212-228.
Dumond, J.B., Vourvahis, M., Rezk, N.L., Patterson, K.B.,
Tien, H.C., White, N., Jennings, S.H., Choi, S.O., Li, J.,
Wagner, M.J. and La‐Beck, N.M. (2010). A Phenotype–
Genotype Approach to Predicting CYP450 and P‐
Glycoprotein Drug Interactions with the Mixed
Inhibitor/Inducer Tipranavir/Ritonavir. Clinical
Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 87(6), pp.735-742.
Jiang, W., Wang, L., Zhang, W., Coffee, R., Fazili, I.S. and
Moorthy, B. (2009). Persistent induction of cytochrome
P450 (CYP) 1A enzymes by 3-methylcholanthrene in
vivo in mice is mediated by sustained transcriptional
activation of the corresponding promoters. Biochemical
and biophysical research communications, 390(4),
pp.1419-1424.
Stevison F, Kosaka M, Kenny JR, et al. (2019). Does In
Vitro Cytochrome P450 Downregulation Translate to In
Vivo Drug-Drug Interactions? Preclinical and Clinical
Studies With 13-cis-Retinoic Acid. Clin Transl Sci.
12(4):350-360.
Ghosh R, Nayan MI, Mitu MM, Nandi T. (2023). Common
Approaches of Cytochrome P450 (CYP) Induction
Assays. International Blood Research & Reviews. Jan
18;14(1):6-14.
Oliva-Vilarnau, N., Vorrink, S.U., Büttner, F.A., Heinrich,
T., Sensbach, J., Koscielski, I., Wienke, D., Petersson,
C., Perrin, D. and Lauschke, V.M. (2023). Comparative
analysis of YAP/TEAD inhibitors in 2D and 3D cultures
of primary human hepatocytes reveals a novel non-
canonical mechanism of CYP induction. Biochemical
Pharmacology, 215, p.115755.