Analysis of the Current Situation and Treatment Technology of
PPCPs in Wastewater
Jiayi Xin
a
School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
Keywords: PPCPs, Water Pollution, Pollution Control.
Abstract: Pharmaceutical and personal care product contaminants (PPCPs) are a representative group of emerging
contaminants. The improvement of human living standards and the development of medical technology have
led to an increase in the accumulation and release of PPCPs in the environment. This paper aims to investigate
the current status of PPCPs pollution and their treatment technology. Currently, there are abundant types of
PPCPs, originating from residences, medical facilities, PPCP producers, etc. The main detection techniques
for PPCPs are UPLC and HPLC, which can detect efficiently and quantitatively.There are high ecological
and environmental risks as well as human health risks associated with the pollution of PPCPs. In addition,
this paper further introduces the new technologies and research related to the removal and control of PPCPs
at home and abroad, which are mainly divided into physical, chemical and biological methods, and analyzes
the scenarios and limitations of each method. Finally, the challenges and problems of PPCPs pollution control
are analyzed, and the research outlook of applying the emerging removal technologies to actual wastewater
treatment facilities is presented. The study in this paper can provide a reference for further research on PPCPs
treatment.
1 INTRODUCTION
Water resources are an indispensable and important
resource for human production and life. Both water
quantity and quality are crucial indicators of water
resources. Currently, the world's population and
standard of living are increasing, and so is the demand
for water resources. However, the development of
modern production technology and economic level
may have more impacts and pollution on the
environment, thus reducing the quality of water and
the amount of available water resources. In addition
to reducing water consumption, preventing and
combating water pollution has become particularly
important.
Water pollution often originates from the
discharge of domestic, industrial, and agricultural
water into natural water bodies during human
activities, and common conventional pollutants
include pesticides, feces and urine, heavy metals, oil,
and microorganisms. Traditional water treatment
methods, regulations, and standards are often set for
these pollutants. In recent years, new pollutants that
a
https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2782-6021
are different from conventional pollutants have
appeared on the scene. These include microplastic
pollution due to the long-term use of difficult-to-
biodegrade plastic products, and persistent organic
pollutants (POPs) resulting from the misuse of
chemicals such as pesticides.
New pollutants are more diverse than traditional
pollutants. However, since emerging contaminants
are more difficult to recognize as pollutants due to
their insignificant short-term hazards and often low
concentrations in the environment (Wang, 2022). At
the same time, such pollutants are also often
characterized by easy bioaccumulation, are not easily
degraded and become enriched with the food chain,
posing hazards to the biological chain and human
health (Álvarez-Ruiz, 2021).
Pharmaceutical and personal care products
(PPCPs) are a representative group of emerging
contaminants. PPCPs mainly include painkillers,
antibiotics, sunscreen, cosmetics, etc. Due to the
improvement of human living standards and the
development of medical technology, the number of
people using medicines and personal care products
190
Xin, J.
Analysis of the Current Situation and Treatment Technology of PPCPs in Wastewater.
DOI: 10.5220/0013253600004558
Paper published under CC license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Modern Logistics and Supply Chain Management (MLSCM 2024), pages 190-196
ISBN: 978-989-758-738-2
Proceedings Copyright © 2025 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda.
has increased, increasing the accumulation and
emission of PPCPs in the environment. As a result,
this type of pollutant has received wider and wider
attention in the field of environmental protection.
Currently, more than 3,000 types of PPCPs are in use,
and this number is increasing with technological
advances and product development (Arpin-pont,
2016). The unabsorbed portion of the
pharmaceuticals in PPCPs leaves the body through
excretion after they are used, and part of the personal
care products in PPCPs enters into the water after they
have been washed and rinsed. Both go into the
drainage system and are treated in sewage plants
before being discharged into water bodies. However,
as a new pollutant, there is a lack of clear definitions
of discharge indicators in wastewater treatment plants
and loopholes in traditional wastewater treatment
methods. Therefore, most of the PPCPs are still
discharged into water bodies, causing water pollution.
This paper aims to discuss the current situation of
PPCPs pollution, including types, common sources
and related monitoring technologies, and to analyze
the environmental and health impacts of PPCPs
pollution. It briefly summarizes the domestic and
international methods and researches related to the
removal and control of PPCPs, which are mainly
divided into physical, chemical and biological
methods. This will help readers to understand the
current status of PPCPs pollution and the progress of
treatment technology, and provide reference for
further research on PPCPs treatment.
2 BACKGROUNDS OF PPCPS
2.1 Classification of PPCPs
PPCPs can be simply categorized into
pharmaceuticals and personal care products. Within
pharmaceuticals, they can be further categorized into
steroids as well as Nonsteroidal pharmaceuticals
(Ebele, 2017).
For steroids, the representative ones are the
various types of medicinal hormones, such as Estrone,
progesterone, hydrocortisone, phytosterols, etc.
Among the steroids, the sex hormones are related to
sexual function and secondary sexual characteristics.
They are commonly used in the treatment of diseases
such as menstrual disorders, habitual abortion, and
uterine hypoplasia. On the other hand,
adrenocorticotropic hormones have mostly metabolic
regulatory effects, often have antiviral, anti-
inflammatory, and anti-allergic pharmacological
effects, and are used in treating severe toxic infections.
These steroids enter water bodies after use, mainly
through excretion and improper disposal.
Nonsteroidal pharmaceuticals also come in a wide
variety of types, including antibiotics such as
penicillin, tetracycline, and amoxicillin, analgesics
such as paracetamol, anti-inflammatories such as
ibuprofen, diclofenac, and naproxen, as well as
allergy medications and antidepressants. They are
widely used in daily treatment and enter the water
column through pathways similar to steroids.
Among personal care products, the most common
nowadays are UV screens, which include
benzophenone-3, homosalate, octyl-
methoxycinnamate, etc. There are also fragrances,
which may include musk xylol, galaxolide, tonalide,
and so on, as well as disinfectants and conservation
agents.
The main sources of PPCPs in water bodies are
homes, medical facilities, PPCP producers, livestock
farms, and landfills (Adeleye, 2022). In homes, it
enters water bodies with the excretion and washing of
every individual who uses pharmaceuticals and
personal care products. Healthcare facilities are
primarily source of pharmaceuticals, which enter the
water column with the water used to clean medical
devices and with the excretions and washings of
patients. Producers of PPCPs have a variety of routes
of leakage into the water column from their
production lines, resulting in effluents that contain
high levels of specificity and concentration of PPCPs.
In livestock farms, there may be misuse of antibiotics
and other substances, and excretions from the
livestock enter the environment.
On the other hand,
landfills
may discharge PPCPs from leachate into
water bodies, depending on the waste landfilled and
the temperature at the time of landfilling. On the other
hand, wastewater treatment plants often aggregate
wastewater containing PPCPs transmitted from
various sources. Due to the current capacity
limitations of wastewater treatment plants, which are
not set up to treat PPCPs, most of the PPCPs will not
be treated by conventional means and will continue to
flow into natural water bodies.
2.2 Detection Methods of PPCPs
PPCPs have non-negligible hazards, and in addition
to bioaccumulation and toxicity, they are
characterized by a high degree of invisibility. This is
due to the fact that PPCPs, although not easily
degradable, have a relatively low concentration in
water bodies compared to traditional pollutants.
Currently, HPLC and UPLC are the main techniques
used for the detection of pharmaceuticals. This
Analysis of the Current Situation and Treatment Technology of PPCPs in Wastewater
191
detection technique uses a liquid as the mobile phase
and separates the components within a column for the
purpose of detection. Hong et al. established the use
of UPLC in order to rapidly detect more than 60
pharmaceuticals in water and to quantify the drugs
(Hong, 2015). UPLC-APPI-MS is also one of the
techniques used for the detection of personal care
products, Lung et al. developed a method for the
detection of six synthetic musks using this technique
with high sensitivity and chromatographic separation
was achieved in a relatively short period of time
(Lung, 2011). High performance liquid
chromatography-mass spectrometry is also one of the
main techniques used for the detection of personal
care products, Lu Jing et al. developed a method for
the determination of 19 PPCPs in water using this
technique (Lu, 2019). HPLC-MS and UPLC-MS
have shown high efficiency and accuracy in
determining the concentration of PPCPs, but as more
and more PPCPs are being used and entering into the
water column, there are still many compounds that
need detection methods with high efficiency and high
sensitivity.
3 ENVIRONMENTAL AND
HEALTH IMPACTS OF PPCPS
3.1 Ecological Impact
PPCPs that have not been removed by wastewater
treatment enter natural water bodies, where the large
volume of natural water has a dilution effect, and
where the concentration of PPCPs will be lower than
that measured at the wastewater treatment plant.
Despite of the low concentration, the characteristic of
PPCPs that deserves our attention is that it is detected
in a very wide range. In addition to natural water
bodies, PPCPs have been detected in algae, shellfish,
shrimps, crabs, fish, and even birds, and they can be
transported and distributed along the food chain in
living organisms. In addition, PPCPs exhibit
inhibitory effects on the growth of algae and adverse
effects on the ability of some organisms to reproduce.
Due to its bio-accumulative and hazardous nature and
the pseudo persistence caused by its continuous
release into the environment, PPCPs are susceptible
to ecological impacts.
He et al. found that sulfadiazine (SDZ) and
triclocarban (TCC) adversely affected the
reproduction of microorganisms such as Daphnia
magna in water bodies, and that TCC was easily
enriched in Daphnia magna (He, 2023). The
concentration of PPCPs in water bodies has not
caused extreme effects on the growth and
reproduction of microorganisms in water bodies.
However, it is foreseeable that if PPCPs continue to
be discharged uncontrolled into the natural
environment, when their concentration reaches a
certain level, the inhibitory effect on the reproduction
of microorganisms in the water bodies is too strong,
and it may cause destructive impacts on the microbial
population structure. Some studies have evaluated the
environmental risk of PPCPs. Nie et al. used the RQ
model to evaluate the environmental risk of estrogen
in the Yangtze River estuary, which expressed a
moderate, or even partly high, environmental risk in
different seasons (Nie, 2015). PPCPs not only affect
the ecosystems, but also pose a threat to human health
through the ecosystems.
3.2 Human health risks
While PPCPs enter the food chain in the water
environment and enter the bodies of animals, it may
also migrate into the soil environment and accumulate
in crops. The PPCPs that humans release into the
natural environment may end up back on human’s
own tables or even in human bodies, posing health
risks. On the one hand, a large portion of PPCPs are
often disease-specific or designed for topical use, and
they have the property of disrupting the normal
healthy human endocrine system and cannot
accumulate in the body over time. For example,
medicines such as steroids may interfere with the
body's normal hormone metabolism. Personal care
products such as synthetic fragrances have been
clinically observed to affect the central nervous
system at certain concentrations (Yang, 2010).
On the other hand, the misuse of PPCPs such as
antibiotics has led to the persistence of low
concentrations of pharmaceuticals in the environment,
which is largely responsible for the emergence of
drug-resistant genes in bacteria, which are also passed
on as bacteria proliferate (Storteboom, 2010). The
occurrence of drug-resistant bacteria is a test for the
human healthcare system, which means that even
colds may be more difficult to cure, and doctors need
to be more careful in terms of the number of types of
drugs they prescribe. The threat that PPCPs pollution
can pose to human health can no longer be ignored
and deserves more attention.
MLSCM 2024 - International Conference on Modern Logistics and Supply Chain Management
192
4 TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
OF PPCPS
PPCPs pollution control technology can be
categorized into physical, chemical and biological
treatment technologies through the methods used.
Physical treatment methods do not change the
chemical properties of PPCPs substances, such as
adsorption method. They are usually simple, flexible,
and have few by-products, and are suitable for
wastewater with relatively high concentrations of
pollutants. Chemical treatment methods change the
chemical properties of PPCPs substances. They have
high removal efficiency and complete degradation.
Biological treatment methods apply microorganisms,
plants and animals for the degradation of pollutants.
They have been widely used in the degradation of
organic pollutants, and in recent years there has been
greater progress in the treatment of PPCPs technology.
They can effectively reduce the toxicity of pollutants
and the quality of the effluent is relatively stable.
4.1 Physical Treatment Methods
Physical treatment methods refer to the removal of
pollutants in the environment by physical means and
do not change the chemical nature of the pollutants.
Commonly used physical treatment methods include
sedimentation, filtration and flotation. The principle
of the precipitation method is that the relative density
is different, thus separating the suspended substances
in the liquid. The principle of the filtration method is
to use porous filter media, thereby retaining the
suspended particles in the liquid. The principle of the
flotation method is to pass air as a carrier in order to
remove pollutants in water that have a density similar
to that of water. However, the concentration of PPCPs
in water is usually small and dissolved in water, so
physical adsorbents need to be introduced in order to
achieve removal using physical treatment methods.
Common physical adsorbents are activated carbon,
biochar, graphene-based adsorbents, carbon
nanotubes, etc. (Ayati, 2023). Javier et al.
investigated the adsorption performance of powdered
activated carbon (PAC) as an adsorbent for four
antibiotics in water bodies, and the adsorption
performance for different antibiotics expressed
different adsorption capacities, with the removal of
enrofloxacin at 28% and sulfadiazine at 67% at the
adsorbent concentration of 100 mg/L. For antibiotics
present in trace quantities in the water column, PAC
showed an effective removal capacity (Berges, 2021).
Shin et al. investigated the adsorption properties of
NaOH-activated biochar (BC) from spent coffee
wastes as an adsorbent for pharmaceuticals in water
such as naproxen, diclofenac, and ibuprofen, and the
chemically activated BC had a stronger adsorption
capacity compared to normal BC (Shin, 2021).
The physical adsorption treatment method is
simple to apply and has demonstrated effective
removal of PPCPs substances with fewer by-products.
However, it should be noted that the adsorbent needs
subsequent regeneration treatment. From the study, it
can be seen that the removal effect is closely related
to the type of the adsorbent and pollutants, and the
removal rate is relatively limited, which is more
suitable as a pre-treatment of a wastewater treatment
plant, or for the case of a single type of pollution.
4.2 Chemical Treatment Methods
Chemical treatment methods require changing the
chemical properties of the contaminant to achieve the
purpose of removing the contamination. Commonly
used chemical methods include chemical
precipitation, which is similar to physical
precipitation, with the difference being that the
pollutants are recovered and removed through
chemical means by making them easier to precipitate.
In addition to this, there are electrolysis, oxidation,
photocatalysis and other chemical treatment methods
to degrade the pollutants in the water body, so that the
pollutants are harmless.
Peng et al. prepared CuZnAl-layered double
hydroxide and examined its performance for
photocatalytic degradation of Naproxen under UV
irradiation, and the removal efficiency of Naproxen
was up to 98.25% under the optimum conditions they
tested, i.e., pH 9.0 and catalyst dosage of 0.25 g/L
(Peng, 2022). Luo et al. used the UV365-
LED/chlorine process for the degradation and
removal of metronidazole with degradation
efficiency up to 90.6%, and it was also found that
increasing the intensity of UV light, the amount of
chlorine and decreasing the pH could help in the
degradation efficiency of metronidazole (Luo, 2023).
Li et al. established a new electrochemical peroxone
process, which can realize electrogenerated H2O2/O3
and can efficiently electrochemically decompose
ibuprofen (Li, 2024).
Chemical treatment technology can reach a high
removal rate and complete degradation of pollutants.
Photocatalytic degradation due to its environmentally
friendly characteristics, has gained widespread
attention in recent years, but it is difficult to apply to
larger-scale wastewater treatment. Ozone oxidation
treatment is also efficient but relatively costly.
Analysis of the Current Situation and Treatment Technology of PPCPs in Wastewater
193
Chemical treatment technologies usually cost high
and are complicated to apply.
4.3 Biological Treatment Methods
Biological treatment methods, on the other hand,
introduce biological means in the process of
removing pollutants, mainly utilizing the metabolism
of microorganisms to absorb or degrade pollutants in
water. Microbial treatment methods can be simply
divided into aerobic biological treatment and
anaerobic biological treatment, but also often used in
conjunction with the two. Biochemical tanks are
currently one of the main treatment units in the
sewage treatment plant. In addition to
microorganisms, a part of plants and animals can also
be used as pollutant absorption treatment, often used
in artificial wetlands.
Mokhtariazar et al. compared the ability of two
technologies, Membrane bioreactor (MBR) and MBR
with fixed-bed packing media (FBMBR), to remove
Naproxen, and demonstrated that FBMBR has a
higher efficiency for the removal of PPCPs
represented by Naproxen (Mokhtariazar, 2024).
Iliopoulou et al. developed a system that combined
strictly anaerobic MBBR and aerobic MBR, which
was effective for the removal of metronidazole
(MTZ), trimethoprim (TMP), sulfamethoxazole
(SMX) , and valsartan (VAL), can achieve removal
efficiencies of more than 65% and biotransformation
is the main principle for the removal of these PPCPs,
while Bacteroidetes are the dominant
microorganisms in this system (Iliopoulou, 2023).
The biological treatment methods have a stable
system, the effluent water quality is also stable, and it
can effectively reduce the toxicity of pollutants.
Compared with the traditional activated sludge
method, MBR technology has obvious removal effect
on PPCPs pollutants, but the cost is also greatly
increased. Artificial wetlands, phytoremediation and
other methods are less costly and environmentally
friendly but are susceptible to environmental climate
and other factors, and are relatively less efficient.
5 CHALLENGES AND
PERSPECTIVES OF
POLLUTION CONTROL OF
PPCPs
Since the concept of PPCPs has come into the
limelight, more attention has now been paid to its
pollution control, and a large number of studies have
been conducted on the detection and removal of
various types of PPCPs pollutants. In terms of
pollutant detection, the main technical challenge
faced by the research initially is that PPCPs usually
exist in trace amounts in the aqueous environment
and are relatively difficult to detect. With the
introduction of UPLC, HPLC and other detection
methods, the difficulty of trace detection has been
reduced. The new challenge is to find and identify the
pollutants with high ecological risk in the water body.
In the face of the rich variety of PPCPs pollutants,
there is a need to identify which ones require our
immediate attention and control.
Current studies have focused on several common
types of PPCPs contaminants, mainly
pharmaceuticals, such as Naproxen and ibuprofen,
and relatively little research has been conducted on
personal care products. Different pollution control
methods have different removal effects for different
PPCPs contaminants, and the research on removal
methods is still far from adequate in the case of
increasing types of PPCPs. In addition, most of the
pollution control methods are highly targeted, and it
is difficult to find a generalized control method. In the
face of the complex pollution of the water
environment, how to apply these methods to achieve
the best PPCPs pollution control efficiency at a lower
cost is also a difficult problem.
Wastewater treatment plants, as the core of urban
drainage systems, are responsible for the removal of
most PPCPs. Therefore, future research should focus
on how to apply emerging removal technologies to
actual wastewater treatment facilities, as well as
upgrading existing treatment processes to enable
them to effectively respond to the challenges of novel
pollutants. Through interdisciplinary cooperation and
technological innovation, pollution control of PPCPs
will be able to achieve better results.
6 CONCLUSIONS
PPCPs are potentially hazardous emerging
contaminants that deserve attention and in-depth
study. In this paper, the current status of PPCPs
contamination is first introduced, and the types of
PPCPs are discussed from pharmaceuticals and
personal care products, as well as the common
sources. The concentration of PPCPs in water is
usually trace, and the commonly used detection
methods are HPLC and UPLC, which can achieve
high efficiency and high sensitivity. The pollution of
PPCPs has high ecological and environmental risks as
well as human health risks. In terms of PPCPs
MLSCM 2024 - International Conference on Modern Logistics and Supply Chain Management
194
removal technology, the adsorption method, which is
commonly used in physical treatment methods, is
simple and has fewer by-products, but the removal
effect is related to the type of application, which is
suitable for pre-treatment or simple pollutants.
Chemical treatment methods can completely degrade
pollutants, but the application is complex and costly,
while photocatalytic degradation is suitable for small-
scale wastewater treatment. Biological treatment
methods have a stable system, can reduce toxicity,
and the effluent quality is stable, but the MBR method
is costly, and the artificial wetland method is
susceptible to climate, so they need to be adapted to
local conditions. Understanding the current status of
PPCPs pollution and treatment technology can
provide a reference for further research on PPCPs
removal. Future research on PPCPs pollution control
should aims to discover and identify PPCPs pollutants
with high ecological risks and apply emerging
treatment technologies to actual wastewater treatment
facilities to face the challenges of emerging
contaminants.
REFERENCES
Adeleye, A. S., Xue, J., Zhao, Y., Taylor, A. A., Zenobio,
J. E., Sun, Y., Han, Z., Salawu, O. A., & Zhu, Y. 2022.
Abundance, fate, and effects of pharmaceuticals and
personal care products in aquatic environments. Journal
of Hazardous Materials, 424, 127284.
Álvarez-Ruiz, R., Picó, Y., & Campo, J. 2021.
Bioaccumulation of emerging contaminants in mussel
(Mytilus galloprovincialis): Influence of microplastics.
Science of The Total Environment, 796, 149006.
Arpin-pont, L., Bueno, M. J., Martinez, Gomez, E., & Fenet,
H. 2016. Occurrence of PPCPs in the marine
environment: a review. Environmental Science and
Pollution Research, 23(6), 4978-4991.
Ayati, A., Tanhaei, B., Beiki, H., Krivoshapkin, P.,
Krivoshapkina, E., & Tracey, C. 2023. Insight into the
adsorptive removal of ibuprofen using porous
carbonaceous materials: A review. Chemosphere, 323,
138241.
Berges, J., Moles, S., Ormad, M. P., Mosteo, R., & Gómez,
J. 2021. Antibiotics removal from aquatic environments:
adsorption of enrofloxacin, trimethoprim, sulfadiazine,
and amoxicillin on vegetal powdered activated carbon.
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(7),
8442-8452.
Ebele, A. J., Abou-Elwafa Abdallah, M., & Harrad, S. 2017.
Pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in
the freshwater aquatic environment. Emerging
Contaminants, 3(1), 1-16.
He, Y 2023. Enrichment, metabolism and transformation of
typical PPCPs in different organisms. Yantai University.
Hong, Y., Sharma, V. K., Chiang, P.-C., & Kim, H. (2015).
Fast-Target Analysis and Hourly Variation of 60
Pharmaceuticals in Wastewater Using UPLC-High
Resolution Mass Spectrometry. Archives of
Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 69(4),
525-534.
Iliopoulou, A., Arvaniti, O. S., Deligiannis, M., Gatidou, G.,
Vyrides, I., Fountoulakis, M. S., & Stasinakis, A. S.
2023. Combined use of strictly anaerobic MBBR and
aerobic MBR for municipal wastewater treatment and
removal of pharmaceuticals. Journal of Environmental
Management, 343, 118211.
Li, J., Hu, S., Yang, B., Deng, J., Xiao, K., Chen, H., Zhuo,
Q., & Sun, K. 2024. High-efficient degradation of
ibuprofen as typical PPCP through a novel
electrochemical approach of traditional peroxone
method. Separation and Purification Technology, 330,
125347.
Lu, J., Chen, L., Fu, S., Wang, M., Chen, J., Zhu, S., & Li,
H. 2019. Determination of 19 personal care products in
environmental water samples by high performance
liquid chromatography mass spectrometry.
Environmental Chemistry, 38(08), 1930-1940.
Lung, S.-C. C., & Liu, C.-H. 2011. High-Sensitivity
Analysis of Six Synthetic Musks by Ultra-Performance
Liquid Chromatography–Atmospheric Pressure
Photoionization–Tandem Mass Spectrometry.
Analytical Chemistry, 83(12), 4955-4961.
Luo, W., Deng, L., Hu, J., Xu, B., Chen, X., & Xue, Q. 2023.
Degradation of metronidazole during the UV365-LED
/chlorine process: Kinetics, influencing factors, and
halonitromethanes formation. Journal of
Environmental Chemical Engineering, 11(5), 110524.
Mokhtariazar, A., Hassani, A. H., Borghei, M., &
Massoudinejad, M. 2024. A comparative study on
performance of the conventional and fixed-bed membra-
ne bioreactors for treatment of Naproxen from pharma-
ceutical wastewater. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 9944.
Nie, M., Yan, C., Dong, W., Liu, M., Zhou, J., & Yang, Y.
2015. Occurrence, distribution and risk assessment of
estrogens in surface water, suspended particulate matter,
and sediments of the Yangtze Estuary. Chemosphere,
127, 109-116.
Peng, B., Wu, L., Li, Q., Wang, Q., Li, K., & Zhou, Z.
(2022). Photodegradation of naproxen using CuZnAl-
layered double hydroxides as photocatalysts
[10.1039/D2CE00633B]. CrystEngComm, 24(28),
5080-5089.
Shin, J., Kwak, J., Lee, Y.-G., Kim, S., Choi, M., Bae, S.,
Lee, S.-H., Park, Y., & Chon, K. 2021. Competitive
adsorption of pharmaceuticals in lake water and
wastewater effluent by pristine and NaOH-activated
biochars from spent coffee wastes: Contribution of
hydrophobic and interactions. Environmental Pollution,
270, 116244
Storteboom, H., Arabi, M., Davis, J. G., Crimi, B., &
Pruden, A. 2010. Tracking Antibiotic Resistance Genes
in the South Platte River Basin Using Molecular
Signatures of Urban, Agricultural, and Pristine Sources.
Environmental Science & Technology, 44(19), 7397-
7404.
Analysis of the Current Situation and Treatment Technology of PPCPs in Wastewater
195
Wang, J., Wang, Z., Chen, J., Liu, W., Cui, Y., Fu, Z., &
Song, G. 2022. Environmental systems engineering
consideration on treatment of emerging pollutants and
risk prevention and control of chemicals. Chinese
Science Bulletin, 67(03), 267-277.
Yang, Z. 2010. Progress in research on the impact of personal
care products on human health and environmental safety.
Technological Trend, (10), 262-263.
MLSCM 2024 - International Conference on Modern Logistics and Supply Chain Management
196