from content to results, from knowledge to personal
development. The competence-based approach
correlates with the situation, the problem, and
represents the reflexive formation of a "mental space"
(Klochko, 2005). Today, it is important to provide a
university graduate with a good competitive position
in the modern labor market, for this purpose, in his
university training, the main emphasis must be placed
on the result (competence), which in turn gives
competence and the latter should be based not just on
knowledge, but operational knowledge. Therefore,
today the competence-based approach is optimal and
represents the basis for training specialists.
3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
In the scientific and methodological literature,
competence and competence are not differentiated
and are characterized by the following features:
- the complexity of the modern world
encourages a person to be competent in any field of
activity (profession) in order to remain independent
and independent of external circumstances;
- competence is a dynamic education that
develops throughout a person's life when included in
various contexts with both targeted and non–targeted
learning;
- the development of key competencies
determines life success, quality of life, individual and
social progress (Zarygin, 2011; Verbitsky, 2004).
From the above, it should already be clear why
it is necessary to distinguish between competence and
competence, and what content characterizes each of
these concepts. At the same time, I would like to
clearly state my position on this issue due to the fact
that both terms in the scientific literature are
considered ambiguously and interpreted quite widely.
In interpreting these two terms, we adhere to the point
of view of V.A. Zarygina, who, distinguishing
between these two concepts, notes that competence
should be understood as the result of learning,
whereas competence is already competence in action.
At the same time, scientists are allocated such
evaluative parameters as assimilation (knowledge,
skills, abilities) and application (related to the
performance of activities) (Verbitsky, 2004).
In addition, from our point of view, the
second component should be considered as an
integrative category, which, as A.A.Verbitsky
emphasizes, is characterized in this case by such
integrative features and properties as: intersubject,
over-subject, practice orientation, motivation of use,
consistency, cultural conformity, situationality
(Verbitsky, 2004; Chesnokova, 2015; Tabachuk,
2007; Mikheeva & Yakusheva, 2019; Kolesova,
2011; Zimnaya, 2003; Zadorozhnaya, 2004;
Akhmedova & Khosilova, 2021).
Thus, speaking about the specifics of the
competence-based approach to education, it is
important to emphasize that the competence-based
approach does not ultimately deny the need to form a
knowledge base, since the latter mainly represents
competence, but this approach is made specific by its
second component competence, as an integral result
of the educational process on a competence basis. A
review of scientific and pedagogical, scientific and
methodological literature shows that the competence
base is divided into:
a) control functions: educational, diagnostic,
predictive,
developing, orienting and educating;
b) forms of control: individual, group, frontal,
combined;
c) types of control: external control of the teacher
over the activities
of students, mutual control and self-control of
students;
d) types of control: introductory, current,
correction, final;
e) control methods: observation, oral interview,
written control.
4 ANALYSIS AND RESULTS
We would like to focus on the latter, on control
methods that have a competence-based nature in their
characteristics, and on their didactic capabilities. In
addition, the quality of education largely depends on
the optimal choice of methods and means of
monitoring and evaluation. Based on the purpose of
learning control (determining the quality of students'
learning of program material, diagnosing and
correcting their knowledge and skills, fostering a
responsible attitude to academic work, to their future
professional / special activities), as well as the
characteristics of the competence approach, we have
identified the following range of competence-based
control methods, dividing it in turn into two groups:
a) traditional: a conversation between a teacher
and a student, other types
of oral questioning, individual cards, written
control /independent work, etc.;
b) non-traditional (non-standard): test, group
creative work, creative report, cluster, discussion,
quiz, role-playing game, interactive presentation, test,
project method, press conference, portfolio, etc.