plausible to improve the model to produce a more
accurate output.
4 CONCLUSIONS
This project successfully developed a machine
learning model capable of analyzing emotional
polarity in Reddit posts, achieving an accuracy of
0.8619 after ten epochs of training. While the model
performed reasonably well, the results were
somewhat lower than expected due to simplified
polarity labels and limitations imposed by the Google
Colab platform. One of the key challenges in this
project was the handling of the large dataset, which
required adjustments in training parameters, such as
batch size and epochs. Time and processing power
limitations prevented the research from
experimenting with more granular output (float
values for polarity), which could have provided a
more detailed emotional analysis. Instead, the project
settled on binary output (0 or 1) for polarity, which
likely contributed to the reduced accuracy.
Despite these limitations, the project achieved its
primary goal of creating a functional model for
emotional polarity classification. The errors
encountered, particularly the anomaly in the sixth
epoch, highlight the complexity of training deep
learning models and the importance of sufficient
computational resources. Future research should aim
to overcome these barriers by utilizing more robust
computing platforms, allowing for finer-tuned
models and the inclusion of additional data.
One promising direction for future work is to
experiment with more accurate and varied datasets,
which could improve the model’s ability to recognize
complex emotional patterns in text. Furthermore,
expanding the project to include more nuanced
outputs for emotional intensity could increase its
usefulness in real-world applications, such as
customer sentiment analysis or mental health
monitoring. Overall, the research demonstrates the
potential of artificial intelligence to analyze human
communication, contributing valuable insights into
emotion detection and text classification in the digital
age.
REFERENCES
Bisong, E., & Bisong, E. 2019. Google
colaboratory. Building machine learning and deep
learning models on google cloud platform: a
comprehensive guide for beginners, 59-64.
Gasparetto, A., Marcuzzo, M., Zangari, A., & Albarelli, A.
2022. A survey on text classification algorithms: From
text to predictions. Information, 13(2), 83.
Gunawan, T. S., Ashraf, A., Riza, B. S., Haryanto, E. V.,
Rosnelly, R., Kartiwi, M., & Janin, Z. 2020.
Development of video-based emotion recognition using
deep learning with Google Colab. TELKOMNIKA
(Telecommunication Computing Electronics and
Control), 18(5), 2463-2471.
Holmes, J., Sacchi, L., & Bellazzi, R. 2004. Artificial
intelligence in medicine. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 86,
334-8.
Holzinger, A., Langs, G., Denk, H., Zatloukal, K., &
Müller, H. 2019. Causability and explainability of
artificial intelligence in medicine. Wiley
Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and
Knowledge Discovery, 9(4), e1312.
Kanani, P., & Padole, M. 2019. Deep learning to detect skin
cancer using google colab. International Journal of
Engineering and Advanced Technology Regular
Issue, 8(6), 2176-2183.
Kaul, V., Enslin, S., & Gross, S. A. 2020. History of
artificial intelligence in medicine. Gastrointestinal
endoscopy, 92(4), 807-812.
Kowsari, K., Jafari Meimandi, K., Heidarysafa, M., Mendu,
S., Barnes, L., & Brown, D. 2019. Text classification
algorithms: A survey. Information, 10(4), 150.
Kuroki, M. 2021. Using Python and Google Colab to teach
undergraduate microeconomic theory. International
Review of Economics Education, 38, 100225.
Minaee, S., Kalchbrenner, N., Cambria, E., Nikzad, N.,
Chenaghlu, M., & Gao, J. 2021. Deep learning-based
text classification: A comprehensive review. ACM
computing surveys (CSUR), 54(3), 1-40.
Mirończuk, M. M., & Protasiewicz, J. 2018. A recent
overview of the state-of-the-art elements of text
classification. Expert Systems with Applications, 106,
36-54.
MLSCM 2024 - International Conference on Modern Logistics and Supply Chain Management