6 CONCLUSION
This study reveals both significant achievements and
ongoing challenges in Uzbekistan’s pursuit of
aligning its education system with global standards
under the "Education 2030" framework. The positive
impact of digital technologies and higher education
reforms in urban areas demonstrates progress towards
meeting international benchmarks. However, the
persistent regional disparities, particularly between
urban and rural areas, underscore the need for more
targeted and inclusive strategies. The survey data
indicate that while urban areas are experiencing
improvements in educational quality and global
competitiveness, rural regions are struggling with
lower levels of digital resource availability, teacher
qualifications, and higher education access. These
disparities highlight the necessity for targeted
interventions to ensure that rural areas benefit equally
from educational reforms. The qualitative insights
from policymakers further emphasize the critical
areas requiring attention, including digital
infrastructure, teacher training, and financial
investment in rural education systems. Addressing
these issues is essential for achieving the
comprehensive goals of the "Education 2030" agenda
and ensuring that all students, regardless of their
geographical location, have access to quality
education.
Overall, Uzbekistan’s efforts to meet global
education standards are commendable, but the study
underscores the importance of a balanced approach to
reform implementation. By addressing regional
disparities and focusing on equitable access to
resources and opportunities, Uzbekistan can make
significant strides towards achieving the objectives of
"Education 2030." Future research and policy
initiatives should continue to explore and address the
challenges identified in this study to foster a more
inclusive and globally competitive education system.
REFERENCES
Braun, E. (2021). Performance-based assessment of
students’ communication skills. Int. J. Chinese Educ.,
10(1). DOI: 10.1177/22125868211006202.
Bo’ranbaeva, S. (2024, February). Международная
Конференция Академических Наук, 3, 114.
Bozorova, N. O. (2024). Scientific approach to the modern
education system, 3, 16.
Durdona, D. S. (2024). Pedagogical reforms and their
solutions, 2, 34.
Dusdal, J. (2019). Higher education in Germany – Recent
developments in an international perspective. Higher
Education, 55(2). DOI:
10.1080/03050068.2019.1575023.
Frey, B. B., & Schmitt, V. L. (2007). W, 18(3), 402.
Gavharxon, O., Sarvinoz, S., & Nuriya, N. Q. (2024, June).
International global conference, 1, 257.
Hyytinen, H., & Toom, A. (2019). Developing a
performance assessment task in the Finnish higher
education context: Conceptual and empirical insights.
Br. J. Educ. Psychol., 89(3). DOI: 10.1111/Bjep.12283.
Miriammtoepperr, O.-T., & Christianeekuhn, H. C. (2018).
Methodology of educational measurement and
assessment: Assessment of learning outcomes in higher
education cross-national comparisons and perspectives.
Springer. Available: Springer.
Samatova, D. (2024). Research and publications, 1, 78.
Shavelson, R. J., Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., & Mariño, J.
P. (2018). International performance assessment of
learning in higher education (Ipal): Research and
development. Methodol. Educ. Meas. Assess., March,
193. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-74338-7_10.
Shermuxammadovich, R. B., & Qaxramon, A. (2024).
Uzbek scholar journal, 27, 1.