function as a source of inspiration, continuously
pushing the envelope for creators in both direction
sits scope and shape (Zhou, 2024, Sun, 2024).
Democratization of Filmmaking. AI levels the
playing field of filmmaking. Both entry-cost and
technical skill barriers are lowered by it, so that a
wider range of voices and visions can take part in this
field (Sun, 2024). Such democracy makes the silver
screen a richer place.
2.3 Concerns Surrounding AI
While AI promises a new dawn for filmmaking, it
comes with its own set of challenges. The specter of
automation raises concern about job security in the
film industry. The evolution of AI may lead to some
people being kicked out of their established roles and
replaced by machines. Debate also surrounds AI's
impact on film expression: it is not hard for AI,
picking from patterns in data, to produce a world of
movies lacking in originality (Tiwari, 2023). Not only
that, but it increases disincentives.
Also, the potential of AI to shape an artistic genre
that is formulaic has become something to be argued
over. Moreover, the use of AI in filmmaking is
fraught with ethical dimension. Begin to worry about
data privacy, not to mention who owns the intellectual
property rights related to AI-generated content.
Debates related to all this are ready to burst open in
the industry. Can I take advantage of AI in a way
which is responsible ethically, as well as creative
(Lee, 2022).
The symbiosis of AI and filmmaking portends a
period of massive change for the industry. While it
makes production faster and more efficient, opens up
entirely new possibilites of creativity and spreads use
out across different segments within media industries
themselves, one must also treat AI with care bringing
it (sometimes harshly) down-back to reality. Above
anything else It Is Vital that while there are
opportunities to innovate creatively or professionally-
-both important aspects within any business or
artform's operation today--the potential pitfalls which
such advances may bring along lie just as heavily on
our minds. With preconceptions newly tailored about
how one shapes a scene however it applies
everywhere and anywhere; from advances in
production to how your 'camera' is aimed for shooting
final resolutions are unknown right now
The film industry must find its way, as it enters
this strange new world. It is imperative that
filmmakers coming into AI technology equip
themselves with the knowledge to employ it in a
conscientious and informed manner. Separating the
chaff from grain will be vital. Only by establishing
practices 'good', responsible and knowing when to
draw on AI 's capabilities--and when not to can we
maintain professionalism of our content and integrity
as a film industry.
3 METHODOLOGY
In this study, we use a qualitative approach to discuss
how artificial intelligence (AI) affects and changes
filming realities. Our main data source is transcripts
of YouTube-video recordings with viewpoints from a
range of period industry stakeholders such as
filmmakers, actors and technicians. These transcripts
give insights into where AI is being deployed in the
film-making process and what the resultant
advantages and problems are as well as its ethical
implications for professionals engaged in this field. In
conducting this research, several rigid criteria were
adopted for selection and analysis of AI in
filmmaking content from YouTube. Firstly, the
regularity of published materials must be considered.
We always paid attention to channels which
maintained an orderly upload schedule for if a
channel has been at it this long and is still enthusiastic
about their subject matter then their output is worth
listening too. Secondly, discussion depth and
audience enthusiasm got priority. We selected videos
which inspired stimulating interchanges of comment
in the comments section, simply because Quality
comments are a reflection of the level to which people
Really think about and discuss the material given that
each video gets only one response. Lastly, content
fairness and objectivity were measured. We
proceeded with caution towards certain videos that
showed a pronounced partiality or pushed a particular
product or service at the cost of fairness of general
coverage on AI in filmmaking. That the material was
both fair and objective was vital for an exhaustive
study which remains worthy of trust.
Data Collection
Selection Criteria. High profile interviews of full-
time working professionals in the field from YouTube
videos were taken as sample for this study. Videos
were selected due to the influence of the filmmaker,
variety of perspectives related to AI and its
applicability in different parts of film production
(such as scriptwriting, editing or special effects).
More specifically, the group wanted to target
generative AI in filmmaking so there was a clear