able to ease the problem of lacking nesting sites in the
short term. It is time- and resource-consuming to
restore a young forest to maturity actively. The effects
of implementing artificial nests are immediate
without requiring the woody vegetation to take years
to develop tree crowns and forks that are large enough
to attract raptors to nest; therefore, this conservation
method is practically appropriate.
To minimize the effect of human intervention on
the species composition of raptors, the ecology and
nesting habits of all raptors in the area should be
studied and evaluated before the placement of
artificial nests. The production of artificial nests
should consider species preferences, for instance,
providing a range of sizes and materials to
accommodate different raptors and prioritizing to
conserve more vulnerable species or species with
intrinsic value. The location and distance of the
implementation should also be considered. Some
species have preferred elevation in landscapes, and
with highly territorial species, distance between
nests is recommended to reduce intraspecific
competition and utilize home ranges.
5 CONCLUSION
This paper discusses the effects of deforestation on
forest raptors and evaluations of two possible
conservation methods. In general, non-migratory
raptors that are reliant on forests are more vulnerable
to habitat degradation. The complexity of maturity of
old-growth forests provides exceptional habitat for a
diversity of forest raptors. With high-density prey
abundance, lateral spatial sites for hunting, and high
biodiversity of animals sustaining specialist species,
forest raptors thrive in large, intact patches of forests.
Mature trees also provide suitable trunks and crowns
for raptors to construct nests, allowing raptors to
breed and raise their young.
With ample evidence showing that deforestation
that caused habitat degradation and fragmentation is
the biggest threat that raptors face, conservation
methods should be evaluated based on species
susceptibility, raptor's diet requirements, and nesting
preferences. The key to sustaining healthy raptor
populations and species diversity is the preservation
of intact, mature forest ecosystems.
REFERENCES
Carrete, M., Tella, J. L., Blanco, G., & Bertellotti, M. 2009.
Effects of habitat degradation on the abundance,
richness and diversity of raptors across Neotropical
biomes. Biological Conservation, 142(10).
McClure, C. J. W., Westrip, J. R. S., Johnson, J. A.,
Schulwitz, S. E., Virani, M. Z., Davies, R., Symes, A.,
Wheatley, H., Thorstrom, R., Amar, A., Buij, R., Jones,
V. R., Williams, N. P., Buechley, E. R., & Butchart, S.
H. M. 2018. State of the world's raptors: Distributions,
threats, and conservation recommendations. Biological
Conservation, 227: 390–402.
Healey, J. 2020. Conserving native forests. Spinney Press.
Piana, R. P., & Marsden, S. J. 2014. Impacts of cattle
grazing on forest structure and raptor distribution
within a neotropical protected area. Biodiversity and
Conservation, 23(3):559–572.
De Labra, M. A., Escalante, P., & Monterrubio-Rico, T.
2013. Diurnal Raptors in Los Tuxtlas Biosphere
Reserve, Mexico: Current Presence and Relative
Abundance. The Journal of Raptor Research, 47(4):
392–399.
Barraclough, S. L., & Ghimire, K. B. 1995. Forests and
Livelihoods: The Social Dynamics of Deforestation in
Developing Countries (1st ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
Whitacre, D. F., & Peregrine Fund. 2012. Neotropical birds
of prey : biology and ecology of a forest raptor
community. Comstock.
Segura, A., & Acevedo, P. 2023. Forest raptor nest
selection traits in Mediterranean forest (Maamora,
North Africa): conservation implications. Bird
Conservation International, 33.
Vargas González, J. de J., McCabe, J. D., Anderson, D. L.,
Curti, M., Cárdenas, D. C., & Vargas, F. H. 2020.
Predictive Habitat Model Reveals Specificity in a
Broadly Distributed Forest Raptor, The Harpy Eagle.
The Journal of Raptor Research, 54(4): 349–363.
Lohmus, A. 2005. Are timber harvesting and conservation
of nest sites of forest-dwelling raptors always mutually
exclusive? Animal Conservation, 8(4): 443–450.
iménez-Franco, M. V., Martínez-Fernández, J., Martínez, J.
E., Pagán, I., Calvo, J. F., & Esteve, M. A. 2018. Nest
sites as a key resource for population persistence: A
case study modelling nest occupancy under forestry
practices. PloS One, 13(10).
Mozgeris, G., Mörtberg, U., Pang, X.-L., Trubins, R., &
Treinys, R. 2021. Future projection for forest
management suggests a decrease in the availability of
nesting habitats for a mature-forest-nesting raptor.
Forest Ecology and Management, 491:119168.
Monteagudo, N., Rebollo, S., Pérez-Camacho, L.,
Martínez-Hesterkamp, S., Fernández-Pereira, J. M.,
Pataro, L., & Rey-Benayas, J. M. 2024. Relative
importance of vegetation features and intra- and inter-
specific interactions on habitat preferences of a raptor
guild in eucalypt plantations. Forest Ecology and
Management, 554: 121656.
Spohn, M., & Sierra, C. A. 2018. How long do elements
cycle in terrestrial ecosystems? Biogeochemistry,
139(1): 69–83.
Clark, C. M., Bai, Y., Bowman, W. D., Cowles, J. M., Fenn,
M. E., Gilliam, F. S., Phoenix, G. K., Siddique, I.,
Stevens, C. J., Sverdrup, H. U., & Throop, H. L. 2013.